The Effect of Delay Joint Benefits in Resource Dilemmas: The Moderating Role of Temporal Discounting

Abstract

Abstract: To explore the relationship between the delay joint benefits and individual decision in resource dilemmas and the moderating effect of temporal discounting, 83 undergraduates accomplished the inter-temporal choice task and the hypothetical gold-coin-taking tasks in which there are different time intervals. The results showed that:1) the amount of gold coin which was taken increased with interval rising, and the increase rate over time and the amount of gold participants took at the first time interval were significant individual difference; 2) The moderating role of temporal discounting was negative for the amount of gold participants took at the first time interval and was positive for the increasing rate over time. These results indicated that resource dilemmas and inter-temporal choice are two strongly related areas, which is significant for the conservation of resources.

Key words: delay joint benefits, resource dilemmas, individual decision, temporal discounting

摘要： 通过测量83名大学生的时间折扣率和不同共同收益延迟时距上的金币拿取量，以探讨资源困境中共同收益延迟对个体决策的影响及时间折扣的调节效应。结果表明：（1）金币拿取量随共同收益延迟时距的增长而增加，增加趋势和初始时间点的金币拿取量均存在显著的个体差异；（2）时间折扣率反向调节初始延迟时间点的金币拿取量，正向调节金币拿取量随延迟时距增长而增加的速率。这表明资源困境与跨期选择两个不同研究领域具有紧密联系，对当前资源保护制度的制定与实施具有一定的启发意义。

关键词: 共同收益延迟, 资源困境, 个体决策, 时间折扣

CLC Number:

B849

SUN Hongri, XIONG Yujiao. The Effect of Delay Joint Benefits in Resource Dilemmas: The Moderating Role of Temporal Discounting[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(6): 827-833.

孙红日, 熊玉娇. 资源困境中共同收益延迟的影响：时间折扣的调节效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 827-833.

References

何嘉梅, 黄希庭, 尹可丽, 罗扬眉. (2010). 时间贴现的分段性. 心理学报, 42(4), 474-484
江程铭, 刘洪志, 蔡晓红, 李纾. (2016). 跨期选择单维占优模型的过程检验. 心理学报, 48(1), 59-72
梁竹苑, 刘欢. (2011). 跨期选择的性质探索. 心理科学进展, 19(7), 959-966
刘长江, 李岩梅, 李纾. (2007). 实验社会心理学中的社会困境. 心理科学进展, 15(2), 379-384
刘洪志, 江程铭, 饶俪琳, 李纾. (2015). “时间折扣”还是“单维占优”?——跨期决策的心理机制. 心理学报, 47(4), 522-532
孙红月, 江程铭. (2016). 跨期决策是基于选项还是基于维度. 心理科学进展, 24(4), 431-437
Curry, O. S., Price, M. E., & Price, J. G (2008). Patience is a virtue: Cooperative people have lower discount rates. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 780-785.
Dawes, R. M (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.
Fehr, E., & Leibbrandt, A (2011). A field study on cooperativeness and impatience in the tragedy of the commons. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 1144-1155.
Green, L., & Myerson, J (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 769-792.
Hardin, G (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.
Harris, A. C., & Madden G. J (2002). Delay discounting and performance on the prisoner’s dilemma game. The Psychological Record, 52, 429-440.
Hendrickx, L., Poortinga, W., & van der Kooij, R (2001). Temporal factors in resource dilemmas. Acta Psychologica, 108, 137-154.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.
Khachatryan, H., Joireman, J., & Casavant, K (2013). Relating values and consideration of future and immediate consequences to consumer preference for biofuels: A three-dimensional social dilemma analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 97-108.
Kortenkamp, K. V., & Moore, C. F (2006). Time, uncertainty, and individual differences in decisions to cooperate in resource dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(5), 603-615.
Luhmann, C. C (2009). Temporal decision-making: Insights from cognitive neuroscience. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 39.
Odum, A. L (2011). Delay discounting: Trait variable? Behavioural Processes, 87(1), 1-9.
Takahashi, T (2007). A comparison of intertemporal choices for oneself versus someone else based on Tsallis’ statistic. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 385(2), 637-644.
Van Lange, P. A. M (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(2), 337-349.
Van Lange, P. A. M., & Joireman, J. A (2008). How we can promote behavior that serves all of us in the future. Social Issues and Policy Review, 2(1), 127-157.
Van Lange, P. A. M., Joireman, J., Parks, C. D., & van Dijk, E (2013). The psychology of social dilemmas: A review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 125-141.
Van Lange, P. A. M., & Rusbult, C. E. (2012). Interdependence theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 251-272). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yi, R., Buchhalter, A. R., Gatchalian, K. M., & Bickel, W. K (2007). The relationship between temporal discounting and the prisoner’s dilemma game in intranasal abusers of prescription opioids. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 87, 94-97.
Yi, R., Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K (2005). Relationship between cooperation in an iterated prisoner’s dilemma game and the discounting of hypothetical outcomes. Learning & Behavior, 33(3), 324-336.

[1]	YOU Xuqun, LI Qianqin, ZHANG Zhenyu, HUANG Pujiang, LIU Zhiyuan. Effectiveness of N-Back Working Memory Training: An Evidence from Meta-Analysis [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 794-801.
[2]	XIONG Sicheng, ZHANG Bin, JIANG Yongzhi, JIANG Huaibin, CHENG Yun. Global Prevalence of Mobile Phone Addiction: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 802-808.
[3]	GUO Ying, FAN Fumin, ZHANG Yingjun, LIU Yu. Development of the Competence Scale for Group Leaders [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 809-815.
[4]	YAO Chong, HUI Qi, WANG Yuan, XI Haisha, LUO Chaoliang. Research on the Relationship Between Social Support and Job Burnout of Government-Supported Normal Teachers [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 816-823.
[5]	LI Feifei, JIAO Runkai, LIU Dan, YIN Hang. Career Calling and Gratitude Trait in Kindergarten Teachers: A Cross-Lagged Analysis [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 824-830.
[6]	ZHOU Yanbang, LI Qiang, BAO Qing. The Prominent Effect and Compatibility Effect of Intertemporal Preference Reversal [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 831-837.
[7]	HOU Juan, ZHENG Xinyi, WANG Xiu, FANG Xiaoyi. The Effect of Money Priming and Time Priming on Mate Selection [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 838-844.
[8]	DOU Yunlai, SHEN Yimo. How Does Participative Leadership Impact on the Employees’ Performance? Moderated Mediating Effect [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 845-852.
[9]	YANG Huai, GONG Shaoying, MIAO Tianchang, LI Weihe. The Relationship Between the Congruence of Boundary Management and the University Counselors’ Job Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Job Engagement [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 853-860.
[10]	WANG Yanli, CHEN Hong. The Development of Sense of Gain Questionnaire Among Urban Community Residents [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 665-670.
[11]	JIA Xiaoshan, ZHU Haidong. Socioeconomic Status and Mental Health in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 671-678.
[12]	HUANG Mingming, CHEN Liping, GUO Liping, ZHAO Shouying. The Relationship of Work-Family Conflict and Preschool Teachers’ Turnover Intentions: The Sequential Mediating Roles of Professional Identity and Job Burnout [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 679-686.
[13]	LIU Chuanjun, XIE Zhongju, WANG Xingyuan. Will Incidental Happiness Reduce the Agent’s Moral Norms Sensitivity? [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 687-694.
[14]	ZHANG Xiaoyu, ZHU Haiyan, CHEN Fengjiao, SU Xinyue. No Place Better than Hometown: The Influence of Hometown Label on Emotional Evaluation and Value Evaluation for Landscape Images [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 695-700.
[15]	SU Mingyu, WANG Guangming. STEAM Training Can Improve Pupils’ Attentional Inhibition and Attentional Concentration Ability [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 701-705.