媒体多任务经验对不同注意模式下内隐记忆的影响

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.04.001

心理与行为研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (4): 433-440.DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.04.001

• 基础心理学 • 下一篇

媒体多任务经验对不同注意模式下内隐记忆的影响

李士一^1,2,3, 谢岩枫², 赵光^1,2,3, 白学军^1,2,3

1. 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院，天津 300387;
2. 天津师范大学心理学部，天津 300387;
3. 学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室，天津 300387

收稿日期:2021-11-27 发布日期:2022-07-20
通讯作者: 李士一，E-mail：elevenny@163.com
基金资助:
天津市教委科研计划项目（2018SK046）

The Influence of Media Multitasking Experience on Implicit Memory in Different Attention Patterns

LI Shiyi^1,2,3, XIE Yanfeng², ZHAO Guang^1,2,3, BAI Xuejun^1,2,3

1. Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
2. Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
3. Tianjin Social Science Laboratory of Students’ Mental Development and Learning, Tianjin 300387

Received:2021-11-27 Published:2022-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究采用经典背景线索范式，在分布式注意（限制眼动）和集中式注意（自由观看）两种模式下考察不同媒体多任务经验者的内隐记忆表现。实验1要求被试在学习阶段自由观看场景并搜索目标，在测试阶段限制眼动并使用外周视野搜索目标。实验2将学习、测试阶段的注意模式反转。结果发现，高媒体多任务经验者在两种注意模式下均表现出背景线索效应；低媒体多任务经验者仅在集中式注意模式下表现出背景线索效应。结果表明，高媒体多任务经验者在分布式注意模式下存在一定的内隐记忆优势。

关键词: 媒体多任务, 内隐记忆, 眼动, 注意模式, 背景线索效应

Abstract: In this study, the classic contextual cueing paradigm was used to investigate the implicit memory of different media multitaskers in the distributed attention mode (limited eye movement) and focused attention mode(free viewing). In experiment 1, participants could freely move their eyes and search the target in the learning phase. On the contrary, participants were required to fixate the screen center and use peripheral vision for search in the testing phase. Experiment 2 reversed the conditions of attention in the learning and testing stages. The current results revealed that heavy media multitaskers showed contextual cueing effect in both attention modes while light media multitaskers only showed such effect in the focused attention mode. The results showed that heavy media multitaskers had better performance on the contextual cueing effect task under the distributed attention mode, indicating that heavy media multitaskers have some specific cognitive advantages.

Key words: media multitasking, implicit memory, eye movements, attention mode, contextual cuing effect

中图分类号:

B842

李士一, 谢岩枫, 赵光, 白学军. 媒体多任务经验对不同注意模式下内隐记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 433-440.

LI Shiyi, XIE Yanfeng, ZHAO Guang, BAI Xuejun. The Influence of Media Multitasking Experience on Implicit Memory in Different Attention Patterns[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(4): 433-440.

参考文献

Beesley, T., Vadillo, M. A., Pearson, D., & Shanks, D. R. (2015). Pre-exposure of repeated search configurations facilitates subsequent contextual cuing of visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(2), 348–362, doi: 10.1037/xlm0000033.
Brady, T. F., & Chun, M. M. (2007). Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: Modeling contextual cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 798–815, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.798.
Cain, M. S., Leonard, J. A., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Finn, A. S. (2016). Media multitasking in adolescence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(6), 1932–1941, doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1036-3.
Cain, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2011). Distractor filtering in media multitaskers. Perception, 40(10), 1183–1192, doi: 10.1068/p7017.
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. H. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 28–71, doi: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0681.
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. H. (2003). Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(2), 224–234, doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.224.
Edwards, K. S., & Shin, M. (2017). Media multitasking and implicit learning. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(5), 1535–1549, doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1319-4.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191, doi: 10.3758/BF03193146.
Higuchi, Y., & Saiki, J. (2017). Implicit learning of spatial configuration occurs without eye movement. Japanese Psychological Research, 59(2), 122–132, doi: 10.1111/jpr.12147.
Lozito, J. P., & Mulligan, N. W. (2010). Exploring the role of attention during implicit memory retrieval. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(3), 387–399, doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.06.007.
Lui, K. F. H., & Wong, A. C. N. (2012). Does media multitasking always hurt? A positive correlation between multitasking and multisensory integration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(4), 647–653, doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0245-7.
Madore, K. P., Khazenzon, A. M., Backes, C. W., Jiang, J. F., Uncapher, M. R., Norcia, A. M., & Wagner, A. D. (2020). Memory failure predicted by attention lapsing and media multitasking. Nature, 587(7832), 87–91, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2870-z.
Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(37), 15583–15587, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903620106.
Ralph, B. C. W., Thomson, D. R., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2014). Media multitasking and failures of attention in everyday life. Psychological Research, 78(5), 661–669, doi: 10.1007/s00426-013-0523-7.
Ralph, B. C. W., Thomson, D. R., Seli, P., Carriere, J. S. A., & Smilek, D. (2015). Media multitasking and behavioral measures of sustained attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(2), 390–401, doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0771-7.
Roberts, D. F., & Foehr, U. G. (2008). Trends in media use. The Future of Children, 18(1), 11–37, doi: 10.1353/foc.0.0000.
Sisk, C. A., Remington, R. W., & Jiang, Y. V. (2019). Mechanisms of contextual cueing: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(8), 2571–2589, doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01832-2.
Treisman, A. (2006). How the deployment of attention determines what we see. Visual Cognition, 14(4–8), 411–443, doi: 10.1080/13506280500195250.
Uncapher, M. R., Thieu, M. K., & Wagner, A. D. (2016). Media multitasking and memory: Differences in working memory and long-term memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(2), 483–490, doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0907-3.
Uncapher, M. R., & Wagner, A. D. (2018). Minds and brains of media multitaskers: Current findings and future directions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(40), 9889–9896, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611612115.
Yap, J. Y., & Lim, S. W. H. (2013). Media multitasking predicts unitary versus splitting visual focal attention. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(7), 889–902, doi: 10.1080/20445911.2013.835315.
Zinchenko, A., Conci, M., Hauser, J., Müller, H. J., & Geyer, T. (2020). Distributed attention beats the down-side of statistical context learning in visual search. Journal of Vision, 20(7), 4, doi: 10.1167/jov.20.7.4.

[1]	贾宁, 容丽卓, 代景华. 社会性线索对内隐和外显元认知监控的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 593-599.
[2]	张慢慢, 胡惠兰, 边菡, 李芳, 张志超, 臧传丽. 中文阅读中快速读者与慢速读者的词频效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 304-310.
[3]	何立媛, 赵星, 白玉, 刘妮娜. 汉语老年读者的多词单元加工：来自眼动研究的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 160-166.
[4]	秦钊, 王影超, 叶佳滢, 袁小源, 闫国利. 聋人句子阅读中的视觉功能补偿现象：副中央凹−中央凹效应的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 167-173.
[5]	顾俊娟, 高志华, 马绍扬. 嵌套词汉字位置加工的亚词边界效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 1-7.
[6]	赵赛男, 李琳, 张俐娟, 王敬欣. 汉语阅读中高限制性语境对不可预测词加工的影响：眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 736-742.
[7]	刘璐, 姜雅梅, 张巧明, 李诸洋. 义符位置与语义透明度对形声字语义激活的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 585-591.
[8]	李赛男, 闫国利, 王亚丽, 刘敏, 赵淑萍. 一年级小学生阅读知觉广度的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 606-611.
[9]	张苏媛, 兰泽波, 张水, 孟珠, 闫国利. 无关言语对一年级小学生阅读影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 433-438,446.
[10]	高晓雷, 沈梦, 任晓飞, 白学军, 高蕾. 高、低汉语水平藏–汉读者汉语阅读知觉广度及预视效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 297-303,333.
[11]	贺斐, 梁菲菲, 白学军. 汉语阅读伴随词汇学习的形旁类别一致性效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 304-311.
[12]	康立超, 兰泽波, 韩映虹. 不同阅读方式下图画书重复阅读对4～5岁幼儿文字关注影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 368-374.
[13]	何立媛, 田雪, 李悦, 沈凤丹, 王永胜, 吴捷. 无关言语影响老年人阅读过程的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 375-381.
[14]	乌仁其木格, 赵傲雪, 汪钰涵, 庄想灵, 马国杰. “找茬”任务中的视野偏好与参照策略[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 166-171.
[15]	高超, 李士一, 章鹏, 赵光. 基于双眼视差探讨深度知觉信息对背景线索效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 16-21,29.

媒体多任务经验对不同注意模式下内隐记忆的影响

The Influence of Media Multitasking Experience on Implicit Memory in Different Attention Patterns

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价