父母手机冷落行为与青少年疏离感的关系：一个有调节的中介模型

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探讨父母手机冷落行为如何及何时影响青少年的疏离感，本研究对某中学的575名初中生进行了问卷调查。结果发现：（1）父母手机冷落行为可以正向预测青少年的疏离感；（2）非适应性认知在父母手机冷落行为与青少年疏离感的关系中起中介作用；（3）应对方式在父母手机冷落行为对青少年疏离感影响的直接路径及中介效应的后半段均发挥着调节作用。因此，父母手机冷落行为会增加青少年的疏离感，降低非适应性认知和调控应对方式能够有效降低青少年的疏离感。

关键词: 父母手机冷落行为, 疏离感, 非适应性认知, 应对方式, 青少年

Abstract: This study aimed to examine how and when parental phubbing affects adolescents’ alienation. We recruited 575 adolescents to complete the Phubbing Scale, Adolescent Students Alienation Scale, Online Cognitive Scale, and Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire in class. Results showed that: 1) Parental phubbing was significantly positively related to adolescents’ alienation. 2) Maladaptive cognition mediated the relationship between parental phubbing and adolescents’ alienation. 3) The association between maladaptive cognition and adolescents’ alienation was moderated by coping style, as well as the direct predictive effect of parental pubbing on alienation. Specifically, adolescents might experience more alienation when using the negative style. This study indicated that parental phubbing might enhance adolescents’ alienation. Besides, reducing maladaptive cognition and regulating the coping style could prevent adolescents’ alienation.

Key words: parental phubbing, alienation, maladaptive cognition, coping style, adolescent

中图分类号:

B844

孔繁昌, 王美茹, 孙乙元, 夏宇娟, 李晓瑶. 父母手机冷落行为与青少年疏离感的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 486-492.

KONG Fanchang, WANG Meiru, SUN Yiyuan, XIA Yujuan, LI Xiaoyao. Parental Phubbing and Adolescents’ Alienation: A Moderated Mediation Model[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(4): 486-492.

参考文献

戴晓阳. (2015). 常用心理评估量表手册 (修订版) (第2版). 北京: 人民军医出版社.
丁倩, 孔令龙, 张永欣, 周宗奎, 胡伟. (2018). 父母“低头族”与初中生手机成瘾的交叉滞后分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 26(5), 952–955
姜倩云, 王兴超, 刘兵, 王鹏程, 雷雳. (2021). 父母低头行为对儿童青少年心理发展的影响. 心理发展与教育, 37(1), 137–145
解亚宁. (1998). 简易应对方式量表信度和效度的初步研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 6(2), 114–115
刘杨, 李泽, 林丹华. (2014). 流动压力与新生代农民工抑郁情绪: 应对方式的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 22(3), 508–511, 498
邱剑, 杨奇伟, 安芹, 唐平, 李茂全. (2015). 青少年被忽视经历与疏离感的关系及心理韧性调节作用的研究. 中国儿童保健杂志, 23(3), 238–241, doi: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2015-23-03-05
宋珺, 杨凤池. (2007). 戴维斯在线认知问卷在538名医学生中的试用. 中国心理卫生杂志, 21(8), 526–528, doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6729.2007.08.004
王琳, 伍麟. (2018). 风险偏好可以代际传递吗?——来自多学科的证据与元理论思考. 心理科学, 41(3), 694–699
王素娟, 孙颖, 张亚利, 张雅明. (2021). 社会排斥对青少年低头行为的影响: 社交焦虑与非适应性认知的链式中介作用. 中国特殊教育, (4), 72–77, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3728.2021.04.011
徐夫真, 张文新. (2011). 青少年疏离感与病理性互联网使用的关系: 家庭功能和同伴接纳的调节效应检验. 心理学报, 43(4), 410–419
杨东, 张进辅, 黄希庭. (2002). 青少年学生疏离感的理论构建及量表编制. 心理学报, 34(4), 407–413
杨晓莉, 邹泓. (2005). 青少年亲子沟通的研究. 心理与行为研究, 3(1), 39–43
中国互联网络信息中心. (2021). 第47次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告. 2021-02-03取自http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/202102/P020210203334633480104.pdf
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942–950
Bai, Q. Y., Lei, L., Hsueh, F. H., Yu, X. Q., Hu, H. H., Wang, X. C., & Wang, P. C. (2020). Parent-adolescent congruence in phubbing and adolescents’ depressive symptoms: A moderated polynomial regression with response surface analyses. Journal of Affective Disorders, 275, 127–135, doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.156.
Carver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. (2010). Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 679–704, doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100352.
Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9–18, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.018.
Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). The effects of “phubbing” on social interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(6), 304–316, doi: 10.1111/jasp.12506.
Compas, B. E., Connor-Smith, J. K., Saltzman, H., Thomsen, A. H., & Wadsworth, M. E. (2001). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: Problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 87–127, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.87.
David, M. E., & Roberts, J. A. (2017). Phubbed and alone: Phone snubbing, social exclusion, and attachment to social media. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 155–163, doi: 10.1086/690940.
Davis, R. A. (2001). A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(2), 187–195, doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00041-8.
Fergus, S., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2005). Adolescent resilience: A framework for understanding healthy development in the face of risk. Annual Review of Public Health, 26(1), 399–419, doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144357.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988). Coping as a mediator of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(3), 466–475, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.3.466.
Gonzales, N. A., Tein, J. Y., Sandler, I. N., & Friedman, R. J. (2001). On the limits of coping: Interaction between stress and coping for inner-city adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16(4), 372–395, doi: 10.1177/0743558401164005.
Grusec, J. E. (2011). Socialization processes in the family: Social and emotional development. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 243–269, doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131650.
Halpern, D., & Katz, J. E. (2017). Texting’s consequences for romantic relationships: A cross-lagged analysis highlights its risks. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 386–394, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.051.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
Jackson, L. A., Witt, E. A., Fitzgerald, H. E., Von Eye, A., & Zhao, Y. (2011). Perceptions of parent behavior and children’s information technology use. In T. Bastiaens & M. Ebner (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2011–World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 3864–3869). Lisbon, Portugal: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kildare, C. A., & Middlemiss, W. (2017). Impact of parents mobile device use on parent-child interaction: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 579–593, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.003.
Kim, S. Y., Chen, Q., Wang, Y. J., Shen, Y. S., & Orozco-Lapray, D. (2013). Longitudinal linkages among parent-child acculturation discrepancy, parenting, parent-child sense of alienation, and adolescent adjustment in Chinese immigrant families. Developmental Psychology, 49(5), 900–912, doi: 10.1037/a0029169.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
Lei, L., & Wu, Y. (2007). Adolescents’ paternal attachment and Internet use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(5), 633–639.
Lewis, K. M., Byrd, D. A., & Ollendick, T. H. (2012). Anxiety symptoms in African-American and Caucasian youth: Relations to negative life events, social support, and coping. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26(1), 32–39, doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.08.007.
Liu, R. D., Hong, W., Ding, Y., Oei, T. P., Zhen, R., Jiang, S. Y., & Liu, J. X. (2019). Psychological distress and problematic mobile phone use among adolescents: The mediating role of maladaptive cognitions and the moderating role of effortful control. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1589, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01589.
Mann, S. J. (2001). Alternative perspectives on the student experience: Alienation and engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 7–19, doi: 10.1080/03075070020030689.
McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85–98, doi: 10.1037/ppm0000065.
Nickerson, A. B., & Nagle, R. J. (2004). The influence of parent and peer attachments on life satisfaction in middle childhood and early adolescence. Social Indicators Research, 66(1), 35–60.
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227, doi: 10.1080/00273170701341316.
Radesky, J., Miller, A. L., Rosenblum, K. L., Appugliese, D., Kaciroti, N., & Lumeng, J. C. (2015). Maternal mobile device use during a structured parent-child interaction task. Academic Pediatrics, 15(2), 238–244, doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.10.001.
Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134–141, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058.
Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2017). Put down your phone and listen to me: How boss phubbing undermines the psychological conditions necessary for employee engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 206–217, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.021.
Rosenthal, N. L., & Kobak, R. (2010). Assessing adolescents’ attachment hierarchies: Differences across developmental periods and associations with individual adaptation. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(3), 678–706, doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00655.x.
Sandhu, D., & Tung, S. (2004). Contributions of family environment and identity formation towards adolescents’ alienation. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 19(1–2), 1–14.
Scarpa, A., & Haden, S. C. (2006). Community violence victimization and aggressive behavior: The moderating effects of coping and social support. Aggressive Behavior, 32(5), 502–515, doi: 10.1002/ab.20151.
Steiner-Adair, C., & Barker, T. H. (2013). The big disconnect: Protecting childhood and family relationships in the digital age. New York: Harper Business.
Stockdale, L. A., Coyne, S. M., & Padilla-Walker, L. M. (2018). Parent and child technoference and socioemotional behavioral outcomes: A nationally representative study of 10- to 20-year-old adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 219–226, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.034.
vanden Abeele, M. M. P., Antheunis, M. L., & Schouten, A. P. (2016). The effect of mobile messaging during a conversation on impression formation and interaction quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 562–569, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.005.
Vanderbilt-Adriance, E., & Shaw, D. S. (2008). Conceptualizing and re-evaluating resilience across levels of risk, time, and domains of competence. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11(1–2), 30–58.
Wang, C., Lee, M. K. O., & Hua, Z. S. (2015). A theory of social media dependence: Evidence from microblog users. Decision Support Systems, 69, 40–49, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2014.11.002.
Wang, M. Y., Xu, Q., & He, N. (2021). Perceived interparental conflict and problematic social media use among Chinese adolescents: The mediating roles of self-esteem and maladaptive cognition toward social network sites. Addictive Behaviors, 112, 106601, doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106601.
Xie, X. C., & Xie, J. L. (2020). Parental phubbing accelerates depression in late childhood and adolescence: A two-path model. Journal of Adolescence, 78, 43–52, doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.12.004.
Yoshida, K., & Busby, D. M. (2012). Intergenerational transmission effects on relationship satisfaction: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Family Issues, 33(2), 202–222, doi: 10.1177/0192513X11412883.

[1]	石鑫欣, 吴怡霏, 冯迎. 父母差别对待与青少年问题行为的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 644-650.
[2]	罗芮, 赵云燕, 何然, 王耘, 陈福美. 二孩家庭父母偏爱的特点及其与青少年抑郁的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 657-664.
[3]	王刚, 刘赛凤, 李琦琛, 文岱, 伍韫旖, 蒋波西, 李放. 父母忽视与青少年短视频过度使用的关系：正念和自我控制的中介机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 487-493.
[4]	李晓明, 刘小丹, 戴婷. 特质焦虑与青少年冒险行为的关系：基于双系统模型的机制探讨[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 529-535.
[5]	李永占. 情绪智力在身体自尊与进食障碍倾向间的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 570-576.
[6]	孙洪蕊, 柳铭心, 张兴利, 周晨浩, 刁雅欣, 包乃丽. 父亲和母亲自主支持的特点及其与青少年社会适应的关系：自尊的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 375-381.
[7]	张一林, 周姿言, 刘雨佳, 辛素飞. 无聊倾向对青少年网络成瘾的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 419-425.
[8]	邓林园, 杨梦茜, 杨雨萌, 周楠, 李蓓蕾. 父母自主支持、父母心理控制和青少年网络成瘾的关系：一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 190-196.
[9]	孙锦露, 刘海骅. 青少年校园欺凌行为量表编制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 255-260.
[10]	邓慧颖, 孔繁昌. 粗暴养育和青少年生命意义寻求的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 612-619.
[11]	贾晓珊, 朱海东. 社会经济地位与儿童青少年心理健康关系的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 671-678.
[12]	刘拓, 陈雪明, 芦旭蓉, 杨莹. 父母积极教养方式对中学生应对方式的影响：社会支持、自我效能感的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 507-514.
[13]	彭顺, 胡祥恩. 大学生压力与疲劳的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 563-570.
[14]	刘艾祎, 伍新春. 创伤后应激障碍对震后青少年反社会行为的影响：复原力的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 244-251.
[15]	刘啸莳. 母亲受教育水平和青少年学业自尊的关系：母亲教养方式的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 59-65.