校园排斥与青少年问题性社交媒体使用的关系：基于潜调节结构方程模型

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.04.014

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探讨校园排斥与青少年问题性社交媒体使用间的关系及其作用机制，采用问卷法对1185名中学生进行调查。结果表明：(1)校园排斥显著正向预测青少年的问题性社交媒体使用；(2)体验回避在校园排斥与问题性社交媒体使用之间起部分中介作用；(3)认知重评调节了校园排斥通过体验回避影响问题性社交媒体使用中介过程的前半段路径和直接路径。研究基于个人−情感−认知−执行模型揭示了校园排斥与青少年问题性社交媒体使用的关系及其作用机制，这提示家长和教师要注重培养青少年积极的应对方式与认知重评情绪调节策略，从而有效预防与干预青少年的问题性社交媒体使用。

关键词: 校园排斥, 问题性社交媒体使用, 体验回避, 认知重评, 潜调节

Abstract:

To explore the relationship between campus exclusion and problematic social media use, 1185 middle school students were surveyed by whole group sampling. The results showed that: 1) Campus exclusion significantly positively predicted problematic social media use among adolescents. 2) Experiential avoidance was the mediator between campus exclusion and problematic social media use. 3) Cognitive reappraisal moderated the direct effect of campus exclusion on problematic social media use and the first path of the indirect association. Based on the I-PACE model, this study revealed the relationship between school exclusion and problematic social media use and its mechanism of action. This study suggests that parents and teachers should pay attention to the cultivation of adolescents’ positive coping styles and emotional regulation strategies such as cognitive reappraisal, so as to prevent and intervene in problematic social media use among adolescents.

Key words: campus exclusion, problematic social media use, experiential avoidance, cognitive reappraisal, latent moderated structural equation

中图分类号:

B849

刘致宏, 张野, 王凯, 许晴. 校园排斥与青少年问题性社交媒体使用的关系：基于潜调节结构方程模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(4): 533-540.

Zhihong LIU, Ye ZHANG, Kai WANG, Qing XU. The Relationship Between Campus Exclusion and Adolescents’ Problematic Social Media Use: Based on Latent Moderated Structural Equation[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(4): 533-540.

图/表 6

参考文献

	曹静, 吉阳, 祝卓宏. 接纳与行动问卷第二版中文版测评大学生的信效度. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2013, 27 (11): 873- 877.
	程利, 袁加锦, 何媛媛, 李红. 情绪调节策略: 认知重评优于表达抑制. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17 (4): 730- 735.
	方杰, 温忠麟. 基于结构方程模型的有调节的中介效应分析. 心理科学, 2018, 41 (2): 453- 458.
	黄垣成, 赵清玲, 李彩娜. 青少年早期抑郁和自伤的联合发展轨迹: 人际因素的作用. 心理学报, 2021, 53 (5): 515- 526.
	姜永志. 青少年问题性移动社交媒体使用评估问卷编制. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6 (10): 613- 621.
	姜永志, 张斌, 李笑燃. 基于安戈夫法的青少年问题性移动社交网络使用评估标准. 心理科学, 2019, 42 (1): 75- 81.
	刘晓薇, 潘斌, 陈亮, 李腾飞, 纪林芹, 张文新. 受欺负与青少年外化问题关系的“健康环境悖论”: 敌意性归因的中介作用. 心理学报, 2021, 53 (2): 170- 181.
	彭苏浩, 陶丹, 冷玥, 邓慧华. 社会排斥的心理行为特征及其脑机制. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27 (9): 1656- 1666.
	汤丹丹, 温忠麟. 共同方法偏差检验: 问题与建议. 心理科学, 2020, 43 (1): 215- 223.
	王凯, 张野. 校园排斥对初中生内外化问题的影响: 同伴关系与核心自我评价的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36 (5): 594- 604.
	王力, 柳恒超, 李中权, 杜卫. 情绪调节问卷中文版的信效度研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2007, 15 (6): 503- 505.
	王玉龙, 陈慧玲, 袁燕. 社会排斥对青少年自伤的影响: 羞耻感的中介和认知重评的调节. 心理科学, 2020, 43 (2): 333- 339.
	吴艳, 温忠麟. 结构方程建模中的题目打包策略. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19 (12): 1859- 1867.
	张野, 苑波, 张珊珊. 青少年学生遭受校园排斥的结构与测量. 沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 43 (3): 119- 124.
	Acar, I. H., Avcılar, G., Yazıcı, G., & Bostancı, S.. The roles of adolescents’ emotional problems and social media addiction on their self-esteem. Current Psychology, 2022, 41 (10): 6838- 6847. DOI
	Ali, S., Rohner, R. P., Uddin, M. K., Tamanna, F. H., & Sultana, M.. Direct and indirect effects of remembered parental rejection on media use among young adults. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 2022, 183 (1): 54- 63. DOI
	Borca, G., Bina, M., Keller, P. S., Gilbert, L. R., & Begotti, T.. Internet use and developmental tasks: Adolescents’ point of view. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015, 52, 49- 58. DOI
	Brand, M., Young, K. S., Laier, C., Wölfling, K., & Potenza, M. N.. Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: An Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2016, 71, 252- 266.
	Chapman, A. L., Gratz, K. L., & Brown, M. Z.. Solving the puzzle of deliberate self-harm: The experiential avoidance model. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2006, 44 (3): 371- 394. DOI
	David, M. E., & Roberts, J. A.. Phubbed and alone: Phone snubbing, social exclusion, and attachment to social media. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2017, 2 (2): 155- 163. DOI
	Dixon, S. (2017). Social media - statistics & facts. Retrieved October 12, 2022, from https://www.statista.com/topics/1164/social-networks/
	Dwivedi, A., & Lewis, C.. How millennials’ life concerns shape social media behaviour. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2021, 40 (14): 1467- 1484.
	Ekşi, F.. The mediating role of social media disorder in the relationship of experiential avoidance with psychological symptoms. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 2019, 6, 497- 509.
	Flouri, E., & Mavroveli, S.. Adverse life events and emotional and behavioural problems in adolescence: The role of coping and emotion regulation. Stress and Health, 2013, 29 (5): 360- 368. DOI
	Fokker, E., Zong, X. R., & Treur, J.. A second-order adaptive network model for emotion regulation in addictive social media behaviour. Cognitive Systems Research, 2021, 70, 52- 62. DOI
	Francis, A. W., Dawson, D. L., & Golijani-Moghaddam, N.. The development and validation of the Comprehensive assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy processes (CompACT). Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 2016, 5 (3): 134- 145. DOI
	Gross, J. J.. Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74 (1): 224- 237. DOI
	Gross, J. J., & John, O. P.. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003, 85 (2): 348- 362. DOI
	Gu, H. L., Xia, T. S., & Wang, L. Z.. Childhood maltreatment and non-suicidal self-injury in prisoners: The mediating role of psychopathy and moderating role of cognitive reappraisal. Current Psychology, 2023, 42 (11): 8963- 8972. DOI
	Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J.. Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2006, 44 (1): 1- 25. DOI
	Kardefelt-Winther, D.. A conceptual and methodological critique of internet addiction research: Towards a model of compensatory internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 31, 351- 354. DOI
	Keles, B., McCrae, N., & Grealish, A.. A systematic review: The influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 2020, 25 (1): 79- 93. DOI
	Kim, S. S., & Bae, S. M.. Social anxiety and social networking service addiction proneness in university students: The mediating effects of experiential avoidance and interpersonal problems. Psychiatry Investigation, 2022, 19 (6): 462- 469. DOI
	Knausenberger, J., & Echterhoff, G.. Recovering from social exclusion: The interplay of subtle Facebook reminders and collectivistic orientation. Computers in Human Behavior, 2018, 78, 298- 305. DOI
	Kormas, G., Critselis, E., Janikian, M., Kafetzis, D., & Tsitsika, A.. Risk factors and psychosocial characteristics of potential problematic and problematic internet use among adolescents: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 2011, 11 (1): 595. DOI
	Li, J., Ge, Y., Yu, T., & Qu, W. N. (2022). Social exclusion and dangerous driving behavior: The mediating role of driving anger and moderating role of cognitive reappraisal. Current Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03259-9
	Lin, X. Q., Li, S. Y., & Qu, C.. Social network sites influence recovery from social exclusion: Individual differences in social anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 2017, 75, 538- 546. DOI
	Ling, Y., You, Y. J., You, S. Y., Yu, M., Wang, Y. X., Zheng, S. X., ... Zhong, M. T. (2022). The relation between social support and internet addiction among Chinese adolescents: A moderated mediation model. Current Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03159-y
	López Hernández, G.. “We Understand You Hate Us”: Latinx immigrant-origin adolescents’ coping with social exclusion. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2022, 32 (2): 533- 551. DOI
	Mo, P. K. H., Chan, V. W. Y., Chan, S. W., & Lau, J. T. F.. The role of social support on emotion dysregulation and Internet addiction among Chinese adolescents: A structural equation model. Addictive Behaviors, 2018, 82, 86- 93. DOI
	Roche, A. I., Kroska, E. B., Miller, M. L., Kroska, S. K., & O’Hara, M. W.. Childhood trauma and problem behavior: Examining the mediating roles of experiential avoidance and mindfulness processes. Journal of American College Health, 2019, 67 (1): 17- 26. DOI
	Sedgwick, R., Epstein, S., Dutta, R., & Ougrin, D.. Social media, internet use and suicide attempts in adolescents. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 2019, 32 (6): 534- 541. DOI
	Seong, Y., & Hyun, M. H.. The mediating effect of experiential avoidance on the relationship between undergraduate student’s motives for using SNS and SNS addiction tendency: Focused on Facebook. Korean Journal of Stress Research, 2016, 24 (4): 257- 263. DOI
	Shea, S. E., & Coyne, L. W.. Reliance on experiential avoidance in the context of relational aggression: Links to internalizing and externalizing problems and dysphoric mood among urban, minority adolescent girls. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 2017, 6 (2): 195- 201. DOI
	Trumello, C., Babore, A., Candelori, C., Morelli, M., & Bianchi, D.. Relationship with parents, emotion regulation, and callous-unemotional traits in adolescents’ internet addiction. Biomed Research International, 2018, 2018, 7914261. DOI
	Tyndall, I., Waldeck, D., Pancani, L., Whelan, R., Roche, B., & Dawson, D. L.. The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II) as a measure of experiential avoidance: Concerns over discriminant validity. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 2019, 12, 278- 284. DOI
	Williams, K. D. (2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 275–314). New York: Academic Press.
	Yıldız Durak, H.. Modeling of variables related to problematic internet usage and problematic social media usage in adolescents. Current Psychology, 2020, 39 (4): 1375- 1387. DOI

变量	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5
1.性别
2.年龄	14.44	1.52	–0.01
3.校园排斥	1.75	0.55	–0.10**	–0.09**
4.体验回避	3.37	1.31	0.07*	0.06*	0.40***
5.认知重评	4.10	1.39	0.08**	0.08**	–0.11***	–0.11***
6.问题性社交媒体使用	2.39	0.83	0.05	0.10**	0.34***	0.45***	–0.24***

变量	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5
1.性别
2.年龄	14.44	1.52	–0.01
3.校园排斥	1.75	0.55	–0.10**	–0.09**
4.体验回避	3.37	1.31	0.07*	0.06*	0.40***
5.认知重评	4.10	1.39	0.08**	0.08**	–0.11***	–0.11***
6.问题性社交媒体使用	2.39	0.83	0.05	0.10**	0.34***	0.45***	–0.24***

结果变量	预测变量	Estimate	S.E.	Est/S.E.	Lower2.5%	Upper2.5%
体验回避	性别	0.20	0.05	4.35***	0.11	0.28
	年龄	0.06	0.05	1.33	–0.03	0.09
	校园排斥	0.48	0.03	14.57***	0.42	0.55
	认知重评	–0.16	0.04	–6.92***	–0.21	–0.12
	校园排斥×认知重评	–0.11	0.03	–4.12***	–0.15	–0.05
问题性社交媒体使用	性别	0.06	0.04	1.35	–0.03	0.14
	年龄	0.05	0.04	1.12	–0.02	0.08
	校园排斥	0.14	0.04	3.91***	0.07	0.21
	体验回避	0.38	0.04	10.61***	0.31	0.45
	认知重评	–0.16	0.02	–6.97***	–0.20	–0.11
	校园排斥×认知重评	–0.10	0.03	–3.64***	–0.15	–0.05

结果变量	预测变量	Estimate	S.E.	Est/S.E.	Lower2.5%	Upper2.5%
体验回避	性别	0.20	0.05	4.35***	0.11	0.28
	年龄	0.06	0.05	1.33	–0.03	0.09
	校园排斥	0.48	0.03	14.57***	0.42	0.55
	认知重评	–0.16	0.04	–6.92***	–0.21	–0.12
	校园排斥×认知重评	–0.11	0.03	–4.12***	–0.15	–0.05
问题性社交媒体使用	性别	0.06	0.04	1.35	–0.03	0.14
	年龄	0.05	0.04	1.12	–0.02	0.08
	校园排斥	0.14	0.04	3.91***	0.07	0.21
	体验回避	0.38	0.04	10.61***	0.31	0.45
	认知重评	–0.16	0.02	–6.97***	–0.20	–0.11
	校园排斥×认知重评	–0.10	0.03	–3.64***	–0.15	–0.05

[1]	于腾旭, 刘文, 刘方. 心理虐待与儿童快感缺失的关系：认知重评的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 361-367.
[2]	刘芳, 霍瑞, 韩铖铖, 王美沂, 杨海波. 执行功能对个体情绪调节策略使用倾向和调节效果的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 382-389.
[3]	张野, 苑波, 王凯, 申婷. 冲动性特质对高中生自杀意念的影响：校园排斥与生命意义感的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 89-95.
[4]	张野, 韩雪, 张珊珊, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生外化问题行为的影响：有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 354-360.
[5]	王道阳, 魏玮, 殷欣. 流动儿童自卑与学习自我效能感的关系：情绪调节策略的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 48-55.