崔凯, 孙林岩. (2009). 人通过视觉和听觉材料获得的重量感知. 工业工程与管理, 14(2), 94-96, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-5429.2009.02.017 高航. (2011). 重力体验的概念分析. 解放军外国语学院学报, 34(3), 1-6 韩冬, 叶浩生. (2014). 重中之"重"——具身视角下重的体验与表征. 心理科学进展, 22(6), 918-925 冷洁, 吴继霞. (2016). 从汉字、成语隐喻看诚信概念隐含的结构维度. 苏州大学学报(教育科学版), (1), 36-49 李丛芹. (2006). 汉字思维与中国设计思维. 装饰, (9), 9-10 吕红波. (2006). 汉英实物颜色词色系与来源对比. 广西社会科学, (6), 154-157, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-6917.2006.06.040 宋东清, 黄会欣, 张剑心, 刘电芝. (2015). "冷"成语语义加工程度对温度具身次级效应的影响. 心理与行为研究, 13(4), 466-471, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2015.04.006 宋宜琪, 张积家. (2014). 空间隐喻和形状变化对物体内隐时间概念加工的影响. 心理学报, 46(2), 216-226 苏得权, 钟元, 曾红, 叶浩生. (2013). 汉语动作成语语义理解激活脑区及其具身效应:来自FMRI的证据. 心理学报, 45(11), 1187-1199 王汉林, 莫雷. (2017). 重要还是笨重?——概念表征对重量具身效应的影响. 心理科学, 40(5), 1054-1060 吴昉. (2015). 汉字象形造字法在视觉传达中的设计应用. 包装工程, 36(14), 119-123 谢久书, 张常青, 王瑞明, 陆直. (2011). 知觉符号理论及其研究范式. 心理科学进展, 19, 1293-1305 谢书书, 张积家. (2012). 知觉表征和语义表征在语言认知中的作用——以东巴文黑色素字为例. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), (6), 127-134 杨宏. (2005). 试论魏碑楷书的字体特征. 中州学刊, (6), 194-196 殷融, 曲方炳, 叶浩生. (2012). 具身概念表征的研究及理论述评. 心理科学进展, 20(9), 1372-1381 喻蓉杰. (2012). 汉字字体设计造型及其情感分析研究 (硕士学位论文). 武汉理工大学. 张恩涛, 方杰, 林文毅, 罗俊龙. (2013). 抽象概念表征的具身认知观. 心理科学进展, 21(3), 429-436 张积家, 何本炫, 陈栩茜. (2011). "上下意象图式"对汉语成语感情色彩加工的影响. 心理学探新, 31(2), 144-149, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-5184.2011.02.009 张腾霄, 韩布新. (2013). 红色的心理效应:现象与机制研究述评. 心理科学进展, 21(3), 398-406 周杨, 张宇红. (2014). 情感化设计中的记忆符号分析研究. 包装工程, 35(4), 70-74 Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 637-660, doi:10.1017/S0140525X99532147. Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences, 364, 1281-1289, doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0319. Boulenger, V., Mechtouff, L., Thobois, S., Broussolle, E., Jeannerod, M., & Nazir, T. A. (2008). Word processing in Parkinson's disease is impaired for action verbs but not for concrete nouns. Neuropsychologia, 46, 743-756, doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.007. Engelen, J. A. A., Bouwmeester, S., de Bruin, A. B. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2011). Perceptual simulation in developing language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 659-675, doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.06.009. Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes, 28, 1-26, doi:10.1080/01638539909545067. IJzerman, H., Padiotis, N., & Koole, S. L. (2013). Replicability of social-cognitive priming:The case of weight as an embodiment of importance. Available at SSRN 2255726. Ionescu, T., & Vasc, D. (2014). Embodied cognition:Challenges for psychology and education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 128, 275-280, doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.156. Jostmann, N. B., Lakens, D., & Schubert, T. W. (2009). Weight as an embodiment of importance. Psychological Science, 20, 1169-1174, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02426.x. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh:The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York:Basic Books. Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2014). Framing love:When it hurts to think we were made for each other. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 61-67, doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.007. Lichtenfeld, S., Maier, M. A., Elliot, A. J., & Pekrun, R. (2009). The semantic red effect:Processing the word red undermines intellectual performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1273-1276, doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.003. Louwerse, M., & Connell, L. (2011). A taste of words:Linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words. Cognitive Science, 35, 381-398, doi:10.1111/cogs.2011.35.issue-2. Louwerse, M. M., & Jeuniaux, P. (2010). The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing. Cognition, 114, 96-104, doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.002. Møller, J., Boldrin, A., Christensen, T. H. (2009). Anaerobic digestion and digestate use:Accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contribution. Waste Management & Research, 27, 813-824. Ouellet, M., Santiago, J., Funes, M. J., & Lupiáňez, J. (2010). Thinking about the future moves attention to the right. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 36, 17-24, doi:10.1037/a0017176. Pecher, D., & Zwaan, R. A. (2005). Grounding cognition:The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. Rabelo, A. L. A., Keller, V. N., Pilati, R., & Wicherts, J. M. (2015). No effect of weight on judgments of importance in the moral domain and evidence of publication bias from a meta-analysis. PLoS One, 10, e0134808, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134808. Schirillo, J. A. (2001). Tutorial on the importance of color in language and culture. Color Research & Application, 26, 179-192. Schneider, I. K., Rutjens, B. T., Jostmann, N. B., & Lakens, D. (2011). Weighty matters:Importance literally feels heavy. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 2, 474-478. Schneider, I. K., Parzuchowski, M., Wojciszke, B., Schwarz, N., & Koole, S. L. (2015). Weighty data:Importance information influences estimated weight of digital information storage devices. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1536. Slepian, M. L., & Ambady, N. (2014). Simulating sensorimotor metaphors:Novel metaphors influence sensory judgments. Cognition, 130, 309-314, doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.006. Slepian, M. L., Weisbuch, M., Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2011). Tough and tender:Embodied categorization of gender. Psychological Science, 22, 26-28, doi:10.1177/0956797610390388. Valenti, S. S., & Costall, A. (1997). Visual perception of lifted weight from kinematic and static (photographic) displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 23, 181-198, doi:10.1037/0096-1523.23.1.181. van Dantzig, S., Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Perceptual processing affects conceptual processing. Cognitive Science, 32, 579-590, doi:10.1080/03640210802035365.
|