|
周子暖, 陈颜璋, 傅世敏. 预期对注意的影响受制于被预期主体是目标还是分心物. 心理学报, 2022, 54 (3): 221- 235.
|
|
Alef Ophir, E., Sherman, E., & Lamy, D. (2020). An attentional blink in the absence of spatial attention: A cost of awareness? Psychological Research, 84(4), 1039–1055.
|
|
Alilović, J., Slagter, H. A., & van Gaal, S.. Subjective visibility report is facilitated by conscious predictions only. Consciousness and Cognition, 2021, 87, 103048.
DOI
|
|
Bang, J. W., & Rahnev, D.. Stimulus expectation alters decision criterion but not sensory signal in perceptual decision making. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7 (1): 17072.
DOI
|
|
Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C.. A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1995, 21 (1): 109- 127.
DOI
|
|
Clark, A.. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2013, 36 (3): 181- 204.
DOI
|
|
de Lange, F. P., Heilbron, M., & Kok, P. (2018). How do expectations shape perception? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(9), 764–779.
|
|
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A.. G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 2007, 39 (2): 175- 191.
DOI
|
|
Feuerriegel, D., Vogels, R., & Kovács, G.. Evaluating the evidence for expectation suppression in the visual system. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2021, 126, 368- 381.
|
|
Friston, K.. A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2005, 360 (1456): 815- 836.
DOI
|
|
Garcı́a-Pérez, M. A.. Forced-choice staircases with fixed step sizes: Asymptotic and small-sample properties. Vision Research, 1998, 38 (12): 1861- 1881.
DOI
|
|
Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
|
|
Jabar, S. B., & Fougnie, D. (2022). How do expectations change behavior? Investigating the contributions at encoding versus decision-making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 48(2), 226–241.
|
|
Jiang, J. F., Summerfield, C., & Egner, T.. Attention sharpens the distinction between expected and unexpected percepts in the visual brain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 2013, 33 (47): 18438- 18447.
DOI
|
|
Jolicœur, P., Sessa, P., Dell’Acqua, R., & Robitaille, N.. Attentional control and capture in the attentional blink paradigm: Evidence from human electrophysiology. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2006, 18 (4): 560- 578.
DOI
|
|
Kok, P., Brouwer, G. J., van Gerven, M. A. J., & de Lange, F. P.. Prior expectations bias sensory representations in visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 2013, 33 (41): 16275- 16284.
DOI
|
|
Lamy, D., Carmel, T., & Peremen, Z.. Prior conscious experience enhances conscious perception but does not affect response priming. Cognition, 2017, 160, 62- 81.
DOI
|
|
Meijs, E. L., Mostert, P., Slagter, H. A., de Lange, F. P., & van Gaal, S.. Exploring the role of expectations and stimulus relevance on stimulus-specific neural representations and conscious report. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2019, (1): 11.
DOI
|
|
Norman, D. A., & Bobrow, D. G.. On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 1975, 7 (1): 44- 64.
DOI
|
|
Papera, M., & Richards, A.. Attentional gain and processing capacity limits predict the propensity to neglect unexpected visual stimuli. Psychophysiology, 2016, 53 (5): 634- 649.
DOI
|
|
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 849–860.
|
|
Richter, D., & de Lange, F. P.. Statistical learning attenuates visual activity only for attended stimuli. eLife, 2019, 8, e47869.
DOI
|
|
Rungratsameetaweemana, N., Itthipuripat, S., Salazar, A., & Serences, J. T.. Expectations do not alter early sensory processing during perceptual decision-making. Journal of Neuroscience, 2018, 38 (24): 5632- 5648.
DOI
|
|
Rungratsameetaweemana, N., & Serences, J. T.. Dissociating the impact of attention and expectation on early sensory processing. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2019, 29, 181- 186.
DOI
|
|
Sherman, M. T., Seth, A. K., Barrett, A. B., & Kanai, R.. Prior expectations facilitate metacognition for perceptual decision. Consciousness and Cognition, 2015, 35, 53- 65.
DOI
|
|
Smout, C. A., Garrido, M. I., & Mattingley, J. B.. Global effects of feature-based attention depend on surprise. NeuroImage, 2020, 215, 116785.
DOI
|
|
Smout, C. A., Tang, M. F., Garrido, M. I., & Mattingley, J. B.. Attention promotes the neural encoding of prediction errors. PLoS Biology, 2019, 17 (2): e2006812.
DOI
|
|
Summerfield, C., & Egner, T.. Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2009, 13 (9): 403- 409.
DOI
|
|
Summerfield, C., & Egner, T.. Feature-based attention and feature-based expectation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2016, 20 (6): 401- 404.
DOI
|
|
Summerfield, C., Egner, T., Mangels, J., & Hirsch, J.. Mistaking a house for a face: Neural correlates of misperception in healthy humans. Cerebral Cortex, 2006, 16 (4): 500- 508.
DOI
|
|
Sun, M., Shang, C. Y., Jia, X., Liu, F., Cui, L. X., Wei, P., & Zhang, Q.. Expectation modulates the preferential processing of task-irrelevant fear in the attentional blink: Evidence from event-related potentials. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 2022, 18 (1): 16.
DOI
|
|
Wang, F., & Maurer, U.. Interaction of top-down category-level expectation and bottom-up sensory input in early stages of visual-orthographic processing. Neuropsychologia, 2020, 137, 107299.
DOI
|
|
Zuanazzi, A., & Noppeney, U.. The intricate interplay of spatial attention and expectation: A multisensory perspective. Multisensory Research, 2020, 33 (4−5): 383- 416.
DOI
|
)
