会计专业人员职业道德行为倾向研究*

心理与行为研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (2): 264-269.

会计专业人员职业道德行为倾向研究*

阴国恩¹, 苏娟¹,² , 于木兰³, 刘海燕¹,⁴

1 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院，天津 300074;
2 内蒙古财经大学统计与数学学院，呼和浩特 010070;
3 中国人民银行天津分行，天津 300040;
4 空军航空大学军事教育训练系，长春 130022

收稿日期:2016-10-12 出版日期:2017-03-20 发布日期:2017-04-24
通讯作者: 阴国恩。E-mail：yinguoen@tjnu.edu.cn。

The Scale Development and Investigation of the Moral Tendency for Accounting Students and Accountants

Yin Guoen¹, Su Juan¹,², Yu Mulan³, Liu Haiyan¹,⁴

1 Academy of psychology and behavior, Tianjin normal university, Tianjin 300074;
2 Institute of Mathematics and Statistics, Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics, Hohhot 010070;
3 People' Bank of China Tianjin Branch, 120101;
4 Department of Military Educational Training, Aviation university of Air Force, Changchun 130022

Received:2016-10-12 Online:2017-03-20 Published:2017-04-24
Supported by:
内蒙古自治区高等学校人文社会科学项目（NJSY16138）。

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用自编的会计专业人员职业道德行为倾向投射测验，包括对自我的社会后果、对自己身体和物质利益的后果、对自己的心理后果和对他人的后果四种情境，考察后果形式、后果表述、会计专业大学生的年级和性别、会计专业人员有无工作经历和资格认证水平与会计职业道德行为倾向的关系。结果发现：给出不利后果和有利不利后果均给出两种后果形式在会计专业人员的职业道德行为倾向上差异不显著；会计专业人员在涉及对自我身体和物质利益后果以及对他人的后果上选择违反会计职业道德规范者较多，其次是对自我社会方面的后果，最少的是对自己的心理后果；低年级男生从自己身体和物质利益的后果考虑倾向于违反会计职业道德的人数高于女生，其他三个方面年级和性别差异不显著；会计从业人员从自己身体和物质利益后果以及他人后果考虑道德判断标准比在校生宽松，且不受会计资格认证水平的影响。

关键词: 会计专业人员, 职业道德行为倾向, 投射测验

Abstract: A self-designed moral reasoning scale was constructed and used to evaluate whether the consequences of form, the consequences of expressions, accounting students' grade and sex, working experience and professional level influences moral reasoning. The four conditions included in this scale were the social consequences of self, the consequence of materi-al interests and physiological benefits, the consequences of mental benefits, and the consequences on other people. The results show that the consequence of reasoning did not influence the moral tendency of accounting students and accountants. If participants tended to break the rule of accounting, they mostly considered material benefits for themselves and other persons, then the social benefits, the least considered was the mental benefits for themselves. The number of male in junior grades who considered heavily on the consequences of themselves and material interests was larger than females. Accountants professionals, both on high and low professional level, who considered the physiological consequences of themselves and material interest of themselves and the other people has a looser standard on moral reasoning thinking than accounting students.

Key words: moral tendency, accounting, projective test.

中图分类号:

B842.6

阴国恩,苏娟, 于木兰, 刘海燕,. 会计专业人员职业道德行为倾向研究*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(2): 264-269.

Yin Guoen, Su Juan, Yu Mulan, Liu Haiyan,. The Scale Development and Investigation of the Moral Tendency for Accounting Students and Accountants[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(2): 264-269.

参考文献

[1] 陈祺戴, 蓬军, 马正凯.(2005). 会计专业学生会计职业道德教育情况的调查研究. 财会通讯,(9), 88-91.
[2] 李小平, 杨晟宇, 李梦遥.(2012). 权威人格与权力感对道德思维方式的影响. 心理学报, 44, 964–971.
[3] 吕伟.(2011). 高校专业教育对职业道德形成的影响——一个实验研究. 中国大学教学,(3), 87-91.
[4] 毛剑芬, 韩存, 隋英杰.(2012). 会计职业道德教育方法效果差异实证分析——科尔伯格道德发展理论的启示. 山东工商学院学报,(4), 87-92.
[5] 王建辉.(2010). 财经法规与会计职业道德. 北京: 中国财政经济出版社.
[6] 郑睦凡, 赵俊华.(2013). 权力如何影响道德判断行为: 情境卷入的效应. 心理学报, 45, 1274-1282.
[7] 郑日昌, 蔡永红, 周益群.(1999). 心理测量学. 北京: 人民教育出版社.
[8] Borkowski, S. C., & Ugras, Y. J.(1992). The Ethical Attitudes of Students as a Function of Age, Sex and Experience. Joumal of Business Ethics,(11), 961-979.
[9] Clikeman, P. M., & Henning, S. L.(2000). The Socialization of Undergraduate Accounting Students. Issues in Accounting Education,(15), 1-17.
[10] Cohen, J. R., Pant, L. W., & Sharp, D. J.(1998). The Effect of Gender and Academic Discipline Diversity on The Ethical Evaluations, Ethical Intentions and Ethical Orientation of Potential Public Accounting Recruits. Accounting Horizons,(9), 250-270.
[11] DeCelles, K. A., DeRue, D. S., Margolis, J. D., & Ceranic, T. L.(2012). Does power corrupt or enable? When and why power facilitates self-interested behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 681-689.
[12] Jeffrey, C.(1993). Ethical Development of Accounting Students, Non-accounting Business Students, and Liberal Arts Stu dents. Issues in Accounting Education,(11), 262-275.
[13] Krebs, D. L., Kathy, D., & Gillian, W.(1997). The forms and functions of real-life moral decision-making, Journal of Moral Education, 26(2), 131-140.
[14] Krebs, D. L.(2005). An evolutionary reconceptualization of Kohlberg′s model of moral development. In R. Burgess & K. MacDonald(Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human development(2nd ed., pp. 243-274). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[15] Lammers, J., & Stapel, D. A.(2009). How power influences moral thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(2), 279-289.
[16] Lammers, J., Stapel, D. A., & Galinsky, A. D.(2010). Power increases hypocrisy: Moralizing in reasoning, immorality in behavior. Psychological Science, 21(5), 737-744.
[17] Lampe, J., & Finn, D. A.(1992). Model of Auditor’ Ethical Decision Process. Auditing: A Journal of Theory and Practice,(3), 33-59.
[18] Ponemon, L. A.(1992). Ethical Reasoning and Selection-Socialization in Accounting. Accounting Organization of Society,(17), 239-259.
[19] Shaub, M.(1994). An Analysis of the Association of Traditional Demographic Variables with The Moral Reasoning of Auditing Students and Auditors. Journal of Accounting Education, (11), 1-26.
[20] Vandello, J. A., Michniewicz, K. S., & Goldschmied, N.(2011). Moral judgments of the powerless and powerful in violent intergroup conflicts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1173-1178.