副中央凹低频双字词首字字频的预视效应研究

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.03.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨副中央凹字的加工负荷在预视加工中的作用，选择高、低首字字频的低频双字词作为副中央凹目标词，同时采用边界范式操纵目标词首字的预视类型（包括目标预视和假字预视）。使用眼动仪记录读者的阅读过程。结果在目标词首字与整词上均发现了显著的预视效应，目标预视下的注视时间显著短于假字预视下的注视时间；在目标词的凝视时间和总注视时间上，字频主效应显著，首字低频条件下的注视时间显著长于首字高频条件；但没有发现两因素的交互作用。结果表明副中央凹低频双字词首字字频并不影响预视效应的大小。

关键词: 副中央凹加工, 字频, 预视效应, 汉语阅读

Abstract: To investigate the effect of processing load on character frequency during parafoveal processing, we selected low-frequency two-character words with different frequencies as parafoveal target words. At the same time, the boundary paradigm was used to manipulate the preview types of the first character in target word (identical preview vs. pseudo-character preview). An eye tracker was used to record eye movements of the participants during reading. A significant preview effect was found on both the first characters and the whole words of the target words. Participants spent shorter fixation time on target words when the first character of the target word was unmasked compared to that masked by pseudo-character. The main effect of character frequency on the gaze duration and total fixation time of target words was significant, and the gaze duration and total fixation time of low-frequency characters were significantly longer than that of high-frequency characters. However, there was no interaction between the two. The results showed that the preview effect is not influenced by the character frequency of the low-frequency two-character word, but the recognition of the low frequency word is affected by the frequency of the first character.

Key words: parafoveal processing, character frequency, preview effect, Chinese reading

中图分类号:

B842

王永胜, 何立媛, 李馨, 白学军. 副中央凹低频双字词首字字频的预视效应研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 311-317.

WANG Yongsheng, HE Liyuan, LI Xin, BAI Xuejun. The Role of the First Character Frequency in Low-Frequency Two-Character Words in Parafoveal Processing in Chinese Reading[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(3): 311-317.

参考文献

白学军, 胡笑羽, 闫国利. (2009). 非注视词特性对注视词加工作用的眼动研究. 心理科学, 32(2), 308–311
白学军, 刘娟, 臧传丽, 张慢慢, 郭晓峰, 闫国利. (2011). 中文阅读过程中的副中央凹预视效应. 心理科学进展, 19(12), 1721–1729
李玉刚, 黄忍, 滑慧敏, 李兴珊. (2017). 阅读中的眼跳目标选择问题. 心理科学进展, 25(3), 404–412
刘志方, 闫国利, 张智君, 潘运, 杨桂芳. (2013). 中文阅读中的预视效应与词切分. 心理学报, 45(6), 614–625
王永胜, 白学军, 臧传丽, 高晓雷, 郭志英, 闫国利. (2016). 副中央凹中字N+2的预视对汉语阅读眼跳目标选择影响的眼动研究. 心理学报, 48(1), 1–11
王永胜, 何立媛. (2022). 双字词词频与尾字字频在老年读者眼跳目标选择中的作用. 天津师范大学学报(社会科学版), (3), 114–120. 2022-04-29 取自 https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?FileName=TJSS202203017&DbName=CJFQ2022
闫国利, 熊建萍, 臧传丽, 余莉莉, 崔磊, 白学军. (2013). 阅读研究中的主要眼动指标评述. 心理科学进展, 21(4), 589–605
赵冰洁, 王永胜, 陈茗静, 李馨, 闫国利, 白学军. (2018). 双字词整词加工与词素加工在眼跳目标选择中的作用. 心理与行为研究, 16(6), 721–734
Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C. L., & Rayner, K. (2008). Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1277–1287, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1277.
Bates, D., M?chler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS One, 5(6), e10729, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010729.
Drieghe, D., Fitzsimmons, G., & Liversedge, S. P. (2017). Parafoveal preview effects in reading unspaced text. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 43(10), 1701–1716, doi: 10.1037/xhp0000441.
Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. M., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112(4), 777–813, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.777.
Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(6), 431–439.
Li, X. S., Bicknell, K., Liu, P. P., Wei, W., & Rayner, K. (2014). Reading is fundamentally similar across disparate writing systems: A systematic characterization of how words and characters influence eye movements in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 895–913, doi: 10.1037/a0033580.
Li, X. S., & Pollatsek, A. (2020). An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1139–1162, doi: 10.1037/rev0000248.
Li, X. S., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. R. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 58(4), 525–552, doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.02.003.
Liu, Y. P., Huang, R., Li, Y. G., & Gao, D. G. (2017). The word frequency effect on saccade targeting during Chinese reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of saccade length. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 116, doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00116.
Liu, Y. P., Yu, L. L., Fu, L., Li, W. W., Duan, Z. Y., & Reichle, E. D. (2019). The effects of parafoveal word frequency and segmentation on saccade targeting during Chinese reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(4), 1367–1376.
Ma, G. J., Li, X. S., & Rayner, K. (2015). Readers extract character frequency information from nonfixated-target word at long pretarget fixations during Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(5), 1409–1419, doi: 10.1037/xhp0000072.
Morris, R. K., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1990). Eye movement guidance in reading: the role of parafoveal letter and space information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(2), 268–281, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.16.2.268.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7(1), 65–81, doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5.
Rayner K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372.
Rayner, K. (2009). The 35th sir Frederick Bartlett lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506, doi: 10.1080/17470210902816461.
Rayner, K., Fischer, M. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control. Vision Research, 38(8), 1129–1144, doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00274-5.
Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(4), 445–476, doi: 10.1017/S0140525X03000104.
Reingold, E. M., Reichle, E. D., Glaholt, M. G., & Sheridan, H. (2012). Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations. Cognitive Psychology, 65(2), 177–206, doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.03.001.
Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 74(1), 5–35.
Schotter, E. R., Lee, M., Reiderman, M., & Rayner, K. (2015). The effect of contextual constraint on parafoveal processing in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 83, 118–139, doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.04.005.
Shen, W., Li, X. S., & Pollatsek, A. (2018). The processing of Chinese compound words with ambiguous morphemes in sentence context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 131–139, doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1270975.
Sheridan, H., Reichle, E. D., & Reingold, E. M. (2016). Why does removing inter-word spaces produce reading deficits? The role of parafoveal processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1543–1552.
Tsai, J. L., Kliegl, R., & Yan, M. (2012). Parafoveal semantic information extraction in traditional Chinese reading. Acta Psychologica, 141(1), 17–23, doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.06.004.
Yan, G. L., Tian, H. J., Bai, X. J., & Rayner, K. (2006). The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers. British Journal of Psychology, 97(2), 259–268, doi: 10.1348/000712605X70066.
Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Shu, H., Pan, J. E., & Zhou, X. L. (2010). Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1669–1676, doi: 10.1037/a0019329.
Yang, J. M., Wang, S. P., Xu, Y. M., & Rayner, K. (2009). Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n+2? Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(4), 1192–1204, doi: 10.1037/a0013554.
Zhu, M. Y., Zhuang, X. L., & Ma, G. J. (2021). Readers extract semantic information from parafoveal two-character synonyms in Chinese reading. Reading and Writing, 34(3), 773–790, doi: 10.1007/s11145-020-10092-8.

[1]	梁菲菲, 向颖, 龙梦灵. 首词素位置概率信息未参与汉语阅读的词切分：基于副中央凹加工的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 318-324.
[2]	何立媛, 赵星, 白玉, 刘妮娜. 汉语老年读者的多词单元加工：来自眼动研究的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 160-166.
[3]	梁菲菲, 向颖, 武浩, 韩洋. 汉语发展性阅读障碍小学生词边界划分的发展研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 757-763.
[4]	高晓雷, 沈梦, 任晓飞, 白学军, 高蕾. 高、低汉语水平藏–汉读者汉语阅读知觉广度及预视效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 297-303,333.
[5]	贺斐, 梁菲菲, 白学军. 汉语阅读伴随词汇学习的形旁类别一致性效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 304-311.
[6]	赵冰洁, 王永胜, 陈茗静, 李馨, 闫国利, 白学军. 双字词整词加工与词素加工在眼跳目标选择中的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 721-734.
[7]	臧传丽, 鹿子佳, 白玉, 张慢慢. 阅读过程中的词跳读及其产生的认知机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 477-483.
[8]	王永胜, 陈茗静, 赵冰洁, 李馨, 白宇鸽. 副中央凹中字N+1与字N+2在眼跳目标选择中的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 756-765.
[9]	张巧明，崔磊. 小学生对不同词语类型预视加工的发展^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(5): 645-651.
[10]	臧传丽, 张慢慢, 岳音其, 白学军, 闫国利. 副中央凹信息量对中文朗读和默读的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(4): 444-450.
[11]	李馨；白学军；闫国利. 词边界信息和词频在汉语阅读中的作用[J]. , 2011, 9(2): 133-139.