小学生对不同词语类型预视加工的发展*

心理与行为研究 ›› 2014, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (5): 645-651.

小学生对不同词语类型预视加工的发展^*

张巧明，崔磊

鲁东大学教育科学学院,烟台 264011
山东师范大学心理学院,济南 250014

收稿日期:2014-06-10 出版日期:2014-09-20 发布日期:2014-12-19
作者简介:张巧明,女,鲁东大学教育科学学院讲师,博士。E-mail:syxlx@163.com。
基金资助:
本研究得到全国教育科学规划教育部重点课题“小学生阅读广度与速度的发展及促进:来自眼动的证据”(DHA130266)的资助。

Development of Preview Effects on Different Type Words during Elementary School Years in Chinese Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements

Zhang Qiaoming¹, Cui Lei²

1 Institute of Educational Science, Ludong University, Yantai 264011;
2 School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014

Received:2014-06-10 Online:2014-09-20 Published:2014-12-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用边界范式,以60名小学生为被试,探讨了小学生不同词语类型的预视效应。结果表明:(1)五年级学生表现出更高的阅读效率；(2)预视类型的主效应显著,出现明显的预视效应；(3)不同词语类型的预视效应差异不显著；(4)未出现副中央凹-中央凹效应。研究结果支持阅读眼动的序列加工模型。

关键词: 中文阅读, 预视效应, 边界范式, 小学, 眼动

Abstract: In the present study, the boundary technique was used to explore the preview effects of different type words in Chinese reading. Sixty primary school students participated in the experiment. Their eye movements were recorded with a SR Research EyeLink 2K eye tracker. Eighty sentences were presented to examine the preview effects of participants in different conditions.The results showed: 1) Reading efficiency of primary school students was increased with the development of age. 2) Preview effects were obtained in all conditions. 3) Preview effect was equal for monomorphemic words, compound words and phrases. 4) Marginal significant parafoveal-on-foveal effect were found for words. To some extent, the current study’s results support the serial processing model.

Key words: Chinese reading, preview effect, the boundary technique, primary school, eye movements

中图分类号:

B842.5

张巧明，崔磊. 小学生对不同词语类型预视加工的发展^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(5): 645-651.

Zhang Qiaoming, Cui Lei. Development of Preview Effects on Different Type Words during Elementary School Years in Chinese Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2014, 12(5): 645-651.

参考文献

白学军, 刘娟, 臧传丽, 张慢慢, 郭晓峰, 闫国利. (2011). 中文阅读过程中的副中央凹预视效应, 心理科学进展, 19, 1721-1729.
闫国利, 王丽红, 巫金根, 白学军. (2011). 不同年级学生阅读知觉广度及预视效益的眼动研究. 心理学报, 43, 249-263.
闫国利, 巫金根, 胡晏雯, 白学军. (2010). 当前阅读的眼动研究范式述评. 心理科学进展, 18(12), 1966-1976.
闫国利, 熊建萍, 臧传丽, 余莉莉, 崔磊, 白学军. (2013). 阅读研究中的主要眼动指标评述. 心理科学进展, 21(4), 589-605.
Angele, B., Timothy J., Slattery, Yang, J., Kliegl, R., & Rayner, K. ( 2008). Parafoveal processing in reading: Manipulating n+1 and n+2 previews simultaneously. Psychology Press: Visual Cognition, 16 (6) , 697-707.
Blythe, H. I., Liversedge, S. P., Joseph, H. S. S. L., White, S. J., & Rayner, K. (2009). Visual information capture during fixations in reading for children and adults. Vision Research, 49, 1583-1591.
Chen, H.-C., Song, H., Lau, W. Y., Wong, K. F. E., & Tang, S. L. (2003). Developmental characteristics of eye movements in reading Chinese. In C. McBride-Chang, & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading development in Chinese children (pp.157-169). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
Cui, L., Drieghe, D., Yan, G.L., Bai , X.J., Chi, H. & Liversedge, S.P. (2013). Parafoveal processing across different lexical constituents in Chinese reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 403-416.
Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. D., & Kliegl, R.(2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112,777-813.
Feng,G., Miller,K., Shu, H., & Zhang, H. (2009). Orthography and the development of reading processes: an eye-movement study of Chinese and English. Child Development, 80(3),720-735.
Hiki, T., Bertram, R., & Hyn, J. (2010). Development of parafoveal processing within and across words in reading: Evidence from the boundary paradigm. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1982-1998.
Hyn, J., Bertram, R., & Pollatsek, A. (2004). Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence from an eye-movement contingent display change study. Memory & Cognition, 32 , 523-532.
Juhasz, B.J., Pollatsek, A., Hyn, J., Drieghe, D., & Rayner, K. (2009). Parafoveal Processing Within and Between Words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1356-1376.
Kennedy, A. (2000). Parafoveal processing in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53 A, 429-455.
McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., & Zola, D.(1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye ?xations on words. Vision Research, 28, IN1-IN2.
McConkie, G.W., Zola, D., Grimes, J., Kerr, P.W., Bryant, N.R., & Wolff, P.M. (1991). Children’s eye movements during reading. In J.F. Stein (Ed.), Vision and visual dyslexia (pp. 251-262). London: Macmillan Press.
Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81.
Rayner, K. (1985). The role of eye movements in learning to read and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 53-60.
Rayner, K. (1986). Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422. 41, 211-236.
Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457-1506.
Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparison to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445-476.
Richter, E.M., Engbert, R., and Kliegl, R. (2006). Current advances in SWIFT. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 23-33.
Yan, M., Richter, E. M., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2009). Readers of Chinese extract semantic information from parafoveal words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 561-566.
Yang, J., Wang, S., Xu, Y., & Rayner, K. (2009). Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n+2? Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1192-1204.
Yen, M.H., Radach, R., Tzeng,O.J.L., Hung, D.L, & Tsai, J.L. (2009). Early parafoveal processing in reading Chinese sentences. Acta Psychologica, 131, 24-33.

[1]	贾宁, 容丽卓, 代景华. 社会性线索对内隐和外显元认知监控的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 593-599.
[2]	李士一, 谢岩枫, 赵光, 白学军. 媒体多任务经验对不同注意模式下内隐记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 433-440.
[3]	张慢慢, 胡惠兰, 边菡, 李芳, 张志超, 臧传丽. 中文阅读中快速读者与慢速读者的词频效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 304-310.
[4]	王永胜, 何立媛, 李馨, 白学军. 副中央凹低频双字词首字字频的预视效应研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 311-317.
[5]	何立媛, 赵星, 白玉, 刘妮娜. 汉语老年读者的多词单元加工：来自眼动研究的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 160-166.
[6]	秦钊, 王影超, 叶佳滢, 袁小源, 闫国利. 聋人句子阅读中的视觉功能补偿现象：副中央凹−中央凹效应的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 167-173.
[7]	顾俊娟, 高志华, 马绍扬. 嵌套词汉字位置加工的亚词边界效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 1-7.
[8]	姚计海, 沈玲, 邹弘晖. 教师教学自主权与教师领导力的关系：心理授权和教学自主性的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 108-114.
[9]	朱海, 宋香, 周云, 杨晓平, 田泽永. 职业压力对西部山区中小学教师主观幸福感的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 115-121.
[10]	赵赛男, 李琳, 张俐娟, 王敬欣. 汉语阅读中高限制性语境对不可预测词加工的影响：眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 736-742.
[11]	梁菲菲, 向颖, 武浩, 韩洋. 汉语发展性阅读障碍小学生词边界划分的发展研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 757-763.
[12]	刘璐, 姜雅梅, 张巧明, 李诸洋. 义符位置与语义透明度对形声字语义激活的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 585-591.
[13]	李赛男, 闫国利, 王亚丽, 刘敏, 赵淑萍. 一年级小学生阅读知觉广度的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 606-611.
[14]	邱晨, 牛美心, 周新林, 杨涛. 四、七年级学生分数数量表征与数学学业成就的关系：分数概念理解的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 628-635.
[15]	张苏媛, 兰泽波, 张水, 孟珠, 闫国利. 无关言语对一年级小学生阅读影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 433-438,446.