An Eye Movement Study on Semantic Effect in PicturePicture Interference Paradigm

Studies of Psychology and Behavior ›› 2014, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2): 188-192.

• Orignal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles

An Eye Movement Study on Semantic Effect in PicturePicture Interference Paradigm

Qi Jianing¹,Ren Guiqin¹,Ren Yantao²,Meng Xue¹

1 School of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China;
2 China Criminal Police University, Shenyang 110035,China

Received:2013-10-25 Online:2014-10-24 Published:2014-03-20

图-图干扰范式中语义效应的眼动研究^*

齐佳凝¹，任桂琴¹，任延涛²，蒙雪¹

1 辽宁师范大学心理学院，大连 116029
2.中国刑事警察学院，沈阳 110035

通讯作者: 任桂琴，女，辽宁师范大学心理学院副教授，硕士生导师，博士。E-mail:renguiqin@126.com。
作者简介:齐佳凝，女，辽宁师范大学心理学院基础心理学专业研究生。
基金资助:
本研究得到国家自然科学基金项目(31100732),教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目(20112136120003)的资助。

Abstract

Abstract: A picturepicture interference paradigm was used to investigate the influence of interference pictures’ frequency and the semantic relation between interference pictures and target pictures on semantic judgment by tracking participants’ eye movements. The results showed that: 1) The main effect of semantic consistency was significant, and semantic consistency interference pictures had longer fixation time than semantic inconsistency interference pictures, confirming the semantic interference effect. This result was consistent with the Dell interactive activation model. 2) The main effect of vocabulary frequency of interference pictures naming was no significant. There was no frequency effect existing among interference items. This result challenged the lexical choice competition hypothesis

Key words: picture picture interference paradigm, semantic effects, word frequency, eye movements

摘要： 采用眼动方法，在图-图干扰范式中探讨了干扰图的频率和语义类型对语义判断的影响。结果发现:(1)语义一致性的主效应显著，与目标图语义一致的干扰图获得的注视时间长于与目标图语义不一致的干扰图，证实了语义干扰效应的存在，与Dell的交互激活模型相吻合。(2)干扰图命名的词汇频率主效应不显著，未发现显著的频率效应，对词汇选择竞争假设提出质疑。

关键词: 图-图干扰范式, 语义一致性, 词频, 眼动方法

CLC Number:

B842.5

Qi Jianing,Ren Guiqin,Ren Yantao,Meng Xue. An Eye Movement Study on Semantic Effect in PicturePicture Interference Paradigm[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2014, 12(2): 188-192.

齐佳凝，任桂琴，任延涛，蒙雪. 图-图干扰范式中语义效应的眼动研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(2): 188-192.

References

陈穗清, 张积家, 肖二平. (2011). 图-词干扰范式下汉语口吃者的语义编码. 心理学报, 43(9),1013-1025.
方燕红, 张积家. (2007). 图-词干扰范式下的语义效应. 心理科学进展, 15(5),781-787.
方燕红, 张积家. (2011). 图-词干扰范式下语义效应的理论及争论. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), (2),120-124.
刘礼明. (2009). 图-词干扰范式下的词频(或词的熟悉度)效应. 福建师范大学硕士论文.
舒华, 程元善, 张厚粲. (1989). 235个图形的命名一致性、熟悉性、表象一致性和视觉复杂性评定. 心理学报, (4),389-396.
张积家. (1992). 测量语义相似性的方法. 心理科学, (3),51-53.
张清芳, 杨玉芳. (2003). 言语产生中的词汇通达理论. 心理科学进展, 11(1), 6-11.
周晓林, 庄捷, 吴佳音, 杨大赫. (2003). 汉语词汇产生中音、形、义三种信息激活的时间进程. 心理学报, 35(6),712-718.
朱雪冰, 张清芳. (2011). 图画口语命名中的语义效应. 心理科学进展, 19, 1281-1292.
庄捷, 周晓林.(2003). 汉语词汇产生中语义、语音层次之间的交互作用. 心理学报, 35,300-308.
Caramazza, A., & Costa, A. (2000). The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: Does the response set matter? . Cognition, 75(2), B51-B64.
Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation model of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
La Heij, W. (1988). Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming. Memory and Cognition, 16 (5), 400-410.
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Antje, S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1),1-75.
Lupker, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory and Cognition, 7(6), 485-495.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
Roelofs, A. (1992). Spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42(1-3),107-142.

[1]	LI Shiyi, XIE Yanfeng, ZHAO Guang, BAI Xuejun. The Influence of Media Multitasking Experience on Implicit Memory in Different Attention Patterns [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(4): 433-440.
[2]	ZHANG Manman, HU Huilan, BIAN Han, LI Fang, ZHANG Zhichao, ZANG Chuanli. Word Frequency Effects in Fast and Slow Readers During Skilled Chinese Reading [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(3): 304-310.
[3]	KANG Lichao, LAN Zebo, HAN Yinghong. The Effect of Repeated Reading on the 4 to 5 Years Old Children’s Print Attention in Different Reading Styles [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(3): 368-374.
[4]	WU-REN Qimuge, ZHAO Aoxue, WANG Yuhan, ZHUANG Xiangling, MA Guojie. Visual Field Preference and Reference Strategy in Comparative Visual Search [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(2): 166-171.
[5]	SHEN Yinglun, MENG Zhu, LAN Zebo, WANG Yingchao, YAN Guoli. Repeated Reading of English Passage for Chinese College Students: An Eye-Tracking Study [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(4): 464-470.
[6]	Li Xin, Li Haichao, Liu Jingyao, Bai Xuejun. Effects of Reading Level and Reading Task on English Word Frequency: Evidence from Eye Movements for Chinese-English Bilinguals During English Reading [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(4): 455-461.
[7]	Chen Shunsen, Lin Caiyun, Ren Jie. Motion Features of Target Stimuli Modulate Smooth Pursuit Eye Movement of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(3): 392-399.
[8]	Wang Botao, Duan Haijun, Han Qin, Hu Weiping,. The Influence of Inter-Hemispheric Interaction on Creative Scientific Problem Finding Ability [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(2): 211-217.
[9]	Liu Zhifang, Wang Ruoyi, Zhang Zhijun, Liu Wei. Saccadic Targeting Based on Character and Word in Chinese Reading: Evidences from Disappearing Text [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2016, 14(1): 27-35.
[10]	Wang Lihong, Bai Xuejun, Yan Guoli. An Aging Study on the Perceptual Span in Reading Chinese：Evidence from Eye Movements [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2014, 12(6): 763-768.
[11]	Guo Zhiying, Bai Xuejun, Gu Li, Wang Yongsheng, Wang Lihong. Effect of Word Segmentation on Japanese-Chinese and Chinese-Japanese Bilinguals′ Japanese Reading：Evidence from Eye Movements [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2014, 12(6): 775-781.
[12]	Zhang Qiaoming, Cui Lei. Development of Preview Effects on Different Type Words during Elementary School Years in Chinese Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2014, 12(5): 645-651.
[13]	Zhang Binyi,Ding Jinhong. The Study of Eye Movements in Features Process During Multiple Object Tracking [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2014, 12(3): 304-309.
[14]	Liu Zhifang,Liu Nina,Tong Wen. The Role of character and/or Word Recognition in the Eye Movement Control for Chinese reading:Evidences from Disappearing Text [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2014, 12(2): 182-187.
[15]	Yu Lili,Yan Guoli. The Application of Eye Movements in Sentence Comprehension [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2014, 12(2): 266-276.

An Eye Movement Study on Semantic Effect in PicturePicture Interference Paradigm

图-图干扰范式中语义效应的眼动研究^*

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

An Eye Movement Study on Semantic Effect in PicturePicture Interference Paradigm

图-图干扰范式中语义效应的眼动研究*

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

图-图干扰范式中语义效应的眼动研究^*