踏步任务下动作同步的神经基础

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.05.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

动作同步在人际关系的建立过程中起着重要作用。以往的动作同步研究大多涉及单个肢体/物体，本研究设置需要双侧肢体协调的踏步任务，使用近红外超扫描技术同步采集互动双方的大脑活动，探究单人协调与动作同步(同相和反相)的大脑激活方式以及行为方面的差异。结果发现，在双侧下顶叶单人协调的神经激活显著高于同相模式和反相模式，表明下顶叶可能是动作同步的重要神经基础。

关键词: 动作同步, 功能性近红外光学成像技术, 超扫描

Abstract:

Motor coordination plays a crucial role in the establishment of social interactions. Previous studies have focused on single-limb coordination, neglecting two-limb coordination. The current study adopted a novel experimental paradigm, a bilateral stepping task of different modes (in-phase/anti-phase) when two participants performed the stepping coordination. In addition to behavioral performance, the brain activity of both interacting parties was simultaneously recorded by using the fNIRS hyperscanning. The results revealed stronger neural activity in certain regions of interest (corresponding to the bilateral inferior parietal lobule) during intra-individual coordination as compared to inter-individual coordination for both in-phase and anti-phase patterns. Therefore, the inferior parietal lobule may be potentially the critical neural basis for motor coordination.

Key words: motor coordination, fNIRS, hyperscanning

中图分类号:

B842

刘蕾, 李亚楠, 牛若愚, 于文婷, 陈玉雪, 刘莹. 踏步任务下动作同步的神经基础[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(5): 600-607.

Lei LIU, Yanan LI, Ruoyu NIU, Wenting YU, Yuxue CHEN, Ying LIU. Neural Basis of Motor Coordination in Stepping Tasks[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(5): 600-607.

图/表 7

参考文献

	Aramaki, Y., Honda, M., Okada, T., & Sadato, N.. Neural correlates of the spontaneous phase transition during bimanual coordination. Cerebral Cortex, 2006, 16 (9): 1338- 1348. DOI
	Cope, M., Delpy, D. T., Reynolds, E. O. R., Wray, S., Wyatt, J., & van der Zee, P. (1988). Methods of quantitating cerebral near infrared spectroscopy data. In M. Mochizuki, C. R. Honig, T. Koyama, T. K. Goldstick, & D. F. Bruley (Eds.), Oxygen transport to tissue X (pp. 183–189). New York: Springer.
	Crone, C. L., Rigoli, L. M., Patil, G., Pini, S., Sutton, J., Kallen, R. W., & Richardson, M. J.. Synchronous vs. non-synchronous imitation: Using dance to explore interpersonal coordination during observational learning. Human Movement Science, 2021, 76, 102776. DOI
	De Pretto, M., Deiber, M. P., & James, C. E.. Steady-state evoked potentials distinguish brain mechanisms of self-paced versus synchronization finger tapping. Human Movement Science, 2018, 61, 151- 166. DOI
	Delaherche, E., Chetouani, M., Mahdhaoui, A., Saint-Georges, C., Viaux, S., & Cohen, D.. Interpersonal synchrony: A survey of evaluation methods across disciplines. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2012, 3 (3): 349- 365. DOI
	Dolk, T., & Prinz, W. (2016). What it takes to share a task: Sharing versus shaping task representations. In S. S. Obhi & E. S. Cross (Eds.), Shared representations: Sensorimotor foundations of social life (pp. 3–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
	Ebisch, S. J. H., Ferri, F., Romani, G. L., & Gallese, V.. Reach out and touch someone: Anticipatory sensorimotor processes of active interpersonal touch. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2014, 26 (9): 2171- 2185. DOI
	Feng, X. D., Sun, B. H., Chen, C. S., Li, W. J., Wang, Y., Zhang, W. H., ... Shao, Y. T.. Self-other overlap and interpersonal neural synchronization serially mediate the effect of behavioral synchronization on prosociality. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2020, 15 (2): 203- 214. DOI
	Fogassi, L., Ferrari, P. F., Gesierich, B., Rozzi, S., Chersi, F., & Rizzolatti, G.. Parietal lobe: From action organization to intention understanding. Science, 2005, 308 (5722): 662- 667. DOI
	Haberstumpf, S., Seidel, A., Lauer, M., Polak, T., Deckert, J., & Herrmann, M. J.. Reduced parietal activation in participants with mild cognitive impairments during visual-spatial processing measured with functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 2022, 146, 31- 42. DOI
	Hu, Y., Hu, Y. Y., Li, X. C., Pan, Y. F., & Cheng, X. J.. Brain-to-brain synchronization across two persons predicts mutual prosociality. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2017, 12 (12): 1835- 1844. DOI
	Jäncke, L., Loose, R., Lutz, K., Specht, K., & Shah, N. J.. Cortical activations during paced finger-tapping applying visual and auditory pacing stimuli. Cognitive Brain Research, 2000, 10 (1−2): 51- 66. DOI
	Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. London: MIT Press.
	Kim, S. G., Jennings, J. E., Strupp, J. P., Andersen, P., & Uǧurbil, K.. Functional MRI of human motor cortices during overt and imagined finger movements. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, 1995, 6 (2−3): 271- 279. DOI
	Knoblich, G., Butterfill, S., & Sebanz, N.. Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 2011, 54, 59- 101.
	Koike, T., Tanabe, H. C., & Sadato, N.. Hyperscanning neuroimaging technique to reveal the “two-in-one” system in social interactions. Neuroscience Research, 2015, 90, 25- 32. DOI
	Kokal, I., Engel, A., Kirschner, S., & Keysers, C.. Synchronized drumming enhances activity in the caudate and facilitates prosocial commitment-if the rhythm comes easily. PLoS One, 2011, 6 (11): e27272. DOI
	Lafleur, M. F., Jackson, P. L., Malouin, F., Richards, C. L., Evans, A. C., & Doyon, J.. Motor learning produces parallel dynamic functional changes during the execution and imagination of sequential foot movements. NeuroImage, 2002, 16 (1): 142- 157. DOI
	Liu, T., Saito, H., & Oi, M.. Role of the right inferior frontal gyrus in turn-based cooperation and competition: A near-infrared spectroscopy study. Brain and Cognition, 2015, 99, 17- 23. DOI
	Ma, Y., Lee, E. W. M., Shi, M., & Yuen, R. K. K.. Spontaneous synchronization of motion in pedestrian crowds of different densities. Nature Human Behaviour, 2021, 5 (4): 447- 457. DOI
	Marsh, K. L., Richardson, M. J., & Schmidt, R. C.. Social connection through joint action and interpersonal coordination. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2009, 1 (2): 320- 339. DOI
	Mayville, J. M., Jantzen, K. J., Fuchs, A., Steinberg, F. L., & Kelso, J. A. S.. Cortical and subcortical networks underlying syncopated and synchronized coordination revealed using fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 2002, 17 (4): 214- 229. DOI
	Meyer, M., van der Wel, R. P. D., & Hunnius, S.. Higher-order action planning for individual and joint object manipulations. Experimental Brain Research, 2013, 225 (4): 579- 588. DOI
	Niu, R. Y., Yu, Y. L., Li, Y. N., & Liu, Y.. Use of fNIRS to characterize the neural mechanism of inter-individual rhythmic movement coordination. Frontiers in Physiology, 2019, 10, 781. DOI
	Nozawa, T., Sakaki, K., Ikeda, S., Jeong, H., Yamazaki, S., Kawata, K., ... Kawashima, R.. Prior physical synchrony enhances rapport and inter-brain synchronization during subsequent educational communication. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9 (1): 12747. DOI
	Okamoto, M., Dan, H., Sakamoto, K., Takeo, K., Shimizu, K., Kohno, S., ... Dan, I.. Three-dimensional probabilistic anatomical cranio-cerebral correlation via the international 10–20 system oriented for transcranial functional brain mapping. NeuroImage, 2004, 21 (1): 99- 111. DOI
	Okamoto, M., Tsuzuki, D., Clowney, L., Dan, H., Singh, A. K., & Dan, I.. Structural atlas-based spatial registration for functional near-infrared spectroscopy enabling inter-study data integration. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2009, 120 (7): 1320- 1328. DOI
	Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., Isenhower, R. W., Goodman, J. R. L., & Schmidt, R. C.. Rocking together: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human Movement Science, 2007, 26 (6): 867- 891. DOI
	Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., & Schmidt, R.. Effects of visual and verbal interaction on unintentional interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2005, 31 (1): 62- 79. DOI
	Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V.. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2001, 2 (9): 661- 670. DOI
	Schippers, M. B., Roebroeck, A., Renken, R., Nanetti, L., & Keysers, C.. Mapping the information flow from one brain to another during gestural communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107 (20): 9388- 9393.
	Schmidt, R. C., & Richardson, M. J. (2008). Dynamics of interpersonal coordination. In A. Fuchs, & V. K. Jirsa (Eds.), Coordination: Neural, behavioral and social dynamics (pp. 281–308). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
	Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G.. Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2006, 10 (2): 70- 76. DOI
	Singer, T.. The past, present and future of social neuroscience: A European perspective. NeuroImage, 2012, 61 (2): 437- 449. DOI
	Strangman, G., Culver, J. P., Thompson, J. H., & Boas, D. A.. A quantitative comparison of simultaneous BOLD fMRI and NIRS recordings during functional brain activation. NeuroImage, 2002, 17 (2): 719- 731. DOI
	Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H.. In search of the uniquely human. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2005, 28 (5): 721- 735. DOI
	Tsuzuki, D., Jurcak, V., Singh, A. K., Okamoto, M., Watanabe, E., & Dan, I.. Virtual spatial registration of stand-alone fNIRS data to MNI space. NeuroImage, 2007, 34 (4): 1506- 1518. DOI
	Tyszka, J. M., Grafton, S. T., Chew, W., Woods, R. P., & Colletti, P. M.. Parceling of mesial frontal motor areas during ideation and movement using functional magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla. Annals of Neurology, 1994, 35 (6): 746- 749. DOI
	van Dijk, J., Kerkhofs, R., van Rooij, I., & Haselager, P. (2008). Special section: Can there be such a thing as embodied embedded cognitive neuroscience? Theory & Psychology, 18(3), 297–316.
	van Ulzen, N. R., Lamoth, C. J. C., Daffertshofer, A., Semin, G. R., & Beek, P. J.. Characteristics of instructed and uninstructed interpersonal coordination while walking side-by-side. Neuroscience Letters, 2008, 432 (2): 88- 93. DOI
	Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., & Kawato, M.. A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2003, 358 (1431): 593- 602. DOI

通道	10−05导联系统定位	x	y	z	解剖学位置
Ch1	CP5h	−61.05	−43.48	44.46	顶下缘角回
Ch2	CCP3	−53.44	−30.44	54.19	中央后回
Ch3	CCP5	−67.01	−31.07	28.89	缘上回
Ch4	C5h	−63.49	−16.83	41.21	缘上回
Ch5	CP6h	62.09	−43.19	44.59	缘上回
Ch6	CCP4	57.13	−30.23	55.23	顶下缘角回
Ch7	CCP6	69.06	−30.29	28.56	缘上回
Ch8	C6h	65.29	−16.79	40.93	中央后回
Ch9	FC1h	−13.63	17.58	67.41	背外侧额上回
Ch10	FC2h	14.89	17.23	66.58	补充运动区
Ch11	FFC	2.26	30.64	57.64	内侧额上回
Ch12	FFC1	−23.30	31.67	54.93	额中回
Ch13	F1h	−10.50	45.34	50.74	背外侧额上回
Ch14	FFC2	25.90	31.40	55.89	背外侧额上回
Ch15	F2h	12.86	45.45	50.67	背外侧额上回

通道	10−05导联系统定位	x	y	z	解剖学位置
Ch1	CP5h	−61.05	−43.48	44.46	顶下缘角回
Ch2	CCP3	−53.44	−30.44	54.19	中央后回
Ch3	CCP5	−67.01	−31.07	28.89	缘上回
Ch4	C5h	−63.49	−16.83	41.21	缘上回
Ch5	CP6h	62.09	−43.19	44.59	缘上回
Ch6	CCP4	57.13	−30.23	55.23	顶下缘角回
Ch7	CCP6	69.06	−30.29	28.56	缘上回
Ch8	C6h	65.29	−16.79	40.93	中央后回
Ch9	FC1h	−13.63	17.58	67.41	背外侧额上回
Ch10	FC2h	14.89	17.23	66.58	补充运动区
Ch11	FFC	2.26	30.64	57.64	内侧额上回
Ch12	FFC1	−23.30	31.67	54.93	额中回
Ch13	F1h	−10.50	45.34	50.74	背外侧额上回
Ch14	FFC2	25.90	31.40	55.89	背外侧额上回
Ch15	F2h	12.86	45.45	50.67	背外侧额上回

兴趣区	单人协调	同相模式	反相模式
ROI1	3.692±3.559	2.036±3.973	2.293±3.131
ROI2	2.501±3.020	0.544±3.469	0.596±2.753
ROI3	3.695±3.339	3.252±3.503	3.022±3.034

兴趣区	单人协调	同相模式	反相模式
ROI1	3.692±3.559	2.036±3.973	2.293±3.131
ROI2	2.501±3.020	0.544±3.469	0.596±2.753
ROI3	3.695±3.339	3.252±3.503	3.022±3.034

[1]	宋娟, 焦志彬, 杨雪, 韩高鑫, 陈祎玥, 连涛, 梁竞元. 共同经历社会排斥提高女性合作倾向：基于fNIRS的超扫描研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(4): 553-561.
[2]	郭文欣, 张微, 李雨茜. 动作电子游戏玩家工作记忆优势的跨系统一致性：一项近红外研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(4): 454-463.