An Intervention Study of Inhibition Training on Chinese Speechreading Performance for Students with Hearing Impairment

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2026.03.003

Abstract

Abstract:

To explore the effect of inhibition training on Chinese speechreading abilities of hearing-impaired students, 57 participants were randomly divided into an inhibition training group, a mirror self-imitation group, and a control group. Results showed that the inhibition training group exhibited stronger Stroop interference effects in the pre-test than in the post-test, with better post-test sentence speechreading performance and marginally higher phrase speechreading accuracy than the control group. The mirror self-imitation group, by contrast, achieved significant pre-to-post improvements in word and phrase speechreading. These findings demonstrate that hearing-impaired students’ interference inhibition is trainable, and that the two interventions enhance Chinese speechreading abilities differentially depending on linguistic complexity: inhibition training benefits complex (sentence) tasks, while mirror self-imitation favors simple (word/phrase) tasks.

Key words: inhibition training, mirror self-imitation training, students with hearing impairment, Chinese speechreading abilities

摘要：

为探究抑制训练对听障学生汉语唇读的影响，将57名听障学生随机分为抑制训练组、镜前模仿组和对照组，对抑制训练组被试进行四周计算机自适应训练、镜前模仿组被试进行四周唇读训练。其中，抑制训练是在沿用经典Stroop、Go/No-go范式基础上，采用改编版Stroop任务、Go/No-go任务，对被试干扰、反应抑制能力进行训练。研究发现：(1)抑制训练组Stroop测试前测干扰效应显著大于后测；(2)抑制训练组后测唇读语句理解显著优于前测，词语边缘显著优于对照组；镜前模仿组后测汉字和词语理解显著优于前测。研究表明，听障学生抑制能力具有可塑性；两种训练均能提升听障学生汉语唇读理解能力，但提升效果受语言级别影响。

关键词: 抑制训练, 镜前模仿训练, 听障学生, 汉语唇读理解能力

CLC Number:

B842

Huina GONG, Qishuang WANG, Dandan LI, Qin PENG, Lingxi DUAN, Jianghua LEI. An Intervention Study of Inhibition Training on Chinese Speechreading Performance for Students with Hearing Impairment[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2026, 24(3): 303-311.

宫慧娜, 王齐双, 李丹丹, 彭秦, 段泠西, 雷江华. 抑制训练对听障学生汉语唇读理解能力的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2026, 24(3): 303-311.

Figures/Tables 7

References 0

	崔晨, 王小春, 解淳, 吴雪萍, 周成林. 急性有氧运动对超重青少年抑制功能效益的影响. 西安体育学院学报, 2017, 34 (2): 214- 220. DOI
	宫慧娜. (2019). 工作记忆在听障学生汉语唇读理解中的作用研究(博士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉.
	雷江华. (2009). 听觉障碍学生唇读的认知研究. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社.
	雷江华. (2022). 听障学生汉语唇读理解能力发展研究. 北京: 科学出版社.
	雷江华, 崔婷, 张晶, 朱楠. 镜前自我模仿策略在听障儿童双语唇读元音识别中的作用. 中国特殊教育, 2014, (4): 36- 40, 64. DOI
	雷江华, 宫慧娜, 贾玲, 陈亮. 听觉辅助在听障学生汉语唇读理解中的作用. 中国特殊教育, 2017, (10): 30- 36. DOI
	李胜利. 构音障碍的评价. 中国康复, 1993, 8 (2): 84- 86.
	朴永馨, 顾定倩, 邓猛. (2015). 特殊教育辞典 (第3版). 北京: 华夏出版社.
	王元, 李柯, 盖笑松, 曹逸飞. 基于即时反馈的反应抑制训练对青少年和成人执行功能的训练效应和迁移效应. 心理学报, 2020, 52 (10): 1212- 1223.
	徐诚. 唇读研究回顾: 从聋人到正常人. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2013, 31 (1): 56- 61. DOI
	杨丽霞, 陈永明. 句子加工水平上对外在干扰的抑制机制. 心理学报, 2002, 34 (6): 553- 560.
	张奋, 雷江华, 陈亮, 王海凤, 魏雪寒. 听障大学生汉语唇读能力对阅读理解的影响. 中国特殊教育, 2023, (10): 29- 35.
	赵鑫, 陈玲, 张鹏. 反应抑制的训练: 内容、效果与机制. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23 (1): 51- 60. DOI
	赵鑫, 贾丽娜, 昝香怡. 干扰控制的训练: 内容、效果与机制. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24 (6): 900- 908.
	赵鑫, 李红利, 金戈, 李世峰, 周爱保, 梁文佳, 蔡亚亚. 语音记忆和中央执行功能在不同年级儿童解码和语言理解中的作用. 心理学报, 2020, 52 (4): 469- 484.
	周晶, 宣宾. 额叶区域的经颅直流电刺激对抑制控制的影响. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26 (11): 1976- 1991. DOI
	朱祖德, 段懿行, 王穗苹. 个体差异对工作记忆训练迁移效果的调节. 心理学报, 2017, 49 (8): 1022- 1030. DOI
	Banich, M. T., Milham, M. P., Atchley, R. A., Cohen, N. J., Webb, A., Wszalek, T., ... Brown, C. Prefrontal regions play a predominant role in imposing an attentional ‘set’: Evidence from fMRI. Cognitive Brain Research, 2000, 10 (1–2): 1- 9. DOI
	Bernstein, L. E., Jordan, N., Auer, E. T., & Eberhardt, S. P. Lipreading: A review of its continuing importance for speech recognition with an acquired hearing loss and possibilities for effective training. American Journal of Audiology, 2022, 31 (2): 453- 469. DOI
	Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 2001, 108 (3): 624- 652. DOI
	Diamond, A. Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 2013, 64, 135- 168. DOI
	Dodd, B., Plant, G., & Gregory, M. Teaching lip-reading: The efficacy of lessons on video. British Journal of Audiology, 1989, 23 (3): 229- 238. DOI
	Elosúa, M. R., García-Madruga, J. A., Vila, J. O., Gómez-Veiga, I., & Gil, L. Improving reading comprehension: From metacognitive intervention on strategies to the intervention on working memory executive processes. Universitas Psychologica, 2013, 12 (5): 1425- 1438. DOI
	Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. New York: Psychology Press.
	Gong, H. N., Jia, L., Peng, Q., Xiao, R., Fan, J. L., Lei, J. H., & Chen, L. The role of the phonological loop and the visual sketchpad in speechreading of students with hearing loss in China. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 2025, 39 (4–5): 412- 426. DOI
	Gong, H. N., Lei, J. H., & Chen, L. Phonological store and speechreading performance of Chinese students with hearing impairment. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 2022, 36 (4–5): 456- 469. DOI
	Gorman, B. M., & Flatla, D. R. (2018). MirrorMirror: A mobile application to improve speechreading acquisition. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (p. 26). Montreal, Canada: Association for Computing Machinery.
	Iversen, J. R., Patel, A. D., Nicodemus, B., & Emmorey, K. Synchronization to auditory and visual rhythms in hearing and deaf individuals. Cognition, 2015, 134, 232- 244. DOI
	Kintsch, W. The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 1988, 95 (2): 163- 182. DOI
	Kopta, S. M. The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy: A defining achievement for Dr. Kenneth Howard. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2003, 59 (7): 727- 733. DOI
	Nozari, N., Woodard, K., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. Consequences of cathodal stimulation for behavior: When does it help and when does it hurt performance. PLoS One, 2014, 9 (1): e84338. DOI
	Rodríguez-Ortiz, I. R., Saldaña, D., & Moreno-Perez, F. J. How speechreading contributes to reading in a transparent ortography: The case of Spanish deaf people. Journal of Research in Reading, 2017, 40 (1): 75- 90. DOI
	Rönnberg, J., Lunner, T., Zekveld, A., Sörqvist, P., Danielsson, H., Lyxell, B., ... Rudner, M. The ease of language understanding (ELU) model: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 2013, 7, 31.
	Thorell, L. B., Lindqvist, S., Bergman Nutley, S., Bohlin, G., & Klingberg, T. Training and transfer effects of executive functions in preschool children. Developmental Science, 2009, 12 (1): 106- 113. DOI
	Woodward, M. F., & Barber, C. G. Phoneme perception in lipreading. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1960, 3 (3): 212- 222. DOI
	Zhang, F., Zhou, Q., Chen, Y., Lei, J. H., & Chen, L. Speechreading ability is related to phonological awareness and reading comprehension in adults with hearing impairment in China. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 2025, 39 (6–8): 602- 624. DOI
	Zhao, X., Chen, L., & Maes, J. H. R. Training and transfer effects of response inhibition training in children and adults. Developmental Science, 2018, 21 (1): e12511. DOI
	Zhao, X., & Jia, L. N. Training and transfer effects of interference control training in children and young adults. Psychological Research, 2019, 83 (7): 1519- 1530. DOI

类别	IT组(n=18)	MT组(n=18)	NT组(n=17)	F/χ²	p
性别(男；女)	6; 12	10; 8	10; 7	2.73	0.255
非言语智力(M±SD)	44.17±6.23	42.94±6.69	44.49±7.32	0.15	0.863
听力损失年龄(M±SD)	1.59±0.94	1.47±0.74	2.07±1.34	1.43	0.248
佩戴助听设备情况(有；无)	13; 5	14; 4	12; 5	0.26	0.879
随班就读经历(有；无)	14; 4	17; 1	16; 1	3.22	0.199

类别	IT组(n=18)	MT组(n=18)	NT组(n=17)	F/χ²	p
性别(男；女)	6; 12	10; 8	10; 7	2.73	0.255
非言语智力(M±SD)	44.17±6.23	42.94±6.69	44.49±7.32	0.15	0.863
听力损失年龄(M±SD)	1.59±0.94	1.47±0.74	2.07±1.34	1.43	0.248
佩戴助听设备情况(有；无)	13; 5	14; 4	12; 5	0.26	0.879
随班就读经历(有；无)	14; 4	17; 1	16; 1	3.22	0.199

序号	词语	序号	词语	序号	词语	序号	材料	序号	材料
1	踢足球	10	热水瓶	19	手电筒	28	唱歌	37	知了
2	穿衣	11	碗筷	20	自行车	29	女孩	38	绿色
3	背心	12	小草	21	天安门	30	熊猫	39	黄瓜
4	布鞋	13	大蒜	22	缝纫机	31	皮带	40	西红柿
5	人头	14	衣柜	23	电冰箱	32	短裤	41	菠萝
6	围巾	15	沙发	24	太阳	33	划船	42	扫地
7	脸盆	16	照相	25	月亮	34	下雨	43	开车
8	牙刷	17	耳朵	26	钟表	35	摩托车	44	圆圈
9	茶杯	18	书架	27	母鸡	36	擦桌子	45	解放军

序号	词语	序号	词语	序号	词语	序号	材料	序号	材料
1	踢足球	10	热水瓶	19	手电筒	28	唱歌	37	知了
2	穿衣	11	碗筷	20	自行车	29	女孩	38	绿色
3	背心	12	小草	21	天安门	30	熊猫	39	黄瓜
4	布鞋	13	大蒜	22	缝纫机	31	皮带	40	西红柿
5	人头	14	衣柜	23	电冰箱	32	短裤	41	菠萝
6	围巾	15	沙发	24	太阳	33	划船	42	扫地
7	脸盆	16	照相	25	月亮	34	下雨	43	开车
8	牙刷	17	耳朵	26	钟表	35	摩托车	44	圆圈
9	茶杯	18	书架	27	母鸡	36	擦桌子	45	解放军

任务	组别	指标	前测	后测	差值
抑制能力	IT组	干扰抑制	35.52±42.51	1.36±16.06	−31.32±50.77
	IT组	反应抑制	0.43±0.22	0.39±0.19	−0.05±0.29
	MT组	干扰抑制	21.91±44.80	5.72±32.76	−5.57±81.25
	MT组	反应抑制	0.38±0.15	0.35±0.10	−0.03±0.20
	NT组	干扰抑制	14.27±48.45	6.98±28.55	−6.58±47.31
	NT组	反应抑制	0.44±0.17	0.45±0.18	0.01±0.29