阅读中的走神有程度之分吗？来自眼动的证据

心理与行为研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4): 471-476.

阅读中的走神有程度之分吗？来自眼动的证据

吴国来, 阴晓娟, 张婧婧, 任方圆, 高原

教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津 300074

收稿日期:2017-12-12 出版日期:2018-07-20 发布日期:2018-07-23
通讯作者: 吴国来,E-mail:wuguolai@mail.tjnu.edu.cn

The Degree of Mind Wandering in Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements

WU Guolai, YIN Xiaojuan, ZHANG Jingjing, REN Fangyuan, GAO Yuan

Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300074

Received:2017-12-12 Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-07-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 选取60名大学生被试进行持续注意刺激任务范式，使用Eyelink-1000眼动仪记录眼动数据，分析错误句为兴趣区的回视路径阅读时间、前句末尾词和低频词的凝视时间三项眼动指标，考察阅读任务中走神是否有不同的程度。结果显示，发现错误时的三项眼动指标均大于未发现错误时；未发现词汇错误和论述错误时，错误句的回视路径阅读时间和前句末尾词的凝视时间均无显著差异，而未发现词汇错误时前句低频词的凝视时间显著小于未发现论述错误时。结果表明阅读时走神存在不同的程度，即深度走神和浅表走神。

关键词: 走神, 程度, 回视路径阅读时间, 凝视时间

Abstract: Selecting sixty graduate participants performed the Sustained Attention to Stimulus Task,eye movements were recorded by a SR Research Eyelink-1000 eye tracker. Through analysis of three eye-movement measures,including the regression path reading time of error-sentence, the gaze duration of previous sentence' last word and the gaze duration of previous sentence' low-frequency word,to prove that there are different levels of MW in reading. Results showed that, 1) above mentioned three eye-movement measures were significantly longer while detected an error compared to overlooked it; 2) the regression path reading time of error-sentence and the gaze duration of previous sentence' last word was no significantly difference between overlooked a lexical error and overlooked a discourse error, however the gaze duration of previous sentence' low-frequency word was significantly shorter during overlooked a lexical error compared to overlooked a discourse error.These results revealed that there were two different levels of MW in reading, namely deeply MW and weakly MW.

Key words: mind wandering, degree, regression path reading time, gaze duration

中图分类号:

B842.1

吴国来, 阴晓娟, 张婧婧, 任方圆, 高原. 阅读中的走神有程度之分吗？来自眼动的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 471-476.

WU Guolai, YIN Xiaojuan, ZHANG Jingjing, REN Fangyuan, GAO Yuan. The Degree of Mind Wandering in Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(4): 471-476.

参考文献

宋晓兰, 唐孝威. (2015). 人类意识流的重要构成部分——心智游移. 自然杂志, 37(1), 8-16.
吴国来, 高原. (2015). 阅读中的"心不在焉"现象及其研究方法. 心理与行为研究, 13(4), 563-569.
吴国来, 高原, 周曼. (2016). 阅读中的"心不在焉":理论假设和影响因素. 心理科学进展, 24(2), 196-202.
闫国利, 熊建萍, 臧传丽, 余莉莉, 崔磊, 白学军. (2013). 阅读研究中的主要眼动指标评述. 心理科学进展, 21(4), 589-605.
Foulsham, T., Farley, J., & Kingstone, A. (2013). Mind wandering in sentence reading:Decoupling the link between mind and eye. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(1), 51-59.
Franklin, M. S., Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2011). Catching the mind in flight:Using behavioral indices to detect mindless reading in real time. Psychological Bulletin & Review, 18(5), 992-997.
Franklin, M. S., Mooneyham, B. M., Baird B., & Schooler, J. W. (2014). Thinking one thing, saying another:The behavioral correlates of mind-wandering while reading aloud. Psychological Bulletin & Review, 21(1), 205-210.
Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading:Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(6), 431-439.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading:From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329-354.
Kane, M. J., Brown, L. H., McVay, J. C., Silvia, P. J., Myin-Germeys, I., & Kwapil, T. R. (2007). For whom the mind wanders, and when:An experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life. Psychological Science, 18(7), 614-621.
Killingsworth, M. A., & Gilbert, D. T. (2010). A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science, 330(6006), 932.
McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2009). Conducting the train of thought:Working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(1), 196-204.
Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2009). Mindless reading revisited:An analysis based on the SWIFT model of eye-movement control. Vision Research, 49(3), 322-336.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing:20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.
Reichle, E. D., Reineberg, A. E., & Schooler, J. W. (2010). Eye movements during mindless reading. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1300-1310.
Schad, D. J., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2012). Your mind wanders weakly, your mind wanders deeply:Objective measures reveal mindless reading at different levels. Cognition, 125(2), 179-194.
Schooler, J. W., Reichle, E. D., & Halpern, D. V. (2004). Zoning out while reading:Evidence for dissociations between experience and metaconsciousness. In D. T. Levin (Ed.), Thinking and seeing:Visual metacognition in adults and children (pp. 204-226). Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
Smallwood, J. (2010). Why the global availability of mind wandering necessitates resource competition:Reply to McVay and Kane (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 202-207.
Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 946-958.
Smallwood, J., McSpadden, M., & Schooler, J. W. (2007). The lights are on but no one's home:Meta-awareness and the decoupling of attention when the mind wanders. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(3), 527-533.
Uzzaman, S., & Joordens, S. (2011). The eyes know what you are thinking:Eye movements as an objective measure of mind wandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1882-1886.
Warren, T., White, S. J., & Reichle, E. D. (2009). Investigating the causes of wrap-up effects:Evidence from eye movements and E-Z Reader. Cognition, 111(1), 132-137.

[1]	麻书滔, 陈少华, 麻彦坤. 未成年犯童年期受虐待程度与攻击行为的关系：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 220-226.
[2]	吴国来, 张婧婧, 任方圆, 杨晶晶, 酒艳红. 工作记忆容量与走神频率关系的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 461-471.
[3]	麦子峰, 孙瑞, 张群, 梁华, 马宁. 个体行为的昼夜节律效应：来自华南地区的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 185-192.
[4]	吴国来, 周曼, 阴晓娟, 李海英, 李娇花. 走神对中文阅读绩效的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 329-334.
[5]	王博韬, 段海军, 韩琴, 胡卫平,. 大脑半球互动对创造性科学问题提出能力的影响*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(2): 211-217.
[6]	戴蕴. 小额信贷女性受众自我感知社会地位提升特点研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(2): 277-282.
[7]	徐炀,李虹. 虚拟逃生环境中视野范围和紧急程度对疏散效率的影响：从众行为的中介作用^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(3): 311-319.
[8]	周宵, 伍新春. 小学生创伤后应激障碍对睡眠问题的影响：积极认知的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(2): 242-250.
[9]	刘宝根；周兢；李林慧3；张莉4；高晓妹3. 文字突显程度对学前儿童图画书阅读中文字注视的影响[J]. , 2013, 11(1): 90-96.
[10]	闻素霞；热比古丽·白克力. [J]. , 2009, 7(2): 134-136.
[11]	陈宝国,周会霞. 多义词意义间的联系程度对词汇判断时间的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2005, 3(3): 214-218.