Repetition Blindness Effect of Korean-Chinese Cross-Language on Semantic Level

Abstract

Abstract: The study explored Repetition Blindness(RB)of intro-language and inter-language on semantic levels of Korean and Chinese words in two experiments. Method and results: Experiment 1 examined the RB on Korean words level of Korean-Chinese bilinguals. The result showed, it existed significantly RB effect in Korean word level. Experiment 2 examined the RB on Korean and Chinese word level by changing the language types of the interval words between two target words. The results show that the correct rate of Korean interval words was significant higher than Chinese. The correct rate of repeating semantic condition was significantly higher than the non-repeating semantic, and it appeared semantic repetition priming effect. Conclusions: 1)RB effect occurred in the Korean words, and not influenced by different languages. 2)The semantic repetition priming effect appeared on inter-languages(Korean and Chinese words), but not RB. It indicates that the orthographical representations were adopted separately and the semantic representations were shared when the bilinguals processed Korean and Chinese languages.

Key words: repetition blindness, Korean-Chinese bilingual, token individuation theory, semantic representation

摘要： 关于语义水平的重复知盲效应一直存在争论。本研究考察非平衡韩-汉双语者在语言内和语言间词义水平的RB效应。实验1采用韩语双字词为实验材料探究韩语语言内的RB效应，结果表明在韩语词汇水平存在RB效应。实验2采用两个关键词为韩语（R1）和汉语（R2）双字词，并通过韩-汉语间隔词W的语言类型变化探究韩、汉语言间的RB效应，结果表明：不同语言类型的间隔词的正确率有显著差异，语义重复词R2在重复条件的正确率显著高于非重复条件，出现语义重复启动效应。本研究结论是：（1）在韩语语言内词水平存在RB效应，具有语言类型普遍性；（2）韩、汉跨语言语义水平出现语义重复启动效应，而未发生RB效应，表明双语者在加工韩、汉两种语言时，采用分别形式表征和共享语义表征的方式。

关键词: 重复知盲效应, 韩-汉双语, 标记个体化理论, 语义表征。

CLC Number:

B842.5

Yoon HoYung, Li Chengcheng, Xiao Xuezhen, Wang Aiping. Repetition Blindness Effect of Korean-Chinese Cross-Language on Semantic Level[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2016, 14(2): 207-213.

Yoon HoYung,李程程,肖雪珍,王爱平. 韩-汉跨语言词义水平的重复知盲效应^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(2): 207-213.

References

李荣宝, 彭聃龄, 郭桃梅.(2003). 汉英语义通达过程的事件相关电位研究. 心理学报,(3), 309-316.
冷英, 陈旭莲.(2011). 汉字多音字加工过程中的重复知盲效应. 心理学报, 43(6), 1370-1379.
冷英, 何秀丽.(2012). 重复知盲效应产生的机制-来自汉语叠词加工的证据. 心理科学, 35(2), 299-303.
冷英, 卢家楣, 金丽, 潘发达, 陈燕, 沈永江.(2014). RSVP 任务下双刺激重复的优势与劣势. 心理学报, 46(3), 298-311.
刘皓明.(2005). 汉字重复知盲发生水平的研究. 硕士学位论文. 广州: 华南师范大学.
王爱平, 张厚粲.(2004). 关于RB效应加工水平的研究. 心理科学, 27(6), 1470-1472.
王爱平, 张厚粲.(2005). 汉字加工中呈现速率对重复知盲效应的影响. 心理科学, 28(4), 809-811.
王爱平, 张厚粲.(2006). 汉语句子加工中RB效应的研究. 心理科学, 29(4), 848-851.
夏依婷, 冷英, 陈燕, 王纪妹, 程晓荣,卢佳楣.(2012a). 重复刺激的末位优势效应. 心理学报, 44(6), 766-776.
夏依婷, 冷英, 陈燕, 王纪妹, 程晓荣,卢佳楣.(2012b). 汉语颠倒词加工中重复知盲发生的水平. 心理学报, 44(12), 1583-1595.
武悦, 王爱平.(2015). 汉字部件水平的重复知盲效应. 心理科学, 38(2), 296-302.
Altarriba, J., & Soltano, E. G.(1996). Repetition blindness and bilingual memory: Token individuation for translation equivalents. Memory and Cognition, 24(6), 700-711.
Bavelier, D.(1994). Repetition Blindness between visually different Items: the case of pictures and words. Cognition, 51(3), 199–236.
Bavelier, D., & Potter, M. C.(1991). Visual and phonological codes in repetition blindness. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29(6), 491.
Buffat, S., Plantier, J., Roumes, C., & Lorenceau, J.(2013). Repetition blindness for natural images of objects with viewpoint changes. Frontier in Psychology, 3, 1-11.
Buttle, H., Ball, C, K., Zhang, J., & Raymond, J. E.(2010). Semantic repetition blindness: Picture versus word effects. Journal of Vision, 3(9), 592-592.
Chialant, D., & Caramazza, A.(1997). Identity and similarity factors in repetition blindness: implications for lexical processing. Cognition, 63(1), 79-119.
Duyck, W., & De Houwer, J.(2008). Semantic access in second-language visual word processing: Evidence from the semantic Simon paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review(pre-2011), 15(5), 961-966.
Groot, A. M. B. D., & Nas, G. L. J.(1991). Lexical representation of cognates and noncognates in compound Bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(1), 90.
Harris, C. L., & Morris, A. L.(2000). Orthographic repetition blindness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Section A: 53(4), 1039-1060.
Harris C. L., & Morris A. L.(2001). Illusory words created by repetition blindness: a technique for probing sublexical representations. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8(1), 118-126.
Harris, I. M., & Dux, P. E.(2005). Orientation-invariant object recognition evidence from repetition blindness. Cognition, 95, 73-93.
Kanwisher, N. G.(1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27(2), 117-143.
Kanwisher, N. G., & Potter, M. C.(1990). Repetition blindness: Levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 30-47.
Kanwisher, N. G.(1991). Orthographic versus phonological similarity in repetition blindness. Bulletin of the Psychology Society, 29(6), 496.
Knickerbockera, H., & Altarribaa, J.(2013). Differential repetition blindness with emotion and emotion-laden word types. Visual Cognition, 21(5), 599-627.
Koivisto, M., & Revonsuo, A.(2008). Comparison of event-related potentials in attentional blink and repetition blindness. Brain Research, 1189(3), 115-126.
Kroll, J. E, & Stewart, E.(1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149-174.
Mackay, D. G., & Miller, M. D.(1994). Semantic blindness: Rapidly presented repeated concepts are difficult to encode and recall. Psychological Science, 5, 52-55.
Mackay, D. G., Abrams, L., Pedroza, M. J., & Miller, M. D.(1996). Cross-language facilitation, semantic blindness, and the relation between language and memory: A reply to Altarriba and Soltano. Memory and Cognition, 6(24), 712-718.
Yeh, S., & Li, J.(2004). Sublexical processing in visual recognition of Chinese characters: Evidence from repetition blindness for subcharacter components. Brain and Language, 88(1), 47-53.

[1]	JIN Li, WU Fengjuan, LENG Ying. The Effect of Semantic Relevance on the Repetition Blindness: Evidence from Chinese Idioms [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(4): 457-463.
[2]	Gao Xiaolei, Wang Yongsheng, Guo Zhiying, Zhang Manman, Bai Xuejun. The Characteristics of Semantic and Lexical Representation of Tibetan-Chinese Bilinguals [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2015, 13(6): 737-743.
[3]	Zhang Jijia, Zhang Fengling. The Language Representation of Auditory Words in Cantonese-Mandarin Diglossias [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2014, 12(4): 433-440.
[4]	Zhao Jianbao, Wang Yonghui. The Effect of Task Type on Color-Based Repetition Disadvantage Effect in Different SOA Conditions [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2014, 12(4): 454-461.
[5]	Duan Haijun；Lin Suqin. FACE REPETITION PRIMING EFFECT: THE CONTRIBUTION OF PERCEPTUAL STRUCTURE AND SEMANTIC REPRESENTATION [J]. , 2011, 9(4): 310-314.