The Dynamic Effects of Retrieval-Induced Forgetting: Combined Influence of Retrieval and Restudy Cross-Mixing Practices

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.05.002

Abstract

Abstract:

Retrieval specificity studies of retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) have largely been limited to pure conditions, neglecting the effects of mixed practice of retrieval and restudy crossover on RIF. In this study, the adapted retrieval practice paradigm was used. Experiment 1 was designed to verify the dynamic effects of RIF by manipulating the practice condition in both pure and mixed ways. Experiment 2 was designed to explore the mechanism of RIF in mixed practice condition by means of the phenomenon of accelerated relearning after RIF through the operation of the combined mixed practice and relearning two manipulations. The results showed that: 1) only retrieval practice exhibited RIF in pure condition, and there was retrieval specificity in RIF; 2) restudy practice could exhibit RIF in mixed condition, and restudy practice showed RIF dynamic effects; 3) relearning could eliminate RIF, and the phenomenon of accelerated relearning after RIF was exhibited in mixed condition. The results indicate that restudy practice exhibits stable dynamic effects of RIF when switching from the pure condition to mixed condition, and that RIF is caused by inhibitory mechanism.

Key words: retrieval-induced forgetting, inhibitory theory, switch cost, dynamic effects, accelerated relearning after RIF

摘要：

提取诱发遗忘(retrieval-induced forgetting, RIF)的提取特定性研究主要局限于单一情境，忽视了提取与重学交叉混合练习对RIF的影响。本研究采用提取练习范式变式，实验1通过单一与混合两种方式操作练习情境，旨在验证RIF的动态效应；实验2通过联合混合练习与再学两种操作，旨在借助RIF加速再学现象探讨混合情境中RIF的形成机制。结果显示：(1)仅提取练习在单一情境中可以产生RIF，RIF存在提取特定性；(2)重学练习在混合情境中可以产生RIF，重学练习表现出RIF动态效应；(3)再学可消除RIF，混合情境中产生了RIF加速再学现象。结果表明，重学练习在由单一情境转变为混合情境时会产生稳定的RIF动态效应，且这种RIF是由抑制机制引起的。

关键词: 提取诱发遗忘, 抑制理论, 切换代价, 动态效应, RIF加速再学现象

CLC Number:

B842

Zhuo WANG, Xu LIU, Jia CAI, Zhirou CHEN. The Dynamic Effects of Retrieval-Induced Forgetting: Combined Influence of Retrieval and Restudy Cross-Mixing Practices[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(5): 585-591.

王卓, 刘旭, 蔡佳, 陈芷柔. 提取诱发遗忘的动态效应：提取与重学交叉混合练习的联合影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(5): 585-591.

Figures/Tables 6

References

	白学军, 刘旭. 项目竞争强度对老年人提取诱发遗忘的影响. 中国老年学杂志, 2013, 33 (11): 2481- 2484. DOI
	白学军, 刘旭. 项目强度与测试顺序对提取诱发遗忘的影响. 心理科学, 2014, 37 (5): 1140- 1147. DOI
	黄四林, 林崇德. 任务刺激的类型对任务切换的影响. 心理科学, 2010, 33 (6): 1334- 1337. DOI
	刘旭, 蔡佳, 崔喆, 宋美含, 王力. 项目竞争强度对网络成瘾大学生提取诱发遗忘的影响. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20 (1): 8- 14. DOI
	刘旭, 岳鹏飞, 白学军. 提取诱发遗忘中的相关代价与效益问题: 反应抑制能力与项目竞争强度的影响. 心理科学, 2019, 42 (5): 1039- 1046.
	刘兆敏, 罗良, 张玮. 记忆提取促进学习: 实验证据与机制解释. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27 (4): 441- 447.
	吴三美, 田良苏, 陈家侨, 陈广耀, 王敬欣. 中文阅读中无关言语效应的认知机制探究: 眼动证据. 心理学报, 2021, 53 (7): 729- 745.
	Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance 15: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
	Anderson, M. C., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A.. Retrieval-induced forgetting: Evidence for a recall-specific mechanism. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2000, 7 (3): 522- 530.
	Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1063–1087.
	Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.), Essays in honor of William K. Estes, Vol. 1. From learning theory to connectionist theory; Vol. 2. From learning processes to cognitive processes (pp. 35–67). Hillsdale, MI: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
	Campbell, J. I. D., & Phenix, T. L.. Target strength and retrieval-induced forgetting in semantic recall. Memory & Cognition, 2009, 37 (1): 65- 72.
	Dobler, I. M., Bäuml, K. H. T.. Retrieval-induced forgetting: Dynamic effects between retrieval and restudy trials when practice is mixed. Memory & Cognition, 2013, 41 (4): 547- 557.
	Glynn, R., Salmon, K., & Low, J.. It’s in the details: The role of selective discussion in forgetting of children’s autobiographical memories. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2018, 167, 117- 127. DOI
	Glynn, R., Salmon, K., & Low, J.. Short-and longer-term effects of selective discussion of adolescents’ autobiographical memories. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2019, 184, 232- 240. DOI
	Hulbert, J. C., & Anderson, M. C.. Does retrieving a memory insulate it against memory inhibition? A retroactive interference study. Memory, 2020, 28 (3): 293- 308. DOI
	Jeye, B. M., McCarthy, C. R., & Slotnick, S. D.. Long-term memory specificity depends on inhibition of related items. Memory, 2020, 28 (2): 261- 269. DOI
	Jonker, T. R., Seli, P., & MacLeod, C. M.. Less we forget: Retrieval cues and release from retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 2012, 40 (8): 1236- 1245.
	Kovacs, O., & Harris, I. M.. Retrieval-induced forgetting with novel visual stimuli is retrieval-specific and strength-independent. Memory, 2022, 30 (3): 330- 343. DOI
	McDermott, K. B.. Practicing retrieval facilitates learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 2021, 72, 609- 633. DOI
	Murayama, K., Miyatsu, T., Buchli, D., & Storm, B. C.. Forgetting as a consequence of retrieval: A meta-analytic review of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Bulletin, 2014, 140 (5): 1383- 1409. DOI
	Perfect, T. J., Stark, L. J., Tree, J. J., Moulin, C. J. A., Ahmed, L., & Hutter, R.. Transfer appropriate forgetting: The cue-dependent nature of retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 2004, 51 (3): 399- 417. DOI
	Storm, B. C., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2008). Accelerated relearning after retrieval-induced forgetting: The benefit of being forgotten. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(1), 230–236.
	Storm, B. C., & Soares, J. S.. Relearning can eliminate the effect of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Research, 2022, 86 (6): 1725- 1736. DOI
	Tempel, T., & Frings, C.. How motor practice shapes memory: Retrieval but not extra study can cause forgetting. Memory, 2016, 24 (7): 903- 915. DOI
	Tempel, T., & Frings, C.. Feedback increases benefits but not costs of retrieval practice: Retrieval-induced forgetting is strength independent. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2018, 25 (2): 636- 642.
	Wickens, C. D.. Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2002, 3 (2): 159- 177. DOI

情境	项目类型
情境	Rp–	Rs–	Nrp
单一(n=34)	60.78±21.67	70.10±15.77	71.57±16.68
混合(n=34)	67.16±17.16	60.29±22.85	73.04±18.36

情境	项目类型
情境	Rp–	Rs–	Nrp
单一(n=34)	60.78±21.67	70.10±15.77	71.57±16.68
混合(n=34)	67.16±17.16	60.29±22.85	73.04±18.36

情境	项目类型
情境	Rp–	Rs–	Nrp
无再学(n=30)	66.11±18.30	58.89±17.36	72.22±18.74
再学(n=30)	80.00±13.42	87.22±11.32	85.00±14.08

情境	项目类型
情境	Rp–	Rs–	Nrp
无再学(n=30)	66.11±18.30	58.89±17.36	72.22±18.74
再学(n=30)	80.00±13.42	87.22±11.32	85.00±14.08

[1]	Shaofeng YANG, Zhichao ZHANG, Ting JI. Inhibition or Interference? Evidence from the Retrieval Practice Paradigm [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(6): 753-759.
[2]	LIU Xu, CAI Jia, CUI Zhe, SONG Meihan, WANG Li. Effects of Item Competitive Intensity on Retrieval-Induced Forgetting in College Students with Internet Addiction [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(1): 8-14.
[3]	Huang Silin. THE EFFECT OF TYPE OF STIMULUS AND FOREKNOWLEDGE ON TASK SWITCHING [J]. , 2011, 9(3): 209-213.
[4]	Huang Silin,Lin Chongde. THEORETICAL CONTROVERSY AND INTEGRATION OF TASK SWITCHING RESEARCH [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2009, 7(4): 304-311.
[5]	dr.leili@china.com. THE EFFECT OF RETRIEVAL PRACTICE IN DIRECTED FORGETTING [J]. , 2009, 7(2): 87-92.