洪慧芳, 寇彧, 伍俊辉. (2012). 大学生在社会困境中的公平决策: 社会价值取向的影响. 心理发展与教育, 28(5), 487-494 刘永芳, 王鹏, 庄锦英, 钟俊, 孙庆洲, 刘毅. (2014). 自我-他人决策差异: 问题、研究与思考. 心理科学进展, 22(4), 580-587 戚艳艳, 伍海燕, 刘勋. (2017). 社会价值取向对亲社会行为的影响: 来自行为和神经影像学的证据. 科学通报, 62(11), 1136-1144 张慧, 陆静怡, 谢晓非. (2014). 解释水平导致的自己-他人决策差异. 北京大学学报 (自然科学版), 50(6), 1124-1132 张振. (2013). 群体身份影响公平加工的行为与脑电研究 (硕士学位论文). 天津师范大学. 张振, 刘凯, 杨邵峰. (2013). 非理性决策中的情绪加工及其影响因素——以最后通牒任务为例. 唐山师范学院学报, 35(1), 155-158 张振, 张帆, 黄亮, 袁博, 王益文. (2014). 决策中社会价值取向的理论与测评方法. 心理科学进展, 22(1), 48-56 张振, 张帆, 原胜, 郭丰波, 王益文. (2015). 社会价值取向滑块测验中文版的测量学分析. 心理与行为研究, 13(3), 404-409, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2015.03.019 Balliet, D., Parks, C., & Joireman, J (2009). Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(4), 533-547. Bieleke, M., Gollwitzer, P. M., Oettingen, G., & Fischbacher, U (2017). Social value orientation moderates the effects of intuition versus reflection on responses to unfair ultimatum offers. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(2), 569-581, doi: 10.1002/bdm.v30.2. Buckholtz, J. W., & Marois, R (2012). The roots of modern justice: Cognitive and neural foundations of social norms and their enforcement. Nature Neuroscience, 15(5), 655-661, doi: 10.1038/nn.3087. Civai, C., Corradi-Dell’Acqua, C., Gamer, M., & Rumiati, R. I (2010). Are irrational reactions to unfairness truly emotionally-driven? Dissociated behavioural and emotional responses in the Ultimatum Game task. Cognition, 114(1), 89-95, doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.001. Debove, S., Baumard, N., & André, J. B (2016). Models of the evolution of fairness in the ultimatum game: A review and classification. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(3), 245-254, doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.01.001. Declerck, C. H., & Bogaert, S (2008). Social value orientation: Related to empathy and the ability to read the mind in the eyes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148(6), 711-726, doi: 10.3200/SOCP.148.6.711-726. Falk, A., & Fischbacher, U (2006). A theory of reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 54(2), 293-315, doi: 10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001. Feng, C. L., Luo, Y. J., & Krueger, F (2015). Neural signatures of fairness-related normative decision making in the ultimatum game: A coordinate-based meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 36(2), 591-602, doi: 10.1002/hbm.v36.2. Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817-868, doi: 10.1162/003355399556151. Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(4), 367-388. Halali, E., Bereby-Meyer, Y., & Meiran, N (2014). Between self-interest and reciprocity: The social bright side of self-control failure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 745-754, doi: 10.1037/a0033824. Hallsson, B. G., Siebner, H. R., & Hulme, O. J (2018). fairness, fast and slow: A review of dual process models of fairness. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 89, 49-60, doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.02.016. Haruno, M., Kimura, M., & Frith, C. D (2014). Activity in the nucleus accumbens and amygdala underlies individual differences in prosocial and individualistic economic choices. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(8), 1861-1870, doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00589. Henrich, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., .. Ziker, J (2006). Costly punishment across human societies. Science, 312(5781), 1767-1770, doi: 10.1126/science.1127333. Karagonlar, G., & Kuhlman, D. M (2013). The role of social value orientation in response to an unfair offer in the ultimatum game. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(2), 228-239, doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.07.006. Kim, H., Schnall, S., Yi, D. J., & White, M. P (2013). Social distance decreases responders' sensitivity to fairness in the ultimatum game. Judgment & Decision Making, 8(5), 632-638. McAuliffe, K., Blake, P. R., Steinbeis, N., & Warneken, F (2017). The developmental foundations of human fairness. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 0042, doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0042. Murphy, R. O., & Ackermann, K. A (2014). Social value orientation: Theoretical and measurement issues in the study of social preferences. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(1), 13-41, doi: 10.1177/1088868313501745. Murphy, R. O., Ackermann, K. A., & Handgraaf, M. J (2011). Measuring social value orientation. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), 771-781. Pletzer, J. L., Balliet, D., Joireman, J., Kuhlman, D. M., Voelpel, S. C., & van Lange, P. A. M (2018). Social value orientation, expectations, and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Personality, 32(1), 62-83, doi: 10.1002/per.2139. Polman, E (2012). Effects of self-other decision making on regulatory focus and choice overload. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 980-993, doi: 10.1037/a0026966. Rand, D. G., Peysakhovich, A., Kraft-Todd, G. T., Newman, G. E., Wurzbacher, O., Nowak, M. A., & Greene, J. D (2014). Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation. Nature Communications, 5, 3677, doi: 10.1038/ncomms4677. Thielmann, I., & Hilbig, B. E (2015). Trust: An integrative review from a person-situation perspective. Review of General Psychology, 19(3), 249-277, doi: 10.1037/gpr0000046. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463, doi: 10.1037/a0018963. Wallace, B., Cesarini, D., Lichtenstein, P., & Johannesson, M (2007). Heritability of ultimatum game responder behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(40), 15631-15634, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706642104. Wang, G. R., Li, J. B., Li, Z., Wei, M. X., & Li, S. D (2016). Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1639, 38-46, doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.02.040. Zheng, Y., Yang, Z., Jin, C. L., Qi, Y., & Liu, X (2017). The influence of emotion on fairness-related decision making: A critical review of theories and evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1592, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01592. |