Studies of Psychology and Behavior ›› 2023, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 744-750.DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.06.004
• ? • Previous Articles Next Articles
Miao YU1,2,3, Wendi WANG2,*(), Xiaoxiao CHEN2,*()
Received:
2023-01-06
Online:
2023-11-20
Published:
2023-11-20
Contact:
Wendi WANG, Xiaoxiao CHEN
通讯作者:
王文娣,陈晓霄
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Miao YU, Wendi WANG, Xiaoxiao CHEN. Prosodic Constraints in Chinese “N de V” Construction[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(6): 744-750.
于秒, 王文娣, 陈晓霄. 汉语“N的V”结构加工的韵律制约[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 744-750.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://psybeh.tjnu.edu.cn/EN/10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.06.004
语义关系 | 韵律形式 | 例句 |
施事 | 偏好 | 心理医生说[妈妈的拥抱]可以让小女孩平静下来。 |
非偏好 | 心理医生说[妈妈的抱]可以让小女孩平静下来。 | |
受事 | 偏好 | 公司领导说[税收的免除]可以使公司资产增长5%。 |
非偏好 | 公司领导说[税收的免]可以使公司资产增长5%。 |
语义关系 | 韵律形式 | 例句 |
施事 | 偏好 | 心理医生说[妈妈的拥抱]可以让小女孩平静下来。 |
非偏好 | 心理医生说[妈妈的抱]可以让小女孩平静下来。 | |
受事 | 偏好 | 公司领导说[税收的免除]可以使公司资产增长5%。 |
非偏好 | 公司领导说[税收的免]可以使公司资产增长5%。 |
变量 | NA的V1 | NA的V2 | NP的V1 | NP的V2 |
词频(次/百万) | 24.59(23.21) | 19.21(47.08) | 14.86(13.61) | 13.77(21.87) |
通顺性 | 4.09(0.52) | 2.40(0.53) | 3.76(0.78) | 2.05(0.46) |
合理性 | 3.68(0.48) | 2.93(0.39) | 3.49(0.55) | 2.64(0.41) |
变量 | NA的V1 | NA的V2 | NP的V1 | NP的V2 |
词频(次/百万) | 24.59(23.21) | 19.21(47.08) | 14.86(13.61) | 13.77(21.87) |
通顺性 | 4.09(0.52) | 2.40(0.53) | 3.76(0.78) | 2.05(0.46) |
合理性 | 3.68(0.48) | 2.93(0.39) | 3.49(0.55) | 2.64(0.41) |
兴趣区 | 眼动指标 | NA的V1 | NA的V2 | NP的V1 | NP的V2 |
兴趣区 1 | FFD (ms) | 247 (29) | 229 (19) | 267 (30) | 240 (20) |
GD (ms) | 274 (39) | 261 (26) | 285 (36) | 283 (28) | |
RPD (ms) | 350 (60) | 338 (54) | 384 (69) | 344 (47) | |
TFD (ms) | 381 (60) | 390 (53) | 420 (63) | 429 (53) | |
REG IN (%) | 38.69 (11.90) | 20.46 (8.57) | 43.61 (11.40) | 26.53 (9.75) | |
REG OUT (%) | 13.36 (6.70) | 13.82 (7.58) | 15.60 (7.44) | 12.29 (6.89) | |
SP (%) | 53.96 (11.67) | 20.83 (8.05) | 53.77 (11.06) | 19.44 (7.50) | |
兴趣区 2 | FFD (ms) | 234 (21) | 232 (23) | 248 (22) | 233 (20) |
GD (ms) | 273 (34) | 268 (34) | 307 (38) | 265 (29) | |
RPD (ms) | 531 (117) | 392 (83) | 619 (128) | 412 (95) | |
TFD (ms) | 482 (71) | 371 (57) | 545 (74) | 386 (55) | |
REG IN (%) | 31.12 (11.10) | 23.10 (9.01) | 25.88 (9.85) | 20.62 (8.62) | |
REG OUT (%) | 30.25 (0.07) | 16.78 (0.08) | 33.61 (0.07) | 19.23 (0.07) | |
SP (%) | 27.14 (9.72) | 36.31 (11.07) | 22.62 (8.90) | 28.34 (9.77) |
兴趣区 | 眼动指标 | NA的V1 | NA的V2 | NP的V1 | NP的V2 |
兴趣区 1 | FFD (ms) | 247 (29) | 229 (19) | 267 (30) | 240 (20) |
GD (ms) | 274 (39) | 261 (26) | 285 (36) | 283 (28) | |
RPD (ms) | 350 (60) | 338 (54) | 384 (69) | 344 (47) | |
TFD (ms) | 381 (60) | 390 (53) | 420 (63) | 429 (53) | |
REG IN (%) | 38.69 (11.90) | 20.46 (8.57) | 43.61 (11.40) | 26.53 (9.75) | |
REG OUT (%) | 13.36 (6.70) | 13.82 (7.58) | 15.60 (7.44) | 12.29 (6.89) | |
SP (%) | 53.96 (11.67) | 20.83 (8.05) | 53.77 (11.06) | 19.44 (7.50) | |
兴趣区 2 | FFD (ms) | 234 (21) | 232 (23) | 248 (22) | 233 (20) |
GD (ms) | 273 (34) | 268 (34) | 307 (38) | 265 (29) | |
RPD (ms) | 531 (117) | 392 (83) | 619 (128) | 412 (95) | |
TFD (ms) | 482 (71) | 371 (57) | 545 (74) | 386 (55) | |
REG IN (%) | 31.12 (11.10) | 23.10 (9.01) | 25.88 (9.85) | 20.62 (8.62) | |
REG OUT (%) | 30.25 (0.07) | 16.78 (0.08) | 33.61 (0.07) | 19.23 (0.07) | |
SP (%) | 27.14 (9.72) | 36.31 (11.07) | 22.62 (8.90) | 28.34 (9.77) |
方绪军, 李翠. “N的V单”的构成及其语篇使用情况考察. 汉语学习, 2017, (2): 34- 41. | |
王丽娟. 汉语两类[N的V]结构的韵律句法考察. 世界汉语教学, 2014, 28 (1): 70- 77. | |
闫国利, 熊建萍, 臧传丽, 余莉莉, 崔磊, 白学军. 阅读研究中的主要眼动指标评述. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21 (4): 589- 605. | |
詹卫东. 关于“NP+的+VP”偏正结构. 汉语学习, 1998, (2): 24- 28. | |
Ashby, J., & Clifton, C., Jr.. The prosodic property of lexical stress affects eye movements during silent reading. Cognition, 2005, 96 (3): B89- B100.
DOI |
|
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M.. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 2008, 59 (4): 390- 412.
DOI |
|
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J.. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 2013, 68 (3): 255- 278.
DOI |
|
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 2015, 67 (1): 1- 48. | |
Breen, M.. Empirical investigations of the role of implicit prosody in sentence processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2014, 8 (2): 37- 50.
DOI |
|
Breen, M., & Clifton, C., Jr.. Stress matters: Effects of anticipated lexical stress on silent reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 2011, 64 (2): 153- 170.
DOI |
|
Breen, M., & Clifton, C., Jr.. Stress matters revisited: A boundary change experiment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2013, 66 (10): 1896- 1909.
DOI |
|
Brothers, T., & Traxler, M. J. (2016). Anticipating syntax during reading: Evidence from the boundary change paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(12), 1894–1906. | |
Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M.. SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS ONE, 2010, 5 (6): e10729.
DOI |
|
Cohen, J.. The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962, 65 (3): 145- 153.
DOI |
|
Dong, Y. (2015). The prosody and morphology of elastic words in Chinese: Annotations and analyses (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. | |
Drieghe, D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A.. Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2008, 61 (8): 1239- 1249.
DOI |
|
Fodor, J. D.. Learning to parse. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1998, 27 (2): 285- 319.
DOI |
|
Fodor, J. D. (2002). Prosodic disambiguation in silent reading. In M. Hirotani (Ed.), Proceedings of the North East linguistics society (Vol. 32, pp. 112–132). Amherst, MA: GSLA. | |
Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D.. Phonological working memory: A critical building block for reading development and vocabulary acquisition. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1993, 8 (3): 259- 272.
DOI |
|
Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | |
Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(3), 417–429. | |
Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K.. Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 1986, 40 (6): 431- 439. | |
Kennison, S. M., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1995). Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), 68–81. | |
Kentner, G.. Linguistic rhythm guides parsing decisions in written sentence comprehension. Cognition, 2012, 123 (1): 1- 20.
DOI |
|
Kentner, G., & Vasishth, S.. Prosodic focus marking in silent reading: Effects of discourse context and rhythm. Frontiers in Psychology, 2016, 7, 319. | |
Lee, Y., Liu, X., & Wang, X. M.. Do metrical incongruities disrupt semantic processing in modern Chinese? An event-related potential study. NeuroReport, 2015, 26 (14): 803- 808.
DOI |
|
Long, J. X., Wang, T. L., & Yu, M.. Sentential position of V—N combination modulates the rhythmic pattern effect during Chinese sentence reading: Evidence from eye movements. Acta Psychologica, 2022, 228, 103641.
DOI |
|
Luo, Y. Y., Duan, Y. Y., & Zhou, X. L.. Processing rhythmic pattern during Chinese sentence reading: An eye movement study. Frontiers in Psychology, 2015, 6, 1881. | |
Luo, Y. Y., & Zhou, X. L.. ERP evidence for the online processing of rhythmic pattern during Chinese sentence reading. NeuroImage, 2010, 49 (3): 2836- 2849.
DOI |
|
Pollatsek, A., Juhasz, B. J., Reichle, E. D., Machacek, D., & Rayner, K.. Immediate and delayed effects of word frequency and word length on eye movements in reading: A reversed delayed effect of word length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2008, 34 (3): 726- 750.
DOI |
|
R Core Team. (2020). R:A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. | |
Rayner, K.. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 1998, 124 (3): 372- 422.
DOI |
|
Rayner, K.. The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2009, 62 (8): 1457- 1506.
DOI |
|
Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., & Raney, G. E.. Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1996, 22 (5): 1188- 1200.
DOI |
|
Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J., & Clifton, C., Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (2nd ed.). New York: Psychology Press. | |
Rothermich, K., & Kotz, S. A.. Predictions in speech comprehension: fMRI evidence on the meter-semantic interface. NeuroImage, 2013, 70, 89- 100.
DOI |
|
Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(1), 5–35. | |
Slowiaczek, M. L., & Clifton, C.. Subvocalization and reading for meaning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1980, 19 (5): 573- 582.
DOI |
|
Staub, A.. Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses. Cognition, 2010, 116 (1): 71- 86.
DOI |
|
Warren, P., Grabe, E., & Nolan, F.. Prosody, phonology and parsing in closure ambiguities. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1995, 10 (5): 457- 486.
DOI |
|
Webman-Shafran, R. & Fodor, J. D.. Phrase length and prosody in on-line ambiguity resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2016, 45 (3): 447- 474.
DOI |
|
Westfall, J. (2016). PANGEA: Power analysis for general anova designs. Retrieved January 12, 2023 from https://jakewestfall.shinyapps.io/pangea/ | |
Zang, C. L., Fu, Y., Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., & Liversedge, S. P.. Investigating word length effects in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2018, 44 (12): 1831- 1841.
DOI |
[1] | Ruqi CHEN, Yaqian BAO, Linjieqiong HUANG, Xingshan LI. An Introduction to the Chinese Reading Model (CRM) [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(6): 725-735. |
[2] | Zijia LU, Zhichao ZHANG, Ying FU, Manman ZHANG, Chuanli ZANG, Xuejun BAI. Repeating Words Cannot Help Chinese Readers to Obtain Word Class Information from Parafoveal Words [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(5): 577-584. |
[3] | AINI Ayiguli, KANJI Maihefulaiti, LIU Guixiong, BULATIHAN Palizha. Word Spacing's Effect on Uyghur College Students' Lexical Processing [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(2): 163-168. |
[4] | Lijuan ZHANG, Fengjun ZHANG, Sainan ZHAO, Jingxin WANG. The Predominant Role of Preview Plausibility on Semantic Preview Benefit of Two-Character Words in Chinese Reading: An Eye Movement Study [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(1): 12-19. |
[5] | Hui DING, Zhichao ZHANG, Manman ZHANG, Chuanli ZANG. A Meta-Analysis of Eye Movement Studies on the Effects of Context on Irony Comprehension [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(1): 28-35. |
[6] | Miao YU, Simin ZHOU, Jiaxin LONG. The Effect of Implicit Prosody and Context on the Disambiguation of Chinese Balanced Ambiguous Structure [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(6): 739-746. |
[7] | JIA Ning, RONG Lizhuo, DAI Jinghua. Effects of Social Cues on Explicit and Implicit Metacognitive Monitoring and Control [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(5): 593-599. |
[8] | TAN Xiujuan, LI Xin, BAI Xuejun. The Influence of Reading Mode and Learning Frequency on Production Effect of Chinese Written Word [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(5): 600-606. |
[9] | LI Shiyi, XIE Yanfeng, ZHAO Guang, BAI Xuejun. The Influence of Media Multitasking Experience on Implicit Memory in Different Attention Patterns [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(4): 433-440. |
[10] | ZHANG Manman, HU Huilan, BIAN Han, LI Fang, ZHANG Zhichao, ZANG Chuanli. Word Frequency Effects in Fast and Slow Readers During Skilled Chinese Reading [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(3): 304-310. |
[11] | HE Liyuan, ZHAO Xing, BAI Yu, LIU Nina. Multi-Word Unit Processing for Chinese Older Readers: Evidence from Eye Movements [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(2): 160-166. |
[12] | QIN Zhao, WANG Yingchao, YE Jiaying, YUAN Xiaoyuan, YAN Guoli. Visual Compensation in Chinese Deaf Readers’ Sentence Reading: Evidence from Parafoveal-on-Foveal Effect [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(2): 167-173. |
[13] | GU Junjuan, GAO Zhihua, MA Shaoyang. The Sub-Word Boundary Effect of Chinese Character Position Processing in Incremental Words [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(1): 1-7. |
[14] | ZHAO Sainan, LI Lin, ZHANG Lijuan, WANG Jingxin. The Influence of Constrictive Context on the Processing of Unpredictable Word in Chinese Reading [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 736-742. |
[15] | LIU Lu, JIANG Yamei, ZHANG Qiaoming, LI Zhuyang. Influence of the Position and Transparency of Semantic Radicals on Semantic Activation in Chinese Phonogram Recognition [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 585-591. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||