创造力的领域性研究进展：从对立到融合的转向

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 创造力究竟是领域一般性的还是领域特殊性的？这一争论是创造力研究面临的首要问题。由于它涉及创造力的内涵、研究方法等基本问题，所以长期以来一直颇具争议。在系统梳理创造力领域特殊性与领域一般性观点及其研究证据的基础上，指出了创造力领域性研究面临的诸多质疑和困境，并从理论探索和实证研究进展两个层面论证了创造力领域性研究逐步呈现出从对立转向融合的趋势。未来研究应以创造力领域融合性理论为基础，进一步细化创造力领域性的二级子维度，加强基于创造力培养的实践探索，并按照行为学—测量学—认知神经科学—基因学的研究主线，综合使用多种方法和技术手段来揭示创造力领域性研究的全貌。

关键词: 创造力, 领域一般性, 领域特殊性, 融合

Abstract: Is creativity domain-general or domain-specific? This is a primary issue that should be considered in the field of creativity research. The domains of creativity have always been controversial on some basic problems, such as definition and research methods of creativity. This paper reviewed theoretical perspectives as well as empirical evidences on whether the creativity is domain-specific or domain-general. And, based on this, we illustrated the existing questions of today′s research about creativity with domain-specific or domain-general which is in a dilemma, and demonstrated that researches related to this topic were fusing together instead of former opposition. Future studies should further refine the sub-dimensions of creativity as well as strengthen the exploration of creativity training based on the syncretic theory of creativity, so as to reveal a whole picture of the domains of creativity with multiple methods and techniques according to the research ways of behavioristic-historical surveying-cognitive neuroscience-genomics.

Key words: creativity, domain generality, domain specificity, conciliation

中图分类号:

B842.5

蔺素琴,申超男,段海军,胡卫平. 创造力的领域性研究进展：从对立到融合的转向[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(3): 426-432.

Lin suqin, Shen Chaonan, Duan Haijun, Hu Weiping. The Progress and Trends of Domains of Creativity: From Opposition to Conciliation[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2016, 14(3): 426-432.

参考文献

[1] 龚平原.(2010). 多巴胺5－羟色胺和谷氨酸递质系统相关基因与人类认知能力的关系研究. 博士学位论文. 西北大学, 西安.
[2] 王瑞明, 莫雷, Chen, Z. H. E.(2005). 使用微观发生法促进儿童的认知发展. 心理发展与教育,(1), 124-128.
[3] 张景焕.(2005). 科学创造人才心理特征及影响因素研究. 博士学位论文. 山东师范大学, 济南.
[4] Baer, J.(1996). The effects of task-specific divergent thinking training. Journal of Creativity Behavior, 30, 183-187.
[5] Baer, J.(2010). Is creativity domain specific? In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg(Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity(pp. 321-341). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[6] Baer, J.(2011). Domains of creativity. In Runco, M. A. & Pritzker, S. R.(Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity(pp. 404-408). London, UK: Academic Press in an Imprint of Elsevier.
[7] Bear, J.(2012). Domain specificity and the limits of creativity theory. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 16-29.
[8] Baer, J., Cropley, D. H., & Reiter-Palmon, R.(2013). Furious activity vs. understanding: How much expertise is needed to evaluate creative work? Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 7(4), 332-341.
[9] Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C.(2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical(APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27, 158-163.
[10] Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C., & Gentile, C. A.(2004). Extension of the consensual assessment technique to nonparallel creative products. Creative Research Journal, 16, 113-117.
[11] Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C.(2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for "mini-c"creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 73-79.
[12] Chen, C., Himsel, A., Kasof, J., Greenberger, E., & Dmitrieva. J.(2006). Boundless creativity: evidence for the domain generality of individual difference in creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 40, 179-199.
[13] Feist, G. J.(1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290-309.
[14] Fink, A., & Neubauer, A. C.(2006). EEG alpha oscillations during the performance of verbal creativity tasks: Differential effects of sex and verbal intelligence. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62(1), 46–53.
[15] Glaveanu, V., Lubart, T., Bonnardel, N., Botella, M., de Biaisi, P. M., Desainte-Catherine, M., ... & Zenasni, F.(2013). Creativity as action: findings from five creative domains. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1-14 .
[16] Han, K. S., & Marvin, C.(2002). Multiple creativities? Investigating domain-specificity of creativity in young children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 98-109.
[17] Hocevar, D.(1976). Dimensionality of creativity. Psychological Reports, 39(3), 869-870.
[18] Hu, W., Adey, P., Jia, X., Liu, J., Zhang, L., Li, J., & Dong, X.(2011). Effects of a‘learn to think’intervention programme on primary school students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 531-557.
[19] Hu, W., Wu, B., Jia, X., Yi, X., Duan, C., Meyer, W., & Kaufman, J. C.(2013). Increasing students′ scientific creativity: The“learn to think”intervention program. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(1), 3-21.
[20] Ivcevic, Z.(2007). Artistic and everyday creativity: An act-frequency approach. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 271-290.
[21] Kaufman, J. C.(2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale(K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 298-308.
[22] Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J.(2004). Sure, I′m creative-but not in math!: Self-reported creativity in diverse domains. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 143-155.
[23] Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J.(2005). The amusement park theory of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer(Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse(pp. 321-328). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[24] Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., & Cole, J. C.(2009). Expertise, domains, and the Consensual Assessment Technique. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 223-233.
[25] Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cole, J. C., & Sexton, J. D.(2008). A comparison of expert and nonexpert raters using the Consensual Assessment Technique. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 171-178.
[26] Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A.(2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1-12.
[27] Kaufman, J. C., Beghetto, R. A., Baer, J., & Ivcevic, Z.(2010). Creativity polymathy: what Benjamin Franklin can teach your kindergartener. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 380-387.
[28] Kaufman, J. C., Niu, W., Sexton, J. D., & Cole, J. C.(2010). In the eye of the beholder: Differences across ethnicity and gender in evaluating creative work. Journal of applied social psychology, 40(2), 496-511.
[29] Kounios, J., & Beeman, M.(2014). The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 71-93.
[30] Liu, G., Zhang, J., & Wang, X.(2010). The amusement park Theoretical Model of creativity and its connotation of creativity fostering . Advances in Psychological Science, 4, 679-684.
[31] MacKinnon, D. W.(1968). Selecting students with creative potential. In P. Heist(Ed.), The creative college student: An unmet challenge(pp. 101-118). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[32] Mumford, M. D., Vessey, W. B., & Barrett, D. J.(2008). Com mentary: Measuring divergent thinking: Is there really one solution to the problem? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 86-88.
[33] Osborn, A. F.(1953). Applied imagination. Oxford, UK: Charles Scribner′s Sons.
[34] Paulus, P. B., Kohn, N. W., & Arditti, L. E.(2011). Effects of quantity and quality instructions on brainstorming. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(1), 38-46.
[35] Plucker, J. A.(1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance′s(1958 to present) longitudinal data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103-114.
[36] Plucker, J. A.(2004). Generalization of creativity across domains: Examination of the method effect hypothesis. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38, 1-11.
[37] Plucker, J. A., & Beghetto, R. A.(2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko(Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization(pp. 153-167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
[38] Pulli, K., Karma, K., Norio, R., Sistonen, P., Gring, H. H. H., & Jrvel, I.(2008). Genome-wide linkage scan for loci of musical aptitude in Finnish families: evidence for a major locus at 4q22. Journal of Medical Genetics, 45(7), 451-456.
[39] Roe, A.(1953). The making of a scientist. New York: Dodd Mead.
[40] Sawyer, R. K.(2011). Improvisation. In M. A. Runco, & S. R.Pritzker,(Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity(pp. 647-652). London, UK: Academic Press in an Imprint of Elsevier.
[41] Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D.(2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361-388.
[42] Silvia, P., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, G. E.(2009). Is creativity domain-specific? Latent class models of creative accomplishments and creative self-descriptions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3), 139-148.
[43] Silvia, P., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K., et al.(2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 68-85.
[44] Steiner, H. H., & Carr, M.(2003). Cognitive development in gifted children: Toward a more precise understanding of emerging differences in intelligence. Educational Psychology Review, 15(3), 215-246.
[45] Ukkola, L. T., Onkamo, P., Raijas, P., Karma, K., & Jrvel, I.(2009). Musical aptitude is associated with AVPR1A-haplotypes. PLoS One, 4(5), e5534.
[46] Zeidner, M., & Shani-Zinovich, I.(2011). Do academically gifted and nongifted students differ on the big-five and adaptive status? Some recent data and conclusions. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 566-570.