竞走裁判员在多人情景下判罚决策的视觉搜索特征

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.01.018

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

竞走裁判员需要依据肉眼观察进行判罚决策，深入了解竞走裁判员对比赛过程中相关线索的注意偏向具有重要意义。本研究通过眼动技术，对比分析不同水平竞走裁判员判罚决策的行为绩效及眼动特征。结果发现，专家组在多人情景中的正确率和反应时均优于新手组；专家组较新手组注视时间短，注视次数少，眼跳次数少，注视轨迹清晰；专家组在与任务相关的区域表现出较长的注视时间、较多的注视次数和较早的首次注视到达时间；注视热点主要集中在犯规运动员的膝和踝区域。研究结果支持了专家认知优势假说，进一步强调了快速、准确、合理的视觉搜索策略对裁判员判罚决策起重要作用。

关键词: 竞走裁判员, 判罚决策, 视觉搜索, 多人情景

Abstract:

Race-walking referees make penalty decisions based on visual observation. Understanding their attentional bias toward relevant cues during the game is crucial for assessing these penalty decisions. This study used eye tracking technology to investigate the differences in gaze behavior and to compare penalty decisions between the expert race-walking referees and the novices. The results showed that the experts outperformed the novices in accuracy and reaction times while making decisions during multi-athlete race-walking scenarios. Compared with the novices, the experts also exhibited shorter fixation times, fewer fixation counts, fewer saccades, and clearer fixation trajectories. For task-related regions, experts performed longer fixation times, more fixation counts, and shorter fixation elapse times. Notably, fixation hotspots for experts predominantly clustered around the knees and ankles of a fouled athlete. These results support the hypothesis of a cognitive advantage for experts and emphasize the crucial role of conducting fast, accurate, and rational visual search strategies for trained referees to make high-quality penalty decisions.

Key words: race-walking referees, refereeing decision-making, gaze behavior, multi-person scenarios

中图分类号:

B849

支慧晶, 刘阳. 竞走裁判员在多人情景下判罚决策的视觉搜索特征[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 130-136.

Huijing ZHI, Yang LIU. A Study of Gaze Behavior for Decision-Making of Race-Walking Referees in the Multi-Person Scenarios[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(1): 130-136.

图/表 7

参考文献

	丁建岚, 黄谦, 张犁, 马林晓, 丁逸菲, 王欢庆. 执裁经验对足球裁判员判罚决策的影响——基于神经管理学视角. 上海体育学院学报, 2021, 45 (9): 29- 39.
	冯琰. (2015). 基于动态情境下击剑专家战术思维优势的ERP研究. 辽宁体育科技, 37(5), 51–54, 58.
	吕中凡, 史鹏. 我国优秀运动员视觉搜索特征——基于眼动实验的Meta分析. 体育科学研究, 2020, 24 (2): 54- 63.
	王福兴, 侯秀娟, 段朝辉, 刘华山, 李卉. 中国象棋经验棋手与新手的知觉差异: 来自眼动的证据. 心理学报, 2016, 48 (5): 457- 471.
	王丽岩, 李安民. 不同刺激呈现方式对乒乓球运动员视觉搜索特征的影响. 中国体育科技, 2009, 45 (5): 32- 39.
	闫国利, 田宏杰. 眼动记录技术与方法综述. 应用心理学, 2004, 10 (2): 55- 58.
	张海斌, 孟献峰, 张松奎, 张大中. (2018). 不同水平排球运动员在扣球情境任务中视觉搜索特征的试验研究. 天津体育学院学报, 33(3), 243–250.
	张学民, 廖彦罡, 葛春林. (2008). 排球运动员在运动情境任务中眼动特征的研究. 体育科学, (6), 57–61, 72.
	张运亮, 李宗浩, 孙延林, 杨晓晨, 阎国利. 篮球后卫运动员专项认知眼动特征研究. 天津体育学院学报, 2005, 20 (5): 39- 41.
	Anderson, J. R.. Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problem situations. Psychological Review, 1987, 94 (2): 192- 210. DOI
	Babadi Aghakhanpour, N., Abdoli, B., Farsi, A., & Moeinirad, S.. Comparison of visual search behavior and decision-making accuracy in expert and novice fencing referees. Optometry and Vision Science, 2021, 98 (7): 783- 788. DOI
	Brams, S., Ziv, G., Levin, O., Spitz, J., Wagemans, J., Williams, A. M., & Helsen, W. F.. The relationship between gaze behavior, expertise, and performance: A systematic review. Psychological Bulletin, 2019, 145 (10): 980- 1027. DOI
	Gegenfurtner, A., Lehtinen, E., & Säljö, R.. Expertise differences in the comprehension of visualizations: A meta-analysis of eye-tracking research in professional domains. Educational Psychology Review, 2011, 23 (4): 523- 552. DOI
	Hancock, D. J., & Ste-Marie, D. M.. Gaze behaviors and decision making accuracy of higher- and lower-level ice hockey referees. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2013, 14 (1): 66- 71. DOI
	Helsen, W., & Bultynck, J. B.. Physical and perceptual-cognitive demands of top-class refereeing in association football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2004, 22 (2): 179- 189. DOI
	Hüttermann, S., Memmert, D., & Nerb, J.. Individual differences in attentional capability are linked to creative decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2019, 49 (3): 159- 167. DOI
	Raab, M., Avugos, S., Bar-Eli, M., & MacMahon, C.. The referee’s challenge: A threshold process model for decision making in sport games. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2021, 14 (1): 208- 228. DOI
	Rayner, K.. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2009, 62 (8): 1457- 1506. DOI
	van Biemen, T., van Zanten, T. F., Savelsbergh, G. J. P., & Mann, D. L.. “What needs to be seen”: An exploration into the visual anticipation behaviour of different skill-levelfootball referees while observing long passes on-field. Human Movement Science, 2022, 85, 102980. DOI
	Williams, A. M., & Davids, K.. Visual search strategy, selective attention, and expertise in soccer. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1998, 69 (2): 111- 128. DOI
	Williams, M., & Davids, K. (1995). Declarative knowledge in sport: A by-product of experience or a characteristic of expertise? Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17(3), 259–275.
	Witkowski, M., Tomczak, M., Bronikowski, M., Tomczak, E., Marciniak, M., & Borysiuk, Z.. Visual perception strategies of foil fencers facing right- versus left-handed opponents. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2018, 125 (3): 612- 625.

	专家组		新手组
	M	SD	M	SD
正确率	0.70	0.09	0.40	0.06
反应时(s)	6.56	0.27	7.35	0.42

	专家组		新手组
	M	SD	M	SD
正确率	0.70	0.09	0.40	0.06
反应时(s)	6.56	0.27	7.35	0.42

	专家组		新手组
	M	SD	M	SD
注视时间(s)	6.01	0.12	6.78	0.21
注视次数	27.51	1.27	31.86	1.12
眼跳次数	28.90	1.02	33.48	1.53

	专家组		新手组
	M	SD	M	SD
注视时间(s)	6.01	0.12	6.78	0.21
注视次数	27.51	1.27	31.86	1.12
眼跳次数	28.90	1.02	33.48	1.53

	兴趣区	专家组		新手组
	兴趣区	M	SD	M	SD
注视时间(s)	正确目标	3.47	0.15	3.02	0.26
注视时间(s)	错误目标	2.49	0.18	3.51	0.15
注视次数	正确目标	15.86	0.98	13.77	1.25
注视次数	错误目标	11.34	0.83	17.54	0.85
首次注视到达时间(s)	正确目标	1.12	0.19	1.45	0.15
首次注视到达时间(s)	错误目标	1.29	0.14	1.11	0.17