Differential Order Loyalty Bias Effect: The Influence of Interpersonal Intimacy and Moral Value Initiation on Behavior and Moral Judgment

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.04.005

Studies of Psychology and Behavior ›› 2023, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (4): 464-470.DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.04.005

Differential Order Loyalty Bias Effect: The Influence of Interpersonal Intimacy and Moral Value Initiation on Behavior and Moral Judgment

Kepeng XU¹^,²^,³, Jiali CHEN¹^,³, Jiahong WU¹^,³^,⁴, Lingqian YANG¹^,³^,⁵, Qianqian OU¹^,³, Dongli LUO¹^,³, Shuyue ZHANG¹^,²^,³^,*()

1. Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541006
2. Guangxi College and University Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Applied Psychology, Guilin 541006
3. Ethnic Education Development Research Center of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guilin 541006
4. Shanghai International Studies University Bilingual School, Shanghai 200093
5. School of Education Science, Guangxi Minzu Normal University, Chongzuo 532200

Received:2022-09-15 Online:2023-07-20 Published:2023-07-20
Contact: Shuyue ZHANG

行为者的忠诚偏向效应：道德价值启动对道德行为及道德判断的影响

徐科朋¹^,²^,³, 陈佳莉¹^,³, 吴家虹¹^,³^,⁴, 杨凌倩¹^,³^,⁵, 欧倩倩¹^,³, 罗冬丽¹^,³, 张姝玥¹^,²^,³^,*()

1. 广西师范大学教育学部心理学系，桂林 541006
2. 广西高校认知神经科学与应用心理重点实验室，桂林 541006
3. 广西高校人文社会科学重点研究基地广西民族教育发展研究中心，桂林 541006
4. 上海市杨浦双语学校，上海 200093
5. 广西民族师范学院教育科学学院，崇左 532200

通讯作者: 张姝玥
基金资助:
广西自然科学基金(2021JA140666)；广西民族教育发展研究中心重点项目(2022MUZD002)；广西民族教育发展研究中心一般项目(2022MJYJS0014)

Abstract

Abstract:

Based on moral foundation theory, this research examined the loyalty bias effect in the process of moral behavior and judgment from the perspectives of observers and actors, and explored the actor-observer separation phenomenon of the loyalty bias effect. The result showed that when participants were actors, in intergroup competition situations, individual moral behaviors and judgments showed a loyalty bias effect, which was more likely to commit loyalty unfair behaviors for the benefit of the group, and gave more lenient moral judgments to this behavior; such effect was weakened by fair value initiation. When participants were observers, the loyalty bias effect disappeared, showing a separation of actors and observers.

Key words: loyalty, fairness, moral judgment, moral foundation theory

摘要：

基于道德基础理论，从行为者与观察者视角，考察道德行为与判断过程中的忠诚偏向效应，探讨忠诚偏向效应的行为者与观察者分离现象。研究发现，当个体是行为者时，在团体间竞争情境下，个体道德行为与判断出现忠诚偏向效应，更可能为团体利益做出忠诚不公平行为，对此行为给予更宽松的道德判断；公平价值启动会削弱这种效应；当个体作为观察者时，道德判断不存在忠诚偏向效应，表现出行为者和观察者的分离现象。

关键词: 忠诚, 公平, 道德判断, 道德基础理论

CLC Number:

B842

Kepeng XU, Jiali CHEN, Jiahong WU, Lingqian YANG, Qianqian OU, Dongli LUO, Shuyue ZHANG. Differential Order Loyalty Bias Effect: The Influence of Interpersonal Intimacy and Moral Value Initiation on Behavior and Moral Judgment[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(4): 464-470.

徐科朋, 陈佳莉, 吴家虹, 杨凌倩, 欧倩倩, 罗冬丽, 张姝玥. 行为者的忠诚偏向效应：道德价值启动对道德行为及道德判断的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(4): 464-470.

Figures/Tables 4

References

	郭婧, 吕厚超, 黄希庭, 陈小静. 自我服务偏向研究现状与展望. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19 (7): 1054- 1060.
	杨继平, 王兴超, 高玲. 道德推脱的概念、测量及相关变量. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18 (4): 671- 678.
	杨中芳. (1996). 如何研究中国人. 台北: 桂冠图书公司.
	Andrejević, M., Feuerriegel, D., Turner, W., Laham, S., & Bode, S.. Moral judgements of fairness-related actions are flexibly updated to account for contextual information. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10 (1): 17828. DOI
	Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., Schulz, J., Henrich, J., Shariff, A., … Rahwan, I.. The moral machine experiment. Nature, 2018, 563 (7729): 59- 64. DOI
	Bocian, K., Cichocka, A., & Wojciszke, B.. Moral tribalism: Moral judgments of actions supporting ingroup interests depend on collective narcissism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2021, 93, 104098. DOI
	Dmytro, D., Lo, J., O’Leary, J., Fu, G. Y., Lee, K., & Cameron, C. A.. Development of cultural perspectives on verbal deception in competitive contexts. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2014, 45 (8): 1196- 1214. DOI
	Fu, G. Y., Luo, Y. C., Heyman, G. D., Wang, B., Cameron, C. A., & Lee, K. (2016). Moral evaluations of lying for one’s own group. Infant and Child Development, 25(5), 355–370.
	Gneezy, U.. Deception: The role of consequences. American Economic Review, 2005, 95 (1): 384- 394. DOI
	Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H.. Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011, 101 (2): 366- 385. DOI
	Greene, J. D.. Dual-process morality and the personal/impersonal distinction: A reply to McGuire, Langdon, Coltheart, and Mackenzie. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2009, 45 (3): 581- 584. DOI
	Guzmán, R. A., Barbato, M. T., Sznycer, D., & Cosmides, L.. A moral trade-off system produces intuitive judgments that are rational and coherent and strike a balance between conflicting moral values. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022, 119 (42): e2214005119. DOI
	Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852–870). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
	Haidt, J.. The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 2007, 316 (5827): 998- 1002. DOI
	Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon.
	Hildreth, J. A. D., & Anderson, C.. Does loyalty trump honesty? Moral judgments of loyalty-driven deceit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2018, 79, 87- 94. DOI
	Hildreth, J. A. D., Gino, F., & Bazerman, M.. Blind loyalty? When group loyalty makes us see evil or engage in it. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2016, 132, 16- 36. DOI
	Hwang, K. K.. Filial piety and loyalty: Two types of social identification in Confucianism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1999, 2 (1): 163- 183. DOI
	Lau, Y. L., Cameron, C. A., Chieh, K. M., O’Leary, J., Fu, G. Y., & Lee, K.. Cultural differences in moral justifications enhance understanding of Chinese and Canadian children’s moral decisions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2013, 44 (3): 461- 477. DOI
	Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S.. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 1991, 98 (2): 224- 253. DOI
	Martin, R., Kusev, P., & van Schaik, P.. Autonomous vehicles: How perspective-taking accessibility alters moral judgments and consumer purchasing behavior. Cognition, 2021, 212, 104666. DOI
	Misch, A., Over, H., & Carpenter, M.. The whistleblower’s dilemma in young children: When loyalty trumps other moral concerns. Frontiers in Psychology, 2018, 9, 250. DOI
	Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M.. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 2002, 128 (1): 3- 72. DOI
	Pronin, E.. How we see ourselves and how we see others. Science, 2008, 320 (5880): e1154199.
	Renfro, C. L., Duran, A., Stephan, W. G., & Clason, D. L.. The role of threat in attitudes toward affirmative action and its beneficiaries. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2006, 36 (1): 41- 74. DOI
	Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., Gaertner, S. L., McDonald, S. A., & Lamoreaux, M. J. (2010). Does a common ingroup identity reduce intergroup threat? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13(4), 403–423.
	Roccas, S., & McCauley, C. (2004). Values and emotions in the relational models. In N. Haslam (Ed.), Relational models theory: A contemporary overview (pp. 263–285). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
	Watkins, H. M., & Goodwin, G. P.. A fundamental asymmetry in judgments of soldiers at war. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2020, 149 (3): 419- 444. DOI
	Watkins, H. M., & Laham, S.. The influence of war on moral judgments about harm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2019, 49 (3): 447- 460. DOI

	诚实行为	欺骗行为
团体间竞争	5.60±0.92	6.01±0.89
团体间不竞争	6.23±0.82	6.39±0.52

	诚实行为	欺骗行为
团体间竞争	5.60±0.92	6.01±0.89
团体间不竞争	6.23±0.82	6.39±0.52

	诚实行为	欺骗行为
团体间竞争	4.46±1.21	4.07±1.41
团体间不竞争	4.61±1.56	3.81±1.42

	诚实行为	欺骗行为
团体间竞争	4.46±1.21	4.07±1.41
团体间不竞争	4.61±1.56	3.81±1.42

	诚实行为	欺骗行为
公平条件	6.29±0.88	5.13±1.26
中性条件	5.54±0.95	6.02±0.87

Differential Order Loyalty Bias Effect: The Influence of Interpersonal Intimacy and Moral Value Initiation on Behavior and Moral Judgment

行为者的忠诚偏向效应：道德价值启动对道德行为及道德判断的影响

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 4

References

Related Articles 12

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	DING Fengqin, MA Xiaohong. The Influence of Clean Dirty Priming on Moral Judgment: Moderated Mediation Effect [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(2): 193-199.
[2]	XU Xiaohui, ZHANG Yaohua, XU Min, ZHANG Minghao. The Effects of Social Comparison on College Students’ Sense of Fairness: The Moderating Role of Subjective Social Status [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(2): 274-281.
[3]	QI Chunhui, ZHANG Zhen. The Effect of Honesty-Humility and Interpersonal Closeness on Fairness Norm Enforcement [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(3): 419-425.
[4]	XIE Xiaoming, HE Weijie, XIAO Qianguo. The Judgment of the Disadvantaged Moderates the Moral Judgment Under Different Semantic Priming of Moral Values [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(5): 644-649,693.
[5]	DING Qian, ZHOU Zong-kui, ZHANG Yong-xin, WEI Hua, XIONG Jie. The Relationship Between Customization, Flow Experience and Loyalty to Online Games: From the Perspective of Gamer [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(2): 261-265.
[6]	LIU Dan, ZHANG Jianxin, ZHANG Mingyan. Relationship between Discipline Inspector's Tolerance of Corruption and Organizational Loyalty [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(1): 130-138.
[7]	Wang Zhenzhen, Jiang Wenming. The Context-Dependency of Fairness Processing: Evidence from Behavior Study [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2016, 14(5): 600-604.
[8]	Li Zonglong, Hu Dongmei, Zhang Tangzheng. Effects of Price Framing on Consumers′ Perceptions of Online Dynamic Pricing and Willingness to Buy with Different Need for Cognitive Closure [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2016, 14(4): 537-543.
[9]	Dong Shenghong, Zheng Hailin, Wang Yan, Yu Qiaoling. 4 to 6 Years Old Children′s Fair Intention Development Research [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2016, 14(3): 325-330.
[10]	Chen Shiping, Bo Xin. The Influence of Unfairness and Punishment Price to the Demand of Third-party Punishment [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2016, 14(3): 372-376.
[11]	Zhou Xiaolin, Hu Jie, Peng Lu. The Neural Basis of the Effects of Social Contexts on Fairness Perception and Fairness-Related Behaviors [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2015, 13(5): 591-598.
[12]	Tian Lifa, Zhang Guanglei, Liang Chen. The Impact of Training and Incentive Practices on Cooperation Intention of Knowledge Workers: The Mediating Roles of Organizational Loyalty [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2014, 12(6): 851-856.