不同性质的评价对特质焦虑者抑制功能影响的ERP研究

心理与行为研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3): 335-341.

不同性质的评价对特质焦虑者抑制功能影响的ERP研究

梁丽美¹, 李佳根¹, 贾江晓¹, 宋海秀¹, 雷怡², 李红^1,2,4, 张文海^3,4

1. 辽宁师范大学脑与认知神经科学研究中心, 大连 116029;
2. 深圳大学心理与社会学院, 深圳 518060;
3. 盐城工学院心理健康教育中心, 盐城 224051;
4. 成都大学教育科学研究院, 成都 610106

收稿日期:2017-03-26 出版日期:2018-05-20 发布日期:2018-06-05
通讯作者: 李红,E-mail:lihongszu@szu.edu.cn;张文海,E-mail:zwh2007106@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（31470997，31571153和81171289）

Different Evaluations on Inhibition Function in Trait Anxiety:An ERP Study

LIANG Limei¹, LI Jiagen¹, JIA Jiangxiao¹, SONG Haixiu¹, LEI Yi², LI Hong^1,2,4, ZHANG Wenhai^3,4

1. Research Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029;
2. College of Psychology and Sociology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060;
3. Mental Health Center, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng 224051;
4. College of Education Science, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106

Received:2017-03-26 Online:2018-05-20 Published:2018-06-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 特质焦虑者作为焦虑障碍易感性个体，会表现出对威胁性刺激的注意偏向，从而损害中央执行系统的抑制功能。但是不同情绪性评价刺激会如何调控特质焦虑者的抑制功能还不太清楚。为此，本研究以脑电P3b为抑制功能指标，要求高低特质焦虑组在三种不同评价下完成反向眼跳范式，考察不同性质的评价如何影响特质焦虑的抑制功能。行为结果发现，高焦虑组比低焦虑组错误率更高；积极评价条件下，高焦虑组的反应时慢于低焦虑组。ERP结果进一步发现，无评价条件下，高焦虑组的P3b波幅大于低焦虑组；低焦虑者在积极评价条件下的P3b波幅大于消极评价条件，但是高焦虑者没有显著差异。结果表明，积极评价会损害高特质焦虑者的抑制功能，而消极评价则促进了高特质焦虑个体的抑制功能。

关键词: 特质焦虑, 抑制功能, 评价, P3b

Abstract: Since individuals with trait anxiety are susceptible to anxiety disorders and exhibit threatening attentional bias, their inhibition function are impaired in the central executive system. However, it is not clear how different emotional evaluation stimuli will affect inhibition function in individuals with trait anxiety. To this end, event-related potentials were recorded from college student groups with high trait anxiety (HTA) and low trait anxiety(LTA) while they performed antisaccade tasks and prosaccade tasks under positive evaluation, negative evaluation, and no evaluation condition. The results indicated that error rate of HTA group was higher than LTA group; reaction time of HTA group was slower than LTA group in antisaccade tasks of positive evaluation. Moreover, the P3b amplitudes in positive evaluation were higher than negative evaluation of LTA group, while no significant evaluation differences were found in the HTA group. These observations suggest that positive evaluation harms inhibition function in individuals with high trait anxiety, while negative evaluation promotes inhibition function in individuals with high trait anxiety.

Key words: trait anxiety, inhibition function, emotional evaluation, P3b

中图分类号:

B842

梁丽美, 李佳根, 贾江晓, 宋海秀, 雷怡, 李红, 张文海. 不同性质的评价对特质焦虑者抑制功能影响的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 335-341.

LIANG Limei, LI Jiagen, JIA Jiangxiao, SONG Haixiu, LEI Yi, LI Hong, ZHANG Wenhai. Different Evaluations on Inhibition Function in Trait Anxiety:An ERP Study[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(3): 335-341.

参考文献

周雅. (2013). 情绪唤起对执行功能的作用. 心理科学进展, 21(7), 1186-1199.
Ansari, T. L., & Derakshan, N. (2011). The neural correlates of impaired inhibitory control in anxiety. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), 1146-1153.
Barlow, D. H. (2014). Clinical handbook of psychological disorders:A step-by-step treatment manual (5th ed.). New York:The Guilford Press.
Berggren, N., & Derakshan, N. (2013). Attentional control deficits in trait anxiety:Why you see them and why you don't. Biological Psychology, 92(3), 440-446.
Bishop, S. J. (2009). Trait anxiety and impoverished prefrontal control of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 12(1), 92-98.
Celik, P., Storme, M., & Myszkowski, N. (2016). Anger and sadness as adaptive emotion expression strategies in response to negative competence and warmth evaluations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55(4), 792-810.
Demyttenaere, K., Bruffaerts, R., Posada-Villa, J., Gasquet, I., Kovess, V., Lepine, J., & Polidori, G. (2004). Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. JAMA, 291(21), 2581-2590.
Dryman, M. T., Gardner, S., Weeks, J. W., & Heimberg, R. G. (2016). Social anxiety disorder and quality of life:How fears of negative and positive evaluation relate to specific domains of life satisfaction. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 38, 1-8.
Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance:Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336-353.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology:The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226.
Hallett, P. E. (1978). Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions. Vision Research, 18(10), 1279-1296.
Huang, Y. X., Bai, L., Ai, H., Li, W., Yu, C., Liu, J., & Luo, Y. J. (2009). Influence of trait-anxiety on inhibition function:Evidence from ERPs study. Neuroscience Letters, 456(1), 1-5.
Huang, Y. X., & Luo, Y. J. (2006). Temporal course of emotional negativity bias:An ERP study. Neuroscience Letters, 398(1-2), 91-96.
Hutton, S. B., & Ettinger, U. (2006). The antisaccade task as a research tool in psychopathology:A critical review. Psychophysiology, 43(3), 302-313.
Johnson, D. T., & Spielberger, C. D. (1968). The effects of relaxation training and the passage of time on measures of state-and trait-anxiety. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24(1), 20-23.
Judah, M. R., Grant, D. M., Mills, A. C., & Lechner, W. V. (2013). The neural correlates of impaired attentional control in social anxiety:An ERP study of inhibition and shifting. Emotion, 13(6), 1096-1106.
Leary, M. R., Tate, E. B., Adams, C. E., Batts Allen, A., & Hancock, J. (2007). Self-compassion and reactions to unpleasant self-relevant events:The implications of treating oneself kindly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 887-904.
Luck, S. J., & Gaspelin, N. (2017). How to get statistically significant effects in any ERP experiment (and why you shouldn't). Psychophysiology, 54(1), 146-157.
MacNamara, A., & Hajcak, G. (2010). Distinct electrocortical and behavioral evidence for increased attention to threat in generalized anxiety disorder. Depression and Anxiety, 27(3), 234-243.
Mueller, S. C., Hardin, M. G., Korelitz, K., Daniele, T., Bemis, J., Dozier, M., … Ernst, M. (2012). Incentive effect on inhibitory control in adolescents with early-life stress:An antisaccade study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36(3), 217-225.
Okon-Singer, H., Hendler, T., Pessoa, L., & Shackman, A. J. (2015). The neurobiology of emotion-cognition interactions:Fundamental questions and strategies for future research. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 58.
Pacheco-Unguetti, A. P., Acosta, A., Callejas, A., & Lupiáñez, J. (2010). Attention and anxiety:Different attentional functioning under state and trait anxiety. Psychological Science, 21(2), 298-304.
Pessoa, L. (2008). On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(2), 148-158.
Pessoa, L. (2009). How do emotion and motivation direct executive control?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 160-166.
Pham, M. T. (2004). The logic of feeling. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 360-369.
Rossignol, M., Philippot, P., Douilliez, C., Crommelinck, M., & Campanella, S. (2005). The perception of fearful and happy facial expression is modulated by anxiety:An event-related potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 377(2), 115-120.
Segalowitz, S. J., Wintink, A. J., & Cudmore, L. J. (2001). P3 topographical change with task familiarization and task complexity. Cognitive Brain Research, 12(3), 451-457.
van Bockstaele, B., Verschuere, B., Tibboel, H., De Houwer, J., Crombez, G., & Koster, E. H. W. (2014). A review of current evidence for the causal impact of attentional bias on fear and anxiety. Psychological Bulletin, 140(3), 682-721.
van der Stigchel, S., Imants, P., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2011). Positive affect increases cognitive control in the antisaccade task. Brain and Cognition, 75(2), 177-181.

[1]	黄杰, 朱丹, 周丽敏, 刘望. 核心自我评价的代际传递：父母支持和子女基本心理需要满足的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 515-521.
[2]	周爱保, 赵海燕, 夏瑞雪, 袁月, 贾婷婷, 谢珮. 不同语义水平下参照方式、情绪效价和特质评价对记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 145-152.
[3]	朱昭红, 孙令令. 阈上阈下启动刺激在不同锻炼人群中引发自动评价的特点[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 182-189.
[4]	于永菊. 焦虑和抑郁对正负性注意偏向的影响：注意控制的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 121-127.
[5]	王春梅, 吕勇. 高、低回避性消极情绪影响抑制功能的神经机制：ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 577-582.
[6]	贾丽萍, 卢国华, 宋玉萍, 李福洪. 负性情绪启动对特质焦虑个体行为抑制的影响机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 604-612.
[7]	田宏杰. 完美主义高标准对大学生拖延行为的影响：链式中介效应分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 668-674.
[8]	罗杰, 陈维, 杨桂芳, 吴丹萍, 刘拓. 大学生主动性人格对其拖延行为的影响：核心自我评价的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 692-698.
[9]	耿靖宇, 侯晓, 杨华勇, 韩丕国, 高峰强, 韩磊. 特质焦虑与大学生拖延行为的关系：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 402-407.
[10]	胡心怡, 陈英和. 智力增长观对高威胁下自我评价的作用效果：呈现顺序和自尊的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 195-201.
[11]	王汉林, 莫雷. “动作-评价”效应：动作与认知的交互作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 626-632.
[12]	郭纪昌, 叶一舵. 青少年核心自我评价对生活满意度的影响：希望的中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 663-668.
[13]	毋嫘,林冰心,蒋娜,赵亚萍. 高焦虑个体对威胁性刺激的注意偏向特点^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(6): 760-764.
[14]	谢丽丽,徐慧芳,姜媛,方平. 情绪的确定性评价对信息加工的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(3): 305-310.
[15]	吕凯. 顿悟问题解决中抑制功能的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(2): 219-227.