儿童受欺凌与情绪问题的关系：希望与宽恕的调节作用

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.04.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了考察儿童受欺凌与情绪问题之间的关系，以及希望和宽恕在其中的调节作用，采用Olweus欺凌/受欺凌问卷、儿童希望量表、Heartland宽恕倾向量表、儿童社交焦虑量表、简版儿童青少年抑郁量表对727名小学生进行问卷调查。结果发现：(1)儿童受欺凌显著正向预测情绪问题，受欺凌水平越高，产生焦虑、抑郁的风险越高；(2)希望和宽恕在儿童受欺凌与两种情绪问题的关系中均发挥调节作用，表现为在高希望或高宽恕水平下，受欺凌对儿童焦虑、抑郁的预测作用显著减弱；(3)希望与宽恕对儿童受欺凌后产生的情绪问题的保护作用遵循“独立模式”，即二者单独发挥对焦虑、抑郁的调节作用。研究发现为如何促进儿童在遭受欺凌后的情绪健康和社会心理适应提供了科学依据。

关键词: 受欺凌, 焦虑, 抑郁, 希望, 宽恕

Abstract:

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between bullying victimization and emotional problems in children, as well as the moderating effects of hope and forgiveness on this relationship. A total of 727 primary school students were evaluated with the Bully/Victim Questionnaire, Children’s Hope Scale, Heartland Forgiveness Scale, Social Anxiety Scale for Children and Short Version of Children’s Depression Inventory. The results showed the followings: 1) Bullying victimization positively predicted emotional problems in children. The higher the levels of bullying victimization were, the higher the risk of anxiety and depression. 2) Both hope and forgiveness played a moderating role in the relationship between bullying victimization and two kinds of emotional problems in children, showing that the predictive effect of bullying victimization on anxiety and depression in children was significantly weakened at high levels of hope or forgiveness. 3) The protective effects of hope and forgiveness against emotional problems in children followed the “independent mode”, that is, they played a separate regulatory role in anxiety and depression. The findings provide a scientific basis for how to promote emotional health and psychosocial adaptation in children after bullying victimization.

Key words: bullying victimization, anxiety, depression, hope, forgiveness

中图分类号:

B844

王凤巧, 李一涵, 丁雯, 张钰晗, 陈光辉. 儿童受欺凌与情绪问题的关系：希望与宽恕的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(4): 517-523.

Fengqiao WANG, Yihan LI, Wen DING, Yuhan ZHANG, Guanghui CHEN. The Relationship Between Bullying Victimization and Emotional Problems in Children: The Moderating Effects of Hope and Forgiveness[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(4): 517-523.

图/表 4

参考文献

	董奇, 林崇德. (2011). 中国儿童青少年心理发育标准化测验简介. 北京: 科学出版社.
	傅宏. 宽恕: 当代心理学研究的新主题. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), 2002, (6): 80- 87.
	胡金凤, 郑雪, 孙娜娜. 压力对“蚁族”群体心理健康的影响: 希望的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27 (3): 313- 318.
	孔艳红, 陈光辉. 儿童受欺负与急性社会应激中应激反应的关系. 心理科学, 2017, 40 (3): 734- 740. DOI
	李董平. (2012). 多重生态学风险因素与青少年社会适应: 风险建模与作用机制研究 (博士学位论文). 华南师范大学, 广州.
	李飞, 苏林雁, 金宇. 儿童社交焦虑量表的中国城市常模. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2006, 14 (4): 335- 337. DOI
	卢颖. (2011). 青少年宽恕状况及其对幸福感的影响研究 (硕士学位论文). 南昌大学.
	倪士光, 李虹, 张平, 徐继红. 压力知觉对流动儿童社交焦虑的影响: 希望的调节作用. 中国特殊教育, 2016, (11): 63- 68. DOI
	田录梅, 陈光辉, 王姝琼, 刘海娇, 张文新. 父母支持、友谊支持对早中期青少年孤独感和抑郁的影响. 心理学报, 2012, 44 (7): 944- 956.
	王艳辉, 张卫, 彭家欣, 莫滨瑞, 熊丝. 亲子依恋、自我概念与大学生自我伤害的关系. 心理学探新, 2009, 29 (5): 56- 61. DOI
	张文新. 中小学生欺负/受欺负的普遍性与基本特点. 心理学报, 2002, 34 (4): 387- 394.
	张文新. 建立校园欺凌的科学防治体系. 教育家, 2021, (23): 1- 2.
	张文新, 武建芬, Jones, K. (1999). Olweus儿童欺负问卷中文版的修订. 心理发展与教育, 15(2), 7–11, 37.
	赵必华, 孙彦. 儿童希望量表中文版的信效度检验. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2011, 25 (6): 454- 459. DOI
	赵彦凯, 李晖, 吴真, 张珊珊. 认知抑制与人际宽恕: 特质宽恕的调节作用. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14 (4): 531- 536. DOI
	Alarcon, G. M., Bowling, N. A., & Khazon, S.. Great expectations: A meta-analytic examination of optimism and hope. Personality and Individual Differences, 2013, 54 (7): 821- 827. DOI
	Barcaccia, B., Pallini, S., Baiocco, R., Salvati, M., Saliani, A. M., & Schneider, B. H.. Forgiveness and friendship protect adolescent victims of bullying from emotional maladjustment. Psicothema, 2018, 30 (4): 427- 433.
	Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D.. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 2001, 108 (3): 624- 652. DOI
	Enright, R. D., Gassin, E. A., & Wu, C. R.. Forgiveness: A developmental view. Journal of Moral Education, 1992, 21 (2): 99- 114. DOI
	Enright, R. D., Knutson Enright, J. A., Holter, A. C., Baskin, T., & Knutson, C.. Waging peace through forgiveness in Belfast, Northern Ireland II: Educational programs for mental health improvement of children. Journal of Research in Education, 2007, 17 (1): 63- 78.
	Enright, R. D., Santos, M. J. D., & Al-Mabuk, R.. The adolescent as forgiver. Journal of Adolescence, 1989, 12 (1): 95- 110. DOI
	Flanagan, K. S., Vanden Hoek, K. K., Ranter, J. M., & Reich, H. A.. The potential of forgiveness as a response for coping with negative peer experiences. Journal of Adolescence, 2012, 35 (5): 1215- 1223. DOI
	Hawker, D. S., & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(4), 441–455.
	La Greca, A. M., Dandes, S. K., Wick, P., Shaw, K., & Stone, W. L.. Development of the Social Anxiety Scale for children: Reliability and concurrent validity. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 1988, 17 (1): 84- 91. DOI
	Li, Z. W., Pan, Y. G., Liu, G. Z., Li, B. B., & Li, X.. Childhood maltreatment and psychosocial flourishing among emerging adults: Roles of psychological suzhi and self-esteem . International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19 (9): 4998. DOI
	Marques, S. C.. Psychological strengths in childhood as predictors of longitudinal outcomes. School Mental Health, 2016, 8 (3): 377- 385. DOI
	Martin, A. J.. Positive education in Asia and beyond. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2016, 25 (3): 493- 498. DOI
	Maunder, R. E., & Crafter, S.. School bullying from a sociocultural perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2018, 38, 13- 20. DOI
	McEwen, B. S.. Stress, adaptation, and disease: Allostasis and allostatic load. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1998, 840 (1): 33- 44. DOI
	Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
	Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P.. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88 (5): 879- 903. DOI
	Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M.. “Positive psychology: An introduction”: Reply. American Psychologist, 2001, 56 (1): 89- 90. DOI
	Snyder, C. R.. Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 2002, 13 (4): 249- 275. DOI
	Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., ... Harney, P.. The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991, 60 (4): 570- 585. DOI
	Snyder, C. R., Hoza, B., Pelham, W. E., Rapoff, M., Ware, L., Danovsky, M., … Stahl, K. J.. The development and validation of the Children’s Hope Scale. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 1997, 22 (3): 399- 421. DOI
	Thompson, L. Y., Snyder, C. R., Hoffman, L., Michael, S. T., Rasmussen, H. N., Billings, L. S., … Roberts, D. E.. Dispositional forgiveness of self, others, and situations. Journal of Personality, 2005, 73 (2): 313- 360. DOI
	Vaillancourt, T., Duku, E., Becker, S., Schmidt, L. A., Nicol, J., Muir, C., & MacMillan, H.. Peer victimization, depressive symptoms, and high salivary cortisol predict poorer memory in children. Brain and Cognition, 2011, 77 (2): 191- 199. DOI
	van der Wal, R. C., Karremans, J. C., & Cillessen, A. H. N.. Interpersonal forgiveness and psychological well-being in late childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 2016, 62 (1): 1- 21. DOI
	Wenzel, M., Anvari, F., de Vel-Palumbo, M., & Bury, S. M.. Collective apology, hope, and forgiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2017, 72, 75- 87. DOI
	Will, G. J., Crone, E. A., van Lier, P. A. C., & Güroğlu, B.. Neural correlates of retaliatory and prosocial reactions to social exclusion: Associations with chronic peer rejection. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2016, 19, 288- 297. DOI
	Wu, L. L., Zhang, D. J., Cheng, G., & Hu, T. Q.. Bullying and social anxiety in Chinese children: Moderating roles of trait resilience and psychological suzhi . Child Abuse & Neglect, 2018, 76, 204- 215.
	Zhang, H. P., Chi, P. L., Long, H. L., & Ren, X. Y.. Bullying victimization and depression among left-behind children in rural China: Roles of self-compassion and hope. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2019, 96, 104072. DOI

变量	M±SD	1	2	3	4
1.受欺凌	3.41±3.79
2.希望	41.32±14.45	–0.21***
3.宽恕	28.45±9.44	–0.30***	0.41***
4.焦虑	6.40±6.76	0.44***	–0.44***	–0.53***
5.抑郁	3.37±2.95	0.50***	–0.49***	–0.57***	0.72***

变量	M±SD	1	2	3	4
1.受欺凌	3.41±3.79
2.希望	41.32±14.45	–0.21***
3.宽恕	28.45±9.44	–0.30***	0.41***
4.焦虑	6.40±6.76	0.44***	–0.44***	–0.53***
5.抑郁	3.37±2.95	0.50***	–0.49***	–0.57***	0.72***

变量	焦虑					抑郁
变量	β	SE	t	95%CI	∆R²	β	SE	t	95%CI	∆R²
第一步					0.42***					0.51***
受欺凌	0.28	0.32	9.30***	[2.35, 3.61]		0.34	0.13	12.22***	[1.31, 1.82]
希望	–0.24	0.15	–7.63***	[–1.41, –0.83]		–0.27	0.06	–9.45***	[–0.67, –0.44]
宽恕	–0.35	0.14	–10.97***	[–1.79, –1.24]		–0.36	0.06	–12.30***	[–0.79, –0.57]
第二步					0.02***					0.02***
受欺凌×希望	–0.10	0.24	–3.05***	[–1.20, –0.26]		–0.07	1.00	–2.51**	[–0.42, –0.05]
受欺凌×宽恕	–0.08	0.20	–2.47**	[–0.88, –0.10]		–0.07	0.08	–2.28**	[–0.33, –0.03]
希望×宽恕	0.03	0.09	1.11	[–0.08, 0.27]		0.08	0.04	3.07***	[0.04, 0.18]
第三步					0.001					0.001
受欺凌×宽恕×希望	–0.02	0.14	–0.62	[–0.35, 0.18]		–0.01	0.05	–0.35	[–0.13, 0.09]

变量	焦虑					抑郁
变量	β	SE	t	95%CI	∆R²	β	SE	t	95%CI	∆R²
第一步					0.42***					0.51***
受欺凌	0.28	0.32	9.30***	[2.35, 3.61]		0.34	0.13	12.22***	[1.31, 1.82]
希望	–0.24	0.15	–7.63***	[–1.41, –0.83]		–0.27	0.06	–9.45***	[–0.67, –0.44]
宽恕	–0.35	0.14	–10.97***	[–1.79, –1.24]		–0.36	0.06	–12.30***	[–0.79, –0.57]
第二步					0.02***					0.02***
受欺凌×希望	–0.10	0.24	–3.05***	[–1.20, –0.26]		–0.07	1.00	–2.51**	[–0.42, –0.05]
受欺凌×宽恕	–0.08	0.20	–2.47**	[–0.88, –0.10]		–0.07	0.08	–2.28**	[–0.33, –0.03]
希望×宽恕	0.03	0.09	1.11	[–0.08, 0.27]		0.08	0.04	3.07***	[0.04, 0.18]
第三步					0.001					0.001
受欺凌×宽恕×希望	–0.02	0.14	–0.62	[–0.35, 0.18]		–0.01	0.05	–0.35	[–0.13, 0.09]

[1]	臧慧琳, 李强, 朱贞洁, 翟宏堃, 王玉钰. 抑郁症消极刻板印象的受众调节效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(4): 549-555.
[2]	刘海东, 虞芷筠, 叶宝娟, 杨强. 家庭亲密度与大学生抑郁：社交焦虑和感恩的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(4): 556-563.
[3]	张思敏, 董亓易如, 陈飞, 阿尔升•海达别克, 丁雪辰, 朱仲敏. 儿童社交自我知觉与情绪适应问题的关系：回避应对策略和社交敏感性的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(3): 336-343.
[4]	李甜甜, 顾吉有. 父母心理控制与儿童学业焦虑的关系：未来取向和父母学业参与的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(3): 359-366.
[5]	陈姣, 熊猛. 相对剥夺感与大学生社交焦虑的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(1): 65-71.
[6]	李甜甜, 武兵. 母亲消极情绪表露与儿童焦虑的关系：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(1): 72-78.
[7]	丁轶飞, 陈兰双, 张镇. 中老年人线上社会参与和抑郁症状的关系：基于自我决定理论[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(1): 86-93.
[8]	刘燊, 洪新伟, 赵明玉, 宋明华. 自我厌恶与大学生同伴关系：抑郁和社会支持的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(1): 102-108.
[9]	杨雪岭, 张桥芬, 王慧琪, 孙熙原, 陈佩儀, 王优. 自我调节失败与抑郁和焦虑症状的关系：纵向追踪研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(1): 116-122.
[10]	尹霞云, 朱康慈, 黎志华. 家庭功能对低收入家庭儿童外化问题行为的影响：同伴关系与希望的链式中介[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(6): 775-781.
[11]	肖丹鹤, 李君, 葛操, 杨海波. 网络受欺凌个体的情绪注意偏向及注意偏向训练的干预研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(6): 828-834.
[12]	李红霞, 徐艳丽, 方怡泉, 郭凯玥, 司继伟. 简版数学焦虑量表在中国小学儿童群体中的修订及信效度检验[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(6): 850-857.
[13]	李嘉欣, 雒瑞帆, 封洪敏, 司继伟. 初中生感知到的同伴支持与数学学习投入—基于变量为中心和个体为中心的分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 629-636.
[14]	张鹏程, 李喜, 桑宇杰, 陈宁. 神经质人格对中小学生抑郁的影响：班级环境的跨层调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 637-643.
[15]	罗芮, 赵云燕, 何然, 王耘, 陈福美. 二孩家庭父母偏爱的特点及其与青少年抑郁的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 657-664.