青少年的同伴选择与同伴影响：基于学业投入与学业成就的纵向社会网络分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以756名中学生为研究对象，对学业投入、学业成就、同伴团体进行追踪测量，探讨青少年同伴团体的学业投入及学业成就是否存在同伴选择与同伴影响效应。结果表明：（1）在1年的追踪时间中，青少年学业投入的发展呈下降趋势，初始水平与下降速度负相关，学业成就的发展呈上升趋势，初始水平与上升速度无显著相关；（2）学业投入与学业成就存在同伴选择效应，青少年倾向选择与自己学业投入及学业成就相似的个体构建同伴团体；（3）青少年的学业投入及学业成就与同伴逐渐趋近相似，即同伴影响效应显著。

关键词: 青少年, 同伴团体, 学业投入, 学业成就, 社会网络分析

Abstract: A total of 756 adolescents were tracked to complete the questionnaires of academic engagement, academic achievement, and peer nomination. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of peer selection and peer influence on adolescent academic engagement and academic achievement. The results showed that: 1) Adolescents’ academic engagement presented a decreasing trend in the period of 1-year, and the initial levels were negatively related to the growth rate. Besides, adolescents’ academic achievement presented an increasing trend, and the initial levels were not related to the growth rate. 2) Peer selection effects of academic engagement and academic achievement were significant. Adolescents tend to select peers with similar academic engagement and academic achievement. 3) Peer influence effects of academic engagement and academic achievement were significant as well. Adolescents’ academic engagement and academic achievement became more and more similar to their peer groups.

Key words: adolescent, peer group, academic engagement, academic achievement, social network analysis

中图分类号:

B844

沙晶莹, 张向葵. 青少年的同伴选择与同伴影响：基于学业投入与学业成就的纵向社会网络分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 652-658.

SHA Jingying, ZHANG Xiangkui. Adolescents’ Peer Selection and Peer Influence: A Vertical Social Network Analysis Based on Academic Engagement and Academic Achievement[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(5): 652-658.

参考文献

邓小平, 徐晨, 程懋伟, 张向葵. (2017). 青少年偏差行为的同伴选择和影响效应: 基于纵向社会网络的元分析. 心理科学进展, 25(11), 1898-1909
董妍, 俞国良. (2010). 青少年学业情绪对学业成就的影响. 心理科学, 33(4), 934-937, 945
方来坛, 时勘, 张风华. (2008). 中文版学习投入量表的信效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 16(6), 618-620
方晓义, 郑宇, 林丹华, 张锦涛. (2003). 友伴网络结构与中学生的吸烟行为. 心理与行为研究, 1(4), 252-256
侯珂, 张云运, 向小平, 任萍. (2018). 青少年早期学业成就的同伴团体社会化: 感知学校氛围的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 34(3), 294-303
贾绪计, 李雅倩, 蔡林, 王庆瑾, 林琳. (2020). 自我妨碍与学习投入的关系: 学业浮力的中介作用和父母支持的调节作用. 心理与行为研究, 18(2), 227-233
刘军. (2014). 整体网分析: UCINET软件实用指南 (第2版). 上海: 格致出版社.
马绍奇, 焦璨, 张敏强. (2011). 社会网络分析在心理研究中的应用. 心理科学进展, 19(5), 755-764
沙晶莹, 张向葵, 邓小平. (2017). 青少年与其同伴团体学业成就同质性的元分析. 应用心理学, 23(4), 345-354
张镇, 郭博达. (2016). 社会网络视角下的同伴关系与心理健康. 心理科学进展, 24(4), 591-602
Brechwald, W. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 166-179, doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00721.x.
Chen, X. Y., Chang, L., & He, Y. F. (2003). The peer group as a context: Mediating and moderating effects on relations between academic achievement and social functioning in Chinese children. Child Development, 74(3), 710-727, doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00564.
Choukas-Bradley, S., Giletta, M., Cohen, G. L., & Prinstein, M. J. (2015). Peer influence, peer status, and prosocial behavior: An experimental investigation of peer socialization of adolescents’ intentions to volunteer. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(12), 2197-2210, doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0373-2.
Cohen, G. L., & Prinstein, M. J. (2006). Peer contagion of aggression and health risk behavior among adolescent males: An experimental investigation of effects on public conduct and private attitudes. Child Development, 77(4), 967-983, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00913.x.
Dryfoos, J. G. (1990). Adolescents at risk: Prevalence and prevention. New York: Oxford University Press.
Flashman, J. (2012). Academic achievement and its impact on friend dynamics. Sociology of Education, 85(1), 61-80, doi: 10.1177/0038040711417014.
Gremmen, M. C., van den Berg, Y. H. M., Steglich, C., Veenstra, R., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2018). The importance of near-seated peers for elementary students’ academic engagement and achievement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 57, 42-52, doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2018.04.004.
Harris, J. R. (1998). The nurture assumption: Why children turn out the way they do. New York: The Free Press.
Howell, A. J. (2009). Flourishing: Achievement-related correlates of students’ well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(1), 1-13, doi: 10.1080/17439760802043459.
Ide, J. K., Parkerson, J., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1981). Peer group influence on educational outcomes: A quantitative synthesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(4), 472-484, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.73.4.472.
Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84(2), 427-436, doi: 10.1086/226792.
Kindermann, T. A. (1993). Natural peer groups as contexts for individual development: The case of children’s motivation in school. Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 970-977, doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.29.6.970.
Kindermann, T. A. (2007). Effects of naturally existing peer groups on changes in academic engagement in a cohort of sixth graders. Child Development, 78(4), 1186-1203, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01060.x.
Kindermann, T. A., & Gest, S. D. (2009). Assessment of the peer group: Identifying naturally occurring social networks and capturing their effects. New York: Guilford.
Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In M. Berger, T. Abel, & C. H. Page (Eds.), Freedom and control in modern society (pp. 18-66). New York: Van Nostrand.
Lerner, R. M. (2006). Developmental science, developmental systems, and contemporary theories of human development. In Handbook of child psychology (pp. 1-17). Hoboken: Wiley.
Lodder, G. M. A., Scholte, R. H. J., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Giletta, M. (2016). Bully victimization: Selection and influence within adolescent friendship networks and cliques. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(1), 132-144, doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0343-8.
Merrin, G. J., de la Haye, K., Espelage, D. L., Ewing, B., Tucker, J. S., Hoover, M., & Green, H. D., Jr. (2018). The co-evolution of bullying perpetration, homophobic teasing, and a school friendship network. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(3), 601-618, doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0783-4.
Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M., & Pattee, L. (1993). Children’s peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113(1), 99-128, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.99.
Reynolds, K. J., Lee, E., Turner, I., Bromhead, D., & Subasic, E. (2017). How does school climate impact academic achievement? An examination of social identity processes. School Psychology International, 38(1), 78-97.
Rimpelä, A., Kinnunen, J. M., Lindfors, P., Soto, V. E., Salmela-Aro, K., Perelman, J., … Lorant, V. (2020). Academic well-being and structural characteristics of peer networks in school. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(8), 2848, doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082848.
Ryan, A. M. (2000). Peer groups as a context for the socialization of adolescents’ motivation, engagement, and achievement in school. Educational Psychologist, 35(2), 101-111, doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3502_4.
Ryan, A. M. (2001). The peer group as a context for the development of young adolescent motivation and achievement. Child Development, 72(4), 1135-1150, doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00338.
Schaufeli, W. B., Martínez, A., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464-481, doi: 10.1177/0022022102033005003.
Shin, H., & Ryan, A. M. (2014a). Early adolescent friendships and academic adjustment: Examining selection and influence processes with longitudinal social network analysis. Developmental Psychology, 50(11), 2462-2472, doi: 10.1037/a0037922.
Shin, H., & Ryan, A. M. (2014b). Friendship networks and achievement goals: An examination of selection and influence processes and variations by gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(9), 1453-1464, doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0132-9.
Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417-453, doi: 10.3102/00346543075003417.
Snijders, T. A. B. (2001). The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociological Methodology, 31(1), 361-395, doi: 10.1111/0081-1750.00099.
Snijders, T. A. B., & Baerveldt, C. (2003). A multilevel network study of the effects of delinquent behavior on friendship evolution. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 27(2-3), 123-151, doi: 10.1080/00222500305892.
Snijders, T. A. B., van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32(1), 44-60, doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004.
Steinberg, L. (2002). Adolescence (6th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
Turner, J. C, Hogg, M. A, Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York: Basil Blackwell.
Valsiner, J., & Connolly, K. (2003). Handbook of developmental psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Veenstra, R., & Steglich, C. (2012). Actor-based model for network and behavior dynamics. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 598-618). New York: Guilford Press.
Wang, M. T., Kiuru, N., Degol, J. L., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2018). Friends, academic achievement, and school engagement during adolescence: A social network approach to peer influence and selection effects. Learning and Instruction, 58, 148-160, doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.06.003.
Wentzel, K. R., & Miele, D. B. (2009). Handbook of motivation at school. New York: Routledge.
Yuan, R., & Ngai, S. S. (2016). Agentic personality as mediator of social capital on developmental outcomes in the transition to adulthood: Evidence from Shanghai, China. Journal of Adolescence, 46, 1-13, doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.10.013.
Zhang, X., Pomerantz, E. M., Qin, L. L., Logis, H., Ryan, A. M., & Wang, M. (2019). Early adolescent social status and academic engagement: Selection and influence processes in the United States and China. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(7), 1300-1316, doi: 10.1037/edu0000333.

[1]	石鑫欣, 吴怡霏, 冯迎. 父母差别对待与青少年问题行为的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 644-650.
[2]	罗芮, 赵云燕, 何然, 王耘, 陈福美. 二孩家庭父母偏爱的特点及其与青少年抑郁的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 657-664.
[3]	王刚, 刘赛凤, 李琦琛, 文岱, 伍韫旖, 蒋波西, 李放. 父母忽视与青少年短视频过度使用的关系：正念和自我控制的中介机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 487-493.
[4]	李晓明, 刘小丹, 戴婷. 特质焦虑与青少年冒险行为的关系：基于双系统模型的机制探讨[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 529-535.
[5]	李永占. 情绪智力在身体自尊与进食障碍倾向间的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 570-576.
[6]	孙洪蕊, 柳铭心, 张兴利, 周晨浩, 刁雅欣, 包乃丽. 父亲和母亲自主支持的特点及其与青少年社会适应的关系：自尊的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 375-381.
[7]	张一林, 周姿言, 刘雨佳, 辛素飞. 无聊倾向对青少年网络成瘾的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 419-425.
[8]	邓林园, 杨梦茜, 杨雨萌, 周楠, 李蓓蕾. 父母自主支持、父母心理控制和青少年网络成瘾的关系：一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 190-196.
[9]	孙锦露, 刘海骅. 青少年校园欺凌行为量表编制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 255-260.
[10]	邓慧颖, 孔繁昌. 粗暴养育和青少年生命意义寻求的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 612-619.
[11]	邱晨, 牛美心, 周新林, 杨涛. 四、七年级学生分数数量表征与数学学业成就的关系：分数概念理解的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 628-635.
[12]	贾晓珊, 朱海东. 社会经济地位与儿童青少年心理健康关系的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 671-678.
[13]	孔繁昌, 王美茹, 孙乙元, 夏宇娟, 李晓瑶. 父母手机冷落行为与青少年疏离感的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 486-492.
[14]	刘艾祎, 伍新春. 创伤后应激障碍对震后青少年反社会行为的影响：复原力的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 244-251.
[15]	刘啸莳. 母亲受教育水平和青少年学业自尊的关系：母亲教养方式的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 59-65.