Development of Ingroup and Outgroup Favouritism from Social Identity Theory Perspective

Abstract

Abstract: Ingroup and outgroup favouritism was a common phenomenon in intergroup relations, in this paper, the evolution process and empirical studies of Ingroup and outgroup favouritism research was reviewed, and from the perspective of social identity theory to interpret the phenomenon of intergroup preference. Although there were more than one theories that could explain the phenomenon of intergroup favoritism, the social identity theory was more comprehensive that it could explain both Ingroup favouritism and outgroup favouritism. Therefore, this paper discussed ingroup and outgroup favouritism in the angle of social identity theory.

Key words: ingroup favouritism, outgroup favouritism, social identity theory.

摘要： 群际偏爱是在群体内或群体间产生的，在评价上和行为上表现出对某个群体明显偏好的倾向。内外群体偏爱是群际关系中的一个普遍现象，本文对内外群体偏爱的实证研究演变过程进行了探讨，并从社会认同理论的角度对群际偏爱的相关现象进行解释。虽然有很多理论都可以解释群际偏爱的现象，但是社会认同理论是能够同时解释内群体偏爱和外群体偏爱的比较全面的理论，因此本文从社会认同理论的视角对群际偏爱进行探讨。

关键词: 内群体偏爱, 外群体偏爱, 社会认同理论。

CLC Number:

B849

Chen Shiping,Cui Xin. Development of Ingroup and Outgroup Favouritism from Social Identity Theory Perspective[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2015, 13(3): 422-427.

陈世平,崔鑫. 从社会认同理论视角看内外群体偏爱的发展^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(3): 422-427.

References

[1] 邓欣媚, 林佳, 曹敏莹, 黄玄凤.(2008). 内群偏私：自我锚定还是社会认同？. 社会心理科学, 23(5), 3-11.
[2] 李琼, 刘力.(2011). 低地位群体的外群体偏好. 心理科学进展, 19(7), 1061-1068.
[3] 连淑芳.(2005). 内-外群体偏爱的内隐效应实验研究. 心理科学, 28(1), 93-95.
[4] 刘华.(2008). 社会认同和内群体偏私的关系模型的实证研究. 陕西师范大学硕士论文.
[5] 彭嘉桦.(2007). 刻板印象内-外群体效应的实验研究. 华南师范大学硕士论文.
[6] 向玲, 赵玉芳.(2013). 使用加工分离程序对低地位群体内/外群体偏爱的研究. 心理科学, 36(3), 702-705.
[7] 严义娟, 佐斌.(2008). 外群体偏爱研究进展. 心理科学, 31(3), 671-674.
[8] 张建玲, 赵玉芳.(2012). 群际威胁与对内群体和外群体支持决策的关系研究. 西南大学学报（自然科学版）, 34(4), 152-156.
[9] 张莹瑞, 佐斌.(2006). 社会认同理论及其发展. 心理科学进展, 14(3), 475-480.
[10] Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A.(1998). Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and inter-group discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 317-334.
[11] Banks, W. C.(1976). White preference in Blacks: A paradigm in search of a phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 83(6), 1179-1186.
[12] Brewer, M. B.(2007). The importance of being we: Human nature and intergroup relations. American Psychologist, 62, 728-738.
[13] Dasgupta, N.(2004). Implicit ingroup favoritism, Outgroup favoritism, and behavioral manifestations. Source Social Justice Research, 17(2), 143-169.
[14] Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D.(1990). Social motivation, self-esteem and social identity. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social Identity Theory: Constructive and critical advances. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf. 28-47.
[15] Jost, J. T., & Burgess, D.(2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, (26), 293-305.
[16] Michael, A. H., & Kipling, D. W.(2000). From i to we: Social identity and the collective self. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4(1), 81-97.
[17] Norton, M. I., Vandello, J. A., & Darley, J. M.(2004). Casuistry and Social Category Bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 817-831.
[18] Reichl, A. J.(1997). Ingroup favouritism and outgroup favouritism in low status minimal groups: differential responses to status-related and status-unrelated measures. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 617-633.
[19] Rubin, M., & Hewstone, M.(2004). Social Identity, System Justification, and Social Dominance: Commentary on Reicher, Jost et al., and Sidanius et al. Political Psychology. 25(6), 823-844.
[20] Tajfel, H.(1979). Individuals and groups in social psychology. British Jonrnal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 183-190.
[21] Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.(1979). An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In J. A. Williams & S. Worchel(Eds.), The social psychology of inter-group relations. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. 33-47.
[22] Tajfel, H.(1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of inter-group relations. chapters1-3. London: Academic Press.