高中生感知到的课堂教学方式量表的编制

心理与行为研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (6): 773-779.

高中生感知到的课堂教学方式量表的编制

张丽娜^1,2, 路海东¹

1. 东北师范大学心理学院, 长春 130024;
2. 北京语言大学附属大连高级中学, 大连 116039

收稿日期:2018-11-30 出版日期:2019-11-20 发布日期:2020-01-13
通讯作者: 路海东,E-mail:luhd@nenu.edu.cn
基金资助:
北京师范大学中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心自主课题（2016-03-011-BZK01）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（2412019ZD015）

Development of Chinese High School Students Perceived Classroom Teaching Approaches Scale

ZHANG Lina^1,2, LU Haidong¹

1. School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024;
2. Dalian High School Affiliated to Beijing Language and Culture University, Dalian 116039

Received:2018-11-30 Online:2019-11-20 Published:2020-01-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在文献分析、课堂观察和访谈的基础上，编制了高中生感知到的课堂教学方式初始问卷。通过探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析对初始问卷进行修订，最终形成的正式量表包括以教师为中心的教学方式和以学生为中心的教学方式两个分量表。以教师为中心的教学方式由直接教学和提问两个维度构成，以学生为中心的教学方式由自主探究学习与合作学习两个维度构成。结果表明，高中生感知到的课堂教学方式量表具有较高的内部一致性信度、重测信度、良好的结构效度和校标关联效度，可以作为我国高中课堂教学方式的测量工具。

关键词: 教学方式, 高中, 量表, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Based on the literature review, classroom observation and interview，the current study firstly constructed the draft of the Questionnaire on the Chinese High School Students’ Perceived Classroom Teaching Approaches. Due to the results of the exploratory factor analysis and the confirmatory factor analysis, this draft questionnaire was further revised and finalized as a two-dimension scale, namely, the formal scale was comprised of teacher-centered teaching approaches and student-centered teaching approaches. The teacher-centered teaching approaches consists of two parts, i.e., direct instruction and questioning, while the student-centered teaching approaches includes another two parts, autonomous-inquiry learning and cooperative learning. The results indicate that this questionnaire is suitable to measure the Chinese high school students’ perceived classroom teaching approaches since it has high-level coefficients of the internal consistency reliability, the test-retest reliability, the construct validity, and the criterion-related validation.

Key words: teaching approaches, Chinese high school, scale, reliability, validity

中图分类号:

B849

张丽娜, 路海东. 高中生感知到的课堂教学方式量表的编制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 773-779.

ZHANG Lina, LU Haidong. Development of Chinese High School Students Perceived Classroom Teaching Approaches Scale[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(6): 773-779.

参考文献

柴晓运, 龚少英. (2013). 中学生感知到的数学教师支持问卷的编制. 心理与行为研究, 11(4), 511-517, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2013.04.013
范春林. (2013). 课堂环境与自主学习. 北京:国家行政学院出版社.
顾明远(主编). (1998). 教育大辞典. 上海:上海教育出版社.
李森, 赵鑫. (2011). 教学方式变革的文化审视. 课程·教材·教法, 31(4), 16-22
潘亦宁, 王珊, 刘喻, 唐洪秀. (2015). 初中数学课堂上的师生互动研究——基于视频案例的分析. 教育理论与实践, 35(8), 59-61
Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(2), 405-419, doi:10.1348/000709905X43571.
Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (2014). Qualitative variation in approaches to university teaching and learning in large first-year classes. Higher Education, 67(6), 783-795, doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9690-0.
Reddy, L. A., Dudek, C. M., Fabiano, G. A., & Peters, S. (2015). Measuring teacher self-report on classroom practices:Construct validity and reliability of the classroom strategies scale-teacher form. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(4), 513-533, doi:10.1037/spq0000110.
Reddy, L. A., Fabiano, G. A., Dudek, C. M., & Hsu, L. (2013a). Development and construct validity of the Classroom Strategies Scale-Observer Form. School Psychology Quarterly, 28(4), 317-341, doi:10.1037/spq0000043.
Reddy, L. A., Fabiano, G. A., Dudek, C. M., & Hsu, L. (2013b). Predictive validity of the classroom strategies scale-observer form on statewide testing scores:An initial investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 28(4), 301-316, doi:10.1037/spq0000041.
Rosário, P., Núñez, J. C., Ferrando, P. J. Paiva, M. O., Lourenço, A., Cerezo, R., & Valle, A. (2013). The relationship between approaches to teaching and approaches to studying:A two-level structural equation model for biology achievement in high school. Metacognition and Learning, 8(1), 47-77, doi:10.1007/s11409-013-9095-6.
Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Congruence between intention and strategy in university science teachers' approaches to teaching. Higher Education, 32(1), 77-87, doi:10.1007/BF00139219.
Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (2004). Development and use of the approaches to teaching inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 409-424, doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0007-9.
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Taylor, P. (1994). Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science. Higher Education, 27(1), 75-84, doi:10.1007/BF01383761.
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37(1), 57-70, doi:10.1023/A:1003548313194.
Zhang, L. F., Evans, C., & Postiglione, G. A. (2017). Do organisational commitments matter in teaching approaches among academics in elite universities in Beijing? Educational Psychology, 37(7), 778-791, doi:10.1080/01443410.2016.1262006.

[1]	程刚, 邹燕, 余玮, 丁芳媛, 贾云丞. 入学过渡期高中新生大五人格与主观社会地位变化轨迹的关系：基于潜变量增长模型的分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 692-699.
[2]	苗秀影, 迟立忠. 情感启发式对风险选择的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 325-331.
[3]	孙锦露, 刘海骅. 青少年校园欺凌行为量表编制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 255-260.
[4]	曾思瑶, 王振宏. 中文版父母报告高敏感儿童量表的修订[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 101-107.
[5]	郭颖, 樊富珉, 张英俊, 刘宇. 团体咨询师胜任力量表的编制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 809-815.
[6]	邱晨, 牛美心, 周新林, 杨涛. 四、七年级学生分数数量表征与数学学业成就的关系：分数概念理解的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 628-635.
[7]	王艳丽, 陈红. 城市社区居民获得感量表的编制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 665-670.
[8]	范奕敏, 张湘琳, 曹玉卿, 李虹. 小学生阅读障碍行为筛查家长问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 521-527.
[9]	张野, 苑波, 王凯, 申婷. 冲动性特质对高中生自杀意念的影响：校园排斥与生命意义感的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 89-95.
[10]	刘文, 孟祥蕊, 车翰博, 张嘉琪, 沈漪. 小学生创造性人格教师评定问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 624-630.
[11]	柴晓运, 李晓燕, 曹娟, 林丹华. 中国青少年积极发展量表（简版）的编制：基于一个大样本数据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 631-637.
[12]	申承林, 李晨麟, 游旭群. 特殊教育教师职业人格量表的编制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 339-345.
[13]	孙崇勇, 刘丽丽, 高春阳. 翻转教学法对高中生认知负荷及学习成绩的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 369-375.
[14]	王战旗, 张兴利. 创造力成就问卷的中文修订[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 390-397.
[15]	郝嘉佳, 陈英和, 刘拓, 白学军. 儿童青少年一般思维能力测验的编制和初步应用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 620-626.