
Studies of Psychology and Behavior ›› 2024, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5): 602-608.DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.05.004
• ? • Previous Articles Next Articles
Jianxin CHEN1, Zimeng FANG1,2, Rong HUANG1, Baoyi YE1, Weiping YANG1, Liuqing WEI*,1(
)
Received:2022-07-27
Online:2024-09-20
Published:2024-09-20
Contact:
Liuqing WEI
陈建新1, 方紫梦1,2, 黄蓉1, 叶宝仪1, 杨伟平1, 魏柳青*,1(
)
通讯作者:
魏柳青
基金资助:Jianxin CHEN, Zimeng FANG, Rong HUANG, Baoyi YE, Weiping YANG, Liuqing WEI. The Influence of Embodied Emotion on Creative Thinking of Individuals with Depressive Tendency[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(5): 602-608.
陈建新, 方紫梦, 黄蓉, 叶宝仪, 杨伟平, 魏柳青. 具身情绪对抑郁倾向个体创造性思维的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(5): 602-608.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://psybeh.tjnu.edu.cn/EN/10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.05.004
| 维度 | 面部表情操纵 | ||
| 对照组 | 抑制微笑组 | 微笑组 | |
| 顿悟 | 3.65±1.30 | 3.60±1.08 | 3.88±1.37 |
| 流畅性 | 6.31±2.52 | 6.12±2.11 | 7.64±3.56 |
| 灵活性 | 3.84±1.08 | 3.80±0.78 | 4.46±1.95 |
| 独特性 | 0.87±0.78 | 0.69±0.50 | 1.47±1.39 |
| 维度 | 面部表情操纵 | ||
| 对照组 | 抑制微笑组 | 微笑组 | |
| 顿悟 | 3.65±1.30 | 3.60±1.08 | 3.88±1.37 |
| 流畅性 | 6.31±2.52 | 6.12±2.11 | 7.64±3.56 |
| 灵活性 | 3.84±1.08 | 3.80±0.78 | 4.46±1.95 |
| 独特性 | 0.87±0.78 | 0.69±0.50 | 1.47±1.39 |
| 因变量 | 面部表情操纵 | 测量时间 | |
| T1 | T2 | ||
| IPA得分 | 对照组 | 46.87±11.60 | 47.59±10.63 |
| 抑制微笑组 | 48.35±10.34 | 46.04±11.43 | |
| 微笑组 | 45.89±9.54 | 49.50±9.91 | |
| INA得分 | 对照组 | 38.86±11.02 | 41.49±12.24 |
| 抑制微笑组 | 38.47±13.45 | 41.24±11.28 | |
| 微笑组 | 40.06±10.13 | 39.37±11.13 | |
| 因变量 | 面部表情操纵 | 测量时间 | |
| T1 | T2 | ||
| IPA得分 | 对照组 | 46.87±11.60 | 47.59±10.63 |
| 抑制微笑组 | 48.35±10.34 | 46.04±11.43 | |
| 微笑组 | 45.89±9.54 | 49.50±9.91 | |
| INA得分 | 对照组 | 38.86±11.02 | 41.49±12.24 |
| 抑制微笑组 | 38.47±13.45 | 41.24±11.28 | |
| 微笑组 | 40.06±10.13 | 39.37±11.13 | |
| 因变量 | 面部表情操纵 | 测量时间 | |
| T1 | T2 | ||
| PA得分 | 对照组 | 26.74±8.00 | 26.13±8.10 |
| 抑制微笑组 | 26.52±6.87 | 25.84±8.28 | |
| 微笑组 | 26.89±5.95 | 24.03±6.70 | |
| NA得分 | 对照组 | 15.30±6.35 | 15.78±6.50 |
| 抑制微笑组 | 16.95±5.77 | 17.72±7.68 | |
| 微笑组 | 17.45±5.54 | 17.57±6.06 | |
| 因变量 | 面部表情操纵 | 测量时间 | |
| T1 | T2 | ||
| PA得分 | 对照组 | 26.74±8.00 | 26.13±8.10 |
| 抑制微笑组 | 26.52±6.87 | 25.84±8.28 | |
| 微笑组 | 26.89±5.95 | 24.03±6.70 | |
| NA得分 | 对照组 | 15.30±6.35 | 15.78±6.50 |
| 抑制微笑组 | 16.95±5.77 | 17.72±7.68 | |
| 微笑组 | 17.45±5.54 | 17.57±6.06 | |
| 维度 | 身体姿势操纵 | ||
| 对照组 | 蜷缩姿势组 | 扩张姿势组 | |
| 顿悟 | 3.33±1.30 | 3.75±1.19 | 3.65±1.20 |
| 流畅性 | 6.91±2.75 | 6.85±1.90 | 7.15±2.65 |
| 灵活性 | 4.11±1.28 | 3.83±1.38 | 4.73±1.38 |
| 独特性 | 0.88±0.55 | 0.75±0.81 | 1.41±1.25 |
| 维度 | 身体姿势操纵 | ||
| 对照组 | 蜷缩姿势组 | 扩张姿势组 | |
| 顿悟 | 3.33±1.30 | 3.75±1.19 | 3.65±1.20 |
| 流畅性 | 6.91±2.75 | 6.85±1.90 | 7.15±2.65 |
| 灵活性 | 4.11±1.28 | 3.83±1.38 | 4.73±1.38 |
| 独特性 | 0.88±0.55 | 0.75±0.81 | 1.41±1.25 |
| 因变量 | 身体姿势操纵 | 测量时间 | |
| T1 | T2 | ||
| IPA得分 | 对照组 | 46.40±10.13 | 48.29±10.49 |
| 蜷缩姿势组 | 46.33±9.26 | 43.54±10.78 | |
| 扩张姿势组 | 47.08±13.41 | 49.73±14.88 | |
| INA得分 | 对照组 | 37.79±10.99 | 40.76±12.00 |
| 蜷缩姿势组 | 35.71±11.18 | 36.83±11.49 | |
| 扩张姿势组 | 32.81±9.68 | 36.73±11.66 | |
| 因变量 | 身体姿势操纵 | 测量时间 | |
| T1 | T2 | ||
| IPA得分 | 对照组 | 46.40±10.13 | 48.29±10.49 |
| 蜷缩姿势组 | 46.33±9.26 | 43.54±10.78 | |
| 扩张姿势组 | 47.08±13.41 | 49.73±14.88 | |
| INA得分 | 对照组 | 37.79±10.99 | 40.76±12.00 |
| 蜷缩姿势组 | 35.71±11.18 | 36.83±11.49 | |
| 扩张姿势组 | 32.81±9.68 | 36.73±11.66 | |
| 因变量 | 身体姿势操纵 | 测量时间 | |
| T1 | T2 | ||
| PA得分 | 对照组 | 25.56±6.53 | 24.94±7.04 |
| 蜷缩姿势组 | 25.75±7.31 | 21.96±6.90 | |
| 扩张姿势组 | 26.89±8.13 | 26.54±9.65 | |
| NA得分 | 对照组 | 17.88±7.86 | 17.84±7.52 |
| 蜷缩姿势组 | 16.17±5.96 | 16.33±6.39 | |
| 扩张姿势组 | 19.73±7.32 | 17.62±6.46 | |
| 因变量 | 身体姿势操纵 | 测量时间 | |
| T1 | T2 | ||
| PA得分 | 对照组 | 25.56±6.53 | 24.94±7.04 |
| 蜷缩姿势组 | 25.75±7.31 | 21.96±6.90 | |
| 扩张姿势组 | 26.89±8.13 | 26.54±9.65 | |
| NA得分 | 对照组 | 17.88±7.86 | 17.84±7.52 |
| 蜷缩姿势组 | 16.17±5.96 | 16.33±6.39 | |
| 扩张姿势组 | 19.73±7.32 | 17.62±6.46 | |
|
陈建新, 伍莉, 黄蓉, 王喆, 陈悦, 杨伟平. 情绪的相容性对创造性思维的影响. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18 (4): 433- 439.
|
|
|
胡卫平, 王博韬, 段海军, 程丽芳, 周寰, 李晶晶. 情绪影响创造性认知过程的神经机制. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23 (11): 1869- 1878.
|
|
|
汪海彬, 侯紫昳, 朱蕾晔, 程思, 姚本先. 内隐积极消极情感量表测评大学生样本的效度和信度. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2018, 32 (10): 869- 872.
DOI |
|
|
王艳梅, 郭德俊. 积极情绪对任务转换的影响. 心理学报, 2008, 40 (3): 301- 306.
|
|
|
吴真真, 邱江, 张庆林. 顿悟脑机制的实验范式探索. 心理科学, 2009, 32 (1): 122- 125.
|
|
|
杨文静, 靳玉乐, 陈群林, 孙江洲, 童丹丹, 李亚丹, … 张庆林. 科学发明中原型启发的创造性思维成分及其脑机制. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24 (8): 1139- 1146.
|
|
|
姚海娟, 王金霞, 苏清丽, 白学军. 具身情绪与创造性思维: 情境性调节定向的调节作用. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16 (4): 441- 448.
DOI |
|
|
叶浩生. 具身心智与具身的教育. 教育研究, 2023, 44 (3): 32- 41.
DOI |
|
|
叶浩生, 苏佳佳, 苏得权. 身体的意义: 生成论视域下的情绪理论. 心理学报, 2021, 53 (12): 1393- 1404.
|
|
|
张鹏程, 丁梦夏, 王灿明. 积极情绪体验对创造力影响. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15 (5): 613- 618.
DOI |
|
|
张亚. (2014). 表情操控对普通人群及轻度抑郁者情绪体验的影响(博士学位论文). 华东师范大学, 上海.
|
|
|
Andolfi, V. R., Di Nuzzo, C., & Antonietti, A. Opening the mind through the body: The effects of posture on creative processes. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2017, 24, 20- 28.
DOI |
|
|
Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus. Psychological Bulletin, 2008, 134 (6): 779- 806.
DOI |
|
|
Cuijpers, P., Quero, S., Papola, D., Cristea, I. A., & Karyotaki, E. Care-as-usual control groups across different settings in randomized trials on psychotherapy for adult depression: A meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 2021, 51 (4): 634- 644.
DOI |
|
|
Fernández-Abascal, E. G., & Díaz, M. D. M. Affective induction and creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 2013, 25 (2): 213- 221.
DOI |
|
|
Guilford, J. P. The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 1956, 53 (4): 267- 293.
DOI |
|
|
Guilford, J. P. Creativity: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1967, 1 (1): 3- 14.
DOI |
|
|
Gupta, R. K. Major depression: An illness with objective physical signs. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, 2009, 10 (3): 196- 201.
DOI |
|
|
Jamison, K. R. Manic-depressive illness and creativity. Scientific American, 1995, 272 (2): 62- 67.
DOI |
|
|
Leung, A. K. Y., Kim, S., Polman, E., Ong, L. S., Qiu, L., Goncalo, J. A., & Sanchez-Burks, J. Embodied metaphors and creative “acts”. Psychological Science, 2012, 23 (5): 502- 509.
DOI |
|
|
Malinin, L. H. How radical is embodied creativity? Implications of 4E approaches for creativity research and teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019, 10, 2372.
DOI |
|
|
Michinov, N., & Michinov, E. (2022). Do open or closed postures boost creative performance? The effects of postural feedback on divergent and convergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 16(3), 504–518.
|
|
|
Michinov, N., & Michinov, E. Can sitting postures influence the creative mind? Positive effect of contractive posture on convergent-integrative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 2024, 36 (1): 58- 69.
DOI |
|
|
Miller, N., Perich, T., & Meade, T. Depression, mania and self-reported creativity in bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Research, 2019, 276, 129- 133.
DOI |
|
|
Parker, G. Defining melancholia: The primacy of psychomotor disturbance. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2007, 115 (S433): 21- 30.
DOI |
|
|
Srivastava, S., & Ketter, T. A. The link between bipolar disorders and creativity: Evidence from personality and temperament studies. Current Psychiatry Reports, 2010, 12 (6): 522- 530.
DOI |
|
|
Stanciu, M. M. Embodied creativity: A critical analysis of an underdeveloped subject. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, 187, 312- 317.
DOI |
|
|
Wang, X. Y., He, Y. Y., Lu, K. L., Deng, C. L., Qiao, X. N., & Hao, N. How does the embodied metaphor affect creative thinking. NeuroImage, 2019, 202, 116114.
DOI |
|
|
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 54 (6): 1063- 1070.
DOI |
|
|
Wilkes, C., Kydd, R., Sagar, M., & Broadbent, E. Upright posture improves affect and fatigue in people with depressive symptoms. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 2017, 54, 143- 149.
DOI |
|
|
Wu, L., Huang, R., Wang, Z., Selvaraj, J. N., Wei, L. Q., Yang, W. P., & Chen, J. X. Embodied emotion regulation: The influence of implicit emotional compatibility on creative thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, 11, 1822.
DOI |
|
|
Zabetipour, M., Pishghadam, R., & Ghonsooly, B. The impacts of open/closed body positions and postures on learners’ moods. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2015, 6 (2): 643- 655.
|
| [1] | Ke ZHANG, Xiumin DU, Liyan LI, Xuehan ZHANG, Haixia ZHAO. Studies on the Relationship Between Sour Taste and Creativity [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(6): 815-823. |
| [2] | ZHONG Weifang, GUO Yongxing. Ability to Recognize Sadness in Ambiguous Facial Expressions Affects Empathy for Pain [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(5): 585-592. |
| [3] | WANG Yuetan, MA Jialin, ZHANG Jingyi, LI Yitong, DING Xiaobin. Differences in Looking at Own-Race and Other-Race Facial Expression: Evidence from Eye Movements [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(6): 749-754. |
| [4] | CHEN Jianxin, WU Li, HUANG Rong, WANG Zhe, CHEN Yue, YANG Weiping. The Influence of Emotional Compatibility on Creative Thinking [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(4): 433-439. |
| [5] | ZHU Hao, YIN Keli, YANG-LI Huizi. Effects of Beneficiaries’ Facial Expressions and Donor-Beneficiary Relationship on Donations Towards Online Crowdfunding for Charity [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(4): 570-576. |
| [6] | LIANG Zongbao, YANG Yun, ZHANG Guangzhen, YANG Yuankui, ZHENG Wenming, CAO Ruixin. The Recognition of Bodily Expression: An Event-related Potential Study [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(3): 318-325. |
| [7] | YAO Haijuan, WANG Jinxia, SU Qingli, BAI Xuejun. The Effects of Embodied Emotion and Creative Thinking: Situational Regulatory Focus as Moderator [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(4): 441-448. |
| [8] | GUO Wenbin, CHEN Jiadan, ZHANG Liang. Experimental Study on Facial Expression Recognition of Children with Autism by Facial Expression Intensity [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(2): 157-163. |
| [9] | ZHANG Hongjia, WANG Ling, ZHANG Min. The Relations Among Creative Cognitive Style, Creative Personality, and Creative Thinking [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(1): 51-57. |
| [10] | Fu Xiaolan, Wang Hui, Fan Wei. Study on the Recognition of Facial Expressions in Patients with Major Depression [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2015, 13(5): 691-697. |
| [11] | Yang Su,Bai Xuejun. The Recognition Cues of Self-Conscious Emotion for College Students of Different Nationalities: Evidence from Eye Moments [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2015, 13(3): 289-295. |
| [12] | Sui Xue,Ji Yating,Chen Xin,Ren Guiqin. The Processing Difference on the Facial Expression Pictures with Different Valence [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2015, 13(1): 7-12. |
| [13] | Zhang Jinghuan,Li Jianquan,Zheng Xuemei,Zhang Shun,Liu Guirong. On the Relationship between Middle School Students’ Parenting Styles and Creative Thinking: The Mediating Role of Self-Concept [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2014, 12(2): 145-150. |
| [14] | Yang Qing, Yan Guoli. Review of Eye Movement Patterns in Face Perception [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2013, 11(3): 417-424. |
| [15] | Zhang Lihua1,2, Bai Xuejun2, Zhang Xiuhong3. IDENTITY NEGATIVE PRIMING OF UNDERGRADUATES WITH DIFFERENT CREATIVE THINKING ABILITY [J]. , 2007, 5(2): 112-115. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||