ENVY DISSOCIATION IN TWO DIFFERENT CONDITIONS: THE ADVANTAGE OF INDIRECT MEASURE

ENVY DISSOCIATION IN TWO DIFFERENT CONDITIONS: THE ADVANTAGE OF INDIRECT MEASURE

Yang Lixian；Yang Zhiliang

School of Education, Fujian Normal University；The School of Psychology and Cognitive Science， East China Normal University

Received:2010-08-10 Online:2011-12-20 Published:2011-12-20
Contact: Yang Zhiliang

两种条件下的妒忌分离：间接测量的优势

杨丽娴；杨治良

福建师范大学教育学院；华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院

通讯作者: 杨治良
作者简介:杨丽娴，女，福建师范大学教育学院讲师，博士；杨治良，男，华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院教授，博士生导师
基金资助:
福建省教育厅B类项目（JBS10061）和教育部人文社科青年基金项目（09YJCXLX002）

Abstract

Abstract: Previous researches related to envy have focused on self-reported measures. In this paper, we use direct measure and indirect measure to test envy(study 1), and then we also investigated the sensitivity(A′)and response bias(B″)in two conditions(study 2).

Key words: envy, direct measure, indirect measure, sensitivity, response bias.

摘要： 通过间接测量和直接测量考察被试的妒忌感受（实验1），并测量两种测量条件下被试的敏感性和反应偏向的分离（实验2）。结果发现：间接测量组的被试比直接测量组报告更多的妒忌感受，两种条件下被试所采用的判定标准没有变化，但间接测量中被试的敏感性高于直接测量，这说明两种测量测得了妒忌的不同层面，间接测量在测量妒忌的无意识方面更具优势；而两种条件下被试对于妒忌者都比被妒忌者要更为敏感，则表明了被试在无意识中对妒忌者更为偏好；两种条件下对于妒忌的评定均无性别差异。

关键词: 妒忌, 直接测量, 间接测量, 敏感性, 反应偏向

CLC Number:

B842.6

Yang Lixian；Yang Zhiliang. ENVY DISSOCIATION IN TWO DIFFERENT CONDITIONS: THE ADVANTAGE OF INDIRECT MEASURE[J]. .

杨丽娴；杨治良. 两种条件下的妒忌分离：间接测量的优势[J]. .

[1]	LI Tiantian, XU Hewen. Self-Concept Clarity and Social Anxiety: Analysis of the Multiple Mediating Effects [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(5): 700-706.
[2]	LI Xiaomei, JIANG Yingjie, YU Mingyang, YUAN Yuan, LIU Fangfang. Left-Behind Children’s Psychological Maltreatment and Aggressive Behavior: Chain Mediating Effect of Resilience and Interpersonal Sensitivity [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(3): 353-360.
[3]	WANG Jiangyang, WANG Mengge. The Relationship Between Rejection Sensitivity and Pathological Internet Use of Left-Behind Middle School Students: The Multiple Mediating Effects of Meaning in Life and Self-Stigma [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(2): 219-225.
[4]	ZENG Siyao, WANG Zhenhong. Revision of the Chinese Version of the Highly Sensitive Child Scale-Parent Report [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(1): 101-107.
[5]	YAO Chong, HUI Qi, WANG Yuan, XI Haisha, LUO Chaoliang. Research on the Relationship Between Social Support and Job Burnout of Government-Supported Normal Teachers [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 816-823.
[6]	SUN Hui, ZHANG Tian. The Effectiveness of Forgiveness Intervention to Decrease of Rejection Sensitivity: A Study Based on Left-Behind Children [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(1): 111-117.
[7]	CHEN Yunxiang, DENG Yanhe, LIU Xiangping. The Relationship Between College Students' Loving Status and Appearance-Based Rejection Sensitivity: The Mediating Role of Self-Perceived Attractiveness [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(1): 107-112.
[8]	ZENG Qing, ZHENG XiFu. The Time-course Difference of the Attention Paid by High Disgust Sensitivity and Low Disgust Sensitivity Individuals when Processing Different Emotional Pictures: An Event-related Potentials Study [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(6): 743-749.
[9]	YANG Lixian, LI Lingfang, ZHANG Jinkun. The Effect of Episode-Evoked Envy on Item-Method Directed Forgetting [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(3): 311-317.
[10]	GU Li, YANG Ruoxi, ZHOU Guangdong. The Effect of Reinforcement Sensitivity of Personality on Intimate Relationships: The Mediation Effect of Adult Attachment [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(4): 534-540.
[11]	HU Shengnan, CHENG Zhijuan, DOU Donghui, ZHANG Hongchuan, WENG Xuedong. The Influence of Other's Positive Emotion on Vicarious Self-control Restoration: The Moderation Effect of Interpersonal Sensitivity [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(1): 45-50.
[12]	Zhao Yang,Wang Lin,Shi Kan. The Relationship between Emotional Sensitivity, Collective Behavior Intention and Implementation Intention of Micro-blog Users [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2015, 13(1): 99-105.