共同经历社会排斥提高女性合作倾向：基于fNIRS的超扫描研究

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.04.017

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

共同经历社会排斥促进合作，但其神经机制并不清楚，尤其是人际神经机制。本研究招募女性被试82名(41对)，采用网络掷球及囚徒困境范式，从双脑视角考察共同经历社会排斥对合作倾向的影响。结果显示，共同经历社会排斥组的合作倾向及右侧额中回脑间同步性均显著高于控制组；并且，右侧额中回脑间同步性与合作倾向显著正相关。这表明合作过程中，右侧额中回脑间同步性的提高，可能是共同经历社会排斥提高合作倾向的脑间神经机制。这一发现为理解合作行为的脑间神经基础提供了新证据，对团队管理具有一定借鉴意义。

关键词: 社会排斥, 合作倾向, fNIRS, 超扫描, 脑间同步性

Abstract:

The shared experience of social exclusion promotes cooperation, but the neural mechanisms, particularly interpersonal ones, are unclear. In the present study, 82 female participants (41 pairs) were recruited to investigate the effects of shared experience of social exclusion on the cooperative tendency from an interbrain perspective using cyberball and prisoner’s dilemma paradigm. The results showed that the group who experienced shared social exclusion significantly exhibited higher level of cooperative tendency and increased interpersonal brain synchronization (IBS) in the right medial prefrontal gyrus(r-MFG) compared to the control group. Furthermore, a significant positive correlation was observed between cooperative tendency and IBS in the r-MFG. This suggests that the increase in the r-MFG IBS during cooperation may be an interbrain neural mechanism for increasing the cooperative tendency through the shared experience of social exclusion. This finding provides new evidence for understanding the interbrain neural basis of cooperative behaviour which provides implications for team management.

Key words: social exclusion, cooperative tendency, fNIRS, hyperscanning, interpersonal brain synchronization (IBS)

宋娟, 焦志彬, 杨雪, 韩高鑫, 陈祎玥, 连涛, 梁竞元. 共同经历社会排斥提高女性合作倾向：基于fNIRS的超扫描研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(4): 553-561.

Juan SONG, Zhibin JIAO, Xue YANG, Gaoxin HAN, Yiyue CHEN, Tao LIAN, Jingyuan LIANG. Shared Experience of Social Exclusion Increases Female’s Cooperative Tendency: An fNIRS-Based Hyperscanning Study[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(4): 553-561.

图/表 5

参考文献 0

	常姣姣, 朱海东, 张馨艺, 李晨曦. 社会支持对青少年亲社会行为的影响: 社交焦虑和抑郁的中介作用. 现代预防医学, 2021, 48 (12): 2210- 2213, 2267.
	戴晓阳. (主编). (2010). 常用心理评估量表手册. 北京: 人民军医出版社.
	胡玉婷. (2020). 社会排斥对疼痛信息注意偏向的影响(硕士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆.
	李星垚. (2022). 生理性疼痛和社会性疼痛对奖赏加工脑电活动的影响(硕士学位论文). 华东师范大学, 上海.
	刘蕾, 李亚楠, 牛若愚, 于文婷, 陈玉雪, 刘莹. 踏步任务下动作同步的神经基础. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21 (5): 600- 607. DOI
	刘岩, 张蔚, 陈晶, 高艳霞, 王益文. “心理理论”的神经机制: 来自脑成像的证据. 心理科学, 2007, 30 (3): 763- 765. DOI
	庞维国, 程学超. 9–16岁儿童的合作倾向与合作意图的发展研究. 心理发展与教育, 2001, 17 (1): 31- 35. DOI
	王慧玲. (2021). 急性有氧运动影响人际合作的fNIRS超扫描研究(硕士学位论文). 华东师范大学, 上海.
	肖治兵. (2022). 吸烟者受连输反馈诱发的风险寻求及其神经机制(硕士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆.
	谢晓非, 余媛媛, 陈曦, 陈晓萍. 合作与竞争人格倾向测量. 心理学报, 2006, 38 (1): 116- 125.
	张丹丹, 王驹, 赵君, 陈淑美, 黄琰淋, 高秋凤. 抑郁倾向对合作的影响: 双人同步近红外脑成像研究. 心理学报, 2020, 52 (5): 609- 622.
	张环, 李婧文, 王海曼, 沙玛丽·阿哈提, 何云凤, 卢春明. 共情在社会互动提取中的作用: 第二人称的视角. 心理科学, 2023, 46 (5): 1254- 1261.
	Batson, C. D. Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1987, 20, 65- 122.
	Cheng, X. J., Li, X. C., & Hu, Y. Synchronous brain activity during cooperative exchange depends on gender of partner: A fNIRS-based hyperscanning study. Human Brain Mapping, 2015, 36 (6): 2039- 2048. DOI
	Chester, D. S., DeWall, C. N., & Pond, R. S. (2016). The push of social pain: Does rejection’s sting motivate subsequent social reconnection? Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16(3), 541−550.
	Cui, X., Bryant, D. M., & Reiss, A. L. NIRS-based hyperscanning reveals increased interpersonal coherence in superior frontal cortex during cooperation. NeuroImage, 2012, 59 (3): 2430- 2437. DOI
	Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 2003, 302 (5643): 290- 292. DOI
	Fung, K., & Alden, L. E. Once hurt, twice shy: Social pain contributes to social anxiety. Emotion, 2017, 17 (2): 231- 239. DOI
	Gallagher, H. L., Happé, F., Brunswick, N., Fletcher, P. C., Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: An fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38(1), 11−21.
	Hermann, A., Neudert, M. K., Schäfer, A., Zehtner, R. I., Fricke, S., Seinsche, R. J., & Stark, R. Lasting effects of cognitive emotion regulation: Neural correlates of reinterpretation and distancing. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2021, 16 (3): 268- 279. DOI
	Hodges, S. D., Kiel, K. J., Kramer, A. D. I., Veach, D., & Villanueva, B. R. Giving birth to empathy: The effects of similar experience on empathic accuracy, empathic concern, and perceived empathy. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 2010, 36 (3): 398- 409.
	Hoshi, Y. Functional near-infrared optical imaging: Utility and limitations in human brain mapping. Psychophysiology, 2003, 40 (4): 511- 520. DOI
	Hu, Y. Y., Wang, Z. X, Song, B., Pan, Y. F., Cheng, X. J., Zhu, Y., & Hu, Y. How to calculate and validate inter-brain synchronization in a fNIRS hyperscanning study. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE, 2021, (175): e62801.
	Huang, S. Y., & Han, S. H. Shared beliefs enhance shared feelings: Religious/irreligious identifications modulate empathic neural responses. Social Neuroscience, 2014, 9 (6): 639- 649.
	Hudd, T., & Moscovitch, D. A. Coping with social wounds: How social pain and social anxiety influence access to social rewards. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 2020, 68, 101572. DOI
	Jenness, J. L., Peverill, M., Miller, A. B., Heleniak, C., Robertson, M. M., Sambrook, K. A., … McLaughlin, K. A. Alterations in neural circuits underlying emotion regulation following child maltreatment: A mechanism underlying trauma-related psychopathology. Psychological Medicine, 2021, 51 (11): 1880- 1889. DOI
	Kawamoto, T., Nittono, H., & Ura, M. Social exclusion induces early-stage perceptual and behavioral changes in response to social cues. Social Neuroscience, 2014, 9 (2): 174- 185. DOI
	Konvalinka, I., & Roepstorff, A. The two-brain approach: How can mutually interacting brains teach us something about social interaction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2012, 6, 215.
	Lee, M., Ahn, H. S., Kwon, S. K., & Kim, S. I. Cooperative and competitive contextual effects on social cognitive and empathic neural responses. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2018, 12, 218. DOI
	Li, L., Wang, H. L., Lin, Y. X., & Li, X. C. One single-person bicycling enhances interpersonal cooperation via increasing interpersonal neural synchronization in left frontal cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 2023, 44 (12): 4535- 4544. DOI
	Lu, K. L., & Hao, N. When do we fall in neural synchrony with others. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2019, 14 (3): 253- 261. DOI
	Lu, K. L., Qiao, X. N., & Hao, N. Praising or keeping silent on partner’s ideas: Leading brainstorming in particular ways. Neuropsychologia, 2019, 124, 19- 30. DOI
	Lu, K. L., Xue, H., Nozawa, T., & Hao, N. Cooperation makes a group be more creative. Cerebral Cortex, 2019, 29 (8): 3457- 3470. DOI
	Masten, C. L., Morelli, S. A., & Eisenberger, N. I. An fMRI investigation of empathy for ‘social pain’ and subsequent prosocial behavior. NeuroImage, 2011, 55 (1): 381- 388. DOI
	Mattick, R. P., & Clarke, J. C. Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1998, 36 (4): 455- 470. DOI
	Meyer, M. L., Masten, C. L., Ma, Y. N., Wang, C. B., Shi, Z. H., Eisenberger, N. I., & Han, S. H. Empathy for the social suffering of friends and strangers recruits distinct patterns of brain activation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2013, 8 (4): 446- 454. DOI
	Miao, X. Y., Chan, K. Q., Gao, C., Lv, S. S., Zhu, Y. X., & Wang, Z. J. Underdogs make an alliance: The co-experience of rejection promotes cooperation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2020, 59 (4): 876- 899. DOI
	Nozawa, T., Sasaki, Y., Sakaki, K., Yokoyama, R., & Kawashima, R. Interpersonal frontopolar neural synchronization in group communication: An exploration toward fNIRS hyperscanning of natural interactions. NeuroImage, 2016, 133, 484- 497. DOI
	Pan, Y. F., Cheng, X. J., Zhang, Z. X., Li, X. C., & Hu, Y. Cooperation in lovers: An fNIRS-based hyperscanning study. Human Brain Mapping, 2017, 38 (2): 831- 841. DOI
	Sandstrom, M. J., Deutz, M. H. F., Lansu, T. A. M., van Noorden, T. H. J., Karremans, J. C., & Cillessen, A. H. N. Unanimous versus partial rejection: How the number of excluders influences the impact of ostracism in children. Aggressive Behavior, 2017, 43 (2): 190- 203. DOI
	Tang, Y., Liu, X., Wang, C. B., Cao, M., Deng, S. N., Du, X. J., … Li, F. Different strategies, distinguished cooperation efficiency, and brain synchronization for couples: An fNIRS-based hyperscanning study. Brain and Behavior, 2020, 10 (9): e01768. DOI
	Vanderhasselt, M. A., Kühn, S., & De Raedt, R. ‘Put on your poker face’: Neural systems supporting the anticipation for expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2013, 8 (8): 903- 910. DOI
	Walasek, L., Juanchich, M., & Sirota, M. Adaptive cooperation in the face of social exclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2019, 82, 35- 46. DOI
	Wang, C., Gao, J., Ma, Y., Zhu, C., & Dong, X. W. Physical pain increases interpersonal trust in females. European Journal of Pain, 2018, 22 (1): 150- 160. DOI
	Wang, C. B., Zhang, T. Y., Shan, Z. K. D., Liu, J. Q., Yuan, D., & Li, X. C. Dynamic interpersonal neural synchronization underlying pain-induced cooperation in females. Human Brain Mapping, 2019, 40 (11): 3222- 3232. DOI
	Wang, Y. F., Wu, L. D., Wang, L. X., Zhang, Y. F., Du, X. X., & Dong, G. H. Impaired decision-making and impulse control in internet gaming addicts: Evidence from the comparison with recreational internet game users. Addiction Biology, 2017, 22 (6): 1610- 1621. DOI
	Williams, K. D. Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2009, 41, 275- 314.
	Williams, K. D., & Jarvis, B. Cyberball: A program for use in research on interpersonal ostracism and acceptance. Behavior Research Methods, 2006, 38 (1): 174- 180. DOI
	Xue, H., Lu, K. L., & Hao, N. Cooperation makes two less-creative individuals turn into a highly-creative pair. NeuroImage, 2018, 172, 527- 537. DOI
	Yang, Z., Zheng, Y., Yang, G. C., Li, Q., & Liu, X. Neural signatures of cooperation enforcement and violation: A coordinate-based meta-analysis. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2019, 14 (9): 919- 931. DOI
	Zheng, L. F., Chen, C. S., Liu, W. D., Long, Y. H., Zhao, H., Bai, X. L., … Lu, C. M. Enhancement of teaching outcome through neural prediction of the students’ knowledge state. Human Brain Mapping, 2018, 39 (7): 3046- 3057. DOI

通道	MNI坐标			BA脑区	概率	AAL脑区	概率
通道	x	y	z	BA脑区	概率	AAL脑区	概率
1	34	40	46	背外侧前额叶	0.98	右侧额中回	0.90
2	15	52	47	背外侧前额叶	1.00	右侧额上回	0.58
3	−13	53	46	背外侧前额叶	1.00	左侧额上回	0.68
4	−33	40	45	背外侧前额叶	0.95	左侧额中回	0.76
5	47	39	34	布洛卡三角区	0.62	右侧额中回	0.90
6	22	58	37	背外侧前额叶	0.70	右侧额上回	0.77
7	1	61	32	额极	0.67	左内侧额上回	0.69
8	−21	59	33	背外侧前额叶	0.42	左侧额上回	0.78
9	−44	40	32	布洛卡三角区	0.64	左侧额中回	0.91
10	35	60	24	背外侧前额叶	0.73	右侧额中回	0.80
11	16	70	21	额极	1.00	右侧额上回	0.53
12	−11	69	22	额极	1.00	左侧额上回	0.61
13	−35	60	20	背外侧前额叶	0.70	左侧额中回	0.77
14	46	56	8	背外侧前额叶	0.77	右侧额中回	0.93
15	23	72	10	额极	0.94	右侧额上回	0.88
16	8	73	11	额极	1.00	右内侧额上回	0.87
17	−21	71	11	额极	0.98	左侧额上回	0.99
18	−43	56	10	背外侧前额叶	0.77	左侧额中回	0.91
19	35	67	−2	额极	0.49	左侧眶部额上回	0.30
20	17	73	−1	额极	0.57	右侧眶部额上回	0.37
21	−12	74	−1	额极	0.64	左侧额上回	0.28
22	−34	66	−2	额极	0.56	左侧眶部额中回	0.39

通道	MNI坐标			BA脑区	概率	AAL脑区	概率
通道	x	y	z	BA脑区	概率	AAL脑区	概率
1	34	40	46	背外侧前额叶	0.98	右侧额中回	0.90
2	15	52	47	背外侧前额叶	1.00	右侧额上回	0.58
3	−13	53	46	背外侧前额叶	1.00	左侧额上回	0.68
4	−33	40	45	背外侧前额叶	0.95	左侧额中回	0.76
5	47	39	34	布洛卡三角区	0.62	右侧额中回	0.90
6	22	58	37	背外侧前额叶	0.70	右侧额上回	0.77
7	1	61	32	额极	0.67	左内侧额上回	0.69
8	−21	59	33	背外侧前额叶	0.42	左侧额上回	0.78
9	−44	40	32	布洛卡三角区	0.64	左侧额中回	0.91
10	35	60	24	背外侧前额叶	0.73	右侧额中回	0.80
11	16	70	21	额极	1.00	右侧额上回	0.53
12	−11	69	22	额极	1.00	左侧额上回	0.61
13	−35	60	20	背外侧前额叶	0.70	左侧额中回	0.77
14	46	56	8	背外侧前额叶	0.77	右侧额中回	0.93
15	23	72	10	额极	0.94	右侧额上回	0.88
16	8	73	11	额极	1.00	右内侧额上回	0.87
17	−21	71	11	额极	0.98	左侧额上回	0.99
18	−43	56	10	背外侧前额叶	0.77	左侧额中回	0.91
19	35	67	−2	额极	0.49	左侧眶部额上回	0.30
20	17	73	−1	额极	0.57	右侧眶部额上回	0.37
21	−12	74	−1	额极	0.64	左侧额上回	0.28
22	−34	66	−2	额极	0.56	左侧眶部额中回	0.39

[1]	张文, 阚超, 郭丽敏, 刘知和, 刘阳. 排球运动员接扣球知觉预测认知加工特征研究：来自眼动和fNIRS的关联证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(4): 562-569.
[2]	刘蕾, 李亚楠, 牛若愚, 于文婷, 陈玉雪, 刘莹. 踏步任务下动作同步的神经基础[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(5): 600-607.
[3]	黄骏青, 李楷政, 张姝玥. 基于公共物品博弈框架的排斥行为范式开发[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(3): 320-327.
[4]	常保瑞, 林培钿, 黄江喜, 方建东. 社会排斥与亲社会行为的关系：物质主义价值观与未来取向的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 556-562.
[5]	王欣竹, 邹何辉, 郝娜, 黄瑶, 吴琴, 崔丽莹. 抑制还是补偿？尴尬情绪对初中生合作倾向和行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 549-555.
[6]	白学军, 张琪涵, 赵光, 孙弘进, 陈怡馨, 孙世南, 章鹏, 宋璐, 杨宇, 原胜. 连续触点运动中障碍物影响个体运动的认知神经机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 145-152.
[7]	梁凤华. 小我争面子、大我争面子与社会排斥感相关研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 283-288.
[8]	孙晓军, 童媛添, 范翠英. 现实及网络社会排斥与大学生抑郁的关系：自我控制的中介作用*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(2): 169-174.
[9]	白学军,刘颖,章鹏,张琪涵. 非情绪与情绪背景下行为抑制时外侧前额叶的功能分化：一项fNIRS研究*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(5): 606-613.