Abstract: The study exams the role of memory in the occurrence and regulation of emotions and how cognition style and intervention to the contents of memory impact negative emotional level induced by negative stimulations, participants accept one of positive intervention, negative intervention and non-intervention. The results show that intervention type has a significant main impact on negative emotions, participants who accept positive intervention and non-intervention would lead to produce more lower level of negative emotions than those who accept negative intervention and the score difference of positive intervention and non-intervention is not significant. Cognition style, sex and intervention order have no significant impact on both positive and negative emotions. To sum up, intervention to the contents of memory influences emotional level. Accepting positive intervention can produce more lower negative emotional level than those who accept negative intervention, positive intervention to the contents of memory influences negative emotional level.

Key words: Emotional level, intervention type, negative stimulations, cognition style

摘要： 探讨记忆在情绪发生和调节中的作用,通过干预个体对负性刺激的记忆内容,研究了积极干预、消极干预和不干预三组被试在接受负性刺激后产生的情绪水平差异,以及不同认知方式个体对诱发情绪的不同反应。结果表明,干预类型对负性刺激诱发的消极情绪产生了一定影响:积极干预组和不干预组在消极情绪后测上的得分显著低于消极干预组,积极干预组与不干预组的得分差异不显著。认知方式、性别及干预顺序对诱发情绪的影响不显著。结论:干预记忆内容可影响负性刺激诱发的消极情绪水平,接受积极干预比消极干预产生的消极情绪水平更低,因此对记忆内容的积极干预可有效降低产生的消极情绪水平。

关键词: 情绪水平, 干预类型, 负性刺激, 认知方式