大学生人格与手机依赖的关系：压力感知的中介与性别的调节作用

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.03.020

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨压力感知在大学生人格与手机依赖关系中的中介作用以及性别在压力感知和手机依赖之间的调节作用，本研究采用青少年有问题手机使用自评问卷、中国大五人格问卷简版和大学生压力量表对1478名大学生施测。结果发现，神经质、开放性正向预测大学生的压力感知和手机依赖；宜人性负向预测压力感知和手机依赖；压力感知在神经质、宜人性、开放性影响手机依赖间起中介效应；性别调节神经质−压力感知−手机依赖这一中介效应的后半段路径。结果表明，降低压力感知水平可减少神经质大学生的手机依赖，且这一影响对男生更显著。

关键词: 人格, 手机依赖, 压力感知, 性别, 大学生

Abstract: This study aimed to explore the mediating role of stress perception between college students’ personality and mobile phone addiction as well as the moderating effect of gender on stress perception and mobile phone addiction. A total of 1478 college students were tested by using the Chinese Big Five Personality Inventory, Self-Rating Questionnaire for Adolescent Problematic Mobile Phone Use and Stress Scale for College Students. The results showed that neuroticism and openness positively but agreeableness negatively predicted college students’ stress perception and mobile phone addiction. Importantly, stress perception had a mediating effect on neuroticism, agreeableness, and openness influencing mobile phone addiction. Furthermore, gender moderated the mediation between neuroticism and mobile phone addiction through the latter pathway from stress perception to mobile phone addiction. These results indicate that reducing stress perception can decrease the mobile phone addiction of neurotic college students, which is more significant for male college students.

Key words: personality traits, mobile phone dependence, stress perception, gender, college students

中图分类号:

B849

尹静, 李传英, 马世超, 徐瑜姣, 李永升. 大学生人格与手机依赖的关系：压力感知的中介与性别的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 426-432.

YIN Jing, LI Chuanying, MA Shichao, XU Yujiao, LI Yongsheng. The Relationship Between Personality and Mobile Phone Dependence in College Students: Stress Perception as a Mediator and Gender as a Moderator[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(3): 426-432.

参考文献

戴维?巴斯. (2015). 进化心理学: 心理的新科学 (张勇, 蒋柯译). 北京: 商务印书馆.
黄海, 余莉, 郭诗卉. (2013). 大学生手机依赖与大五人格的关系. 中国学校卫生, 34(4), 414–416, 419.
理查德?拉扎勒斯, 苏珊?福尔克曼. (2020). 压力: 评价与应对 (曲晓艳译). 北京: 中国人民大学出版社.
李虹, 梅锦荣. (2002). 大学生压力量表的编制. 应用心理学, 8(1), 27–32
刘金平, 韩菁, 刘亚丽. (2008). 青少年冒险行为及其与人格、依恋的关系. 心理学探新, 28(3), 77–81
刘鹏. (2014). 大学生手机依赖与社会支持及人格特质的关系研究 (硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉.
刘世奎. (1991). 归因理论的历史、现状及发展趋势. 心理学探新, (4), 1–3
孙玮玮, 胡瑜. (2018). 大学生手机依赖倾向与人格特点和社会支持的关系. 中国心理卫生杂志, 32(5), 425–431
陶婧, 程志元, 方金勇, 陶德刚, 王芸, 翟翌, … 陈阳. (2021). 留守儿童的人格特质与心理健康问题: 留守类型的调节作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 29(12), 1878–1883
陶舒曼, 付继玲, 王惠, 郝加虎, 陶芳标. (2013). 青少年手机使用依赖自评问卷编制及其在大学生中的应用. 中国学校卫生, 34(1), 26–29
王欢, 黄海, 吴和鸣. (2014). 大学生人格特征与手机依赖的关系: 社交焦虑的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 22(3), 447–450
王慧慧, 王孟成, 吴胜齐. (2015). 不同手机成瘾类型对大学生人际关系和孤独感的影响——基于潜剖面分析的结果. 中国临床心理学杂志, 23(5), 881–885
王孟成, 戴晓阳, 姚树桥. (2011). 中国大五人格问卷的初步编制Ⅲ: 简式版的制定及信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 19(4), 454–457
谢灿杰. (2017). 大学生人格、社交焦虑与手机依赖的关系研究 (硕士学位论文). 哈尔滨工程大学.
杨海波, 杨世欣. (2022). 压力与中小学教师问题性手机的关系: 健康焦虑和反刍思维的作用. 天津师范大学学报(社会科学版), (1), 77–83.
曾练平, 田丹丹, 黄亚夫, 赵守盈. (2021). 中小学教师人格类型及其对工作家庭平衡与工作绩效关系的调节作用. 心理与行为研究, 19(2), 280–286
詹启生, 许俊. (2020). 自我隐瞒与大学生手机成瘾的关系: 反向自尊和心理压力的中介作用. 中国特殊教育, (2), 91–96
张建育, 梁浚彬. (2019). 大学生人格特质与手机依赖的关系: 社会支持的中介作用. 赣南师范大学学报, 40(2), 124–129
张亚利, 李森, 俞国良. (2020). 孤独感和手机成瘾的关系: 一项元分析. 心理科学进展, 28(11), 1836–1852
中国互联网络信息中心. (2020). 第46次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告. 2021-01-24 取自 http://www.cnnic.net.cn/gywm/xwzx/rdxw/202009/t20200929_71255.htm
Abbasi, I. S. (2016). The role of neuroticism in the maintenance of chronic baseline stress perception and negative affect. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19, e9, doi: 10.1017/sjp.2016.7.
Arpaci, I., & Unver, T. K. (2020). Moderating role of gender in the relationship between big five personality traits and smartphone addiction. Psychiatric Quarterly, 91(2), 577–585, doi: 10.1007/s11126-020-09718-5.
Balo?lu, M., Kozan, H. ?. ?., & Kesici, ?. (2018). Gender differences in and the relationships between social anxiety and problematic internet use: Canonical analysis. Journal of medical Internet Research, 20(1), e8947, doi: 10.2196/jmir.8947.
Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354–364, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354.
Bianchi, A., & Phillips, J. G. (2005). Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8(1), 39–51, doi: 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.39.
Borjalilu, S., Mohammadi, A., & Mojtahedzadeh, R. (2015). Sources and severity of perceived stress among Iranian medical students. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 17(10), e17767, doi: 10.5812/ircmj.17767.
Britton, D., Kavanagh, E., & Polman, R. (2017). The perceived stress reactivity scale for adolescent athletes. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 301–308, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.008.
Busch, P. A., & McCarthy, S. (2021). Antecedents and consequences of problematic smartphone use: A systematic literature review of an emerging research area. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106414, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106414.
Ellis, L. (2006). Gender differences in smiling: An evolutionary neuroandrogenic theory. Physiology & Behavior, 88(4?5), 303–308, doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.03.034.
Geser, H. (2006). Are girls (even) more addicted? Some gender patterns of cell phone usage. Retrieved March 19, 2021, from https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-327002
Goeders, N. E. (2003). The impact of stress on addiction. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 13(6), 435–441, doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2003.08.004.
Handa, R. J., & Chung, W. C. J. (2019). Gender and stress. In Stress: Physiology, biochemistry, and pathology (pp. 165–176). Cambridge: Academic Press, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-813146-6.00014-X.
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
Horwood, S., & Anglim, J. (2019). Problematic smartphone usage and subjective and psychological well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 44–50, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.028.
Jenaro, C., Flores, N., & Arias, B. (2007). Burnout and coping in human service practitioners. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(1), 80–87, doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.38.1.80.
Jeong, S. H., Kim, H., Yum, J. Y., & Hwang, Y. (2016). What type of content are smartphone users addicted to?: SNS vs. games. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 10–17, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.035.
Judge, T. A., & Zapata, C. P. (2015). The person-situation debate revisited: Effect of situation strength and trait activation on the validity of the Big Five personality traits in predicting job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), 1149–1179, doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0837.
Kardefelt-Winther, D. (2014). A conceptual and methodological critique of internet addiction research: Towards a model of compensatory internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 351–354, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.059.
Kural, A. I., & Özyurt, B. (2021). Why some students adjust easily while others can not? Stress and adjustment to university: Personality as moderator. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, doi: 10.1177/15210251211002179.
Leger, K. A., Charles, S. T., Turiano, N. A., & Almeida, D. M. (2016). Personality and stressor-related affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(6), 917–928, doi: 10.1037/pspp0000083.
Leung, L. (2008). Linking psychological attributes to addiction and improper use of the mobile phone among adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Children and Media, 2(2), 93–113, doi: 10.1080/17482790802078565.
Li, H. H., Wang, J. Q., & Wang, L. (2009). A survey on the generalized problematic internet use in Chinese college students and its relations to stressful life events and coping style. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7(2), 333–346, doi: 10.1007/s11469-008-9162-4.
Lundberg, U. (2002). Psychophysiology of work: Stress, gender, endocrine response, and work-related upper extremity disorders. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 41(5), 383–392, doi: 10.1002/ajim.10038.
Montag, C., Wegmann, E., Sariyska, R., Demetrovics, Z., & Brand, M. (2021). How to overcome taxonomical problems in the study of Internet use disorders and what to do with “smartphone addiction”. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 9(4), 908–914, doi: 10.1556/2006.8.2019.59.
Ormel, J., & Wohlfarth, T. (1991). How neuroticism, long-term difficulties, and life situation change influence psychological distress: A longitudinal model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5), 744–755, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.744.
Pearson, C., & Hussain, Z. (2016). Smartphone addiction and associated psychological factors. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 3(2), 193–207, doi: 10.15805/addicta.2016.3.0103.
Pengpid, S., & Peltzer, K. (2018). Vigorous physical activity, perceived stress, sleep and mental health among university students from 23 low-and middle-income countries. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 32(2), 2017116, doi: 10.1515/ijamh-2017-0116.
Soliemanifar, O., Soleymanifar, A., & Afrisham, R. (2018). Relationship between personality and biological reactivity to stress: A review. Psychiatry Investigation, 15(12), 1100–1114, doi: 10.30773/pi.2018.10.14.2.
Ursin, H., & Eriksen, H. R. (2004). The cognitive activation theory of stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29(5), 567–592, doi: 10.1016/s0306-4530(03)00091-x.
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Bolle, C. L., Hegner, S. M., & Kommers, P. A. M. (2015). Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior: The role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age, and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 411–420, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.039.
Varghese, R., Norman, T. S., & Thavaraj, S. (2015). Perceived stress and self efficacy among college students: A global review. International Journal of Human Resource Management and Research, 5(3), 15–24, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2703908.
Whang, L. S. M., Lee, S., & Chang, G. (2003). Internet over-users’ psychological profiles: A behavior sampling analysis on internet addiction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6(2), 143–150, doi: 10.1089/109493103321640338.
Wilson, V., Guenther, A., ?verli, ?., Seltmann, M. W., & Altschul, D. (2019). Future directions for personality research: Contributing new insights to the understanding of animal behavior. Animals, 9(5), 240, doi: 10.3390/ani9050240.
Winstok, Z., & Weinberg, M. (2018). From posttrauma to gender and back: A gender motivation theory-explanation of gender differences in trauma exposure, symptoms, diagnosis, and implications. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 27(9), 959–982, doi: 10.1080/10926771.2017.1420719.

[1]	张鹏程, 李喜, 桑宇杰, 陈宁. 神经质人格对中小学生抑郁的影响：班级环境的跨层调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 637-643.
[2]	程刚, 邹燕, 余玮, 丁芳媛, 贾云丞. 入学过渡期高中新生大五人格与主观社会地位变化轨迹的关系：基于潜变量增长模型的分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 692-699.
[3]	李甜甜, 徐鹤文. 大学生自我概念清晰性与社交焦虑的关系：多重中介效应分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 700-706.
[4]	郝喜玲, 陈煊, 刘依冉. 失败恐惧对大学生失败学习的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 707-713.
[5]	刘建榕, 谢林君, 郑琳. 社会性发展迟滞大学生的情绪韵律识别特点[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 714-720.
[6]	鲍旭辉, 黄杰, 李娜, 李健军, 李亚红. 主动性人格对学习投入的影响：领悟社会支持和积极情绪的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 508-514.
[7]	李娇娇, 刘晓冰, 裴丹丹, 徐碧波, 尹锡杨. 情绪智力对大学生恶意创造力的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 563-569.
[8]	张硕, 蔡雪斌, 邓旭阳, 赵馨. 青少年家庭功能与心理复原力的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 204-211.
[9]	岳鹏飞, 胡文丽, 张嘉鑫, 史梦梦. 粗暴养育与中学生学习投入：状态焦虑与性别的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 226-232.
[10]	孙云瑞, 韩映虹, 吕勇, 刘芳. 人格对幼儿白谎行为的影响：“冷”“热”执行功能的并行中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 240-247.
[11]	李启明, 王纪婷. 家庭氛围、子女生活满意度与心理健康代际传递的关系：亲子性别和子女年龄的差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 282-288.
[12]	姜琨, 兰泽波, 孙晓铜, 丁晓辉, 陶佳雨. 听障大学生社会支持对学业自我效能感的影响：心理韧性的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 96-100.
[13]	熊思成, 张斌, 姜永志, 蒋怀滨, 陈芸. 手机成瘾流行率及其影响因素的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 802-808.
[14]	侯娟, 郑心怡, 王秀, 方晓义. 金钱与时间感受启动对择偶标准的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 838-844.
[15]	杨雪, 雷江华. 阅读能力对听障大学生语音编码的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 599-605.