抑制控制训练对手机依赖大学生的干预效果

心理与行为研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3): 342-348.

抑制控制训练对手机依赖大学生的干预效果

丁相玲¹, 祖静², 张向葵^1,3

1. 东北师范大学心理学院, 长春 130024;
2. 沈阳师范大学学前与初等教育学院, 沈阳 110034;
3. 东北师范大学儿童发展研究中心, 长春 130024

收稿日期:2018-01-16 出版日期:2018-05-20 发布日期:2018-06-05
通讯作者: 张向葵,E-mail:zhangxiangkui@126.com
基金资助:
2017年辽宁省高等学校基本科研项目（WQN201738）；奕阳教育研究院青年学者学术研究资助项目（SEI-QXZ-2017-09）

The Effects of Inhibition Control Training in Mobile Phone Dependency College Students

DING Xiangling¹, ZU Jing², ZHANG Xiangkui^1,3

1. School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China;
2. College of Preschool and Primary Education of Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang 110034, China;
3. Northeast Normal University, Child Development Research Center, Changchun 130024, China

Received:2018-01-16 Online:2018-05-20 Published:2018-06-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 依照手机成瘾倾向量表得分及手机使用时间记录从548名被试中筛选出60名手机依赖大学生，将其随机分配到抑制控制训练组和非训练组进行实验。预期通过抑制控制训练提升手机依赖大学生抑制控制能力，降低其手机依赖水平。结果发现：训练组被试在接受为期8周的抑制控制训练任务后，手机依赖总分、手机使用时间和非训练组相比显著降低，抑制控制能力显著提升。结果表明抑制控制训练对手机依赖大学生的干预效果明显。

关键词: 大学生, 抑制控制训练, 手机依赖

Abstract: The research filters 60 subjects from 548 college students by using the mobile phone addiction scale and cell phone use time records, 60 mobile phone dependency users were randomly assigned to the intervention group and the non-intervention group to conduct the experiment. It is expected that by carrying out the inhibition control training in the intervention group, the mobile phone dependency students' inhibition control ability can increase and their mobile phone dependence can descend. It is found that subjects in the intervention group for 8 weeks of inhibitory control training, mobile phones addiction scale total scores and mobile phone use time decreased significantly than the intervention group, compared inhibitory control ability to ascend.The results showed that the inhibitory control training had obvious effect on the intervention of college students.

Key words: College Students, Inhibitory Control training, Mobile Phone Dependence

中图分类号:

B842

丁相玲, 祖静, 张向葵. 抑制控制训练对手机依赖大学生的干预效果[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 342-348.

DING Xiangling, ZU Jing, ZHANG Xiangkui. The Effects of Inhibition Control Training in Mobile Phone Dependency College Students[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(3): 342-348.

参考文献

窦凯, 聂衍刚, 王玉洁, 黎建斌, 沈汪兵. (2014). 自我损耗促进冲动决策:来自行为和ERPs的证据. 心理学报, 46(10), 1564-1579.
汪海彬, 陶炎坤, 徐宏图. (2015). 不同手机依赖程度大学生的抑制控制特点. 中国心理卫生杂志, 29(3), 226-229.
王正翔. (2013). 大学生手机依赖与冲动性关系研究(硕士学位论文). 苏州大学, 苏州.
夏领婕. (2013). 当代大学生使用手机的现状及影响(硕士学位论文). 华中科技大学, 武汉.
熊婕, 周宗奎, 陈武, 游志麒, 翟紫艳. (2012). 大学生手机成瘾倾向量表的编制. 中国心理卫生杂志, 26(3), 222-225.
徐晓丹. (2014). 手机成瘾大学生自我控制缺陷及其机制(硕士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆.
赵鑫, 周仁来. (2011). 工作记忆中央执行系统不同子功能评估方法. 中国临床心理学杂志, 19(6), 748-751.
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351-355.
Beranuy, M., Oberst, U., Carbonell, X., & Chamarro, A. (2009). Problematic Internet and mobile phone use and clinical symptoms in college students:The role of emotional intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(5), 1182-1187.
Bianchi, A., & Phillips, J. G. (2005). Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8(1), 39-51.
Billieux, J., Van der Linden, M., D'Acremont, M., Ceschi, G., & Zermatten, A. (2007). Does impulsivity relate to perceived dependence on and actual use of the mobile phone?. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(4), 527-537.
Billieux, J., Van Der Linden, M., & Rochat, L. (2008). The role of impulsivity in actual and problematic use of the mobile phone. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(9), 1195-1210.
D'Hondt, F., Billieux, J., & Maurage, P. (2015). Electrophysiological correlates of problematic Internet use:Critical review and perspectives for future research. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 59, 64-82.
Feil, J., Sheppard, D., Fitzgerald, P. B., Yücel, M., Lubman, D. I., & Bradshaw, J. L. (2010). Addiction, compulsive drug seeking, and the role of frontostriatal mechanisms in regulating inhibitory control. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(2), 248-275.
Giesen, J. C., Havermans, R. C., Douven, A., Tekelenburg, M., & Jansen, A. (2010). Will work for snack food:The association of BMI and snack reinforcement. Obesity, 18(5), 966-970.
Kamibeppu, K., & Sugiura, H. (2005). Impact of the mobile phone on junior high-school students' friendships in the Tokyo metropolitan area. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8(2), 121-130.
King, A. L. S., Valença, A. M., Silva, A. C. O., Baczynski, T., Carvalho, M. R., & Nardi, A. E. (2013). Nomophobia:Dependency on virtual environments or social phobia?. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 140-144.
Lawrence, N. S., O'Sullivan, J., Parslow, D., Javaid, M., Adams, R. C., Chambers, C. D., … Verbruggen, F. (2015). Training response inhibition to food is associated with weight loss and reduced energy intake. Appetite, 95, 17-28.
Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C. (2015). The relationship between cell phone use and academic performance in a sample of U. S. college students. SAGE Open, 1-9, doi:10.1177/2158244015573169.
Nikhita, C. S., Jadhav, P. R., & Ajinkya, S. (2015). Prevalence of mobile phone dependence in secondary school adolescents. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research, 9(11), VC06-VC09.
Oaten, M., & Cheng, K. (2006a). Improved self-control:The benefits of a regular program of academic study. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28(1), 1-16.
Oaten, M., & Cheng, K. (2006b). Longitudinal gains in self-regulation from regular physical exercise. British Journal of Health Psychology, 11(4), 717-733.
Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone:Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134-141.
Spierer, L., Chavan, C. F., & Manuel, A. L. (2013). Training-induced behavioral and brain plasticity in inhibitory control. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 427.
Toda, M., Monden, K., Kubo, K., & Morimoto, K. (2006). Mobile pone dependence and health-related lifestyle of university students. Social Behavior and Personality:An International Journal, 34(10), 1277-1284.

[1]	李甜甜, 徐鹤文. 大学生自我概念清晰性与社交焦虑的关系：多重中介效应分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 700-706.
[2]	郝喜玲, 陈煊, 刘依冉. 失败恐惧对大学生失败学习的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 707-713.
[3]	刘建榕, 谢林君, 郑琳. 社会性发展迟滞大学生的情绪韵律识别特点[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 714-720.
[4]	李娇娇, 刘晓冰, 裴丹丹, 徐碧波, 尹锡杨. 情绪智力对大学生恶意创造力的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 563-569.
[5]	尹静, 李传英, 马世超, 徐瑜姣, 李永升. 大学生人格与手机依赖的关系：压力感知的中介与性别的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 426-432.
[6]	姜琨, 兰泽波, 孙晓铜, 丁晓辉, 陶佳雨. 听障大学生社会支持对学业自我效能感的影响：心理韧性的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 96-100.
[7]	熊思成, 张斌, 姜永志, 蒋怀滨, 陈芸. 手机成瘾流行率及其影响因素的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 802-808.
[8]	杨雪, 雷江华. 阅读能力对听障大学生语音编码的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 599-605.
[9]	朱莹莹, 马晓晴, 唐卓仪, 杨敏齐. 睡眠类型对大学生抑郁的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 657-664,694.
[10]	彭顺, 胡祥恩. 大学生压力与疲劳的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 563-570.
[11]	陈佩儀, 陈瑜, 杨雪岭. 中庸思维对大学生抑郁症状的影响机制：消极认知情绪调节策略的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 571-576.
[12]	彭丽仪, 胡义秋, 曾子豪, 詹林. 儿童期受虐经历对大学生抑郁的影响：神经质人格和MAOA基因rs3027407多态性的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 230-236.
[13]	闫广芬, 姜琨, 兰泽波, 丁晓辉. 听障大学生社会支持对适应的影响：心理韧性的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 252-257.
[14]	纪凌开, 刘华山, 李晨璐. 温水煮青蛙：专业认同对大学生抑郁的影响机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 833-838.
[15]	黄明明, 赵守盈. 述情障碍对大学生手机成瘾倾向的影响：孤独感与正念的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 686-692.