月是故乡明：家乡标签对风景图的情感和价值评估的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨家乡标签对风景图的情感和价值评估的影响，实验1将相同的风景图分别赋予家乡和非家乡标签，要求被试对风景图进行喜爱度评分。实验2将相同的风景油画分别赋予家乡和非家乡标签，要求被试对风景油画进行定价。结果发现：（1）相比有非家乡标签的风景图，有家乡标签的风景图的喜爱度评分更高；（2）相比有非家乡标签的风景油画，有家乡标签的风景油画的定价更高。研究结果揭示了个体对具有家乡标签的事物更容易产生情感偏好和价值高估。

关键词: 家乡标签, 标签效应, 家乡认同

Abstract: To explore the influence of hometown labels on emotional and value evaluation of landscape pictures, participants were required to evaluate their preferences for the same landscape painting pictures respectively with hometown and non-hometown labels in experiment 1. In experiment 2, participants were required to assess values of the same landscape oil painting pictures respectively with hometown and non-hometown labels. The results showed that: 1) compared with landscape painting pictures with non-hometown labels, participants had stronger preferences for those with hometown labels; 2) compared with landscape oil painting pictures with non-hometown labels, participants placed a higher value on those with hometown labels. The results indicate people are more likely to prefer and overvalue the items with their hometown labels.

Key words: hometown label, label effect, hometown identity

中图分类号:

B849

张霄钰, 朱海燕, 陈凤姣, 苏欣悦. 月是故乡明：家乡标签对风景图的情感和价值评估的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 695-700.

ZHANG Xiaoyu, ZHU Haiyan, CHEN Fengjiao, SU Xinyue. No Place Better than Hometown: The Influence of Hometown Label on Emotional Evaluation and Value Evaluation for Landscape Images[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 695-700.

参考文献

安德明. (2019). 作为范畴、视角与立场的家乡民俗学. 西北民族研究, (3), 152–162
曹春方, 刘秀梅, 贾凡胜. (2018). 向家乡投资: 信息、熟悉还是代理问题? 管理世界, (5), 107–119, 180.
黄宇霞, 罗跃嘉. (2004). 国际情绪图片系统在中国的试用研究. 中国心理卫生杂志, 18(9), 631–634
荣格. (2013). 分析心理学的理论与实践 (成穷, 王作虹译). 北京: 北京联合出版公司.
徐岚, 蒋怡然, 崔楠, 张留霞, 赵帅勤. (2020). 最心安处是吾乡: 本体安全感威胁对家乡品牌偏好的影响. 心理学报, 52(4), 513–527
张莹瑞, 佐斌. (2006). 社会认同理论及其发展. 心理科学进展, 14(3), 475–480
中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室. (2016). 现代汉语词典(第7版). 北京: 商务印书馆.
Afshar, P. F., Foroughan, M., Vedadhir, A., & Tabatabaei, M. G. (2017). The effects of place attachment on social well-being in older adults. Educational Gerontology, 43(1), 45–51, doi: 10.1080/03601277.2016.1260910.
Beukeboom, C. J., & Burgers, C. (2019). How stereotypes are shared through language: A review and introduction of the social categories and stereotypes communication (SCSC) framework. Review of Communication Research, 7, 1–37, doi: 10.12840/issn.2255-4165.017.
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2007). The international affective picture system (IAPS) in the study of emotion and attention. In J. Coan & J. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 29–46). New York: Oxford University Press.
Brewer, M. B. (2007). The importance of being we: Human nature and intergroup relations. American Psychologist, 62(8), 728–738, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.8.728.
Buijs, A. E., Elands, B. H. M., & Langers, F. (2009). No wilderness for immigrants: Cultural differences in images of nature and landscape preferences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 91(3), 113–123, doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.003.
Foland, A., & Lewicka, M. (2007). PsiMap: Psychological method for psycho-cartographic research. Poster session presented at the Xth European Congress of Psychology, Prague, Czech Republic.
Goudy, W. J. (1982). Further consideration of indicators of community attachment. Social Indicators Research, 11(2), 181–192, doi: 10.1007/BF00302748.
Karlsson, A., & Nordén, L. (2007). Home sweet home: Home bias and international diversification among individual investors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(2), 317–333.
Kwok, S., Uncles, M., & Huang, Y. M. (2006). Brand preferences and brand choices among urban Chinese consumers: An investigation of country-of-origin effects. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 18(3), 163–172, doi: 10.1108/13555850610675634.
Lalli, M. (1992). Urban-related identity: Theory, measurement, and empirical findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(4), 285–303, doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80078-7.
Morgan, P. (2010). Towards a developmental theory of place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 11–22, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.07.001.
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1971). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Preston, S. D., & Gelman, S. A. (2020). This land is my land: Psychological ownership increases willingness to protect the natural world more than legal ownership. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 70, 101443, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101443.
Proshansky, H. M. (1978). The city and self-identity. Environment and Behavior, 10(2), 147–169, doi: 10.1177/0013916578102002.
Rothbart, M., Davis-Stitt, C., & Hill, J. (1997). Effects of arbitrarily placed category boundaries on similarity judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(2), 122–145, doi: 10.1006/jesp.1996.1315.
Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1–10, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39, doi: 10.1146/ANNUREV.PS.33.020182.000245.
Tesar, L. L., & Werner, I. M. (1995). Home bias and high turnover. Journal of International Money and Finance, 14(4), 467–492, doi: 10.1016/0261-5606(95)00023-8.
Tuan, Y. F. (1978). Space and place: The perspective of experience. London: University of Minnesota Press.

[1]	白博仁, 周详, 张婧婧, 崔虞馨. 人工智能自恋提升人机合作创新意愿及其机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 137-144.
[2]	支慧晶, 刘阳. 竞走裁判员在多人情景下判罚决策的视觉搜索特征[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 130-136.
[3]	张耀华, 徐敏, 黄云云, 辛素飞. 心理韧性缓冲压力生活事件与青少年学业倦怠之间的非线性关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 123-129.
[4]	史滋福, 陈火红, 张艺瀚, 管锦亮, 夏笔奇, 靳紫阳. 父母直升机教养对大学生主观幸福感的影响：自我控制和抑郁的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 116-122.
[5]	王兴超, 田芳芳. 儿童期虐待与欺负行为：青少年道德推脱与父亲道德推脱的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 108-115.
[6]	韩迎春, 王琳萱. 有氧运动、情绪与创造力：流体智力的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 100-107.
[7]	林祟德. “教育家精神”也是中国心理学家精神之追求[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 721-724.
[8]	张克, 杜秀敏, 李立言, 张雪寒, 赵海霞. 酸味与创造力的关系研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 815-823.
[9]	闫景蕾, 傅苗苗, 黄贝, 连帅磊. 问题性社交媒介使用与主观幸福感的关系：技术冲突和疲惫感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 824-831.
[10]	吴明证, 陈迪, 严梦瑶, 倪苏杭, 王士祺, 尹金荣, 孙晓玲. 家庭仪式与青少年自我控制的关系：亲子依恋与生命意义感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 832-838.
[11]	占友龙, 江雪芬, 刘长林, 刘旭, 谭千保. 大学生自我担当对道德困境下亲社会行为意愿的影响：自我效能感和预期自豪的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 839-845.
[12]	周曌, 季顺鑫, 刘拓. 简版和极简版问题性手机使用量表的开发[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 846-853.
[13]	李文福, 刘燕, 段熙明, 牛四方, 许瑞雪, 慕福芹. 反刍思维量表在不同性别和抑郁症状医学院校新生中的测量等值性[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 854-860.
[14]	田可心, 阴山燕, 武亦文, 胡文彬. 积极共情与高中生亲社会行为的关系：自我建构的中介与社会比较的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(5): 712-719.
[15]	姜鹤, 叶华蓉, 张力伟, 汪新建. 差序式领导对员工绩效的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(5): 705-711.