汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童的快速命名缺陷

心理与行为研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (5): 652-661.

汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童的快速命名缺陷

杨宇, 马杰, 谭珂, 张明哲, 白学军

教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津师范大学心理学部, 国民心理健康评估与促进协同创新中心, 天津 300387

收稿日期:2019-01-04 出版日期:2019-09-20 发布日期:2019-11-22
通讯作者: 白学军
基金资助:
全国文化名家暨“四个一批”人才工程项目、教育部“长江学者”奖励计划特聘教授和天津市杰出津门学者计划

The Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) Deficit of Chinese Developmental Dyslexic Children

YANG Yu, MA Jie, TAN Ke, ZHANG Mingzhe, BAI Xuejun

Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Center of Collaborative Innovation for Assessment and Promotion of Mental Health, Tianjin 300387

Received:2019-01-04 Online:2019-09-20 Published:2019-11-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 汉语发展性阅读障碍（DD）儿童在快速命名（RAN）任务中会表现出显著缺陷，从眼动加工的视角，其成因主要存在两种观点，即副中央凹加工困难和中央凹－副中央凹困难。本研究运用眼动追踪技术，实验1将边界范式与单项RAN结合，操纵预视时间和预视类型，探究汉语DD儿童在单项RAN中的副中央凹预视效应，结果并未发现汉语DD儿童表现出副中央凹加工困难。实验2将边界范式与系列RAN结合，对预视类型进行操纵，探究汉语DD儿童在系列RAN中的副中央凹预视效应，结果表明汉语DD儿童与正常儿童的副中央凹预视效应存在差异，同时表现出显著的RAN缺陷。这证明了汉语DD儿童的RAN缺陷由中央凹与副中央凹共同作用导致。

关键词: 汉语发展性阅读障碍, 快速命名任务, 副中央凹, 中央凹

Abstract: Rapid automatized naming (RAN) deficit is a dominant deficit of Chinese developmental dyslexic(DD). Two hypotheses have been put forward to account for the RAN dysfunction in dyslexic: parafoveal processing difficulty and foveal-parafoveal difficulty. In Experiment 1, the boundary paradigm was used in discrete RAN to investigate whether Chinese dyslexic had parafoveal processing deficit in discrete RAN while participants' eye movements were recorded. Three groups of children were selected as participants, i.e., children with DD, chronological age-matched children (CA), and reading level-matched children (RL). In Experiment 1, preview time and the type of preview were manipulated. The results showed that there was no evidence demonstrating that Chinese children with DD had parafoveal processing difficulty in RAN task. In Experiment 2, the boundary paradigm was used in serial RAN such that the preview information was presented firstly and target characters appeared only when the foveal processing started. We found significant phonological and orthographical priming effects for all three groups of child participants. Children with DD had clear RAN deficit with larger preview effects. Taken together, we argue that the RAN deficit of DD is caused by their foveal-parafoveal difficulty.

Key words: developmental dyslexia, rapid automatized naming, parafoveal, foveal

中图分类号:

B844

杨宇, 马杰, 谭珂, 张明哲, 白学军. 汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童的快速命名缺陷[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 652-661.

YANG Yu, MA Jie, TAN Ke, ZHANG Mingzhe, BAI Xuejun. The Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) Deficit of Chinese Developmental Dyslexic Children[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(5): 652-661.

参考文献

李丹, 胡克定, 陈国鹏, 金瑜, 李眉. (1988). 瑞文测验联合型(CRT)上海市区试测报告. 心理科学, 4, 29-33
谭珂, 马杰, 连坤予, 郭志英, 白学军. (2018). 双重缺陷汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童的言语工作记忆和阅读能力研究. 心理与行为研究, 16(3), 308-314, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2018.03.004
王敬欣, 李琳, 李莎, 谢芳, 常敏, 张阔. (2015). 正字法邻近字在汉字识别过程中的抑制效应. 心理学探新, 35(6), 493-498, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-5184.2015.06.003
王孝玲, 陶保平. (1996). 小学生识字量测试题库及评价量表. 上海:上海教育出版社.
闫国利, 王丽红, 巫金根, 白学军. (2011). 不同年级学生阅读知觉广度及预视效应的眼动研究. 心理学报, 43(3), 249-263
闫国利, 熊建萍, 臧传丽, 余莉莉, 崔磊, 白学军. (2013). 阅读研究中的主要眼动指标评述. 心理科学进展, 21(4), 589-605
Amtmann, D., Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (2007). Mixture growth models of RAN and RAS row by row:Insight into the reading system at work over time. Reading and Writing, 20(8), 785-813, doi:10.1007/s11145-006-9041-y.
Bexkens, A., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., & Tijms, J. (2015). Rapid automatized naming in children with dyslexia:Is inhibitory control involved? Dyslexia, 21(3), 212-234, doi:10.1002/dys.1487.
Cheng, Y. H., Li, L. P., & Wu, X. C. (2015). The reciprocal relationship between compounding awareness and vocabulary knowledge in Chinese:A latent growth model study. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 440.
Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. (1974). Rapid "automatized" naming of pictured objects, colors, letters and numbers by normal children. Cortex, 10(2), 186-202, doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(74)80009-2.
Jones, M. W., Ashby, J., & Branigan, H. P. (2012). Dyslexia and fluency:parafoveal and foveal influences on rapid automatized naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 39(2), 554-567.
Jones, M. W., Branigan, H. P., & Kelly, M. L. (2009). Dyslexic and nondyslexic reading fluency:Rapid automatized naming and the importance of continuous lists. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(3), 567-572.
Li, L. P., & Wu, X. C. (2015). Effects of metalinguistic awareness on reading comprehension and the mediator role of reading fluency from grades 2 to 4. PLoS One, 10(3), e0114417, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114417.
Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53(1), 1-14, doi:10.1007/s11881-003-0001-9.
Meng, X. Z., Cheng-Lai, A., Zeng, B., Stein, J. F., & Zhou, X. L. (2011). Dynamic visual perception and reading development in Chinese school children. Annals of Dyslexia, 61(2), 161-176, doi:10.1007/s11881-010-0049-2.
Norton, E. S., & Wolf, M. (2012). Rapid automatized naming(RAN) and reading fluency:Implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 427-452, doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100431.
Protopapas, A., Altani, A., & Georgiou, G. K. (2013). Development of serial processing in reading and rapid naming. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(4), 914-929, doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2013.08.004.
Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(1), 5-35.
Shaywitz, S. E. (1998). Dyslexia. New England Journal of Medicine, 338(5), 307-312, doi:10.1056/NEJM199801293380507.
Shu, H., McBride-Chang, C., Wu, S. N., & Liu, H. Y. (2006). Understanding Chinese developmental dyslexia:Morphological awareness as a core cognitive construct. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 122-133, doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.122.
Shu, H., Meng, X. Z., Chen, X., Luan, H., & Cao, F. (2005). The subtypes of developmental dyslexia in Chinese:Evidence from three cases. Dyslexia, 11(4), 311-329, doi:10.1002/dys.310.
Silva, S., Faísca, L., Araújo, S., Casaca, L., Carvalho, L., Petersson, K. M., & Reis, A. (2016). Too little or too much? Parafoveal preview benefits and parafoveal load costs in dyslexic adults. Annals of Dyslexia, 66(2), 187-201, doi:10.1007/s11881-015-0113-z.
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 415-438, doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.415.
Yan, M., Pan, J., Laubrock, J., Kliegl, R., & Shu, H. (2013). Parafoveal processing efficiency in rapid automatized naming:A comparison between Chinese normal and dyslexic children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(3), 579-589, doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2013.01.007.

[1]	王永胜, 何立媛, 李馨, 白学军. 副中央凹低频双字词首字字频的预视效应研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 311-317.
[2]	梁菲菲, 向颖, 龙梦灵. 首词素位置概率信息未参与汉语阅读的词切分：基于副中央凹加工的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 318-324.
[3]	秦钊, 王影超, 叶佳滢, 袁小源, 闫国利. 聋人句子阅读中的视觉功能补偿现象：副中央凹−中央凹效应的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 167-173.
[4]	巫金根, 刘志方, 刘妮娜, 黄发杰. 高低水平汉英二语者阅读难易英语句子的知觉广度[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 460-465.
[5]	张慢慢, 张志超, 臧传丽. 跳读是基于副中央凹词的部分加工还是完全加工？[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 311-317.
[6]	臧传丽, 鹿子佳, 白玉, 张慢慢. 阅读过程中的词跳读及其产生的认知机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 477-483.
[7]	王永胜, 陈茗静, 赵冰洁, 李馨, 白宇鸽. 副中央凹中字N+1与字N+2在眼跳目标选择中的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 756-765.
[8]	田梦雨,张熙,张逸玮,毕鸿燕. 汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童的不同视野注意能力[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(3): 289-297.
[9]	臧传丽, 张慢慢, 岳音其, 白学军, 闫国利. 副中央凹信息量对中文朗读和默读的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(4): 444-450.
[10]	姜华, 卢春明彭聃龄郭桃梅. 不同阅读水平儿童中央执行系统比较研究[J]. , 2008, 6(1): 42-49.