感知父母婚姻冲突、亲子关系与青少年心理危机的关系：认知灵活性的中介作用

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.02.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本研究采用多项式回归和响应面分析技术综合考察感知父母婚姻冲突、亲子关系与青少年心理危机的关系，及认知灵活性在其间的中介作用。结果显示：(1)感知父母婚姻冲突和亲子关系的综合作用可以显著预测青少年的抑郁和非自杀性自伤行为。(2)当感知父母婚姻冲突和亲子关系一致时，相较低亲子关系−高感知父母婚姻冲突，高亲子关系−低感知父母婚姻冲突的个体具有更高的认知灵活性，进而降低了抑郁和非自杀性自伤行为的发生风险。(3)当感知父母婚姻冲突和亲子关系不一致时，相较低亲子关系−低感知父母婚姻冲突，高亲子关系−高感知父母婚姻冲突的个体具有更低的认知灵活性，从而增加了抑郁和非自杀性自伤行为的发生风险。

关键词: 感知父母婚姻冲突, 亲子关系, 认知灵活性, 青少年心理危机, 响应面分析

Abstract:

The study investigated the combined influence of perceived interparental conflict and parent-child relationship interactions on adolescent psychological crises, also considering the mediating role of cognitive flexibility. The results showed that: 1) The combination of perceived interparental conflict and parent-child relationship significantly predicted adolescent depression and non-suicidal self-injury. 2) If the perceived interparental conflict and parent-child relationship were congruent, compared to adolescents with low parent-child relationship and high perceived interparental conflict, those with high parent-child relationship and low perceived interparental conflict demonstrated higher levels of cognitive flexibility, thereby reducing the risk of depression and non-suicidal self-injury. 3) If the perceived interparental conflict and parent-child relationship were incongruent, compared to adolescents with a low parent-child relationship and low perceived interparental conflict, individuals with high parent-child relationship and high perceived interparental conflict showed lower levels of cognitive flexibility, thus elevating the risk of depression and non-suicidal self-injury.

Key words: perceived interparental conflict, parent-child relationship, cognitive flexibility, adolescent psychological crisis, response surface analysis

赵海燕, 周爱保, 迟海霞, 白红敏, 叶长春, 蒋彦妮. 感知父母婚姻冲突、亲子关系与青少年心理危机的关系：认知灵活性的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(2): 227-233.

Haiyan ZHAO, Aibao ZHOU, Haixia CHI, Hongmin BAI, Changchun YE, Yanni JIANG. The Connection Between Perceived Interparental Conflict, Parent-Child Relationship and Adolescent Psychological Crisis: The Mediation of Cognitive Flexibility[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(2): 227-233.

图/表 6

参考文献 0

	池丽萍, 辛自强. 儿童对婚姻冲突的感知量表修订. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2003, 17 (8): 554- 556.
	范航, 朱转, 苗灵童, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突对青少年抑郁情绪的影响: 一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34 (4): 481- 488.
	高雯, 王玉红, 方臻, 刘明艳. 亲子三角关系和心理韧性在父母冲突与青少年问题行为之间的作用: 一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35 (6): 729- 739.
	胡胜利. 中学生SCL-90评定结果分析及其常模的建立. 心理与行为研究, 2006, 4 (2): 114- 119.
	黄春晖, 唐义诚, 王利刚, 谢东杰, 樊春雷, 高文斌. 青少年执行功能量表的编制. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 2014, 23 (5): 463- 465. DOI
	刘慧瀛, 赵心萌, 杨静怡, 刘雨姗, 赵悦茗, 张磊. 初中生羞怯与非自杀性自伤: 同伴侵害及敌意归因的作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2023, 31 (5): 1097- 1101, 1161.
	刘志军, 陈继为. 父母“低头行为”对青少年网络欺负和受欺负的影响: 亲子亲密感和内化问题的链式中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21 (1): 79- 85.
	万宇辉, 刘婉, 郝加虎, 陶芳标. 青少年非自杀性自伤行为评定问卷的编制及其信效度评价. 中国学校卫生, 2018, 39 (2): 170- 173.
	王湃, 刘爱书. 童年期心理虐待对抑郁的影响: 认知灵活性的中介作用. 中国特殊教育, 2017, (3): 84- 90, 96.
	王颖, 朱海东, 张馨艺, 肖沿. 学龄前留守儿童亲子依恋对执行功能的影响: 祖孙依恋的调节作用和中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38 (2): 195- 206.
	王征宇. 症状自评量表(SCL-90). 上海精神医学, 1984, (2): 68- 70.
	薛胜平, 范文翼, 江景华, 吴柔, 段雅芳. 中学生羞怯与执行功能关系的网络分析. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2023, 37 (7): 590- 595.
	张锦涛, 刘勤学, 邓林园, 方晓义, 刘朝莹, 兰菁. 青少年亲子关系与网络成瘾: 孤独感的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27 (6): 641- 647.
	Beck, A. T., & Bredemeier, K. A unified model of depression: Integrating clinical, cognitive, biological, and evolutionary perspectives. Clinical Psychological Science, 2016, 4 (4): 596- 619. DOI
	Becker, M., & Correll, C. U. Suicidality in childhood and adolescence. Deutsches Arzteblatt International, 2020, 117 (15): 261- 267.
	Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. Nature-nuture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 1994, 101 (4): 568- 586. DOI
	Caouette, J. D., & Guyer, A. E. Cognitive distortions mediate depression and affective response to social acceptance and rejection. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2016, 190, 792- 799. DOI
	Chung, J. J., Heakes, M., & Kaufman, E. A. The role of cognitive flexibility in self-injurious thoughts and behaviors: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2024, 31 (1): 42- 56. DOI
	Collins, N. L. Working models of attachment: Implications for explanation, emotion, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 71 (4): 810- 832. DOI
	Cox, M. J., & Paley, B. Families as systems. Annual Review of Psychology, 1997, 48 (1): 243- 267. DOI
	Cox, M. J., & Paley, B. Understanding families as systems. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2003, 12 (5): 193- 196. DOI
	Crone, E. A., & Dahl, R. E. Understanding adolescence as a period of social-affective engagement and goal flexibility. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2012, 13 (9): 636- 650. DOI
	Davies, P. T., & Cummings, E. M. Marital conflict and child adjustment: An emotional security hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 1994, 116 (3): 387- 411. DOI
	Dykstra, V. W., Willoughby, T., & Evans, A. D. A longitudinal examination of the relation between lie-telling, secrecy, parent-child relationship quality, and depressive symptoms in late-childhood and adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2020, 49 (2): 438- 448. DOI
	Edwards, J. R., & Cable, D. M. The value of value congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009, 94 (3): 654- 677. DOI
	El-Sheikh, M., Tu, K. M., Erath, S. A., & Buckhalt, J. A. Family stress and adolescents’ cognitive functioning: Sleep as a protective factor. Journal of Family Psychology, 2014, 28 (6): 887- 896. DOI
	Erel, O., & Burman, B. Interrelatedness of marital relations and parent-child relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 1995, 118 (1): 108- 132. DOI
	Goschin, S., Briggs, J., Blanco-Lutzen, S., Cohen, L. J., & Galynker, I. Parental affectionless control and suicidality. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2013, 151 (1): 1- 6. DOI
	Gotlib, I. H., & Hammen, C. L. (2008). Handbook of depression (2nd ed.). New York: the Guilford Press.
	Gustafsson, H. C., Coffman, J. L., & Cox, M. J. Intimate partner violence, maternal sensitive parenting behaviors, and children’s executive functioning. Psychology of Violence, 2015, 5 (3): 266- 274. DOI
	Harold, G. T., Aitken, J. J., & Shelton, K. H. Inter-parental conflict and children’s academic attainment: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2007, 48 (12): 1223- 1232. DOI
	Horvath, C., & Lee, C. M. Review of Handbook of depression in children and adolescents. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 2009, 50 (1): 48- 49. DOI
	Human, L. J., Dirks, M. A., Delongis, A., & Chen, E. Congruence and incongruence in adolescents’ and parents’ perceptions of the family: Using response surface analysis to examine links with adolescents’ psychological adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2016, 45 (10): 2022- 2035. DOI
	Jouriles, E. N., Rosenfield, D., Mcdonald, R., & Mueller, V. Child involvement in interparental conflict and child adjustment problems: A longitudinal study of violent families. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2014, 42 (5): 693- 704. DOI
	Jugert, P., Eckstein, K., Beelmann, A., & Noack, P. Parents’ influence on the development of their children’s ethnic intergroup attitudes: A longitudinal analysis from middle childhood to early adolescence. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2016, 13 (2): 213- 230. DOI
	Mann, J. J., & Rizk, M. M. A brain-centric model of suicidal behavior. American Journal of Psychiatry, 2020, 177 (10): 902- 916. DOI
	Marko, M., & Riečanský, I. Sympathetic arousal, but not disturbed executive functioning, mediates the impairment of cognitive flexibility under stress. Cognition, 2018, 174, 94- 102. DOI
	Martin, M. M., Anderson, C. M., & Thweatt, K. S. Aggressive communication traits and their relationships with the Cognitive Flexibility Scale and the Communication Flexibility Scale. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1998, 13 (3): 531- 540.
	Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. Boosting attachment security to promote mental health, prosocial values, and inter-group tolerance. Psychological Inquiry, 2007, 18 (3): 139- 156. DOI
	Nock, M. K. Self-injury. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2010, 6, 339- 363. DOI
	Salk, R. H., Hyde, J. S., & Abramson, L. Y. Gender differences in depression in representative national samples: Meta-analyses of diagnoses and symptoms. Psychological Bulletin, 2017, 143 (8): 783- 822. DOI
	Sturge-Apple, M. L., Davies, P. T., Winter, M. A., Cummings, E. M., & Schermerhorn, A. Interparental conflict and children’s school adjustment: The explanatory role of children’s internal representations of interparental and parent-child relationships. Developmental Psychology, 2008, 44 (6): 1678- 1690. DOI
	Thapar, A., Collishaw, S., Pine, D. S., & Thapar, A. K. Depression in adolescence. The Lancet, 2012, 379 (9820): 1056- 1067. DOI
	Wang, Q. Q., & Liu, X. Peer victimization, depressive symptoms and non-suicidal self-injury behavior in Chinese migrant children: The roles of gender and stressful life events. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 2019, 12, 661- 673. DOI
	Wu, C. W., Chen, W. W., & Jen, C. H. Emotional intelligence and cognitive flexibility in the relationship between parenting and subjective well-being. Journal of Adult Development, 2021, 28 (2): 106- 115. DOI
	Xu, H. Q., Xiao, W., Xie, Y., Xu, S. J., Wan, Y. H., & Tao, F. B. Association of parent-child relationship quality and problematic mobile phone use with non-suicidal self-injury among adolescents. BMC Psychiatry, 2023, 23 (1): 304. DOI
	Yap, M. B. H., & Jorm, A. F. Parental factors associated with childhood anxiety, depression, and internalizing problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2015, 175, 424- 440. DOI
	Zhang, R. W., Li, D., Chen, F., Ewalds-Kvist, B. M., & Liu, S. H. Interparental conflict relative to suicidal ideation in Chinese adolescents: The roles of coping strategies and meaning in life. Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, 8, 239437.
	Zhou, J., Hu, F., Wu, J., Zou, Z. Y., Wang, Y. X., Peng, H. C., ... Ma, Y. H. Subjective well-being and family functioning among adolescents left behind by migrating parents in Jiangxi province, China. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2018, 31 (5): 382- 388.

变量	M±SD	1	2	3	4
1.抑郁	1.49±0.63
2.非自杀性自伤行为	1.59±4.86	0.40**
3.认知灵活性	2.39±0.47	−0.36**	−0.19**
4.感知父母婚姻冲突	1.64±0.76	0.32**	0.25**	−0.29**
5.亲子关系	3.29±0.97	−0.33**	−0.22**	0.19**	−0.38**

变量	M±SD	1	2	3	4
1.抑郁	1.49±0.63
2.非自杀性自伤行为	1.59±4.86	0.40**
3.认知灵活性	2.39±0.47	−0.36**	−0.19**
4.感知父母婚姻冲突	1.64±0.76	0.32**	0.25**	−0.29**
5.亲子关系	3.29±0.97	−0.33**	−0.22**	0.19**	−0.38**

模型		β	SE	△R²
模型1	亲子关系(b₁)	0.10***	0.02	0.09**
	感知父母婚姻冲突(b₂)	−0.25***	0.02
模型2	亲子关系(b₁)	0.11***	0.01	0.10**
	感知父母婚姻冲突(b₂)	−0.33***	0.02
	亲子关系平方(b₃)	0.05*	0.01
	亲子关系×感知父母婚姻冲突(b₄)	−0.06*	0.01
	感知父母婚姻冲突平方(b₅)	0.08*	0.01
X₁ = −X₂	a₁ = b₁+b₂	−0.23***	0.02
	a₂ = b₃+b₄+b₅	0.07	0.02
X₁ = X₂	a₃ = b₁ − b₂	0.44***	0.02
	a₄ = b₃ − b₄+b₅	0.20***	0.02

模型		β	SE	△R²
模型1	亲子关系(b₁)	0.10***	0.02	0.09**
	感知父母婚姻冲突(b₂)	−0.25***	0.02
模型2	亲子关系(b₁)	0.11***	0.01	0.10**
	感知父母婚姻冲突(b₂)	−0.33***	0.02
	亲子关系平方(b₃)	0.05*	0.01
	亲子关系×感知父母婚姻冲突(b₄)	−0.06*	0.01
	感知父母婚姻冲突平方(b₅)	0.08*	0.01
X₁ = −X₂	a₁ = b₁+b₂	−0.23***	0.02
	a₂ = b₃+b₄+b₅	0.07	0.02
X₁ = X₂	a₃ = b₁ − b₂	0.44***	0.02
	a₄ = b₃ − b₄+b₅	0.20***	0.02

结果变量	预测变量	R²	F	β	t	p	95%CI
抑郁	块变量	0.11	228.67	−0.33	−15.12	<0.01	[−0.37, −0.29]
认知灵活性	块变量	0.10	219.87	0.32	14.83	<0.01	[0.28, 0.37]
抑郁	块变量	0.18	204.88	−0.24	−10.77	<0.01	[−0.28, −0.19]
抑郁	认知灵活性	0.18	204.88	−0.28	−12.70	<0.01	[−0.32, −0.24]