心理与行为研究

›› 2007, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4): 305-308.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

影响博弈结果的方法效应研究

皇甫刚 朱莉琪 戴 航 张岗英   

  1. （北京航空航天大学经济管理学院，北京 100083）（中国科学院心理研究所，北京 100101） （中国航空工业第二集团公司人力资源部，北京 100712）（陕西师范大学心理系，西安 710062）
  • 收稿日期:2007-06-21 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-12-20 发布日期:2007-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 朱莉琪

METHOD EFFECT OF ULTIMATUM GAME AND DICTATOR GAME

Huangfu Gang, Zhu Liqi, Dai Hang, Zhang Gangying   

  1. (Beihang University, Beijing 100083; Institute of Psychology, CAS, Beijing 100101; China Aviation Industry Corporation II, Beijing 100712; Shaanxi Normal University, Xi′an 710062)
  • Received:2007-06-21 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-12-20 Published:2007-12-20
  • Contact: Zhu Liqi

PDF (PC)

摘要： 最后通谍博弈和独裁者博弈是实验经济学的经典博弈，也被心理学家用来研究人的公平和利他行为。该研究考查了经济学和心理学通常的报酬支付方式、博弈中待分配的金额是否影响博弈结果，以及两个博弈进行组内实验时是否会产生顺序效应。结果发现支付方式和金额不影响博弈结果，但有顺序效应产生。该研究对国内研究者进一步借用这两个博弈的相关研究打下了一定的方法学基础。

关键词: 决策, 最后通谍博弈, 独裁者博弈, 方法效应

Abstract: Ultimatum game and dictator game are classical games in experimental economics, also used by psychologists to study people′s fair and altruism behavior. This study explored whether the different paying way of economics and psychology to participants, and the different stakes made difference to the game result, and whether there was an order effect when the two games served as a within-subject variable. Results showed that the paying way and the stake made no difference to the game result, but order effect existed. The study shed some light on fur?鄄ther studies using these two games.

Key words: decision-making, ultimatum game, dictator game, method effect

中图分类号: