价值-项目间隔和项目呈现时间对价值导向元记忆的影响*

心理与行为研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6): 749-754.

价值-项目间隔和项目呈现时间对价值导向元记忆的影响^*

姜英杰¹,于洋¹,严燕²

1 东北师范大学心理学院，长春 130024
2 兰州大学管理学院，兰州 730000

收稿日期:2016-02-29 出版日期:2016-12-20 发布日期:2016-12-28
通讯作者: 姜英杰，E-mail：jiangyj993@nenu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家社科基金教育学一般项目（BBA150047），教育部第50批留学回国人员科研启动基金和吉林省教育厅自然科学基金（吉教科合字2014B047号）。

The Influence of Value-Item Interval and Item Presentation Duration on Value-Directed Metamemory

Jiang Yingjie¹, Yu Yang¹, Yan Yan²

1 School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024;
2 School of Management, Lanzhou University, lanzhou 730000

Received:2016-02-29 Online:2016-12-20 Published:2016-12-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用选择性任务范式，用2个实验考察价值-项目间隔和项目呈现时长对价值导向元记忆的影响。实验1考察不同价值-项目间隔（无, 1s, 2s）时被试的选择性记忆指标SI和记忆成绩。结果发现，随价值-项目间隔增加，被试的记忆选择性逐渐下降，间隔1s时对高价值项目的选择性仍存在，但间隔2s时消失；实验2选取实验1的两种价值-项目间隔（无, 1s）条件，延长其项目呈现时间至4.5s，考察项目呈现时间对价值导向元记忆的影响。结果发现，两种价值-项目间隔条件下记忆选择性水平（SI）均显著降低，但对高价值项目的选择性加工优势并没消失。结论：价值导向元记忆受价值-项目间隔和项目呈现时间的影响。

关键词: 价值导向元记忆, 选择性记忆, 记忆决策, 元记忆, 记忆

Abstract: In the present study, two experiments with selective task paradigm were conducted to investigate the influences of value-item interval and item presentation duration on the effect of value-directed metamemory. Experiment 1 explored whether different value-item intervals(0s, 1s, and 2s)would affect selectivity index(SI)and memory performance. Results showed that the value-directed metamemory was still existed on 1s interval condition but disappeared on 2s interval condition. Experiment 2 inspected whether the item presentation duration would influence the value-directed metamemory further. Two conditions with value-directed selectivity from Experiment 1 were used with expanded longer item presentation duration(4.5s). Results showed that the SIs descended significantly in both two conditions. However, the memory performance of high-value items and low-value items both increased with the item presentation duration increasing, which showed a separation phenomenon between metamemory and memory. In conclusion, value-directed metamemory is affected by both value-item interval and item presentation duration.

Key words: value-directed metamemory, selective memory, memory decision, metamemory, memory

中图分类号:

B842

姜英杰,于洋,严燕. 价值-项目间隔和项目呈现时间对价值导向元记忆的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(6): 749-754.

Jiang Yingjie, Yu Yang, Yan Yan. The Influence of Value-Item Interval and Item Presentation Duration on Value-Directed Metamemory[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2016, 14(6): 749-754.

参考文献

陈文瑛.(2008). 英汉塑料工业词汇（第三版）. 轻工业出版社.
刘希平.(1998). 任务难度预见能力发展的实验研究. 心理发展与教育, (4), 17-21.
刘希平, 方格, 杨小冬.(2004). 国外有关学习时间分配决策能力的研究概述. 心理科学进展, 12(4), 524-535.
姜英杰.(2016). 价值导向元记忆: 记忆的选择与控制. 科学出版社. 2016年版.
严燕, 姜英杰, 杨玲.(2013). 价值导向元记忆中价值顺序效应初探. 心理学报,(10), 1094-1103.
Ariel, R., Dunlosky, J., & Bailey, H.(2009). Agenda-Based Regulation of Study-Time Allocation: When Agendas Override Item-Based Monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 432-447.
Castel, A. D.(2007). The adaptive and strategic use of memory by older adults: Evaluative processing and value-directed remembering. Psychology of learning and motivation, 48(12), 225-270.
Castel, A. D., Farb, N. A. S., & Craik, F. I. M.(2007). Memory for general and specific value information in younger and older adults: Measuring the limits of strategic control. Memory & Cognition, 35(4), 689-700.
Castel, A. D., Benjamin, A. S., Craik, F. I. M., & Watkins, M. J.(2002). The effects of aging on selectivity and control in short-term recall. Memory and Cognition, 30(7), 1078-1085.
Castel, A. D., Lee, S. S., Humphreys, K. L., & Moore, A.(2011). Memory capacity, selective control, and value-directed remembering in children with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder(ADHD). Neuropsychology, 25, 15-24.
Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W.(2004). Causes and constraints of the shift-to-easier-materials effect in the control of study. Memory and Cognition, 32(5), 779-788.
Kornell, N., & Metcalfe, J.(2006). Study efficacy and the region of proximal learning framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 32(3), 609-622.
Metcalfe, Janet, & Kornell, Nate.(2003). The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(4), 530-547.
Scharlau, I., Ansorge, U., & Horstmann, G.(2006). Latency facilitation in temporal-order judgments: Time course of facilitation as a function of judgment type. Acta Psychologica, 122(2), 129-159.
Skavhaug, I. M., Wilding, E. L., & Donaldson, D. I.(2013). Immediate judgments of learning predict subsequent recollection: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory & Cognition, 39(1), 159-166.
Soderstrom, N. C., & McCabe, D. P.(2011). The Interplay Between Value and Relatedness as Bases for Metacognitive Monitoring and Control: Evidence for Agenda-Based Monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 37(5), 1236-1242.

[1]	李士一, 谢岩枫, 赵光, 白学军. 媒体多任务经验对不同注意模式下内隐记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 433-440.
[2]	陈相霖, 张军恒, 晏碧华. 现实场景典型空间位置关系客体的解码效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 441-449.
[3]	周爱保, 赵海燕, 夏瑞雪, 袁月, 贾婷婷, 谢珮. 不同语义水平下参照方式、情绪效价和特质评价对记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 145-152.
[4]	刘旭, 蔡佳, 崔喆, 宋美含, 王力. 项目竞争强度对网络成瘾大学生提取诱发遗忘的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 8-14.
[5]	王家慰, 冼美君, 邢强. 任务数量与工作记忆容量对交错学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 15-21.
[6]	刘湍丽, 郝兴风, 邢敏, 白学军. 网络成瘾对大学生推理能力的影响：工作记忆容量的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 642-649.
[7]	江黛苔, 段亚杰, 严帅, 付思文, 刘伟. 事件性前瞻记忆的自我参照效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 312-318.
[8]	张嘉欣, 陈璇, 钱彬彬, 韩丹, 王璐, 张智君. 事件切割对时距知觉的影响：基于记忆碎片效应的研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 145-151.
[9]	王嵩, 李甦. 幼儿复述能力的发展及其与言语工作记忆的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 596-602.
[10]	刘红, 褚铮, 李缓缓, 赵笑梅. 自我损耗对基于时间前瞻记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 446-451,459.
[11]	车晓玮, 王凯旋, 上官梦麒, 李寿欣. 视觉工作记忆中注意模板的表征—来自EROS的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 297-303.
[12]	屈晓兰, 曾萍, 王思非. 基于同义关联的句子错误记忆：发展性逆转现象及句式效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 332-338.
[13]	赵敏芳, 傅小兰, 李开云, Hubert D. Zimmer. 动作操作与怪异性对联结记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 145-152.
[14]	吴慧芬, 黎晓娜, 张琼, 唐一纯, 刘华山. 因为注意，所以拥有—纯粹所有权效应内部机制探究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 161-167,175.
[15]	唐丹丹, 傅瑜, 吴燕京, 朱海. 视觉空间工作记忆组间差异的神经机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 176-184.