中文阅读中的情绪词类型效应不受效价的调节：来自眼动的证据

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.02.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本研究利用眼动追踪技术，将不同类型情绪词嵌入到同一句子框架，考察中文自然阅读中的情绪词类型效应及其与效价的关系。结果发现，情绪标签词注视时间显著长于情绪负载词，且这种注视差异不受情绪效价的调节。此外，对积极词的注视显著短于消极词，验证了积极效价的语义加工优势，支持了密度假说。结果表明，中文阅读中同样存在情绪词类型效应，且不论情绪效价如何，情绪标签词上情绪信息作用更为显著，更吸引读者注意且难以解离，表现出注意偏向优势。

关键词: 情绪词类型效应, 情绪标签词, 情绪负载词, 中文阅读

Abstract:

In the current study, we investigated how the type (label or laden) and the valence (positive or negative) of the emotion words affect the Chinese reading processing, with embedding different types of emotion words into the same sentence frame. The eye movement data was collected. The results showed that emotion-label words were fixated significantly longer than emotion-laden words, which was not moderated by valence. Additionally, positive words were fixated significantly shorter than negative words, confirming the advantage of semantic processing for positive words and supporting the density hypothesis. These findings suggest that the emotion word type differently affect the lexical access in Chinese reading. The emotional information has a more pronounced effect on emotion-label words, captivating readers’ attention and leading to increased involvement and difficulty in disengagement.

Key words: emotion word type effect, emotion-label word, emotion-laden word, Chinese reading

胡同文, 张阔, 程玉茹, 王敬欣. 中文阅读中的情绪词类型效应不受效价的调节：来自眼动的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(2): 197-203.

Tongwen HU, Kuo ZHANG, Yuru CHENG, Jingxin WANG. The Emotion Word Type Effect in Chinese Reading not Moderated by Valence: Evidence from Eye-Tracking[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(2): 197-203.

图/表 4

参考文献 0

	曹阳, 王琳. 书面语言中情绪信息的加工. 科学通报, 2018, 63 (2): 148- 163.
	刘佳. (2021). 注意导向的汉语情绪直意词和情绪隐含词的神经机制研究(博士学位论文). 北京外国语大学.
	史汉文, 李雨桐, 隋雪. 情绪词类型效应: 区分情绪标签词和情绪负载词的行为和神经活动证据. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30 (12): 2696- 2707.
	王霞, 卢家楣, 陈武英. 情绪词加工过程及其情绪效应特点: ERP的证据. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27 (11): 1842- 1852.
	闫国利, 熊建萍, 臧传丽, 余莉莉, 崔磊, 白学军. 阅读研究中的主要眼动指标评述. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21 (4): 589- 605.
	Basnight-Brown, D. M., & Altarriba, J. (2017). The influence of emotion and culture on language representation and processing. In M. Faucher, C. (Ed.), Advances in culturally-aware intelligent systems and in cross-cultural psychological studies (pp. 415–432). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
	Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS One, 2010, 5 (6): e10729. DOI
	Hinojosa, J. A., Moreno, E. M., & Ferré, P. (2020). Affective neurolinguistics: Towards a framework for reconciling language and emotion. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(7), 813–839.
	Jia, D. D., Zhang, H. P., Wang, Y., & Zhou, Z. J. Which word makes you feel more negative? “Nausea” or “corpse”. Current Psychology, 2023, 42 (36): 31724- 31735. DOI
	Kaltwasser, L., Ries, S., Sommer, W., Knight, R. T., & Willems, R. M. Independence of valence and reward in emotional word processing: Electrophysiological evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 2013, 4, 168.
	Kazanas, S. A., & Altarriba, J. The automatic activation of emotion and emotion-laden words: Evidence from a masked and unmasked priming paradigm. The American Journal of Psychology, 2015, 128 (3): 323- 336. DOI
	Kazanas, S. A., & Altarriba, J. Emotion word type and affective valence priming at a long stimulus onset asynchrony. Language and Speech, 2016, 59 (3): 339- 352. DOI
	Knickerbocker, F., Johnson, R. L., Starr, E. L., Hall, A. M., Preti, D. M., Slate, S. R., & Altarriba, J. The time course of processing emotion-laden words during sentence reading: Evidence from eye movements. Acta Psychologica, 2019, 192, 1- 10. DOI
	Knickerbocker, H., Johnson, R. L., & Altarriba, J. Emotion effects during reading: Influence of an emotion target word on eye movements and processing. Cognition and Emotion, 2015, 29 (5): 784- 806. DOI
	Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 2017, 82 (13): 1- 26.
	Liu, J., Fan, L., Tian, L. Y., Li, C., & Feng, W. S. (2023). The neural mechanisms of explicit and implicit processing of Chinese emotion-label and emotion-laden words: Evidence from emotional categorisation and emotional Stroop tasks. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 38(10), 1412–1429.
	Pavlenko, A. Emotion and emotion-laden words in the bilingual lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2008, 11 (2): 147- 164. DOI
	Pratto, F., & John, O. P. Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991, 61 (3): 380- 391. DOI
	Rayner, K. The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2009, 62 (8): 1457- 1506. DOI
	Schindler, S., & Kissler, J. Selective visual attention to emotional words: Early parallel frontal and visual activations followed by interactive effects in visual cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 2016, 37 (10): 3575- 3587. DOI
	Schupp, H. T., Stockburger, J., Codispoti, M., Junghöfer, M., Weike, A. I., & Hamm, A. O. Selective visual attention to emotion. The Journal of Neuroscience, 2007, 27 (5): 1082- 1089. DOI
	Scott, G. G., O’Donnell, P. J., Leuthold, H., & Sereno, S. C. Early emotion word processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Biological Psychology, 2009, 80 (1): 95- 104. DOI
	Scott, G. G., O’Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C. (2012). Emotion words affect eye fixations during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(3), 783–792.
	Spruyt, A., Hermans, D., Houwer, J. D., & Eelen, P. On the nature of the affective priming effect: Affective priming of naming responses. Social Cognition, 2002, 20 (3): 227- 256. DOI
	Sutton, T. M., & Altarriba, J. The automatic activation and perception of emotion in word processing: Evidence from a modified dot probe paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2011, 23 (6): 736- 747. DOI
	Tang, D., Fu, Y., Wang, H. L., Liu, B., Zang, A. Q., & Kärkkäinen, T. The embodiment of emotion-label words and emotion-laden words: Evidence from late Chinese-English bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 2023, 14, 1143064. DOI
	Unkelbach, C., Fiedler, K., Bayer, M., Stegmüller, M., & Danner, D. Why positive information is processed faster: The density hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2008, 95 (1): 36- 49. DOI
	Vigliocco, G., Meteyard, L., Andrews, M., & Kousta, S. Toward a theory of semantic representation. Language and Cognition, 2009, 1 (2): 219- 247. DOI
	Vinson, D., Ponari, M., & Vigliocco, G. How does emotional content affect lexical processing. Cognition & Emotion, 2014, 28 (4): 737- 746.
	Wang, X., Shangguan, C. Y., & Lu, J. M. Time course of emotion effects during emotion-label and emotion-laden word processing. Neuroscience Letters, 2019, 699, 1- 7. DOI
	Zhang, D. D., He, W. Q., Wang, T., Luo, W. B., Zhu, X. R., Gu, R., … Luo, Y. J. Three stages of emotional word processing: An ERP study with rapid serial visual presentation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2014, 9 (12): 1897- 1903. DOI
	Zhang, J., Wu, C. G., Meng, Y. X., & Yuan, Z. Different neural correlates of emotion-label words and emotion-laden words: An ERP study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2017, 11, 455. DOI
	Zhang, J., Wu, C. G., Yuan, Z., & Meng, Y. X. Differentiating emotion-label words and emotion-laden words in emotion conflict: An ERP study. Experimental Brain Research, 2019, 237 (9): 2423- 2430. DOI
	Zsidó, A. N., Bali, C., Kocsor, F., & Hout, M. C. Task-irrelevant threatening information is harder to ignore than other valences. Emotion, 2023, 23 (6): 1606- 1617. DOI

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

724

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	35	0	0	689

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	636	88
比例	88%	12%

摘要

469

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	469

	来源	本网站

	次数	469
	比例	100%

情绪词类型	效价	愉悦度	唤醒度	抽象度	词频(次/百万)	笔画数	邻居词数量
标签词	积极	7.11(0.45)	5.32(0.35)	6.75(0.31)	24.74(28.76)	19.32(3.42)	25.50(21.43)
标签词	消极	2.77(0.56)	5.39(0.51)	6.70(0.34)	19.25(29.69)	18.14(4.62)	22.75(29.20)
负载词	积极	6.95(0.41)	5.42(0.60)	6.63(0.34)	34.39(64.89)	18.57(4.69)	21.64(16.38)
负载词	消极	2.87(0.46)	5.49(0.54)	6.67(0.37)	16.98(34.44)	19.18(5.35)	17.89(15.15)

情绪词类型	效价	愉悦度	唤醒度	抽象度	词频(次/百万)	笔画数	邻居词数量
标签词	积极	7.11(0.45)	5.32(0.35)	6.75(0.31)	24.74(28.76)	19.32(3.42)	25.50(21.43)
标签词	消极	2.77(0.56)	5.39(0.51)	6.70(0.34)	19.25(29.69)	18.14(4.62)	22.75(29.20)
负载词	积极	6.95(0.41)	5.42(0.60)	6.63(0.34)	34.39(64.89)	18.57(4.69)	21.64(16.38)
负载词	消极	2.87(0.46)	5.49(0.54)	6.67(0.37)	16.98(34.44)	19.18(5.35)	17.89(15.15)

情绪词类型	效价	首次注视时间(ms)	单一注视时间(ms)	凝视时间(ms)	回视路径时间(ms)	总注视时间(ms)
标签词	积极	240(90)	241(89)	278(139)	387(291)	399(243)
标签词	消极	243(90)	244(93)	296(162)	426(324)	444(275)
负载词	积极	230(82)	229(82)	264(124)	362(274)	375(223)
负载词	消极	237(86)	241(89)	294(143)	408(315)	409(238)

情绪词类型	效价	首次注视时间(ms)	单一注视时间(ms)	凝视时间(ms)	回视路径时间(ms)	总注视时间(ms)
标签词	积极	240(90)	241(89)	278(139)	387(291)	399(243)
标签词	消极	243(90)	244(93)	296(162)	426(324)	444(275)
负载词	积极	230(82)	229(82)	264(124)	362(274)	375(223)
负载词	消极	237(86)	241(89)	294(143)	408(315)	409(238)

分析指标	效应	b	SE	t	95%CI
首次注视时间	截距	5.40	0.02	244.02***	[5.36, 5.44]
	类型	−0.03	0.01	−2.54*	[−0.05, −0.01]
	效价	−0.02	0.01	−1.25	[−0.04, 0.01]
	类型×效价	−0.02	0.03	−0.92	[−0.08, 0.03]
单一注视时间	截距	5.41	0.02	226.99***	[5.36, 5.45]
	类型	−0.03	0.01	−1.75†	[−0.05, 0.00]
	效价	−0.02	0.02	−1.53	[−0.05, 0.01]
	类型×效价	−0.04	0.03	−1.42	[−0.10, 0.02]
凝视时间	截距	5.52	0.03	198.51***	[5.47, 5.59]
	类型	−0.02	0.02	−1.22	[−0.07, 0.02]
	效价	−0.07	0.02	−3.35**	[−0.11, −0.03]
	类型×效价	−0.05	0.04	−1.43	[−0.14, 0.02]
回视路径时间	截距	5.78	0.04	162.49***	[5.70, 5.85]
	类型	−0.06	0.03	−2.03*	[−0.11, −0.00]
	效价	−0.10	0.03	−3.40**	[−0.15, −0.04]
	类型×效价	−0.03	0.05	−0.63	[−0.14, 0.07]
总注视时间	截距	5.84	0.04	149.16***	[5.76, 5.91]
	类型	−0.07	0.03	−2.27*	[−0.12, −0.01]
	效价	−0.09	0.03	−2.90**	[−0.15, −0.03]
	类型×效价	0.01	0.06	0.17	[−0.11, 0.13]