负性情绪启动对特质焦虑个体行为抑制的影响机制

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用双选择Oddball范式，通过事件相关电位技术，考察负性情绪启动对特质焦虑个体行为抑制的影响。结果发现：（1）相比标准刺激，对偏差刺激的反应时更长；P2、N2、P3的波幅更大；（2）相比低唤醒负性情绪和中性情绪启动条件，高唤醒负性情绪启动下的N1-P2和N2波幅更大；非特质焦虑个体对偏差刺激的N1和P3潜伏期在高唤醒负性情绪启动条件下比低唤醒负性情绪和中性情绪启动条件下更短，P3波幅更小，而特质焦虑个体在高、低唤醒的负性情绪及中性情绪启动条件下无显著差异。以上结果表明，对特质焦虑个体，高唤醒负性情绪启动促进其更好的检测行为抑制；对非特质焦虑个体，高唤醒负性情绪启动促进其对偏差刺激的早期识别、行为抑制的检测并更容易地完成行为抑制任务。

关键词: 负性情绪, 行为抑制, 双选择Oddball任务, 特质焦虑, 事件相关电位

Abstract: To explore the mechanism of negative emotional priming on response inhibition for trait anxiety individuals, the ERPs were recorded during a two-choice Oddball task. The results showed that: (1) The response time was longer to the deviant stimulus than to the standard stimulus; P2, N2, and P3 also have a larger amplitude. (2) Compared with low arousal and neutral priming conditions, the amplitudes of N1-P2 and N2 under high arousal negative priming were larger; for non-trait anxiety individuals, the latency of N1 and P3 under the high arousal negative priming was shorter than that under low arousal negative and neutral priming. The amplitude of P3 was smaller too. However, there were no significant differences among different priming conditions for trait anxiety individuals. The results suggested that high arousal negative priming promotes a better detection of behavioral inhibition for trait anxiety individuals; while the high arousal negative priming promotes the early recognition of deviant stimuli, the detection of behavioral inhibition and the completion of the response inhibition task for non-trait anxiety individuals.

Key words: negative emotion, response inhibition, two-choice oddball task, trait anxiety, event-related potentials

中图分类号:

B845

贾丽萍, 卢国华, 宋玉萍, 李福洪. 负性情绪启动对特质焦虑个体行为抑制的影响机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 604-612.

JIA Liping, LU Guohua, SONG Yuping, LI Fuhong. The Mechanism of Negative Emotional Priming on Response Inhibition for Trait Anxiety Individuals[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(5): 604-612.

参考文献

白露, 马慧, 黄宇霞, 罗跃嘉. (2005). 中国情绪图片系统的编制——在46名中国大学生中的试用. 中国心理卫生杂志, 19(11), 719-722, doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-6729.2005.11.001
戴晓阳. (2014). 常用心理评估量表手册. 北京:人民军医出版社.
贾丽萍, 白学军, 邵建岗, 卢国华, 韩冰雪, 李长江. (2018). 情绪诱发对有特质焦虑大学生的行为抑制的影响. 中国心理卫生杂志, 32(12), 1029-1033, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2018.12.012
梁丽美, 李佳根, 贾江晓, 宋海秀, 雷怡, 李红, 张文海. (2018). 不同性质的评价对特质焦虑者抑制功能影响的ERP研究. 心理与行为研究, 16(3), 335-341, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2018.03.008
余凤琼, 袁加锦, 罗跃嘉. (2009). 情绪干扰听觉反应冲突的ERP研究. 心理学报, 41(7), 594-601
袁加锦, 徐萌萌, 杨洁敏, 李红. (2017). 双选择Oddball范式在行为抑制控制研究中的应用. 中国科学:生命科学, 47(10), 1065-1073
周雅. (2013). 情绪唤起对执行功能的作用. 心理科学进展, 21(7), 1186-1199
Berggren, N., & Derakshan, N. (2013). Attentional control deficits in trait anxiety:Why you see them and why you don't. Biological Psychology, 92(3), 440-446, doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.03.007.
Dichter, G. S., Felder, J. N., & Smoski, M. J. (2009). Affective context interferes with cognitive control in unipolar depression:An fMRI investigation. Journal of Affective Disorders, 114(1-3), 131-142, doi:10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.027.
Dimoska, A., Johnstone, S. J., & Barry, R. J. (2006). The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task:Indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection? Brain and Cognition, 62(2), 98-112, doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2006.03.011.
Eysenck, M. W., & Derakshan, N. (2011). New perspectives in attentional control theory. Personality & Individual Differences, 50(7), 955-960.
Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance:Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336-353, doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336.
Fichtenholtz, H. M., Dean, H. L., Dillon, D. G., Yamasaki, H., McCarthy, G., & LaBar, K. S. (2004). Emotion-attention network interactions during a visual oddball task. Cognitive Brain Research, 20(1), 67-80, doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.01.006.
Folstein, J. R., & van Petten, C. (2008). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP:A review. Psychophysiology, 45(1), 152-170.
Grützmann, R., Riesel, A., Klawohn, J., Kathmann, N., & Endrass, T. (2014). Complementary modulation of N2 and CRN by conflict frequency. Psychophysiology, 51(8), 761-772, doi:10.1111/psyp.12222.
Heil, M., Osman, A., Wiegelmann, J., Rolke, B., & Hennighausen, E. (2000). N200 in the Eriksen-task:Inhibitory executive processes? Journal of Psychophysiology, 14(4), 218-225, doi:10.1027//0269-8803.14.4.218.
Kalamala, P., Szewczyk, J., Senderecka, M., & Wodniecka, Z. (2018). Flanker task with equiprobable congruent and incongruent conditions does not elicit the conflict N2. Psychophysiology, 55(2), e12980, doi:10.1111/psyp.12980.
Kissler, J., & Keil, A. (2008). Look-don't look! How emotional pictures affect pro-and anti-saccades. Experimental Brain Research, 188(2), 215-222, doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1358-0.
Kok, A., Ramautar, J. R., De Ruiter, M. B., Band, G. P. H., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2004). ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task. Psychophysiology, 41(1), 9-20, doi:10.1046/j.1469-8986.2003.00127.x.
Pessoa, L. (2012). Beyond brain regions:Network perspective of cognition-emotion interactions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(3), 158-159, doi:10.1017/S0140525X11001567.
Pessoa, L., Padmala, S., Kenzer, A., & Bauer, A. (2012). Interactions between cognition and emotion during response inhibition. Emotion, 12(1), 192-197, doi:10.1037/a0024109.
Pires, L., Leitão, J., Guerrini, C., & Simões, M. R. (2014). Event-related brain potentials in the study of inhibition:Cognitive control, source localization and age-related modulations. Neuropsychology Review, 24(4), 461-490, doi:10.1007/s11065-014-9275-4.
Tillman, C. M., & Wiens, S. (2011). Behavioral and ERP indices of response conflict in Stroop and flanker tasks. Psychophysiology, 48(10), 1405-1411, doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01203.x.
Williams, R. S., Biel, A. L., Wegier, P., Lapp, L. K., Dyson, B. J., & Spaniol, J. (2016). Age differences in the attention network test:Evidence from behavior and event-related potentials. Brain and Cognition, 102, 65-79, doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2015.12.007.

[1]	金花, 严世振, 单金磊, 刘婷. 面孔生命性加工的时间进程：ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 577-584.
[2]	杨嘉炜, 李东玲, 刘建榕. 感知社会敌意对大学生攻击性的影响：负性情绪体验的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 382-388.
[3]	贾磊, 陆家豪, 王逸, 张常洁. 权力概念隐喻映射中的冲突控制：特征与过程[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 417-423.
[4]	陈衍, 江婷, 李玮, 陈取麟, 潘运, 胡思瑶. 合作中责任比较和分配评价差异的ERPs研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 152-159.
[5]	刘羽, 杨洋, 王晨旭, 杨亚楠, 贾绪计, 白学军, 林琳. 校园氛围和负性情绪对青少年自杀意念的影响：一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 784-790.
[6]	宋娟, 杜梦, 连涛, 张倩. 积极怀旧情绪对疼痛共情影响的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 466-473.
[7]	李骋诗, 白学军, 王永胜. 映射具体性和语境线索对新颖隐喻加工的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 153-160.
[8]	唐丹丹, 傅瑜, 吴燕京, 朱海. 视觉空间工作记忆组间差异的神经机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 176-184.
[9]	于永菊. 焦虑和抑郁对正负性注意偏向的影响：注意控制的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 121-127.
[10]	曾庆, 郑希付. 高低厌恶敏感性个体对不同情绪刺激的注意时程: 来自ERP研究的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 743-749.
[11]	杨丽娴, 李铃芳, 张锦坤. 妒忌情绪下的定向遗忘效应：基于情境模拟诱发[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 311-317.
[12]	宋娟, 魏艳秋, 杜梦, 解鸿宇, 连涛, 胡亚奇, 马欧. 眼部情绪信息对疼痛共情影响的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 326-332,347.
[13]	耿靖宇, 侯晓, 杨华勇, 韩丕国, 高峰强, 韩磊. 特质焦虑与大学生拖延行为的关系：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 402-407.
[14]	张娟, 张大均. 大学生心理素质水平与正性负性情绪的外显和内隐相关[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 91-96.
[15]	赵小淋, 张燕, 王建峰. 情绪对不同外倾水平个体行为抑制的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 449-457.