The Influence of Perceived Social Hostility on College Students’ Aggression: The Role of Negative Emotional Experience

Abstract

Abstract: This study examined the influence of perceived social hostility on college students’ aggression and the role of negative emotional experience. Experiment 1 used the perceived social mindfulness paradigm and the hot sauce paradigm to examine the influence of perceived social hostility on college students’ overt aggression. The Chinese version of the Positive Negative Sentiment Scale (PANAS) was used to measure the subjects’ baseline mood and immediate mood. Experiment 2 used the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to measure implicit aggression. Results showed that perceived social hostility significantly increased college students’ aggression. Negative emotional experience partially mediated the relationship between perceived social hostility and college students’ overt aggression, but had no mediate effects on implicit aggression.

Key words: perceived social hostility, overt aggression, implicit aggression, negative emotional experience

摘要： 以往研究发现，挑衅、排斥、激惹等相对“激烈”的敌意情境会直接导致攻击行为，但鲜有研究探讨社会敌意这一相对“温和”的敌意情境对攻击行为的影响。本研究考察感知社会敌意对大学生攻击性的影响，并探讨负性情绪体验在其中的作用。实验1采用辣酱实验范式测量外显攻击，实验2采用内隐联想攻击测验测量内隐攻击，用中文版正性和负性情绪量表（PANAS）测量情绪。研究发现，感知社会敌意明显增加了大学生的负性情绪体验和攻击行为。负性情绪体验在感知社会敌意与大学生外显攻击间起部分中介作用，但在感知社会敌意与大学生内隐攻击之间无中介效应。

关键词: 感知社会敌意, 外显攻击, 内隐攻击, 负性情绪体验

CLC Number:

B844

YANG Jiawei, LI Dongling, LIU Jianrong. The Influence of Perceived Social Hostility on College Students’ Aggression: The Role of Negative Emotional Experience[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(3): 382-388.

杨嘉炜, 李东玲, 刘建榕. 感知社会敌意对大学生攻击性的影响：负性情绪体验的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 382-388.

References

蔡华俭. (2003). Greenwald提出的内隐联想测验介绍. 心理科学进展, 11(3), 339-344
褚祯. (2014). 诱发正负性情绪及归因对大学生攻击性影响的实验研究 (硕士学位论文). 曲阜师范大学.
窦凯. (2016). 感知社会正念:有效促进合作行为的心理机制 (博士学位论文). 暨南大学, 广州.
窦凯, 刘耀中, 王玉洁, 聂衍刚. (2018). "乐"于合作:感知社会善念诱导合作行为的情绪机制. 心理学报, 50(1), 101-114
窦凯, 聂衍刚, 王玉洁, 黎建斌. (2014). 自我损耗促进冒险行为. 心理科学, 37(1), 150-155
何珍, 杨起群, 周宪斌. (2020). 存在焦虑对大学生攻击行为的影响——人际归因的中介作用. 高教论坛, (1), 76-79, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-9719.2020.01.021
靳宇倡, 李俊一. (2014). 暴力游戏对青少年攻击性认知影响的文化差异:基于元分析视角. 心理科学进展, 22(8), 1226-1235
李婵, 单雨婷, 李文辉. (2017). 大学生冲动性和攻击行为的关系:焦虑情绪的中介作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 25(12), 1825-1829
李桃林, 黄小梅, 张又雪, 戈洪鑫, 孟春燕. (2019). 内隐攻击与外显攻击的关系:同一还是分离? 乐山师范学院学报, 34(12), 100-106.
李宇, 王沛, 孙连荣. (2014). 中国人社会认知研究的沿革、趋势与理论建构. 心理科学进展, 22(11), 1691-1707
吕路, 高见和至, 董冬, Wong, L., 王翕 (2013). 中文大学生版Buss-Perry攻击性量表的修订与信效度分析. 中国心理卫生杂志, 27(5), 378-383, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2013.05.012
宋依君. (2019). 情绪诱发对外显攻击和内隐攻击的影响——自尊的中介作用 (硕士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆.
王风霞. (2009). 青少年的内隐攻击性及其影响因素. 湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版), 6(1), 16-17
杨晨晨, 李彩娜, 王振宏, 边玉芳. (2016). 状态自恋与攻击行为——知觉到的威胁、愤怒情绪和敌意归因偏差的多重中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 32(2), 236-245
Adachi, P. J. C., & Willoughby, T. (2011). The effect of video game competition and violence on aggressive behavior:Which characteristic has the greatest influence? Psychology of Violence, 1(4), 259-274, doi:10.1037/a0024908.
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 27-51, doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231.
Berkowitz, L. (1993). Pain and aggression:Some findings and implications. Motivation and Emotion, 17(3), 277-293, doi:10.1007/BF00992223.
Buss, D. M., & Dedden, L. A. (1990). Derogation of competitors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7(3), 395-422, doi:10.1177/0265407590073006.
Cowie, H., Naylor, P., Rivers, I., Smith, P. K., & Pereira, B. (2002). Measuring workplace bullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7(1), 33-51, doi:10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00034-3.
DeBono, A., & Muraven, M. (2014). Rejection perceptions:Feeling disrespected leads to greater aggression than feeling disliked. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 43-52, doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.05.014.
Dollard, J., Miller, N. E., Doob, L. W., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
Dowsett, A., & Jackson, M. (2019). The effect of violence and competition within video games on aggression. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 22-27, doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.002.
Ferguson, T. J., & Rule, B. G. (1983). An attributional perspective on anger and aggression. In R. G. Green & E. I. Donnerstein (Eds.), Aggression:Theoretical and empirical reviews (Vol. 1, pp. 41-74). New York:Academic.
Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS:A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Retrieved November 1, 2020, from http://www.doc88.com/p-5079541815765.html
Hosie, J., Gilbert, F., Simpson, K., & Daffern, M. (2014). An examination of the relationship between personality and aggression using the general aggression and five factor models. Aggressive Behavior, 40(2), 189-196, doi:10.1002/ab.21510.
Reijntjes, A., Kamphuis, J. H., Thomaes, S., Bushman, B. J., & Telch, M. J. (2013). Too calloused to care:An experimental examination of factors influencing youths' displaced aggression against their peers. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 142(1), 28-33, doi:10.1037/a0028619.
Teng, Z., Nie, Q., Guo, C., Zhang, Q., Liu, Y., & Bushman, B. J. (2019). A longitudinal study of link between exposure to violent video games and aggression in Chinese adolescents:The mediating role of moral disengagement. Developmental Psychology, 55(1), 184-195, doi:10.1037/dev0000624.
Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 227-242, doi:10.1177/0022022106297301.
van Doesum, N. J., van Lange, D. A. W., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2013). Social mindfulness:Skill and will to navigate the social world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(1), 86-103, doi:10.1037/a0032540.
van Doesum, N. J., van Prooijen, J. W., Verburgh, L., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2016). Social hostility in soccer and beyond. PLoS ONE, 11(4), e0153577, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153577.
van Lange, P. A. M., & van Doesum, N. J. (2015). Social mindfulness and social hostility. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 18-24, doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.12.009.

[1]	LIANG Feifei, XIANG Ying, WU Hao, HAN Yang. The Development of Word Boundary Marking in Chinese Children with Developmental Dyslexia [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 757-763.
[2]	WANG Junli, WEN Yanru, LIN Yi, HOU Limin. Cognitive Development Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Emotional Display Rules in Preschool Children: A Follow-Up Study [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 764-770.
[3]	ZHANG Di, ZHAO Wei, LI Li, GAO Guili. Measurement of Word Awareness and Its Predictability to Early Reading Development [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 771-778.
[4]	HUANG He, WANG Xiaoying, LV Bo. Family Cumulative Risk and Problem Behavior of Migrant Preschool Children: A Moderated Mediation Model [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 779-785.
[5]	LAI Xiaolu, LIU Xuelan, LIN Liyun, ZHOU Zihan. Co-Parenting, Self-Expansion and Marital Quality: A Dyadic Analysis of Couples [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 786-793.
[6]	DENG Huiying, KONG Fanchang. The Relationship Between Harsh Parenting and Adolescents’ Search for Meaning in Life: A Moderated Mediation Model [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 612-619.
[7]	ZHOU Guangdong, ZHOU Guangmin. Peer Relationship and Children’s Reactive and Proactive Aggression: A Cross-Lagged Regression Analysis [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 620-627.
[8]	QIU Chen, NIU Meixin, ZHOU Xinlin, YANG Tao. The Relationship Between Fraction Magnitude Representation and Mathematics Achievement: The Mediating Role of the Conceptual Understanding of Fraction in Fourth-Grade and Seventh-Grade [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 628-635.
[9]	HE Xiaoling, LIU Yiqing, NA Linna. Cognitive Development of Colour Mapping Morality and Power Concepts in 3- to 5-Year-Old Children [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 636-641.
[10]	LIU Tuanli, HAO Xingfeng, XING Min, BAI Xuejun. The Influence of Internet Addiction on Reasoning Ability of College Students: The Mediating Role of Working Memory Capacity [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 642-649.
[11]	GUO Qingtong, XU Mingxue, XU Chunyan, LIU Xiuli. The Relationship Between University Students’ Dormitory Relationship Disturbance and Mobile Phone Addiction: A Sequential Mediation Model and Gender Differences [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 650-656.
[12]	ZHU Yingying, MA Xiaoqing, TANG Zhuoyi, YANG Minqi. Impact of Chronotype on Symptoms of Depression in College Students: A Moderate Mediation Model [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 657-664,694.
[13]	YOU Zhiqi, ZHOU Zongkui. Developmental Trajectories of Self-Perceived Social Competence and Its Relevance to Loneliness and Passive Withdrawal in Childhood [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(4): 473-479.
[14]	SHI Zifu, TANG Wanqiu, XIE Yuntian. Relationship Between Cognitive Needs and Math Academic Performance of Junior High School Students: Based on Latent Profile Analysis [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(4): 480-485.
[15]	KONG Fanchang, WANG Meiru, SUN Yiyuan, XIA Yujuan, LI Xiaoyao. Parental Phubbing and Adolescents’ Alienation: A Moderated Mediation Model [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(4): 486-492.