
Studies of Psychology and Behavior ›› 2023, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 736-743.DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.06.003
• ? • Previous Articles Next Articles
Feifei LIANG1,2,3,*(
), Linlin FENG2, Ying LIU2, Changhao WANG2, Jie WANG2
Received:2023-04-19
Online:2023-11-20
Published:2023-11-20
Contact:
Feifei LIANG
梁菲菲1,2,3,*(
), 冯琳琳2, 刘瑛2, 王昶浩2, 王洁2
通讯作者:
梁菲菲
基金资助:CLC Number:
Feifei LIANG, Linlin FENG, Ying LIU, Changhao WANG, Jie WANG. The Role of Character Positional Probability in Chinese Two-Word Identification: Moderation of Lexical Contextual Diversity[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(6): 736-743.
梁菲菲, 冯琳琳, 刘瑛, 王昶浩, 王洁. 词素位置概率信息在中文双字词识别中的作用:词汇语境多样性的调节[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 736-743.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://psybeh.tjnu.edu.cn/EN/10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.06.003
| 条件 | HH | HL | LH | LL |
| 目标词举例 | 银器 | 几何 | 岛屿 | 派对 |
| 首词素位置概率 | 0.87(0.10) | 0.88(0.09) | 0.20(0.06) | 0.24(0.04) |
| 尾词素位置概率 | 0.86(0.09) | 0.20(0.06) | 0.85(0.09) | 0.24(0.05) |
| 整词语境多样性(log转换) | 1.70(0.13) | 1.70(0.25) | 1.77(0.41) | 1.73(0.60) |
| 整词词频(log转换) | 1.83(0.07) | 1.77(0.26) | 1.90(0.43) | 1.83(0.67) |
| 首词素笔画数 | 9.10(2.99) | 9.43(3.37) | 8.98(2.93) | 7.98(3.29) |
| 尾词素笔画数 | 9.38(3.34) | 8.55(3.25) | 8.78(3.46) | 8.50(3.04) |
| 首词素字频 | 82.83(187.40) | 650.33(3251.94) | 250.00(754.99) | 282.70(921.99) |
| 尾词素字频 | 201.61(809.57) | 101.04(240.02) | 246.49(1030.61) | 347.27(755.17) |
| 条件 | HH | HL | LH | LL |
| 目标词举例 | 银器 | 几何 | 岛屿 | 派对 |
| 首词素位置概率 | 0.87(0.10) | 0.88(0.09) | 0.20(0.06) | 0.24(0.04) |
| 尾词素位置概率 | 0.86(0.09) | 0.20(0.06) | 0.85(0.09) | 0.24(0.05) |
| 整词语境多样性(log转换) | 1.70(0.13) | 1.70(0.25) | 1.77(0.41) | 1.73(0.60) |
| 整词词频(log转换) | 1.83(0.07) | 1.77(0.26) | 1.90(0.43) | 1.83(0.67) |
| 首词素笔画数 | 9.10(2.99) | 9.43(3.37) | 8.98(2.93) | 7.98(3.29) |
| 尾词素笔画数 | 9.38(3.34) | 8.55(3.25) | 8.78(3.46) | 8.50(3.04) |
| 首词素字频 | 82.83(187.40) | 650.33(3251.94) | 250.00(754.99) | 282.70(921.99) |
| 尾词素字频 | 201.61(809.57) | 101.04(240.02) | 246.49(1030.61) | 347.27(755.17) |
| 条件 | HH | HL | LH | LL |
| 首词素位置概率 | 0.86(0.10) | 0.90(0.09) | 0.20(0.06) | 0.20(0.08) |
| 尾词素位置概率 | 0.86(0.10) | 0.20(0.07) | 0.82(0.09) | 0.19(0.09) |
| 首词素笔画数 | 9.53(2.83) | 9.55(4.05) | 9.38(2.73) | 8.43(3.11) |
| 尾词素笔画数 | 9.50(2.81) | 9.45(3.15) | 9.15(3.49) | 8.93(2.74) |
| 首词素字频 | 55.28(105.24) | 640.13(3253.68) | 205.13(707.12) | 59.24(92.99) |
| 尾词素字频 | 187.60(810.07) | 85.23(219.19) | 274.91(977.70) | 133.62(327.05) |
| 条件 | HH | HL | LH | LL |
| 首词素位置概率 | 0.86(0.10) | 0.90(0.09) | 0.20(0.06) | 0.20(0.08) |
| 尾词素位置概率 | 0.86(0.10) | 0.20(0.07) | 0.82(0.09) | 0.19(0.09) |
| 首词素笔画数 | 9.53(2.83) | 9.55(4.05) | 9.38(2.73) | 8.43(3.11) |
| 尾词素笔画数 | 9.50(2.81) | 9.45(3.15) | 9.15(3.49) | 8.93(2.74) |
| 首词素字频 | 55.28(105.24) | 640.13(3253.68) | 205.13(707.12) | 59.24(92.99) |
| 尾词素字频 | 187.60(810.07) | 85.23(219.19) | 274.91(977.70) | 133.62(327.05) |
| 条件 | 正确率 | 反应时(ms) |
| HH | 0.94(0.25) | 659(252) |
| HL | 0.96(0.20) | 644(239) |
| LH | 0.95(0.22) | 625(211) |
| LL | 0.89(0.31) | 651(250) |
| 条件 | 正确率 | 反应时(ms) |
| HH | 0.94(0.25) | 659(252) |
| HL | 0.96(0.20) | 644(239) |
| LH | 0.95(0.22) | 625(211) |
| LL | 0.89(0.31) | 651(250) |
| 变量 | b | SE | t/z | 95%CI | |
| 正确率 | 截距 | 3.73 | 0.17 | 21.69*** | [3.39, 4.06] |
| 首词素位置概率 | −0.27 | 0.26 | −1.04 | [−0.78, 0.24] | |
| 尾词素位置概率 | −0.29 | 0.28 | −1.05 | [−0.83, 0.25] | |
| 首×尾词素位置概率 | −1.37 | 0.52 | −2.63** | [−2.39, −0.35] | |
| 比较1 | −0.01 | 0.01 | 1.02 | [−0.01, 0.03] | |
| 比较2 | −0.03 | 0.01 | −2.42* | [−0.05, −0.01] | |
| 反应时 | 截距 | 6.43 | 0.02 | 344.60*** | [6.39, 6.47] |
| 首词素位置概率 | −0.01 | 0.02 | −0.73 | [−0.04, 0.02] | |
| 尾词素位置概率 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.52 | [−0.02, 0.04] | |
| 首×尾词素位置概率 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 1.99* | [0.001, 0.12] | |
| 比较1 | −0.01 | 0.01 | −1.03 | [−0.03, 0.01] | |
| 比较2 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 1.79 | [−0.002, 0.04] |
| 变量 | b | SE | t/z | 95%CI | |
| 正确率 | 截距 | 3.73 | 0.17 | 21.69*** | [3.39, 4.06] |
| 首词素位置概率 | −0.27 | 0.26 | −1.04 | [−0.78, 0.24] | |
| 尾词素位置概率 | −0.29 | 0.28 | −1.05 | [−0.83, 0.25] | |
| 首×尾词素位置概率 | −1.37 | 0.52 | −2.63** | [−2.39, −0.35] | |
| 比较1 | −0.01 | 0.01 | 1.02 | [−0.01, 0.03] | |
| 比较2 | −0.03 | 0.01 | −2.42* | [−0.05, −0.01] | |
| 反应时 | 截距 | 6.43 | 0.02 | 344.60*** | [6.39, 6.47] |
| 首词素位置概率 | −0.01 | 0.02 | −0.73 | [−0.04, 0.02] | |
| 尾词素位置概率 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.52 | [−0.02, 0.04] | |
| 首×尾词素位置概率 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 1.99* | [0.001, 0.12] | |
| 比较1 | −0.01 | 0.01 | −1.03 | [−0.03, 0.01] | |
| 比较2 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 1.79 | [−0.002, 0.04] |
| 条件 | HH | HL | LH | LL |
| 目标词举例 | 讲坛 | 皇朝 | 量筒 | 味精 |
| 首词素位置概率 | 0.86(0.11) | 0.88(0.10) | 0.22(0.05) | 0.22(0.06) |
| 尾词素位置概率 | 0.85(0.10) | 0.22(0.07) | 0.87(0.10) | 0.22(0.06) |
| 整词语境多样性(log转换) | 0.53(0.09) | 0.48(0.18) | 0.49(0.22) | 0.46(0.30) |
| 整词词频(log转换) | 0.56(0.09) | 0.51(0.14) | 0.56(0.24) | 0.51(0.33) |
| 首词素笔画数 | 9.49(2.47) | 9.83(2.36) | 9.17(3.01) | 8.31(2.97) |
| 尾词素笔画数 | 9.49(3.36) | 9.09(3.39) | 9.51(3.63) | 9.74(3.67) |
| 首词素字频 | 50.31(152.70) | 26.47(47.78) | 44.74(71.33) | 91.94(205.76) |
| 尾词素字频 | 214.31(1065.38) | 50.03(83.49) | 39.88(91.67) | 161.99(669.65) |
| 条件 | HH | HL | LH | LL |
| 目标词举例 | 讲坛 | 皇朝 | 量筒 | 味精 |
| 首词素位置概率 | 0.86(0.11) | 0.88(0.10) | 0.22(0.05) | 0.22(0.06) |
| 尾词素位置概率 | 0.85(0.10) | 0.22(0.07) | 0.87(0.10) | 0.22(0.06) |
| 整词语境多样性(log转换) | 0.53(0.09) | 0.48(0.18) | 0.49(0.22) | 0.46(0.30) |
| 整词词频(log转换) | 0.56(0.09) | 0.51(0.14) | 0.56(0.24) | 0.51(0.33) |
| 首词素笔画数 | 9.49(2.47) | 9.83(2.36) | 9.17(3.01) | 8.31(2.97) |
| 尾词素笔画数 | 9.49(3.36) | 9.09(3.39) | 9.51(3.63) | 9.74(3.67) |
| 首词素字频 | 50.31(152.70) | 26.47(47.78) | 44.74(71.33) | 91.94(205.76) |
| 尾词素字频 | 214.31(1065.38) | 50.03(83.49) | 39.88(91.67) | 161.99(669.65) |
| 条件 | HH | HL | LH | LL |
| 首词素位置概率 | 0.87(0.11) | 0.86(0.10) | 0.20(0.08) | 0.19(0.08) |
| 尾词素位置概率 | 0.84(0.10) | 0.22(0.07) | 0.83(0.09) | 0.14(0.12) |
| 首词素笔画数 | 10.71(3.42) | 10.34(2.89) | 9.11(3.12) | 9.51(3.85) |
| 尾词素笔画数 | 9.73(2.92) | 9.32(3.15) | 9.04(3.58) | 9.24(2.69) |
| 首词素字频 | 16.13(17.81) | 25.90(47.64) | 34.96(63.65) | 53.92(199.01) |
| 尾词素字频 | 69.91(113.90) | 74.79(113.16) | 79.12(169.91) | 31.29(37.96) |
| 条件 | HH | HL | LH | LL |
| 首词素位置概率 | 0.87(0.11) | 0.86(0.10) | 0.20(0.08) | 0.19(0.08) |
| 尾词素位置概率 | 0.84(0.10) | 0.22(0.07) | 0.83(0.09) | 0.14(0.12) |
| 首词素笔画数 | 10.71(3.42) | 10.34(2.89) | 9.11(3.12) | 9.51(3.85) |
| 尾词素笔画数 | 9.73(2.92) | 9.32(3.15) | 9.04(3.58) | 9.24(2.69) |
| 首词素字频 | 16.13(17.81) | 25.90(47.64) | 34.96(63.65) | 53.92(199.01) |
| 尾词素字频 | 69.91(113.90) | 74.79(113.16) | 79.12(169.91) | 31.29(37.96) |
| 条件 | 正确率 | 反应时(ms) |
| HH | 0.89(0.32) | 759(303) |
| HL | 0.85(0.36) | 776(321) |
| LH | 0.87(0.33) | 725(279) |
| LL | 0.73(0.44) | 760(303) |
| 条件 | 正确率 | 反应时(ms) |
| HH | 0.89(0.32) | 759(303) |
| HL | 0.85(0.36) | 776(321) |
| LH | 0.87(0.33) | 725(279) |
| LL | 0.73(0.44) | 760(303) |
| 变量 | b | SE | t/z | 95%CI | |
| 正确率 | 截距 | 2.31 | 0.15 | 15.11*** | [2.01, 2.61] |
| 首词素位置概率 | −0.48 | 0.25 | −1.94 | [−0.97, 0.01] | |
| 尾词素位置概率 | −0.81 | 0.25 | −3.22** | [−1.31, −0.32] | |
| 首×尾词素位置概率 | −0.75 | 0.50 | −1.52 | [−1.72, 0.22] | |
| 反应时 | 截距 | 6.58 | 0.02 | 317.58*** | [6.54, 6.63] |
| 首词素位置概率 | −0.02 | 0.02 | −0.94 | [−0.06, 0.02] | |
| 尾词素位置概率 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 1.99* | [0.001, 0.08] | |
| 首×尾词素位置概率 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 1.09 | [−0.04, 0.13] |
| 变量 | b | SE | t/z | 95%CI | |
| 正确率 | 截距 | 2.31 | 0.15 | 15.11*** | [2.01, 2.61] |
| 首词素位置概率 | −0.48 | 0.25 | −1.94 | [−0.97, 0.01] | |
| 尾词素位置概率 | −0.81 | 0.25 | −3.22** | [−1.31, −0.32] | |
| 首×尾词素位置概率 | −0.75 | 0.50 | −1.52 | [−1.72, 0.22] | |
| 反应时 | 截距 | 6.58 | 0.02 | 317.58*** | [6.54, 6.63] |
| 首词素位置概率 | −0.02 | 0.02 | −0.94 | [−0.06, 0.02] | |
| 尾词素位置概率 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 1.99* | [0.001, 0.08] | |
| 首×尾词素位置概率 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 1.09 | [−0.04, 0.13] |
| 条件 | 正确率 | 反应时(ms) |
| HH | 0.90(0.30) | 773(295) |
| HL | 0.91(0.29) | 763(293) |
| LH | 0.91(0.29) | 767(299) |
| LL | 0.96(0.20) | 718(275) |
| 条件 | 正确率 | 反应时(ms) |
| HH | 0.90(0.30) | 773(295) |
| HL | 0.91(0.29) | 763(293) |
| LH | 0.91(0.29) | 767(299) |
| LL | 0.96(0.20) | 718(275) |
| 变量 | b | SE | t/z | 95%CI | |
| 正确率 | 截距 | 3.09 | 0.15 | 21.12*** | [2.80, 3.38] |
| 首词素位置概率 | 0.52 | 0.15 | 3.54*** | [0.23, 0.80] | |
| 尾词素位置概率 | 0.54 | 0.14 | 3.96*** | [0.27, 0.81] | |
| 首×尾词素位置概率 | 0.90 | 0.27 | 3.29*** | [0.36, 1.43] | |
| 比较1 | −0.002 | 0.01 | −0.04 | [−0.01, 0.01] | |
| 比较2 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 3.88*** | [0.01, 0.04] | |
| 反应时 | 截距 | 6.58 | 0.02 | 312.37*** | [6.54, 6.62] |
| 首词素位置概率 | −0.04 | 0.01 | −3.85*** | [−0.05, −0.02] | |
| 尾词素位置概率 | −0.04 | 0.01 | −4.22*** | [−0.06, −0.02] | |
| 首×尾词素位置概率 | −0.05 | 0.02 | −2.96** | [−0.09, −0.02] | |
| 比较1 | −0.01 | 0.01 | −0.78 | [−0.02, 0.01] | |
| 比较2 | −0.03 | 0.01 | −5.30*** | [−0.05, −0.02] |
| 变量 | b | SE | t/z | 95%CI | |
| 正确率 | 截距 | 3.09 | 0.15 | 21.12*** | [2.80, 3.38] |
| 首词素位置概率 | 0.52 | 0.15 | 3.54*** | [0.23, 0.80] | |
| 尾词素位置概率 | 0.54 | 0.14 | 3.96*** | [0.27, 0.81] | |
| 首×尾词素位置概率 | 0.90 | 0.27 | 3.29*** | [0.36, 1.43] | |
| 比较1 | −0.002 | 0.01 | −0.04 | [−0.01, 0.01] | |
| 比较2 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 3.88*** | [0.01, 0.04] | |
| 反应时 | 截距 | 6.58 | 0.02 | 312.37*** | [6.54, 6.62] |
| 首词素位置概率 | −0.04 | 0.01 | −3.85*** | [−0.05, −0.02] | |
| 尾词素位置概率 | −0.04 | 0.01 | −4.22*** | [−0.06, −0.02] | |
| 首×尾词素位置概率 | −0.05 | 0.02 | −2.96** | [−0.09, −0.02] | |
| 比较1 | −0.01 | 0.01 | −0.78 | [−0.02, 0.01] | |
| 比较2 | −0.03 | 0.01 | −5.30*** | [−0.05, −0.02] |
| 白学军, 马杰, 李馨, 连坤予, 谭珂, 杨宇, 梁菲菲. 发展性阅读障碍儿童的新词习得及其改善. 心理学报, 2019, 51 (4): 471- 483. | |
| 曹海波, 兰泽波, 高峰, 于海涛, 李鹏, 王敬欣. 词素位置概率在中文阅读中的作用: 词汇判断和眼动研究. 心理学报, 2023, 55 (2): 159- 176. | |
| 贺斐. (2021). 汉语新词词形信息在阅读伴随新词学习中的作用——基于眼动的证据(博士学位论文). 天津师范大学. | |
| 梁菲菲, 马杰, 李馨, 连坤予, 谭珂, 白学军. (2019). 发展性阅读障碍儿童阅读中的眼跳定位缺陷: 基于新词学习的实验证据. 心理学报, 51(7), 805–815. | |
|
梁菲菲, 向颖, 龙梦灵. 首词素位置概率信息未参与汉语阅读的词切分: 基于副中央凹加工的证据. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20 (3): 318- 324.
DOI |
|
|
Adelman, J. S., Brown, G. D. A., & Quesada, J. F.. Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science, 2006, 17 (9): 814- 823.
DOI |
|
| Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2023). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using ‘Eigen’ and S4. Retrieved April 19, 2023, from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html | |
|
Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M.. SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS One, 2010, 5 (6): e10729.
DOI |
|
|
Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C.. Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 1988, 28 (3): 297- 332.
DOI |
|
| Chen, Q. R., Huang, X., Bai, L., Xu, X. D., Yang, Y. M., & Tanenhaus, M. K.. The effect of contextual diversity on eye movements in Chinese sentence reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2017, 24 (2): 510- 518. | |
|
Clifton, C., Ferreira, F., Henderson, J. M., Inhoff, A. W., Liversedge, S. P., Reichle, E. D., & Schotter, E. R.. Eye movements in reading and information processing: Keith Rayner’s 40 year legacy. Journal of Memory and Language, 2016, 86, 1- 19.
DOI |
|
|
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J.. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 2001, 108 (1): 204- 256.
DOI |
|
| Davis, C. J.. The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 2001, 62 (1–B): 594. | |
|
Hoffman, P., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Rogers, T. T.. Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words. Behavior Research Methods, 2013, 45 (3): 718- 730.
DOI |
|
|
Huang, X., Lin, D., Yang, Y. M., Xu, Y. H., Chen, Q. R., & Tanenhaus, M. K.. Effects of character and word contextual diversity in Chinese beginning readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2021, 25 (3): 251- 271.
DOI |
|
|
Johns, B. T., Gruenenfelder, T. M., Pisoni, D. B., & Jones, M. N.. Effects of word frequency, contextual diversity, and semantic distinctiveness on spoken word recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2012, 132 (2): EL74- EL80.
DOI |
|
| Jones, M. N., Dye, M., & Johns, B. T.. Context as an organizing principle of the lexicon. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 2017, 67, 239- 283. | |
|
Li, X. S., & Pollatsek, A.. An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading. Psychological Review, 2020, 127 (6): 1139- 1162.
DOI |
|
|
Liang, F. F., Blythe, H. I., Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., Li, X., Zang, C. L., & Liversedge, S. P.. The role of character positional frequency on Chinese word learning during natural reading. PLoS One, 2017, 12 (11): e0187656.
DOI |
|
|
Liang, F. F., Blythe, H. I., Zang, C. L., Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., & Liversedge, S. P.. Positional character frequency and word spacing facilitate the acquisition of novel words during Chinese children’s reading. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2015, 27 (5): 594- 608.
DOI |
|
| Liang, F. F., Gao, Q., Li, X., Wang, Y. S., Bai, X. J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2023). The importance of the positional probability of word final (but not word initial) characters for word segmentation and identification in children and adults’ natural Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49(1), 98–115. | |
|
Ma, G. J., & Li, X. S.. How character complexity modulates eye movement control in Chinese reading. Reading and Writing, 2015, 28 (6): 747- 761.
DOI |
|
|
Nation, K.. Nurturing a lexical legacy: Reading experience is critical for the development of word reading skill. NPJ Science of Learning, 2017, 2 (1): 3.
DOI |
|
|
Pagán, A., Bird, M., Hsiao, Y., & Nation, K.. Both semantic diversity and frequency influence children’s sentence reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2020, 24 (4): 356- 364.
DOI |
|
|
Perea, M., & Acha, J.. Space information is important for reading. Vision Research, 2009, 49 (15): 1994- 2000.
DOI |
|
|
Perea, M., Soares, A. P., & Comesaña, M.. Contextual diversity is a main determinant of word identification times in young readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2013, 116 (1): 37- 44.
DOI |
|
| Plummer, P., Perea, M., & Rayner, K. (2014). The influence of contextual diversity on eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(1), 275–283. | |
| R Development Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. | |
|
Rosa, E., Tapia, J. L., & Perea, M.. Contextual diversity facilitates learning new words in the classroom. PLoS One, 2017, 12 (6): e0179004.
DOI |
|
|
Soares, A. P., Machado, J., Costa, A., Iriarte, Á., Simões, A., de Almeida, J. J., … Perea, M.. On the advantages of word frequency and contextual diversity measures extracted from subtitles: The case of Portuguese. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2015, 68 (4): 680- 696.
DOI |
|
| Taft, M., & Zhu, X. P. (1997). Submorphemic processing in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(3), 761–775. | |
|
Tsang, Y. K., & Zou, Y.. An ERP megastudy of Chinese word recognition. Psychophysiology, 2022, 59 (11): e14111.
DOI |
|
| Whitney, C.. How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2001, 8 (2): 221- 243. |
| [1] | Shuangshuang WANG, Zhichao ZHANG, Manman ZHANG, Chuanli ZANG, Guoli YAN. Are the Literal Meanings of Constituents Activated in Chinese Idioms’ Processing? Evidence from the Semantic Preview Effect [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2025, 23(6): 759-765. |
| [2] | Yufei DU, Zhichao ZHANG, Manman ZHANG, Chuanli ZANG. Semantics Takes Precedence over World Knowledge in Sentence Comprehension: Evidence from Eye Movements [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2025, 23(2): 153-160. |
| [3] | Yongsheng WANG, Yang HAN, Xin LI, Liyuan HE. The Promotion of Inter-Word Space in Chinese Sentence Reading of Uyghur College Students with Different Text Presentation Directions [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2025, 23(1): 41-48. |
| [4] | Xiangwen CHEN, Longge WANG, Huilan HU, Zhichao ZHANG, Mengsi WANG, Qiang WANG, Manman ZHANG. The Neural Structural Basis of Individual Differences in Word Frequency Effect on Eye Movement Measures During Chinese Reading [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(6): 721-729. |
| [5] | Xin LI, Mengling LONG, Feifei LIANG, Yongsheng WANG. The Role of Character Positional Probability During Chinese Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements of Uyghur Readers [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(5): 585-593. |
| [6] | Kunying SONG, Linlin FENG, Zheng WANG, Xuejun BAI, Feifei LIANG. The Relative Contributions of Word Frequency and Contextual Diversity in Chinese Word Identification: Evidence from an ERP Study [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(4): 433-441. |
| [7] | Min CHANG, Kuo ZHANG, Yue SUN, Sha LI, Jingxin WANG. Semantic Similarity Effects in Chinese Reading: Evidence for Semantic Prediction [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(4): 442-449. |
| [8] | Tongwen HU, Kuo ZHANG, Yuru CHENG, Jingxin WANG. The Emotion Word Type Effect in Chinese Reading not Moderated by Valence: Evidence from Eye-Tracking [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(2): 197-203. |
| [9] | Ruqi CHEN, Yaqian BAO, Linjieqiong HUANG, Xingshan LI. An Introduction to the Chinese Reading Model (CRM) [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(6): 725-735. |
| [10] | Zijia LU, Zhichao ZHANG, Ying FU, Manman ZHANG, Chuanli ZANG, Xuejun BAI. Repeating Words Cannot Help Chinese Readers to Obtain Word Class Information from Parafoveal Words [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(5): 577-584. |
| [11] | Lijuan ZHANG, Fengjun ZHANG, Sainan ZHAO, Jingxin WANG. The Predominant Role of Preview Plausibility on Semantic Preview Benefit of Two-Character Words in Chinese Reading: An Eye Movement Study [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(1): 12-19. |
| [12] | Haibo CAO, Liang REN, Dan HAN, Dongli JIA, Jingxin WANG. The Role of Character Positional Frequency of Word Segmentation of Overlapping Ambiguous Strings in Chinese [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(6): 732-738. |
| [13] | ZHANG Manman, HU Huilan, BIAN Han, LI Fang, ZHANG Zhichao, ZANG Chuanli. Word Frequency Effects in Fast and Slow Readers During Skilled Chinese Reading [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(3): 304-310. |
| [14] | WANG Yongsheng, HE Liyuan, LI Xin, BAI Xuejun. The Role of the First Character Frequency in Low-Frequency Two-Character Words in Parafoveal Processing in Chinese Reading [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(3): 311-317. |
| [15] | LIANG Feifei, XIANG Ying, LONG Mengling. Initial Character Positional Probability Does Not Influence Word Segmentation in Chinese Reading: Evidence from Parafoveal Processing [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(3): 318-324. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||