高中生生命意义感的类别特征及与孤独感的关系：基于潜在剖面分析

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.02.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 运用潜在剖面分析探讨高中生生命意义感潜在特征模式及其与孤独感的关系。采用生命意义感量表和青少年孤独感问卷对高一至高三共997名学生进行调查，结果发现：(1)高中生生命意义感存在四种潜在类别：消极意义感型(4.71%)、探索意义感型(11.43%)、一般意义感型(43.63%)和积极意义感型(40.22%)。其中，一般意义感型和积极意义感型更具有群体普遍性。(2)高中生孤独感在四种生命意义感潜在类别上差异显著。具体表现为，消极意义感型高中生孤独感最高，探索意义感型和一般意义感型处于中间，积极意义感型孤独感最低。结果表明，高中生生命意义感存在异质性分化，具有明显的分类特征且与孤独感关系密切。

关键词: 生命意义感, 孤独感, 潜在剖面分析, 高中生

Abstract: The present study applied latent profile analysis to explore the latent categories of meaning in life and its relationship with loneliness for senior high school students. This study, which extended to 997 senior high school students, used the Meaning in Life Scale and the Adolescent Loneliness Questionnaire to measure participants’ meaning in life and loneliness. The results showed that there were four latent categories of meaning in life for senior high school students, namely, negative meaning in life (4.71%), exploration meaning in life (11.43%), general meaning in life (43.63%) and positive meaning in life (40.22%). Among them, general meaning in life and positive meaning in life were more universal. Senior high school students’ loneliness is significantly different in these four potential categories of meaning in life. Specifically, senior high school students who were categorized in the negative meaning in life had the highest level of loneliness, those who were categorized in exploration meaning in life and general meaning in life were in the middle level, and those who were categorized in positive meaning in life had the lowest level of loneliness. The results show that meaning in life of senior high school students is heterogeneous with obvious classification characteristics and is closely related to loneliness.

Key words: meaning in life, loneliness, latent profile analysis, senior high school students

中图分类号:

B844

麻超, 刘亚飞, 于海波, 武晓光. 高中生生命意义感的类别特征及与孤独感的关系：基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(2): 216-223.

MA Chao, LIU Yafei, YU Haibo, WU Xiaoguang. Categories of Meaning in Life and Its Relationship with Loneliness in Senior High School Students: Based on Latent Profile Analysis[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(2): 216-223.

参考文献

陈云祥, 李若璇, 刘翔平. (2019). 消极退缩、积极应对对青少年网络成瘾的影响: 孤独感的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 27(1), 94–98
衡书鹏, 赵换方, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. (2020). 朋友圈点赞与主观幸福感的关系: 一个有中介的调节模型. 心理发展与教育, 36(3), 341–349
纪玉足, 张敏强, 刘晶, 毕宇晴, 王碧瑶. (2013). 海峡两岸大学生生命意义比较研究——以广州市与台中市为例. 心理学探新, 33(5), 472–478
李晓巍, 邹泓, 刘艳. (2014). 孤独感量表在中学生群体中的初步修订. 中国临床心理学杂志, 22(4), 731–733, 760.
刘莹, 李韵韵, 赖青. (2022). 初中生社会疏远动机与生命意义感的关系. 赣南师范大学学报, 43(2), 129–134
刘志春. (2005). 生命教育: 学校教育的题中应有之义. 河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 32(4), 170–172
马茜芝, 张志杰. (2020). 高中生亲子依恋与生命意义感的关系: 同伴依恋和时间洞察力的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 36(2), 168–174
苏斌原, 张洁婷, 喻承甫, 张卫. (2015). 大学生心理行为问题的识别: 基于潜在剖面分析. 心理发展与教育, 31(3), 350–359
王江洋, 王蒙歌. (2022). 拒绝敏感性与留守中学生病理性网络使用: 生命意义感和自我污名的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 20(2), 219–225
王鑫强. (2013). 生命意义感量表中文修订版在中学生群体中的信效度. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(5), 764–767, 763.
于晓琪, 张亚利, 俞国良. (2022). 2010~2020中国内地高中生心理健康问题检出率的元分析. 心理科学进展, 30(5), 978–990
张春阳, 余萌, 王建平. (2019). 青少年孤独感与抑郁症状: 反应风格的中介作用以及性别的调节作用. 心理科学, 42(6), 1470–1477
张洁婷, 张敏强, 焦璨. (2019). 纳入式分类分析法在潜在剖面模型的后续多元回归中的应用. 心理学探新, 39(1), 40–46
张姝玥, 许燕. (2013). 事件认知与生命意义关系的日记式追踪研究. 中国特殊教育, (11), 70–74
张姝玥, 许燕, 杨浩铿. (2010). 生命意义的内涵、测量及功能. 心理科学进展, 18(11), 1756–1761
赵景欣, 刘霞, 申继亮. (2008). 留守青少年的社会支持网络与其抑郁、孤独之间的关系——基于变量中心和个体中心的视角. 心理发展与教育, 24(1), 36–42
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942–950
朱海腾, 姚小雪. (2015). 大学新生的人生意义与抑郁: 交互效应与中介效应. 心理发展与教育, 31(4), 475–484
Al-Yagon, M. (2008). On the links between aggressive behaviour, loneliness, and patterns of close relationships among non-clinical school-age boys. Research in Education, 80(1), 75–92.
Burrow, A. L., & Hill, P. L. (2013). Derailed by diversity? Purpose buffers the relationship between ethnic composition on trains and passenger negative mood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(12), 1610–1619.
Folker, A. P., Lauridsen, S. M., Hegelund, E. R., Wimmelmann, C. L., & Flensborg-Madsen, T. (2021). Does meaning protect against loneliness? Exploring empirical studies and theory. Health Promotion International, 36(2), 471–480.
George, L. S., & Park, C. L. (2017). Meaning in life and violations of beliefs and goals: Reciprocal relations among individuals with congestive heart failure. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 30(3), 282–289.
Goodman, M. L., Gibson, D. C., Keiser, P. H., Gitari, S., & Raimer-Goodman, L. (2019). Family, belonging and meaning in life among semi-rural Kenyans. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(5), 1627–1645.
Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Loneliness matters: A theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 40(2), 218–227.
Hawton, K., Saunders, K. E., & O’Connor, R. C. (2012). Self-harm and suicide in adolescents. The Lancet, 379(9834), 2373–2382.
Jung, T., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (2008). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 302–317.
King, L. A., Hicks, J. A., Krull, J. L., & Del Gaiso, A. K. (2006). Positive affect and the experience of meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 179–196.
Kinnunen, M. L., Metsäpelto, R. L., Feldt, T., Kokko, K., Tolvanen, A., Kinnunen, U., … Pulkkinen, L. (2012). Personality profiles and health: Longitudinal evidence among Finnish adults. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53(6), 512–522.
Lubke, G., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Performance of factor mixture models as a function of model size, covariate effects, and class-specific parameters. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(1), 26–47.
Macià, D., Cattaneo, G., Solana, J., Tormos, J. M., Pascual-Leone, A., & Bartrés-Faz, D. (2021). Meaning in life: A major predictive factor for loneliness comparable to health status and social connectedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 627547.
Merz, E. L., & Roesch, S. C. (2011). A latent profile analysis of the Five Factor Model of personality: Modeling trait interactions. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 915–919.
Peplau, L. A. (1982). In search of intimacy: A report on loneliness and what to do about it/the anatomy of loneliness. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 20(11), 38–39.
Peugh, J., & Fan, X. T. (2013). Modeling unobserved heterogeneity using latent profile analysis: A Monte Carlo simulation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(4), 616–639.
Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L. (2006). The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 183–242.
Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80–93.
Stillman, T. F., Baumeister, R. F., Lambert, N. M., Crescioni, A. W., DeWall, C. N., & Fincham, F. D. (2009). Alone and without purpose: Life loses meaning following social exclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 686–694.
Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2005). Factor analysis with categorical indicators: A comparison between traditional and latent class approaches. In L. A. van der Ark, M. A. Croon, & K. Sijtsma (Eds.), New developments in categorial data analysis for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 41–62). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wang, X. H., Sun, Y. X., & Kramer, T. (2021). Ritualistic consumption decreases loneliness by increasing meaning. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(2), 282–298.
Zhang, J., Lyu, J., Sun, W. W., & Wang, L. J. (2022). Changes and explanations of suicide rates in China by province and gender over the past three decades. Journal of Affective Disorders, 299, 470–474.

[1]	蒋俊杰, 王旭, 喻婧, 向欢欢, 郭成. 教师关怀行为对中学生学业压力的影响：睡眠质量的中介作用和生命意义感的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(2): 260-265.
[2]	孟鸿兴, 梅志玲, 王晓庄, 徐晟. 网络社交媒体使用与老年人孤独感关系的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(2): 280-288.
[3]	白金花, 赵玉芳, 菅越, 邓起昌. 孤独感对人际目标追求的影响：目标实现可能性的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 464-471.
[4]	靳铭, 曾练平, 曾小叶, 黄亚夫. 高中生正念与学习倦怠：基于自我调节学习模型的视角[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 494-500.
[5]	王江洋, 王蒙歌. 拒绝敏感性与留守中学生病理性网络使用：生命意义感和自我污名的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 219-225.
[6]	张馨予, 孙琦, 周广东, 李冰. 大学生进食障碍症状的潜在剖面分析及其与抑郁的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 73-79.
[7]	陈艳桃, 高晓彤, 陈兆琳, 黄时华. 基于双因素模型的老年人生命意义感与心理健康：老化态度的中介作用——基于双因素模型的老年人生命意义感与心理健康：老化态度的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 88-95.
[8]	王嘉莹, 姚梅林, 刘红瑞. 成就目标与教师效能感、焦虑、工作投入的关系：基于变量中心和个体中心的视角[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 122-129.
[9]	游志麒, 周宗奎. 儿童社交自我知觉的发展及其与孤独感和安静退缩的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 473-479.
[10]	史滋福, 唐婉秋, 谢云天. 初中生认知需求与数学学业成绩的关系：基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 480-485.
[11]	魏灵真, 刘衍玲, 刘传星, 林杰, 王旭. 家庭亲密度对高中生心理健康的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 361-367.
[12]	吴旻, 孙丽萍, 梁丽婵, 边玉芳. 农村小学寄宿生心理资本的异质性及其社会适应：基于潜在剖面分析的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 186-192.
[13]	曾练平, 田丹丹, 黄亚夫, 赵守盈. 中小学教师人格类型及其对工作家庭平衡与工作绩效关系的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 280-286.
[14]	张野, 苑波, 王凯, 申婷. 冲动性特质对高中生自杀意念的影响：校园排斥与生命意义感的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 89-95.
[15]	黄明明, 赵守盈. 述情障碍对大学生手机成瘾倾向的影响：孤独感与正念的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 686-692.