The Positional Effect of Semantic and Grammatical Activation of Semantic Radical Under Semantic Radical Priming Paradigm

Studies of Psychology and Behavior ›› 2021, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (6): 721-727.

The Positional Effect of Semantic and Grammatical Activation of Semantic Radical Under Semantic Radical Priming Paradigm

ZHANG Yuzhi¹, GAO Yi^1,2, ZHANG Jijia³

1. School of Educational Science and Technology, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou 510665;
2. Guangzhou Huadu District No.8 Primary School, Guangzhou 510800;
3. Faculty of Education, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004

Received:2021-08-03 Online:2021-11-20 Published:2021-11-20

义符启动范式下义符语义和语法激活的位置效应

章玉祉¹, 高异^1,2, 张积家³

1. 广东技术师范大学教育科学与技术学院，广州 510665;
2. 广州市花都区新华街第八小学，广州 510800;
3. 广西师范大学教育学部，桂林 541004

通讯作者: 张积家，E-mail：Zhangjj1955@163.com
基金资助:
广东省哲社共建项目（GD18XXL01）；广东省教育科学规划项目（2018GXJK100）；2019年度广东省高等教育教学研究和改革项目“以心理素质提升为导向的《大学生心理健康教育》移动课堂建设”；广州市哲社共建项目（2021GZGJ183）

Abstract

Abstract: This study used the priming paradigm to explore the influence of the position of semantic radical on the semantic and grammatical activation of phonogram. The results of experiment 1 showed that the position of semantic radical affected the semantic activation of phonogram. The activation was significant when the semantic radical was on the left/upper side, but no activation was detected on the opposite side. The results of experiment 2 showed that the semantic radical position also affected the grammatical activation. The grammatical activation was stronger when the semantic radical was on the left/upper side than when it was on the opposite position. The whole finding indicates that the semantic and grammatical activation of semantic radical show obvious position effect.

Key words: semantic radical priming paradigm, positional effect, semantic activation, grammatical activation

摘要： 采用义符启动范式探讨了义符位置对形声字语义、语法激活的影响。实验1采用义符启动下的词汇判断任务，发现义符处于形声字的左/上位置，其语义激活明显；处于形声字的右/下位置，其语义未见显著激活。实验2采用义符启动下的词性判断任务，发现上/下、左/右位置义符的语法信息都能得到显著激活，但左/上位置的激活效应显著强于右/下位置。研究表明，义符的语义、语法激活具有明显的位置效应，形声字的左/上位置是义符的优势位置。

关键词: 义符启动范式, 位置效应, 语义激活, 语法激活

CLC Number:

B842

ZHANG Yuzhi, GAO Yi, ZHANG Jijia. The Positional Effect of Semantic and Grammatical Activation of Semantic Radical Under Semantic Radical Priming Paradigm[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 721-727.

章玉祉, 高异, 张积家. 义符启动范式下义符语义和语法激活的位置效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 721-727.

References

蔡厚德, 齐星亮, 陈庆荣, 钟元. (2012). 声旁位置对形声字命名规则性效应的影响. 心理学报, 44(7), 868–881
李燕, 康加深, 魏励, 张书岩. (1992). 现代汉语形声字研究. 语言文字应用, (1), 74–83
罗艳琳, 王鹏, 李秀军, 石雅琪, 陈墨, 王培培, … 罗跃嘉. (2010). 汉字认知过程中整字对部件的影响. 心理学报, 42(6), 683–694
彭瑞祥. (1982). 汉字结构的统计分析. 心理学报, (4), 385–390
苏振华. (2009). “右文说”浅论. 钦州学院学报, 24(1), 102–105
唐兰. (2005). 中国文字学. 上海: 上海古籍出版社.
王丹, 王婷, 秦松, 张积家. (2019). 部件启动范式下可成字部件的位置效应. 心理学报, 51(2), 163–176
王娟, 张积家. (2016). 义符的类别一致性和家族大小影响形声字的语义加工. 心理学报, 48(11), 1390–1400
吴岩, 莫德圆, 王海英, 于溢洋, 陈烜之, 张明. (2016). 语义分类任务中部件位置在汉字识别中的作用. 心理学报, 48(6), 599–606
印丛, 王娟, 张积家. (2011). 汉语言语产生中语音、字形启动的位置效应. 心理学报, 43(9), 1002–1012
曾捷英, 周新林. (2001). 汉字识别中的部位部件效应. 心理科学, 24(3), 356
张积家, 盛红岩. (1999). 整体与部分的关系对汉字的知觉分离影响的研究. 心理学报, 31(4), 369–376
张积家, 王斌, 刘红艳. (2019). 义符的句法倾向性及对形声字词类判断的影响. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), (5), 80–91
张积家, 王娟, 印丛. (2014). 声符和义符在形声字语音、语义提取中的作用—来自部件知觉眼动研究的证据. 心理学报, 46(7), 885–900
张积家, 张厚粲, 彭聃龄. (1990). 分类过程中汉字的语义提取(Ⅰ). 心理学报, 22(4), 63–71
张积家, 章玉祉. (2016). 义符启动范式下义符的语义和语法激活的时间进程. 心理学报, 48(9), 1070–1081
章玉祉, 张积家. (2017). 义符启动范式下家族大小和类别一致性对义符语义激活的影响. 心理学报, 49(8), 1041–1052
章玉祉, 张积家. (2018). 形声字的语义透明度和结构类型对义符语音激活进程的影响. 心理与行为研究, 16(5), 612–617
章玉祉, 张积家. (2019). 任务性质、家族大小和词类一致性对义符语法信息激活的影响. 心理学报, 51(10), 1091–1101
赵艳芳. (2001). 认知语言学概论. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.
Chua, H. F., Boland, J. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (2005). Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(35), 12629–12633, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506162102.
Ding, G. S., Peng, D. L., & Taft, M. (2004). The nature of the mental representation of radicals: A priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 530–539, doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.530.
Feldman, L. B., & Siok, W. W. T. (1997). The role of component function in visual recognition of Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(3), 776–781, doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.23.3.776.
Hsiao, J. H. W., & Shillcock, R. (2006). Analysis of a Chinese phonetic compound database: Implications for orthographic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(5), 405–426, doi: 10.1007/s10936-006-9022-y.
Lee, C. Y., Tsai, J. L., Huang, H. W., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (2006). The temporal signatures of semantic and phonological activations for Chinese sublexical processing: An event-related potential study. Brain Research, 1121(1), 150–159, doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.117.
Nisbett, R. E., & Miyamoto, Y. (2005). The influence of culture: Holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(10), 467–473, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.004.
Taft, M., Zhu, X. P., & Peng, D. L. (1999). Positional specificity of radicals in Chinese character recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(4), 498–519, doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2625.
Wu, Y., Mo, D. Y., Tsang, Y. K., & Chen, H. C. (2012). ERPs reveal sub-lexical processing in Chinese character recognition. Neuroscience Letters, 514(2), 164–168, doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.02.080.

[1]	LIU Lu, JIANG Yamei, ZHANG Qiaoming, LI Zhuyang. Influence of the Position and Transparency of Semantic Radicals on Semantic Activation in Chinese Phonogram Recognition [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 585-591.
[2]	Yu Linxin. The Role of Phonology in the Meaning Access of Chinese Character:A Review [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2014, 12(3): 413-417.
[3]	Zhou Xiaolin,Qu Yanxuan,Zhuang Jie. THE RELATIVE TIME COURSE OF PHONOLOGICAL AND SEMANTIC ACTIVATION IN READING CHINESE: FURTHER EVIDENCE [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2003, 1(4): 241-247.