理论知识对相似性判断的影响：来自眼动的证据*

心理与行为研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (4): 449-454.

理论知识对相似性判断的影响：来自眼动的证据^*

孙红梅, 阴国恩

天津中医药大学管理学院,天津 300073
天津师范大学心理与行为研究院,天津 300074

收稿日期:2016-03-08 出版日期:2017-07-20 发布日期:2017-10-10
通讯作者: 孙红梅,E-mail：shm1029@126.com。
基金资助:
天津市哲学社会科学研究规划项目（TJJX16-021）

The Effect of Theoretical Knowledge on the Similarity Judgment：Evidence from Eye Tracking

Sun Hongmei, Yin Guo'en

School of Management, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 300073;
Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074

Received:2016-03-08 Online:2017-07-20 Published:2017-10-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以大学生为被试,植物孢子图片为实验材料,采用2（材料关系类型: 知觉相似vs概念相似）×2（学习条件: 无理论知识条件vs有理论知识条件）的混合设计,通过眼动追踪技术探讨理论知识对相似性判断的作用机制。结果发现：理论知识改变了相似性判断等级,增加了对不同类型材料进行相似性判断的注视时间比率和注视次数比率,但并没有影响首次注视时间比率和凝视时间比率。在理论知识条件下进行相似性判断时人们更少地依赖于对情境的注视。这些结果表明理论知识影响相似性判断过程中注意在时间维度上的分配,而且理论知识对相似性判断的影响可能是在加工后期起作用的。

关键词: 相似性判断, 理论知识, 眼动

Abstract: The college students have participated in the current study. The study used the plant spore pictures as the experimental materials, applied the mixed design of 2(material relationship: perceived similarity and knowledge similarity)×2(learning condition: non-theoretical knowledge and theoretical knowledge), and explored the action mechanism of the effect of theoretical knowledge on the similarity judgment by the eye tracking method. The results demonstrated that, the theoretical knowledge can impact on the grade of similarity judgment,the rate of total dwell time and the rate of fixation times of similarity judgment were increased in theoretical knowledge condition, and the number of skipping trials of context was increased in this condition, but the first fixation duration rate and the gaze duration rate weren't influenced. These findings suggest that theoretical knowledge affected the distribution of attention in the time dimension. Moreover, the influence of theoretical knowledge is in the post processing of similarity judgment.

中图分类号:

B842.5

孙红梅, 阴国恩. 理论知识对相似性判断的影响：来自眼动的证据^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(4): 449-454.

Sun Hongmei, Yin Guo'en. The Effect of Theoretical Knowledge on the Similarity Judgment：Evidence from Eye Tracking[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(4): 449-454.

参考文献

1 蔡晨, 曲可佳, 张华, 张奇.(2016). 正误样例组合学习的相似性效应和认知加工深度效应. 心理发展与教育, 32(3), 310-316.
2 闫国利, 熊建萍, 臧传丽.(2013). 阅读研究中的主要眼动指标评述. 心理科学进展, 21(4), 589-605.
3 阴国恩, 杨文, 肖艳丽, 王正光.(2013). 面孔相似性判断中各部件的权重分配. 心理科学, 36(3), 553-557.
4 Blair, M. R., Watson, M. R., & Meier, K. M.(2009). Errors, efficiency, and the interplay between attention and category learning. Cognition, 112(2), 330-336.
5 Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L.(2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(3), 201-215.
6 Deng, W., & Sloutsky, V. M.(2013). The role of linguistic labels in inductive generalization. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114(3), 432-455.
7 Goldstone, R., Medin, D., & Halberstadt, J.(1997). Similarity in context. Memory and Cognition, 25(2), 237-255.
8 Grant, E. R., & Spivey, M. J.(2003). Eye movements and problem solving: Guiding attention guides thoughts. Psychological Science, 14(5), 462-466.
9 Griffin, Z., & Bock, K.(2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11(4), 274-279.
10 Kaplan, A. S., & Murphy, G. L.(2000). Category learning with minimal prior knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(4), 829-846.
11 Medin, D. L., Lynch, E. B., Coley, J. D., & Atran, S.(1997). Categorization and reasoning among tree experts: Do all roads lead to Rome?. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 49-96.
12 Murphy, G. L., & Allopenna, P. D.(1994). The locus of knowledge effects in concept learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 20(4), 904-919.
13 Noles, N. S., & Gelman, S. A.(2012). Effects of categorical labels on similarity judgments: A critical analysis of similarity-based approaches. Developmental psychology, 48(3), 890-896.
14 Rehder, B., & Hoffman, A. B.(2005). Thirty-something categorization results explained: Selective attention, eyetracking, and models of category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(5), 811-829.
15 Rehder, B., Colner, R. M., & Hoffman, A. B.(2009). Feature inference learning and eyetracking. Journal of Memory & Language, 60(4), 394-419.
16 Sloutsky, V. M.(2015). Linguistic labels, dynamic visual features, and attention in infant category learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 134, 62-77.
17 Sloutsky, V. M., & Fisher, A. V.(2012). Linguistic labels: Conceptual markers or object features? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111(1), 65-86.
18 Vandierendonck, A., & Rossel, Y.(2000). Interaction of knowledge-driven and data-driven processing in category learning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 37-63.
19 Wisniewski, E. J.(1995). Prior knowledge and functionally relevant features in concept learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(2), 449-468.
20 Yamauchi, T., & Markman, A. B.(2000a). Inference using categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(3), 776-795.
21 Yu, N. Y., Yamauchi, T., & Schumacher, J.(2008). Rediscovering symbols: The role of category labels in similarity judgment. Journal of Cognitive Science, 9(2), 89-109.

[1]	贾宁, 容丽卓, 代景华. 社会性线索对内隐和外显元认知监控的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 593-599.
[2]	李士一, 谢岩枫, 赵光, 白学军. 媒体多任务经验对不同注意模式下内隐记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 433-440.
[3]	张慢慢, 胡惠兰, 边菡, 李芳, 张志超, 臧传丽. 中文阅读中快速读者与慢速读者的词频效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 304-310.
[4]	何立媛, 赵星, 白玉, 刘妮娜. 汉语老年读者的多词单元加工：来自眼动研究的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 160-166.
[5]	秦钊, 王影超, 叶佳滢, 袁小源, 闫国利. 聋人句子阅读中的视觉功能补偿现象：副中央凹−中央凹效应的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 167-173.
[6]	顾俊娟, 高志华, 马绍扬. 嵌套词汉字位置加工的亚词边界效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 1-7.
[7]	赵赛男, 李琳, 张俐娟, 王敬欣. 汉语阅读中高限制性语境对不可预测词加工的影响：眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 736-742.
[8]	刘璐, 姜雅梅, 张巧明, 李诸洋. 义符位置与语义透明度对形声字语义激活的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 585-591.
[9]	李赛男, 闫国利, 王亚丽, 刘敏, 赵淑萍. 一年级小学生阅读知觉广度的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 606-611.
[10]	张苏媛, 兰泽波, 张水, 孟珠, 闫国利. 无关言语对一年级小学生阅读影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 433-438,446.
[11]	高晓雷, 沈梦, 任晓飞, 白学军, 高蕾. 高、低汉语水平藏–汉读者汉语阅读知觉广度及预视效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 297-303,333.
[12]	贺斐, 梁菲菲, 白学军. 汉语阅读伴随词汇学习的形旁类别一致性效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 304-311.
[13]	康立超, 兰泽波, 韩映虹. 不同阅读方式下图画书重复阅读对4～5岁幼儿文字关注影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 368-374.
[14]	何立媛, 田雪, 李悦, 沈凤丹, 王永胜, 吴捷. 无关言语影响老年人阅读过程的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 375-381.
[15]	乌仁其木格, 赵傲雪, 汪钰涵, 庄想灵, 马国杰. “找茬”任务中的视野偏好与参照策略[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 166-171.