情绪对不同状态焦虑个体认知抑制的影响

心理与行为研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (6): 721-726.

• 基础心理学 • 下一篇

情绪对不同状态焦虑个体认知抑制的影响

贾丽萍¹, 白学军², 王敬欣²

1. 潍坊医学院心理学系, 潍坊 261053;
2. 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津 300074

收稿日期:2017-06-14 出版日期:2017-11-20 发布日期:2017-12-28
通讯作者: 贾丽萍,E-mail:lpjia@wfmc.edu.cn;白学军,E-mail:bxuejun@126.com
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金（17YJC190007）、山东自然科学基金联合专项（ZR2015CL027）和潍坊医学院科技计划项目（KB2014012）

The Effect of Emotion on Cognition Inhibition for State Anxiety

JIA Liping¹, BAI Xuejun², WANG Jingxin²

1. Department of Psychology, Weifang Medical University, Weifang 261053;
2. Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300074

Received:2017-06-14 Online:2017-11-20 Published:2017-12-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 探讨了情绪对不同状态焦虑被试认知抑制的影响。采用减法运算诱发被试的状态焦虑，在Stroop任务之前呈现正性、负性和中性图片，考察情绪对高、低状态焦虑被试认知抑制的影响。结果发现，状态焦虑问卷上的得分在减法运算后显著提高；正性情绪加快了高、低状态焦虑被试一致条件下的反应时，不一致条件下，正性和负性情绪导致高、低状态焦虑被试的反应时均增长，表现出了正性和负性情绪对高、低状态焦虑被试认知抑制的阻碍作用。

关键词: 情绪, 状态焦虑, 认知抑制

Abstract: The effects of different emotions on cognition inhibition for state anxiety participants was the focus analysis of this study. The mental arithmetic was used to induce state anxiety. Different emotional pictures were presented before the Stroop task to explore how different emotion affect the cognition inhibition. The results showed that the scores on the state anxiety questionnaire were higher after the mental arithmetic procedure which demostrated that the mental arithmetic procedure can induce state anxiety effectively. In the congruite condition, positive emotion ruduced the reaction time while in the incongruite condition, the reaction time after positive and negative emotion was longer than that after neutral emoion which demostrated that positive and negative emotion can impair cognition inhibition of both state anxiety and normal participants.

Key words: emotion, state anxiety, cognition inhibition

中图分类号:

B842.1

贾丽萍, 白学军, 王敬欣. 情绪对不同状态焦虑个体认知抑制的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 721-726.

JIA Liping, BAI Xuejun, WANG Jingxin. The Effect of Emotion on Cognition Inhibition for State Anxiety[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(6): 721-726.

参考文献

白露, 马慧, 黄宇霞, 罗跃嘉. (2005). 中国情绪图片系统的编制—在46名中国大学生中的试用. 中国心理卫生杂志, 19, 719-722.
白学军, 贾丽萍, 王敬欣. (2013). 抑制范式下的情绪注意偏向. 心理科学进展, 21, 785-791.
白学军, 贾丽萍, 王敬欣. (2016). 特质焦虑个体在高难度Stroop任务下的情绪启动效应. 心理科学, 39, 8-12.
贾丽萍, 白学军, 王敬欣. (2013). 不同类型情绪对认知抑制的影响. 心理学进展, 3, 233-237.
刘溪, 梁宝勇. (2008). 心算应激与特质焦虑、应对风格的关系. 心理与行为研究, 6, 30-37.
王敬欣, 贾丽萍, 白学军, 罗跃嘉. (2013). 返回抑制过程中情绪面孔加工优先: ERPs研究. 心理学报, 45, 1-10.
Amodio, D. M., Master, S. L., Yee, C. M., & Taylor, S. E. (2008). Neurocognitive components of the behavioral inhibition and activation systems: Implications for theories of self-regulation. Psychophysiology, 45, 11-19.
Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529-550.
Basten, U., Stelzel, C., & Fiebach, C. J. (2011). Trait anxiety modulates the neural efficiency of inhibitory control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 3132-3145.
Becker, E. S., Rinck, M., Margraf, J., & Roth, W. T. (2001). The emotional Stroop effect in anxiety disorders: General emotionality or disorder specificity? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 15, 147-159.
Chajut, E., & Algom, D. (2003). Selective attention improves under stress: Implications for theories of social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 231-248.
Chajut, E., Schupak, A., & Algom, D. (2010). Emotional dilution of the Stroop effect: A new tool for assessing attention under emotion. Emotion, 10(6), 944-948.
Chechko, N., Wehrle, R., Erhardt, A., Holsboer, F., Czisch, M., & Sämann, P. G. (2009). Unstable prefrontal response to emotional conflict and activation of lower limbic structures and brainstem in remitted panic disorder. PLoS One, 4(5), e5537.
Choi, J. M., Padmala, S., & Pessoa, L. (2012). Impact of state anxiety on the interaction between threat monitoring and cognition. NeuroImage, 59, 1912-1923.
Etkin, A., Prater, K. E., Hoeft, F., Menon, V., & Schatzberg, A. F. (2010). Failure of anterior cingulate activation and connectivity with the amygdala during implicit regulation of emotional processing in generalized anxiety disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 545-554.
Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336-353.
Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300-319.
Hajcak, G., & Foti, D. (2008). Errors are aversive. Psychological Science, 19, 103-108.
Hart, S. J., Green, S. R., Casp, M., & Belger, A. (2010). Emotional priming effects during Stroop task performance. NeuroImage, 49(3), 2662-2670.
Hu, K. S., Bauer, A., Padmala, S., & Pessoa, L. (2012). Threat of bodily harm has opposing effects on cognition. Emotion, 12(1), 28-32.
Logie, R. H. (2011). The functional organization and capacity limits of working memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 240-245.
Olatunji, B. O., Ciesielski, B. G., Armstrong, T., & Zald, D. H. (2011). Emotional expressions and visual search efficiency: Specificity and effects of anxiety symptoms. Emotion, 11(5), 1073-1079.
Pessoa, L., Padmala, S., Kenzer, A., & Bauer, A. (2012). Interactions between cognition and emotion during response inhibition. Emotion, 12(1), 192-197.
Righi, S., Mecacci, L., & Viggiano, M. P. (2009). Anxiety, cognitive self-evaluation and performance: ERP correlates. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23, 1132-1138.
Robinson, O. J., Letkiewicz, A. M., Overstreet, C., Ernst, M., & Grillon, C. (2011). The effect of induced anxiety on cognition: Threat of shock enhances aversive processing in healthy individuals. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 11(2), 217-227.
Shackman, A. J., Maxwell, J. S., McMenamin, B. W., Greischar, L. L., & Davidson, R. J. (2011). Stress potentiates early and attenuates late stages of visual processing. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 1156-1161.
Somerville, L. H., Whalen, P. J., & Kelley, W. M. (2010). Human bed nucleus of the stria terminalis indexes hypervigilant threat monitoring. Biological Psychiatry, 68, 416-424.
Taylor, T. L., & Therrien, M. E. (2008). Inhibition of return for the discrimination of faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(2), 279-290.
Tops, M., & Boksem, M. A. S. (2011). Cortisol involvement in mechanisms of behavioral inhibition. Psychophysiology, 48(5), 723-732.
Wolfe, J. M., Võ, M. L. H., Evans, K. K., & Greene, M. R. (2011). Visual search in scenes involves selective and nonselective pathways. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(2), 77-84.
Yuan, J. J., Xu, S., Yang, J. M., Liu, Q., Chen, A. T., Zhu, L. P., … Li, H. (2011). Pleasant mood intensifies brain processing of cognitive control: ERP correlates. Biological Psychology, 87(1), 17-24.

[1]	马丽云, 莫文. 自我损耗下积极情绪对亲社会行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 684-691.
[2]	刘建榕, 谢林君, 郑琳. 社会性发展迟滞大学生的情绪韵律识别特点[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 714-720.
[3]	鲍旭辉, 黄杰, 李娜, 李健军, 李亚红. 主动性人格对学习投入的影响：领悟社会支持和积极情绪的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 508-514.
[4]	李娇娇, 刘晓冰, 裴丹丹, 徐碧波, 尹锡杨. 情绪智力对大学生恶意创造力的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 563-569.
[5]	李永占. 情绪智力在身体自尊与进食障碍倾向间的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 570-576.
[6]	刘芳, 霍瑞, 韩铖铖, 王美沂, 杨海波. 执行功能对个体情绪调节策略使用倾向和调节效果的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 382-389.
[7]	郭丰波, 黄佳珊, 刘腾飞, 谷莉. 社会责任感调节群际替代性排斥中旁观者第三方惩罚[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 397-403.
[8]	李鹏, 张志超, 杨洋, 杨佳奇, 李洪玉. 工作压力对中小学教师职业倦怠的影响：情绪劳动和工作满意度的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 412-418.
[9]	周爱保, 赵海燕, 夏瑞雪, 袁月, 贾婷婷, 谢珮. 不同语义水平下参照方式、情绪效价和特质评价对记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 145-152.
[10]	赵思怡, 李莹, 王悦. 情绪效价−空间动作隐喻联结对成人和儿童外语情绪词学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 153-159.
[11]	岳鹏飞, 胡文丽, 张嘉鑫, 史梦梦. 粗暴养育与中学生学习投入：状态焦虑与性别的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 226-232.
[12]	王军利, 文彦茹, 林艺, 侯莉敏. 学前儿童情绪表达规则认知发展特征及其影响因素：一项追踪研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 764-770.
[13]	陈兰双, 宋惠敏, 董静, 赵欢, 张镇. 老年大学学员组织融入度和抑郁症状的关系及其机制探索[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 706-713.
[14]	杨伟平, 杨项富, 徐建萍. 跨通道视听觉情绪信息对婴儿图式效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 447-453.
[15]	王欣竹, 邹何辉, 郝娜, 黄瑶, 吴琴, 崔丽莹. 抑制还是补偿？尴尬情绪对初中生合作倾向和行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 549-555.

情绪对不同状态焦虑个体认知抑制的影响

The Effect of Emotion on Cognition Inhibition for State Anxiety

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价