大学生失败心态量表的编制及信效度检验

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.03.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

探讨中国大学生失败心态的结构，编制大学生失败心态量表并检验其信效度。首先通过文献分析和半结构式访谈发展出量表的初始条目，依次进行项目分析和探索性因素分析(n=699)、验证性因素分析(n=684)等确定量表的信效度。然后通过考察大学生失败心态与心理健康的关系，再次验证量表效度(n=2922)。结果发现：最终形成的正式量表包含消极失败心态和积极失败心态两个相对独立的维度；量表的内部一致性信度、重测信度和结构效度、效标效度均符合心理测量学要求；失败心态两维度与主观幸福感和一般心理问题均显著相关。该量表可作为测量中国大学生失败心态水平的有效工具。

关键词: 中国大学生, 失败心态, 信度, 效度

Abstract:

This study aimed to develop and validate an instrument for measuring failure mindset in Chinese college students. Based on literature analysis and semi-structured interviews, the initial items of the Failure Mindset Scale (FMS) were developed. The factor structure of the FMS was examined by exploratory factor analysis (n=699) and confirmatory factor analysis (n=684). Then the scale validity was verified again by examining the relationship between failure mentality and mental health (n=2922). The results showed that the final formal scale contains two relatively independent dimensions, that is, the negative failure mindset and the positive failure mindset. The internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, construct validity and criterion validity of FMS all met the requirements of psychometric characteristics. Both dimensions of failure mindset predicted subjective well-being and general psychological problems significantly. In conclusion, the FMS can be used as an effective tool to measure the level of failure mindset among Chinese college students.

Key words: Chinese college students, failure mindset, reliability, validity

牛宏伟, 郝嘉佳, 白学军. 大学生失败心态量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(3): 379-386.

Hongwei NIU, Jiajia HAO, Xuejun BAI. Development and Validation of Chinese College Students Failure Mindset Scale[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(3): 379-386.

图/表 7

参考文献 0

	傅小兰. 不忘初心守正出新?——试论个体的信念形成与改变的心理过程. 中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32 (8): 887- 895.
	侯玉波, 彭凯平, 朱滢. 中国人整体思维方式量表的编制与确认. 中国社会心理学评论, 2016, (2): 45- 72.
	胡心怡, 陈英和. 智力和人格内隐观对大学生应对方式和抑郁的影响——变量中心和个体中心分析. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34 (5): 586- 594.
	黄莲琼, 罗曦, 侯玉波. 中国人的思维方式与心理健康: 心理弹性与自尊的作用. 心理科学, 2024, 47 (2): 458- 466.
	景怀斌. 儒家式应对思想及其对心理健康的影响. 心理学报, 2006, 38 (1): 126- 134.
	刘春晖, 张俊怡, 刘思佳, 郭筱琳, 罗良. 父母失败观与儿童能力实体观的关系: 一项基于响应面分析的纵向研究. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21 (4): 479- 487.
	罗鸣春, 常敬, 陈家敏. 儒家文化与中国人健康心理的交互建构. 心理学探新, 2020, 40 (1): 3- 8.
	彭华. 中国传统思维的三个特征: 整体思维、辩证思维、直觉思维. 社会科学研究, 2017, (3): 126- 133. DOI
	史梦薇, 赵守盈. 儒家思想与压力应对: 应激研究的本土心理学视角. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), 2014, (2): 117- 122.
	宋勃东, 李永娟, 董好叶, 方平, 王岩. 无惧失败预测幸福: 成就动机对心理幸福感的预测作用. 心理科学, 2015, 38 (1): 203- 208.
	陶沙. 乐观、悲观倾向与抑郁的关系及压力、性别的调节作用. 心理学报, 2006, 38 (6): 886- 901.
	王鑫强, 谢倩, 张大均, 刘明矾. 心理健康双因素模型在大学生及其心理素质中的有效性研究. 心理科学, 2016, 39 (6): 1296- 1301.
	温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 马什赫伯特. 结构方程模型检验: 拟合指数与卡方准则. 心理学报, 2004, 36 (2): 186- 194.
	吴艾柯, 胡影, 岳心慧, 胡锦仪, 卢丽宇, 杨雪岭, 王优. 大学生失败内隐观与抑郁症状和情绪面孔加工的关系. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2022, 36 (12): 1050- 1056. DOI
	吴明隆. (2010). 问卷统计分析实务——SPSS 操作与应用. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社.
	辛自强, 辛素飞, 张梅. 1993至2009年大学生焦虑的变迁: 一项横断历史研究. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27 (6): 648- 653.
	徐展菲, 席居哲. 矛盾态度的成因与应对. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26 (2): 331- 343.
	中共教育部党组. (2018). 中共教育部党组关于印发《高等学校学生心理健康教育指导纲要》的通知. 2022-03-24 取自http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A12/moe_1407/s3020/201807/t20180713_342992.html
	Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1997, 1 (1): 3- 25. DOI
	Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2002, 9 (2): 233- 255. DOI
	Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 2003, 18 (2): 76- 82. DOI
	Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985, 49 (1): 71- 75. DOI
	Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
	Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 1995, 6 (4): 267- 285. DOI
	Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 1988, 95 (2): 256- 273. DOI
	Eskreis-Winkler, L., & Fishbach, A. Not learning from failure—The greatest failure of all. Psychological Science, 2019, 30 (12): 1733- 1744. DOI
	Follette, V. M., & Jacobson, N. S. Importance of attributions as a predictor of how people cope with failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, 52 (6): 1205- 1211. DOI
	Goldberg, D., & Williams, P. (1988). A user’s guide to the general health questionnaire. London: NFER-NELSON.
	Goodhart, D. E. The effects of positive and negative thinking on performance in an achievement situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51 (1): 117- 124. DOI
	Haimovitz, K., & Dweck, C. S. Parents’ views of failure predict children’s fixed and growth intelligence mind-sets. Psychological Science, 2016, 27 (6): 859- 869. DOI
	Helgeson, V. S., Reynolds, K. A., & Tomich, P. L. A meta-analytic review of benefit finding and growth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2006, 74 (5): 797- 816. DOI
	Hong, Y. Y., Chiu, C. Y., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M. S., & Wan, W. Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999, 77 (3): 588- 599. DOI
	Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K. P., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 2001, 108 (2): 291- 310. DOI
	Peng, K. P., & Nisbett, R. E. Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 1999, 54 (9): 741- 754. DOI
	Sim, T. N., & Wong, E. X. Adolescents’ evaluative beliefs of failure: Explorations in a Chinese Singaporean sample. International Journal of Psychology, 2010, 45 (3): 212- 220. DOI
	Spencer-Rodgers, J., Boucher, H. C., Mori, S. C., Wang, L., & Peng, K. P. The dialectical self-concept: Contradiction, change, and holism in East Asian cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2009, 35 (1): 29- 44. DOI
	Tao, V. Y. K., Li, Y., & Wu, A. M. S. Do not despise failures: Students’ failure mindset, perception of parents’ failure mindset, and implicit theory of intelligence. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2022, 37 (2): 375- 389. DOI
	Wang, Y., Jones, B. F., & Wang, D. S. Early-career setback and future career impact. Nature Communications, 2019, 10 (1): 4331. DOI
	Weiner, B., & Kukla, A. An attributional analysis of achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 15 (1): 1- 20. DOI
	Xie, F., Duan, X. F., Ni, X. L., Li, L., & Zhang, L. B. The impact of parents’ intelligence mindset on math anxiety of boys and girls and the role of parents’ failure beliefs and evaluation of child’s math performance as mediators. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 13, 687136. DOI
	Yama, H., & Zakaria, N. Explanations for cultural differences in thinking: Easterners’ dialectical thinking and westerners’ linear thinking. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2019, 31 (4): 487- 506. DOI
	Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. What can be learned from growth mindset controversies. American Psychologist, 2020, 75 (9): 1269- 1284. DOI
	Yu, X. N., & Zhang, J. X. Factor analysis and psychometric evaluation of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) with Chinese people. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 2007, 35 (1): 19- 30. DOI

核心编码	主轴编码	参考点(个)	开放式编码(示例)	原始资料(示例)
积极失败心态	促进成长	38	从中学习	02：每次失败都能学到很多东西
积极失败心态	反思改变	36	改变不足	06：失败可以让自己找到不足去修正
消极失败心态	痛苦打击	36	打击	07：给人打击特别大
消极失败心态	贬低否定	19	自我否定	03：让自己觉得什么都做不好

核心编码	主轴编码	参考点(个)	开放式编码(示例)	原始资料(示例)
积极失败心态	促进成长	38	从中学习	02：每次失败都能学到很多东西
积极失败心态	反思改变	36	改变不足	06：失败可以让自己找到不足去修正
消极失败心态	痛苦打击	36	打击	07：给人打击特别大
消极失败心态	贬低否定	19	自我否定	03：让自己觉得什么都做不好

项目	F1	F2	共同度
6.失败让我怀疑自己的价值	0.80		0.67
3.失败会让我陷入痛苦	0.80		0.65
1.失败让我没面子	0.76		0.57
13.失败会打击我的热情和积极性	0.75		0.63
14.失败让我觉得自己的能力不足	0.74		0.57
9.失败提示我需要更加努力		0.78	0.63
7.失败意味着获得成长的机会		0.78	0.62
5.失败是值得从中学习的经历		0.76	0.61
2.失败提示我需要反思自己的方法策略		0.72	0.51
11.失败提示我需要调整自己的目标或方向		0.60	0.38
特征值	3.94	1.91
解释率	30.55%	27.87%

项目	F1	F2	共同度
6.失败让我怀疑自己的价值	0.80		0.67
3.失败会让我陷入痛苦	0.80		0.65
1.失败让我没面子	0.76		0.57
13.失败会打击我的热情和积极性	0.75		0.63
14.失败让我觉得自己的能力不足	0.74		0.57
9.失败提示我需要更加努力		0.78	0.63
7.失败意味着获得成长的机会		0.78	0.62
5.失败是值得从中学习的经历		0.76	0.61
2.失败提示我需要反思自己的方法策略		0.72	0.51
11.失败提示我需要调整自己的目标或方向		0.60	0.38
特征值	3.94	1.91
解释率	30.55%	27.87%

模型	χ²/df	RMSEA	SRMR	GFI	NFI	CFI
1	31.96	0.21	0.18	0.67	0.55	0.55
2	3.46	0.06	0.04	0.97	0.95	0.97