汉语口语词汇识别中声调、语境的作用：来自眼动研究的证据

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨汉语口语词汇识别过程的影响因素，本研究采用眼动方法，结合视觉-情境范式，通过2个实验考察了不同语境条件下声调对汉语双字词听觉词汇识别的作用。结果发现：（1）在不同语境中，三种竞争词各自的总注视时间显著长于无关控制词；（2）在低限制性语境中，高频词的凝视时间显著短于低频词；（3）在低限制性语境中出现词频效应。该结果表明：音段信息、声调都能够影响口语词汇识别过程，实验结果支持TRACE模型。

关键词: 口语词汇识别, 声调信息, 语境, 眼动

Abstract: In two experiments, we investigated the role of context and phonology on Mandarin word recognition by using a method of eye tracking combined with visual-world paradigm. Participants were required to finish a semantic judgment task. The results showed that:(1) the total fixation duration for three kinds words was significantly longer than the control; (2) gaze duration on the high frequency words presented in low constrained sentence context was significantly shorter than the low-frequency words;(3) word frequency effect was found in the context of low constrained sentence context. Those results indicated that both tone information, segmental information can influence Mandarin spoken word recognition.Our results supported the TRACE model.

Key words: Spoken word recognition, tone information, context, eye movement

中图分类号:

B842.5

王露, 万鹏, 任桂琴. 汉语口语词汇识别中声调、语境的作用：来自眼动研究的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 150-156.

WANG Lu, WAN Peng, REN Guiqin. The Activation of Tone Information and Context during Chinese Spoken Words Recognition: An Eye Movement Research[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(2): 150-156.

参考文献

龚文进. (2007). 汉语双字词听觉词汇识别进程中词频效应和多义词效应研究 (硕士学位论文). 华南师范大学, 广州.
卢张龙, 白学军, 闫国利. (2008). 汉语词汇识别中词频和可预测性交互作用的眼动研究. 心理研究, 1(4), 29-33.
鲁忠义, 熊伟. (2001). 语境作用机制研究. 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版), 3(4), 50-56.
吕勇, 沈德立, 杜英春, 韩宗义. (2004). 听觉呈现条件下汉语双字词语义和语音启动的ERP研究. 心理科学, 27(1), 8-12.
邱丽景, 王穗苹, 关心. (2009). 口语理解的视觉-情境范式研究. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), (1), 130-136.
任桂琴. (2006). 句子语境中汉语词汇识别的即时加工研究 (博士学位论文). 辽宁师范大学, 大连.
任桂琴, 韩玉昌, 刘颖. (2012). 句子语境中汉语词汇识别的即时加工过程. 心理科学进展, 20(4), 493-503.
任桂琴, 刘颖, 于泽. (2012). 汉语口语韵律的作用及其神经机制. 心理科学进展, 20(3), 338-343.
谭力海, 彭聃龄. (1990). 关于语义情境与汉语单字词特征分析之间关系的实验研究. 心理科学进展, 8(2), 5-10.
闫国利, 熊建萍, 臧传丽, 余莉莉, 崔磊, 白学军. (2013). 阅读研究中的主要眼动指标评述. 心理科学进展, 21(4), 589-605.
张仙峰, 叶文玲. (2006). 当前阅读研究中眼动指标述评. 心理与行为研究, 4(3), 236-240.
朱晓平. (1991). 汉语句子语境对单词识别的效应. 心理学报, (2), 145-152.
中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室. (2005). 现代汉语词典(第5版)(精). 北京:商务印书馆.
北京语言学院语言教学研究所. (1986). 现代汉语频率词典. 北京:北京语言学院.
Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements:Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory & Language, 38(4), 419-439.
Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (2007). The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge:Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing. Journal of Memory & Language, 57(4), 502-518.
Becker, C. A. (1976). Allocation of attention during visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception & Performance, 2(4), 556-566.
Bi, Y. F., Ganushchak, L. Y., Konopka, A. E., Ren, G. Q., Sui, X., & Chen, Y. Y. (2016, May). Prosodic encoding of information structure in Mandarin Chinese:Evidence from picture description task. Paper presented at the meeting of Speech Prosody, Boston, USA.
Brown, M., Salverda, A. P., Gunlogson, C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2015). Interpreting prosodic cues in discourse context. Language, Cognition & Neuroscience, 30(1-2), 149-166.
Connine, C. M., Blasko, D. G., & Titone, D. (1993). Do the beginnings of spoken words have a special status in auditory word recognition?. Journal of Memory & Language, 32(2), 193-210.
Cooper, R. M. (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language:A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology, 6(1), 84-107.
Cutler, A., & Chen, H. C. (1997). Lexical tone in Cantonese spoken-word processing. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 59(2), 165-179.
Dahan, D., Magnuson, J. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Hogan, E. M. (2001). Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access:Evidence for lexical competition. Language & Cognitive Processes, 16(5-6), 507-534.
Desroches, A. S., Joanisse, M. F., & Robertson, E. K. (2006). Specific phonological impairments in dyslexia revealed by eyetracking. Cognition, 100(3), B32-B42.
Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2005). Word meaning and the control of eye fixation:Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition, 96(1), B23-B32.
Huettig, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2007). The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory & Language, 57(4), 460-482.
Johns, B. T., Gruenenfelder, T. M., Pisoni, D. B., & Jones, M. N. (2012). Effects of word frequency, contextual diversity, and semantic distinctiveness on spoken word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(2), 74-80.
Lotto, A. J., Sullivan, S. C., & Holt, L. L. (2003). Central locus for nonspeech context effects on phonetic identification (L). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(1), 53-56.
Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words:The neighborhood activation model. Ear & Hearing, 19(1), 1-36.
Malins, J. G., & Joanisse, M. F. (2010). The roles of tonal and segmental information in mandarin spoken word recognition:An eyetracking study. Journal of Memory & Language, 62(4), 407-420.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25(1-2), 71-102.
Marslen-Wilson, W., & Zwitserlood, P. (1989). Accessing spoken words:The importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception & Performance, 15(3), 576-585.
Marslen-Wilson, W., Moss, H. E., & Van, H. S. (1996). Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,22(6), 1376-1392.
McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 1-86.
Moss, H. E., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1993). Access to word meanings during spoken language comprehension:Effects of sentential semantic context. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19(6), 1254-1276.
Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist:A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52(3), 189-234.
Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition:Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23(3), 299-325.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing:20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.
Rayner, K., Fischer, M. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control. Vision Research, 38(8), 1129-1144.
Salverda, A. P., Kleinschmidt, D., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2014). Immediate effects of anticipatory coarticulation in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 71(1), 145-163.
Schirmer, A., Tang, S. L., Penney, T. B., Gunter, T. C., & Chen, H. C. (2005). Brain responses to segmentally and tonally induced semantic violations in Cantonese. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(1), 1-12.
Sereno, J. A., & Lee, H. (2015). The contribution of segmental and tonal information in mandarin spoken word processing. Language & Speech, 58(Pt 2), 131-151.
Shen, J., Deutsch, D., & Rayner, K. (2013). On-line perception of mandarin tones 2 and 3:Evidence from eye movements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(5), 3016-3029.
Soto-Faraco, S., Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Cutler, A. (2001). Segmental and suprasegmental mismatch in lexical access. Journal of Memory & Language, 45(3), 412-432.
Spivey, M. J., Tanenhaus, M. K., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (2002). Eye movements and spoken language comprehension:Effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Cognitive Psychology, 45(4), 447-481.
Taft, M., & Chen, H. C. (1992). Judging homophony in Chinese:The influence of tones. Advances in Psychology, 90, 151-172.
Wiener, S., & Ito, K. (2015). Do syllable-specific tonal probabilities guide lexical access? Evidence from Mandarin, Shanghai and Cantonese speakers. Language, Cognition & Neuroscience, 30(9), 1048-1060.
Wong, K. F. E., & Chen, H. C. (1999). Orthographic and phonological processing in reading Chinese text:Evidence from eye fixations. Language & Cognitive Processes, 14(5-6), 461-480.
Yang, C. L., Perfetti, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2010). Sentence integration processes:An ERP study of Chinese sentence comprehension with relative clauses. Brain & Language, 112(2), 85-100.
Ye, Y., & Connine, C. M. (1999). Processing spoken Chinese:The role of tone information. Language & Cognitive Processes, 14(5-6), 609-630.
Zhou, X. L., Qu, Y. X., Hua, S., Gaskell, G., & Wilson, W. M. (2004). Constraints of lexical tone on semantic activation in Chinese spoken word recognition. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 36(4), 379-392.

[1]	贾宁, 容丽卓, 代景华. 社会性线索对内隐和外显元认知监控的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 593-599.
[2]	李士一, 谢岩枫, 赵光, 白学军. 媒体多任务经验对不同注意模式下内隐记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 433-440.
[3]	张慢慢, 胡惠兰, 边菡, 李芳, 张志超, 臧传丽. 中文阅读中快速读者与慢速读者的词频效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 304-310.
[4]	何立媛, 赵星, 白玉, 刘妮娜. 汉语老年读者的多词单元加工：来自眼动研究的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 160-166.
[5]	秦钊, 王影超, 叶佳滢, 袁小源, 闫国利. 聋人句子阅读中的视觉功能补偿现象：副中央凹−中央凹效应的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 167-173.
[6]	顾俊娟, 高志华, 马绍扬. 嵌套词汉字位置加工的亚词边界效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 1-7.
[7]	赵赛男, 李琳, 张俐娟, 王敬欣. 汉语阅读中高限制性语境对不可预测词加工的影响：眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 736-742.
[8]	刘璐, 姜雅梅, 张巧明, 李诸洋. 义符位置与语义透明度对形声字语义激活的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 585-591.
[9]	李赛男, 闫国利, 王亚丽, 刘敏, 赵淑萍. 一年级小学生阅读知觉广度的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 606-611.
[10]	罗雨娇, 王永胜, 何立媛, 李馨. 语境背景线索和词切分线索对留学生新词学习的作用：来自眼动的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 714-720.
[11]	张苏媛, 兰泽波, 张水, 孟珠, 闫国利. 无关言语对一年级小学生阅读影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 433-438,446.
[12]	宋宜琪, 杨婉晴, 梁丹丹. 6～8岁汉语高功能自闭症儿童空间概念“大”的隐喻映射研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 460-465.
[13]	高晓雷, 沈梦, 任晓飞, 白学军, 高蕾. 高、低汉语水平藏–汉读者汉语阅读知觉广度及预视效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 297-303,333.
[14]	贺斐, 梁菲菲, 白学军. 汉语阅读伴随词汇学习的形旁类别一致性效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 304-311.
[15]	康立超, 兰泽波, 韩映虹. 不同阅读方式下图画书重复阅读对4～5岁幼儿文字关注影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 368-374.