大学生的恋爱宽恕:问卷编制与特点研究*

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为编制大学生恋爱宽恕问卷并对大学生恋爱宽恕的特点进行研究，采用自编初始问卷对上海某高校的213名在校大学生进行预测，利用完善后的正式问卷对上海和南京两地的556名在校大学生展开正式施测，通过项目分析、探索性因素分析、相关分析、信效度分析等方法对数据进行处理，并利用编制的问卷对大学生的恋爱宽恕特点进行研究。结果显示:(1)编制的《大学生恋爱宽恕问卷》包含报复、回避、宽恕和消极沉思四个维度，可以解释方差总变异的69.08%;(2)内部一致性系数、分半信度、重测信度、结构效度和外部效度均显示编制的问卷具有良好的信效度指标;(3)编制的问卷能够较好地契合宽恕的定义;(4)大学生恋爱宽恕存在性别差异，其中女大学生的宽恕倾向高于男生;(5)面对恋爱中的伤害，中国大学生更多地采用消极深思的应对方式，而较少采用报复的方式。可见，大学生恋爱宽恕问卷信效度均达到了测量学的要求，中国大学生的恋爱宽恕与西方有所不同。

关键词: 恋爱宽恕, 大学生, 问卷编制, 特点

Abstract: To develop the questionnaire and investigate the courtship forgiveness of college students, 213 college students from one university in Shanghai were collected in order to develop the questionnaire by the the initial questionnaire, then 556 colleges from Shanghai and Nanjing were collected to test the validity and reliability of the courtship forgiveness questionnaire. Then the questionnaire was used to investigate the courtship forgiveness of college students. The results showed: 1) the final courtship forgiveness of college students questionnaire have four sub-scale, those are retaliation, avoidance, rumination and forgiveness, which accounted for 69.08% of the total variance; 2) the tests of Cronbach ?, split half reliability, retest reliability, structure validity and external validity showed that the questionnaire has perfect validity and reliability; 3) the questionnaire fits the definition of forgiveness; 4) the female students level of courtship forgiveness is significant higher than male students; 5) in China, the college students prefer rumination to revenge in courtship hurt. The courtship forgiveness questionnaire of college students has good validity and reliability, and the courtship forgiveness of Chinese university students is different from western.

Key words: amative forgiveness, college students, develop the questionnaire, distinguishing feature

中图分类号:

B841.2

张田，傅宏. 大学生的恋爱宽恕:问卷编制与特点研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(2): 220-225.

Zhang Tian,Fu Hong. The Scale Development and Investigation of the Courtship Forgiveness for College Students[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2014, 12(2): 220-225.

参考文献

北京市教育委员会. (2011). 北京高校《大学生心理健康》课程教学大纲(征求意见稿). 现代教育报, http://www.modedu.com/ msg/info.php?InfoID=39352.
陆益龙. (2009). “门当户对”的婚姻会更稳吗?——匹配结构与离婚风险的实证分析. 人口研究, 33 (2), 81-91.
顾海根. (1999). 学校心理测量学. 南宁: 广西教育出版社.
陶小月. (2012). 大学生结束恋爱关系决策过程中感情与机会的作用研究. 硕士学位论文, 西南大学.
邱皓政. (2002). 量化研究与统计分析(第2版). 台北: 五南图书公司.
温济聪. (2012). “拇指运动”对异地恋女性大学生情感沟通造成的负面影响与原因初探——以杭州、沈阳地区8所高校异地恋女大学生为例. 浙江传媒学院学报, 19 (2), 14-19.
叶浩生. (2004). 文化模式及其对心理与行为的影响. 心理科学, 27, 1032-1036.
张登浩, 罗琴. (2011). 宽恕性与“大七”人格维度. 中国临床心理学杂志, 19, 100-102.
张田, 孙卉, 傅安球. (2012). 集体主义背景下的宽恕研究及其对心理治疗的启示. 心理科学进展, 20, 265-273.
Berry, J. W., & Worthington, E. L. J. (2001). Forgiveness, relationship quality, stress while imagining relationship events, and physical and mental health. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 447-455.
Enright, R. D., Gassin, E. A., & Wu, C. (1992). Forgiveness: A developmental view. Journal of Moral Education, 2, 99-114.
Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. (2002). Forgiveness in marriage: Implications for psychological aggression and constructive communication. Personal Relationships, 9, 239-251.
Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. R., & Davila, J. (2004). Forgiveness and conflict resolution in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 72-81.
Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. R., & Davila, J. (2007). Longitudinal Relations Between Forgiveness and Conflict Resolution in Marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 542-545.
Fincham, F. D., Hall, J. H., & Beach, S. R. H. (2005). Til lack of forgiveness doth us part: Forgiveness in marriage. In E. L. Worthington (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 207-226). New York: Routledge.
Guielford, J. P. (1965). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Hook, J. H., Worthington, E. L. Jr., & Utsey, S. O. (2009). Collectivism, forgiveness, and social harmony. The Counseling Psychologist, 37, 821-847.
Hui, E. K. P., & Chau, T. S. (2009). The impact of a forgiveness intervention with Hong Kong Chinese children hurt in interpersonal relationship. British Journal of Guidance & Counseling, 37, 141-156.
Huston, T. L. (2009). Whats love got to do with it? Why some marriages succeed and others fail. Personal Relationships, 16, 301-327.
McCullough, M. E. (2000). Forgiveness as human strength: Theory, measurement, and links to well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 43-55.
McCullough, M. E. (2001). Forgiveness: Who does it and how do they do it? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 194-197.
McCullough, M. E., & Hoyt, W. T. (2002). Transgression-related motivational dispositions: Personality substrates of forgiveness and their links to the Big Five. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1556-1573.
McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., et al. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586-1603.
Niehuis, S., Huston, T. L., & Rosenband, R. (2006). From courtship into marriage: A new developmental model and methodological critique. Journal of Family Communication, 6, 23-47.
Paleari, F. G., Regalia, C., & Fincham, F. D. (2009). Measuring offence-specific forgiveness in marriage: The marital offence-specific forgiveness scale (MOFS). Psychological Assessment, 21, 194-209.
Peggy, K., Wertheim, E. H., & Kornblum., J. (2008). Paths to interpersonal forgiveness: The roles of personality, disposition to forgive and contextual factors in predicting forgiveness following a specific offence. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 337-348.
Roberts, R. C. (1995). Forgivingness. American Philosophical Quarterly, 32, 289-306.
Rye, M. S., Loiacono, D. M., & Folck, C. D., et al. (2001). Evaluation of the psychometric properties of two forgiveness scales. Current Psychology: Develop, Learning, Personality, Social, 20, 260-277.
Rye, M. S., & Pargament, K. I. (2002). Forgiveness and romantic relationship in college: Can it heal the wounded heart. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 419-441.
Worthington, E. L., Jr. (Ed.). (2005). Handbook of forgiveness. New York: Brunner-Routledge.

[1]	李甜甜, 徐鹤文. 大学生自我概念清晰性与社交焦虑的关系：多重中介效应分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 700-706.
[2]	郝喜玲, 陈煊, 刘依冉. 失败恐惧对大学生失败学习的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 707-713.
[3]	刘建榕, 谢林君, 郑琳. 社会性发展迟滞大学生的情绪韵律识别特点[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 714-720.
[4]	李娇娇, 刘晓冰, 裴丹丹, 徐碧波, 尹锡杨. 情绪智力对大学生恶意创造力的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 563-569.
[5]	尹静, 李传英, 马世超, 徐瑜姣, 李永升. 大学生人格与手机依赖的关系：压力感知的中介与性别的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 426-432.
[6]	陆芳, 付淑英. 农村儿童社会性发展问卷的编制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 248-254.
[7]	姜琨, 兰泽波, 孙晓铜, 丁晓辉, 陶佳雨. 听障大学生社会支持对学业自我效能感的影响：心理韧性的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 96-100.
[8]	杨雪, 雷江华. 阅读能力对听障大学生语音编码的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 599-605.
[9]	朱莹莹, 马晓晴, 唐卓仪, 杨敏齐. 睡眠类型对大学生抑郁的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 657-664,694.
[10]	彭顺, 胡祥恩. 大学生压力与疲劳的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 563-570.
[11]	陈佩儀, 陈瑜, 杨雪岭. 中庸思维对大学生抑郁症状的影响机制：消极认知情绪调节策略的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 571-576.
[12]	彭丽仪, 胡义秋, 曾子豪, 詹林. 儿童期受虐经历对大学生抑郁的影响：神经质人格和MAOA基因rs3027407多态性的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 230-236.
[13]	闫广芬, 姜琨, 兰泽波, 丁晓辉. 听障大学生社会支持对适应的影响：心理韧性的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 252-257.
[14]	纪凌开, 刘华山, 李晨璐. 温水煮青蛙：专业认同对大学生抑郁的影响机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 833-838.
[15]	黄明明, 赵守盈. 述情障碍对大学生手机成瘾倾向的影响：孤独感与正念的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 686-692.

大学生的恋爱宽恕:问卷编制与特点研究^*

The Scale Development and Investigation of the Courtship Forgiveness for College Students

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价