损失情境下社会困境中的合作行为

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 既往社会困境的研究表明，人们能够做出牺牲个人利益而维护他人或集体利益的亲社会合作行为，且这种合作行为表现出一定的直觉自动性特点。然而，既往研究中的社会困境往往置于正向的收益情境中，本研究在经典公共物品困境与公共资源困境的基础上，通过操纵个体利益与集体利益冲突标的的效价，设置出损失情境下的公共物品困境与公共资源困境，系统探究了个体在损失情境下社会困境中的亲社会合作行为及其特点。结果发现，即使是在损失情境下的社会困境任务中，被试依然表现出了较高的合作行为水平，但较收益情境下合作水平略低；此外，损失情境下的合作行为同样表现出直觉自动性的特点。本研究为社会困境中合作行为的广泛存在及其直觉自动性特点提供了新的证据。

关键词: 社会困境, 合作, 收益情境, 损失情境

Abstract: Previous studies have revealed that people were willing to sacrifice personal interests to keep cooperation in social dilemmas, and this prosocially cooperative behavior seemed to be an intuitive response. However, social dilemmas in previous studies were often in the gain context, in which people have to decide whether or not to reduce individual gains in order that others or group get more gains. Based on classic social dilemmas tasks, this study sought to investigate cooperative behavior and its characteristic in social dilemmas in the loss context. We found that participants showed higher level of cooperative behavior in both contexts, and they cooperated more in the gain context than in the loss context; in addition, time stress upgraded the level of prosocially cooperative behavior in both contexts. These findings added new evidence to the argument that prosocially cooperative behavior in social dilemmas was widespread and it was an intuitive response.

Key words: social dilemmas, cooperation, gain, loss

中图分类号:

B842.9

凌晓丽, 孙鹏. 损失情境下社会困境中的合作行为[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 377-383.

LING Xiaoli, SUN Peng. Cooperation in Social Dilemmas in Loss Context[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(3): 377-383.

参考文献

刘长江, 郝芳. (2014). 社会困境问题的理论架构与实验研究. 心理科学进展, 22(9), 1475-1484
刘长江, 李岩梅, 李纾. (2007). 实验社会心理学中的社会困境. 心理科学进展, 15(2), 379-384
Amir, O., Rand, D. G., & Gal, Y. K. (2012). Economic games on the internet:The effect of $1 stakes. PLoS One, 7(2), e31461, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031461.
Bokhari, S., & Geltner, D. (2011). Loss aversion and anchoring in commercial real estate pricing:Empirical evidence and price index implications. Real Estate Economics, 39(4), 635-670, doi:10.1111/j.1540-6229.2011.00308.x.
Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas:Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 50(3), 543-549.
Brosnan, S. F., Jones, O. D., Lambeth, S. P., Mareno, M. C., Richardson, A. S., & Schapir, S. J. (2007). Endowment effects in chimpanzees. Current Biology, 17(19), 1704-1707, doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.059.
Chen, M. K. (2005). The evolution of our preferences:Evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior. Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers.
Cone, J., & Rand, D. G. (2014). Time pressure increases cooperation in competitively framed social dilemmas. PLoS One, 9(12), e115756, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115756.
Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31(1), 169-193, doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001125.
Dawes, R. M., & Messick, D. M. (2000). Social dilemmas. International Journal of Psychology, 35(2), 111-116, doi:10.1080/002075900399402.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & McCusker, C. (1997). Gain-loss frames and cooperation in two-person social dilemmas:A transformational analysis. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 72(5), 1093-1106.
Decety, J., Jackson, P. L., Sommerville, J. A., Chaminade, T., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2004). The neural bases of cooperation and competition:An fMRI investigation. NeuroImage, 23(2), 744-751, doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.025.
Evans, A. M., Dillon, K. D., & Rand, D. G. (2015). Fast but not intuitive, slow but not reflective:Decision conflict drives reaction times in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 144(5), 951-966, doi:10.1037/xge0000107.
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425(6960), 785-791, doi:10.1038/nature02043.
Flemming, T. M., Jones, O. D., Mayo, L., Stoinski, T., & Brosnan, S. F. (2012). The endowment effect in orangutans. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 25, 285-298.
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., … Tracer, D. (2005). "Economic man" in cross-cultural perspective:Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(6), 795-815.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory:An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292, doi:10.2307/1914185.
Kollock, P. (1998). Social dilemmas:The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 183-214, doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.183.
Kovarik, J. (2009). Giving it now or later:Altruism and discounting. Economics Letters, 102(3), 152-154, doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2008.12.005.
Lakshminaryanan, V., Chen, M. K., & Santos, L. R. (2008). Endowment effect in capuchin monkeys. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 363(1511), 3837-3844, doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0149.
List, J. A. (2011). The market for charitable giving. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(2), 157-180, doi:10.1257/jep.25.2.157.
Lotz, S. (2015). Spontaneous giving under structural inequality:Intuition promotes cooperation in asymmetric social dilemmas. PLoS One, 10(7), e0131562, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131562.
Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on amazon's mechanical turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 1-23, doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6.
McCusker, C., & Carnevale, P. J. (1995). Framing in resource dilemmas:Loss aversion and the moderating effects of sanctions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61(2), 190-201, doi:10.1006/obhd.1995.1015.
Messick, D. M. (1967). Interdependent decision strategies in zero-sum games:A computer-controlled study. Behavioral Science, 12(1), 33-48, doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1743.
Messick, D. M., & Mackie, D. M. (1989). Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 45-81, doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.000401.
Milkman, K. L., Mazza, M. C., Shu, L. L., Tsay, C. J., & Bazerman, M. H. (2012). Policy bundling to overcome loss aversion:A method for improving legislative outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 158-167, doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.001.
Nicolau, J. L. (2012). Asymmetric tourist response to price:Loss aversion segmentation. Journal of Travel Research, 51(5), 568-576, doi:10.1177/0047287511431321.
Novemsky, N., & Kahneman, D. (2005). The boundaries of loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 119-128, doi:10.1509/jmkr.42.2.119.62292.
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), 411-419.
Pope, D. G., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2011). Is tiger woods loss averse? Persistent bias in the face of experience, competition, and high stakes. American Economic Review, 101(1), 129-157, doi:10.1257/aer.101.1.129.
Rand, D. G., Fudenberg, D., & Dreber, A. (2015). It's the thought that counts:The role of intentions in noisy repeated games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 116, 481-499.
Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature, 489(7416), 427-430, doi:10.1038/nature11467.
Rand, D. G., & Kraft-Todd, G. T. (2014). Reflection does not undermine self-interested prosociality. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 300.
Rand, D. G., Kraft-Todd, G. T., & Gruber, J. (2015). The collective benefits of feeling good and letting go:Positive emotion and (dis)inhibition interact to predict cooperative behavior. PLoS One, 10(1), e0117426, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117426.
Rand, D. G., Newman, G. E., & Wurzbacher, O. M. (2015). Social context and the dynamics of cooperative choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 28(2), 159-166, doi:10.1002/bdm.v28.2.
Rand, D. G., & Nowak, M. A. (2013). Human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(8), 413-425, doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.003.
Rand, D. G., Peysakhovich, A., Kraft-Todd, G. T., Newman, G. E., Wurzbacher, O., Nowak, M. A., & Greene, J. D. (2014). Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation. Nature Communications, 5, 3677, doi:10.1038/ncomms4677.
Roch, S. G., Lane, J. A. S., Samuelson, C. D., Allison, S. T., & Dent, J. L. (2000). Cognitive load and the equality heuristic:A two-stage model of resource overconsumption in small groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83(2), 185-212, doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2915.
Schulz, J. F., Fischbacher, U., Thöni, C., & Utikal, V. (2014). Affect and fairness:Dictator games under cognitive load. Journal of Economic Psychology, 41, 77-87, doi:10.1016/j.joep.2012.08.007.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458, doi:10.1126/science.7455683.
van Lange, P. A. M., Joireman, J., Parks, C. D., & van Dijk, E. (2013). The psychology of social dilemmas:A review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(2), 125-141, doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.11.003.

[1]	王欣竹, 邹何辉, 郝娜, 黄瑶, 吴琴, 崔丽莹. 抑制还是补偿？尴尬情绪对初中生合作倾向和行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 549-555.
[2]	邓颜彦, 郭成. 合作与竞争关系中社会比较对高中生认知信任与情感信任的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 556-562.
[3]	陈衍, 江婷, 李玮, 陈取麟, 潘运, 胡思瑶. 合作中责任比较和分配评价差异的ERPs研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 152-159.
[4]	郑文倩, 陈云云, 宋国萍, 徐敏, 白正月, 李兰洁. 亲社会视频游戏中的合作对博弈决策中合作行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 85-91.
[5]	侯钰莹, 陈世平, 孟四清. 收益和损失情境中D-E冲突的反射效应和习得速度[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 268-273.
[6]	周详, 张泽宇, 曾晖. 长期合作学习小组中的集体智慧及其影响因素研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 231-237.
[7]	崔丽莹,黄晓娇,陈晓梅. 组间竞争对小学生合作绩效及言语互动策略的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(6): 788-794.
[8]	魏华,周宗奎,田媛,丁倩,熊婕. 网络游戏成瘾：竞争、合作体验与沉醉感的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(2): 264-269.
[9]	王娜. 中国人人格特质结构对合作的影响机制[J]. , 2012, 10(2): 92-97.
[10]	张丽玲；白学军. 合作游戏训练对学前儿童合作行为的影响[J]. , 2010, 8(3): 218-222.
[11]	王静,陈英和. 大学生合作学习的问题解决过程及其对问题解决水平的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2009, 7(4): 258-264.