利益冲突对不同认知风格决策者建议采纳的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究利益冲突和建议偏差对不同认知风格决策者建议采纳程度的影响，以77名大学生为被试，采用2×2×3混合实验设计，通过设置与建议者有/无利益冲突两种情境，对场独立和场依存型被试在点数估计任务中获得不同建议时的采纳程度进行实验。结果显示，场依存型决策者的建议采纳程度显著高于场独立型决策者，无利益冲突组建议采纳程度显著高于有利益冲突组，利益冲突与认知风格交互作用显著；决策者在获得不同建议时，建议采纳程度不同。研究表明，场依存型决策者的建议采纳程度会受到建议和有无利益冲突的影响，而场独立型决策者在建议采纳过程中不会考虑利益冲突因素；建议偏差大于90%时，决策者才会发觉建议不可靠，建议可信度在建议采纳过程中起中介作用。

关键词: 建议采纳, 利益冲突, 认知风格

Abstract: In order to explore the impact of conflicts of interest and advice bias on the degree of recommendation of different cognitive style decision-makers.This study used a mixed-design, specifically, 2 situations (conflict of interest/no-conflict of interest)×2 cognitive styles (field dependence (FD)/field independence (FI))×3 advice (50%/90%/95%). The sample are 34(FD) and 43(FI) students. The results found that:The recommendation adoption of FD individuals is significantly higher than that of FI individuals; The degree of adoption of non-interest conflict groups is significantly higher than that of conflict interest groups, and the interaction of interest conflicts and cognitive styles is significant. The weight giving to the advice is different when decision-makers receive different advice. It shows that The weight of advice of FD individuals will be affected by the bias of advice and situations(whether there is a conflict of interest between advisors and decision-makers), while FI individuals will not consider the factors of conflict of interest in the process of advice-taking process. It also showed the bias of advice is greater than 90%, before the decision-makers find that advice is not reliable. Finally, we also find the credibility of advice mediate the relationship of conflict of interest and the weight of advice.

Key words: advice-taking, conflicts of interest, cognitive style

中图分类号:

B849

王焕弟, 陈世平. 利益冲突对不同认知风格决策者建议采纳的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 415-421.

WANG Huandi, CHEN Shiping. The Impact of Conflict of Interest on the Proposed Adoption of Different Cognitive Style Decision-Makers[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(3): 415-421.

参考文献

蔡曙光, 张笑, 冯廷勇. (2016). "先扬后抑" vs. "先抑后扬":反馈顺序对决策信心建构的影响. 心理科学, 39(3), 686-692
段锦云, 古晓花, 孙露莹. (2016). 外显自尊、内隐自尊及其分离对建议采纳的影响. 心理学报, 48(4), 371-384
段锦云, 周冉, 古晓花. (2014). 正面自我标签对建议采纳的影响. 心理学报, 46(10), 1591-1602
费广洪, 王细英, 龚桂红. (2013). 图文相关性对不同认知方式大学生阅读影响的眼动研究. 心理学报, 45(7), 783-789
李力红, 赵秋玲, 张德臣. (2002). 外显、内隐记忆与场依存-场独立认知风格关系的实验研究. 心理科学, 25(5), 614-615, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2002.05.033
李跃然, 李纾. (2009). 决策者-建议者系统模型的回顾与前瞻. 心理科学进展, 17(5), 1026-1032
孙露莹, 陈琳, 段锦云. (2017). 决策过程中的建议采纳:策略、影响及未来展望. 心理科学进展, 25(1), 169-179
徐惊蛰, 谢晓非. (2009). 决策过程中的建议采纳. 心理科学进展, 17(5), 1016-1025
Gino, F., & Moore, D. A. (2007). Effects of task difficulty on use of advice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20(1), 21-35, doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0771.
Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451-470, doi:10.1111/bmsp.2014.67.issue-3.
Kausel, E. E., Culbertson, S. S., Leiva, P. I., Slaughter, J. E., & Jackson, A. T. (2015). Too arrogant for their own good? Why and when narcissists dismiss advice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 131, 33-50, doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.07.006.
Pleskac, T. J., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2010). Two-stage dynamic signal detection:A theory of choice, decision time, and confidence. Psychological Review, 117(3), 864-901, doi:10.1037/a0019737.
Rader, C. A., Soll, J. B., & Larrick, R. P. (2015). Pushing away from representative advice:Advice taking, anchoring, and adjustment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 130, 26-43, doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.05.004.
Sah, S., & Loewenstein, G. (2015). Conflicted advice and second opinions:Benefits, but unintended consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 130, 89-107, doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.06.005.
Sniezek, J. A., & Buckley, T. (1995). Cueing and cognitive conflict in judge-advisor decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(2), 159-174, doi:10.1006/obhd.1995.1040.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty:Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131, doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
Tzini, K., & Jain, K. (2018). The role of anticipated regret in advice taking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31(1), 74-86, doi:10.1002/bdm.v31.1.
Witkin, H. A., & Asch, S. E. (1948). Studies in space orientation. Ⅲ. Perception of the upright in the absence of a visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38(5), 603-614, doi:10.1037/h0055372.
Yaniv, I., & Choshen-Hillel, S. (2012). Exploiting the wisdom of others to make better decisions:Suspending judgment reduces egocentrism and increases accuracy. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(5), 427-434, doi:10.1002/bdm.v25.5.

[1]	段锦云, 徐悦, 任小云, 吴俏敏. 语境交流导向与建议方式对建议采纳的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 261-267.
[2]	谢梦雅, 段锦云. 真诚-虚伪品质对建议采纳的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 134-140.
[3]	张洪家, 汪玲, 张敏. 创造性认知风格、创造性人格与创造性思维的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(1): 51-57.
[4]	李艳芬, 赵宁宁, 周铁民. 不同内隐学习任务在不同认知风格个体上的成绩差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 606-612.
[5]	胡闲秋, 李海垒, 张文新. 大学生认知风格与创业意向的关系：性别的调节作用^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(1): 87-94.
[6]	胡卫平, 程丽芳, 贾小娟, 韩蒙, 陈英和. 认知抑制对创造性科学问题提出的影响：认知风格的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(6): 721-728.
[7]	宋淑娟,刘华山,. 数学-性别刻板印象对女生的威胁效应：场认知风格的调节作用^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(3): 302-305.
[8]	杨楠,叶卓尔,林依,高宏巍,黄平,林慧妍,许欢,马军朋,金花. 认知风格分型的神经基础：静息态fMRI研究^[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(3): 320-327.
[9]	闫婷婷，杜秀芳，李假. 情绪和认知方式对个体建议采纳的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(5): 601-608.
[10]	李贞，刘新春，翟瑞龙，刘芳，邓晶晶，程诚，杨丽. 中国成年人认知风格调查报告^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(5): 621-626.
[11]	康廷虎，庞倩，张丰. 职业决策情境中信任水平对建议采纳的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(3): 371-376.
[12]	杨丽,；翟瑞龙；齐振亚；王岳飞3. 心理健康素质测评系统·中国成年人认知风格问卷的编制[J]. , 2012, 10(5): 332-339.
[13]	王静,陈英和. 大学生合作学习的问题解决过程及其对问题解决水平的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2009, 7(4): 258-264.
[14]	王惠萍柯洪霞. 大学生的认知风格与逻辑推理的关系[J]. , 2007, 5(3): 177-182.
[15]	姚海娟,沈德立. 启发信息对个体顿悟问题解决影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2006, 4(3): 207-212.