Studies of Psychology and Behavior ›› 2024, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (2): 163-172.DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.02.003
• ? • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xiaoqi YU1, Xiaoxiao HUANG1, Guoliang YU*,2()
Received:
2023-12-27
Online:
2024-03-20
Published:
2024-03-20
Contact:
Guoliang YU
通讯作者:
俞国良
Xiaoqi YU, Xiaoxiao HUANG, Guoliang YU. A Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of Mental Health Problems Among Secondary School Teachers in Chinese Mainland: 2000~2022[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(2): 163-172.
于晓琪, 黄潇潇, 俞国良. 中国内地中学教师心理健康问题检出率的元分析:2000~2022[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(2): 163-172.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://psybeh.tjnu.edu.cn/EN/10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.02.003
心理健康问题 | k | 被试数 | 效应值及95%的置信区间 | 异质性检验 | ||||
检出率 | 下限 | 上限 | I(%) | p | ||||
焦虑 | 74 | 70187 | 0.189 | 0.158 | 0.225 | 98.79 | <0.001 | |
抑郁 | 73 | 35287 | 0.201 | 0.165 | 0.243 | 98.52 | <0.001 | |
躯体化问题 | 55 | 23415 | 0.166 | 0.129 | 0.212 | 98.36 | <0.001 | |
强迫问题 | 55 | 17402 | 0.230 | 0.186 | 0.282 | 98.02 | <0.001 | |
敌对问题 | 53 | 16765 | 0.167 | 0.131 | 0.211 | 97.91 | <0.001 | |
偏执问题 | 50 | 15773 | 0.174 | 0.137 | 0.218 | 97.72 | <0.001 | |
睡眠问题 | 20 | 22955 | 0.364 | 0.270 | 0.471 | 99.37 | <0.001 |
心理健康问题 | k | 被试数 | 效应值及95%的置信区间 | 异质性检验 | ||||
检出率 | 下限 | 上限 | I(%) | p | ||||
焦虑 | 74 | 70187 | 0.189 | 0.158 | 0.225 | 98.79 | <0.001 | |
抑郁 | 73 | 35287 | 0.201 | 0.165 | 0.243 | 98.52 | <0.001 | |
躯体化问题 | 55 | 23415 | 0.166 | 0.129 | 0.212 | 98.36 | <0.001 | |
强迫问题 | 55 | 17402 | 0.230 | 0.186 | 0.282 | 98.02 | <0.001 | |
敌对问题 | 53 | 16765 | 0.167 | 0.131 | 0.211 | 97.91 | <0.001 | |
偏执问题 | 50 | 15773 | 0.174 | 0.137 | 0.218 | 97.72 | <0.001 | |
睡眠问题 | 20 | 22955 | 0.364 | 0.270 | 0.471 | 99.37 | <0.001 |
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 检出率 | 95%CI | |||
QB | df | p | 下限 | 上限 | ||||
学校类别 | 10.46 | 2 | 0.005 | 初中 | 20 | 0.225 | 0.168 | 0.295 |
高中 | 24 | 0.214 | 0.135 | 0.320 | ||||
中职 | 4 | 0.051 | 0.020 | 0.124 | ||||
测量工具+检出标准 | 52.44 | 3 | <0.001 | SAS≥50 | 8 | 0.403 | 0.236 | 0.597 |
SCL-90≥2 | 32 | 0.246 | 0.183 | 0.321 | ||||
SCL-90≥3 | 17 | 0.051 | 0.033 | 0.079 | ||||
GAD-7≥10 | 3 | 0.092 | 0.062 | 0.136 | ||||
检出时间 | 8.46 | 2 | 0.015 | 1周 | 71 | 0.198 | 0.161 | 0.240 |
2周 | 4 | 0.113 | 0.079 | 0.159 | ||||
无 | 5 | 0.096 | 0.021 | 0.342 | ||||
区域 | 3.63 | 3 | 0.304 | 东北 | 11 | 0.110 | 0.051 | 0.220 |
东部 | 26 | 0.169 | 0.115 | 0.241 | ||||
中部 | 19 | 0.212 | 0.161 | 0.273 | ||||
西部 | 21 | 0.209 | 0.148 | 0.288 |
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 检出率 | 95%CI | |||
QB | df | p | 下限 | 上限 | ||||
学校类别 | 10.46 | 2 | 0.005 | 初中 | 20 | 0.225 | 0.168 | 0.295 |
高中 | 24 | 0.214 | 0.135 | 0.320 | ||||
中职 | 4 | 0.051 | 0.020 | 0.124 | ||||
测量工具+检出标准 | 52.44 | 3 | <0.001 | SAS≥50 | 8 | 0.403 | 0.236 | 0.597 |
SCL-90≥2 | 32 | 0.246 | 0.183 | 0.321 | ||||
SCL-90≥3 | 17 | 0.051 | 0.033 | 0.079 | ||||
GAD-7≥10 | 3 | 0.092 | 0.062 | 0.136 | ||||
检出时间 | 8.46 | 2 | 0.015 | 1周 | 71 | 0.198 | 0.161 | 0.240 |
2周 | 4 | 0.113 | 0.079 | 0.159 | ||||
无 | 5 | 0.096 | 0.021 | 0.342 | ||||
区域 | 3.63 | 3 | 0.304 | 东北 | 11 | 0.110 | 0.051 | 0.220 |
东部 | 26 | 0.169 | 0.115 | 0.241 | ||||
中部 | 19 | 0.212 | 0.161 | 0.273 | ||||
西部 | 21 | 0.209 | 0.148 | 0.288 |
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 检出率 | 95%CI | |||
QB | df | p | 下限 | 上限 | ||||
学校类别 | 2.09 | 2 | 0.351 | 初中 | 20 | 0.204 | 0.157 | 0.261 |
高中 | 21 | 0.272 | 0.183 | 0.383 | ||||
中职 | 5 | 0.147 | 0.048 | 0.374 | ||||
测量工具+检出标准 | 32.22 | 2 | <0.001 | SDS≥53 | 4 | 0.382 | 0.172 | 0.648 |
SCL-90≥2 | 33 | 0.280 | 0.212 | 0.360 | ||||
SCL-90≥3 | 16 | 0.061 | 0.036 | 0.100 | ||||
检出时间 | 0.34 | 2 | 0.844 | 1周 | 72 | 0.206 | 0.170 | 0.248 |
2周 | 3 | 0.207 | 0.044 | 0.598 | ||||
无 | 4 | 0.161 | 0.057 | 0.381 | ||||
区域 | 2.32 | 3 | 0.509 | 东北 | 10 | 0.160 | 0.072 | 0.321 |
东部 | 26 | 0.202 | 0.149 | 0.268 | ||||
中部 | 19 | 0.247 | 0.153 | 0.373 | ||||
西部 | 20 | 0.159 | 0.104 | 0.235 |
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 检出率 | 95%CI | |||
QB | df | p | 下限 | 上限 | ||||
学校类别 | 2.09 | 2 | 0.351 | 初中 | 20 | 0.204 | 0.157 | 0.261 |
高中 | 21 | 0.272 | 0.183 | 0.383 | ||||
中职 | 5 | 0.147 | 0.048 | 0.374 | ||||
测量工具+检出标准 | 32.22 | 2 | <0.001 | SDS≥53 | 4 | 0.382 | 0.172 | 0.648 |
SCL-90≥2 | 33 | 0.280 | 0.212 | 0.360 | ||||
SCL-90≥3 | 16 | 0.061 | 0.036 | 0.100 | ||||
检出时间 | 0.34 | 2 | 0.844 | 1周 | 72 | 0.206 | 0.170 | 0.248 |
2周 | 3 | 0.207 | 0.044 | 0.598 | ||||
无 | 4 | 0.161 | 0.057 | 0.381 | ||||
区域 | 2.32 | 3 | 0.509 | 东北 | 10 | 0.160 | 0.072 | 0.321 |
东部 | 26 | 0.202 | 0.149 | 0.268 | ||||
中部 | 19 | 0.247 | 0.153 | 0.373 | ||||
西部 | 20 | 0.159 | 0.104 | 0.235 |
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 检出率 | 95%CI | |||
QB | df | p | 下限 | 上限 | ||||
学校类别 | 3.56 | 2 | 0.169 | 初中 | 13 | 0.193 | 0.147 | 0.250 |
高中 | 18 | 0.229 | 0.135 | 0.360 | ||||
中职 | 4 | 0.051 | 0.010 | 0.220 | ||||
测量工具+检出标准 | 31.71 | 1 | <0.001 | SCL-90≥2 | 33 | 0.285 | 0.221 | 0.358 |
SCL-90≥3 | 16 | 0.061 | 0.037 | 0.100 | ||||
区域 | 2.08 | 3 | 0.556 | 东北 | 11 | 0.171 | 0.085 | 0.313 |
东部 | 17 | 0.125 | 0.067 | 0.220 | ||||
中部 | 14 | 0.218 | 0.131 | 0.338 | ||||
西部 | 15 | 0.164 | 0.112 | 0.234 |
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 检出率 | 95%CI | |||
QB | df | p | 下限 | 上限 | ||||
学校类别 | 3.56 | 2 | 0.169 | 初中 | 13 | 0.193 | 0.147 | 0.250 |
高中 | 18 | 0.229 | 0.135 | 0.360 | ||||
中职 | 4 | 0.051 | 0.010 | 0.220 | ||||
测量工具+检出标准 | 31.71 | 1 | <0.001 | SCL-90≥2 | 33 | 0.285 | 0.221 | 0.358 |
SCL-90≥3 | 16 | 0.061 | 0.037 | 0.100 | ||||
区域 | 2.08 | 3 | 0.556 | 东北 | 11 | 0.171 | 0.085 | 0.313 |
东部 | 17 | 0.125 | 0.067 | 0.220 | ||||
中部 | 14 | 0.218 | 0.131 | 0.338 | ||||
西部 | 15 | 0.164 | 0.112 | 0.234 |
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 检出率 | 95%CI | |||
QB | df | p | 下限 | 上限 | ||||
学校类别 | 2.22 | 2 | 0.330 | 初中 | 13 | 0.238 | 0.169 | 0.325 |
高中 | 18 | 0.283 | 0.171 | 0.430 | ||||
中职 | 4 | 0.125 | 0.043 | 0.315 | ||||
测量工具+检出标准 | 42.80 | 1 | <0.001 | SCL-90≥2 | 33 | 0.404 | 0.332 | 0.481 |
SCL-90≥3 | 17 | 0.087 | 0.055 | 0.136 | ||||
区域 | 1.48 | 3 | 0.688 | 东北 | 11 | 0.203 | 0.110 | 0.344 |
东部 | 17 | 0.219 | 0.130 | 0.343 | ||||
中部 | 13 | 0.283 | 0.199 | 0.385 | ||||
西部 | 16 | 0.226 | 0.147 | 0.331 |
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 检出率 | 95%CI | |||
QB | df | p | 下限 | 上限 | ||||
学校类别 | 2.22 | 2 | 0.330 | 初中 | 13 | 0.238 | 0.169 | 0.325 |
高中 | 18 | 0.283 | 0.171 | 0.430 | ||||
中职 | 4 | 0.125 | 0.043 | 0.315 | ||||
测量工具+检出标准 | 42.80 | 1 | <0.001 | SCL-90≥2 | 33 | 0.404 | 0.332 | 0.481 |
SCL-90≥3 | 17 | 0.087 | 0.055 | 0.136 | ||||
区域 | 1.48 | 3 | 0.688 | 东北 | 11 | 0.203 | 0.110 | 0.344 |
东部 | 17 | 0.219 | 0.130 | 0.343 | ||||
中部 | 13 | 0.283 | 0.199 | 0.385 | ||||
西部 | 16 | 0.226 | 0.147 | 0.331 |
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 检出率 | 95%CI | |||
QB | df | p | 下限 | 上限 | ||||
学校类别 | 2.98 | 2 | 0.226 | 初中 | 13 | 0.162 | 0.115 | 0.224 |
高中 | 16 | 0.230 | 0.137 | 0.360 | ||||
中职 | 4 | 0.070 | 0.015 | 0.267 | ||||
测量工具+检出标准 | 45.05 | 1 | <0.001 | SCL-90≥2 | 32 | 0.299 | 0.233 | 0.375 |
SCL-90≥3 | 16 | 0.053 | 0.033 | 0.083 | ||||
区域 | 0.76 | 3 | 0.859 | 东北 | 11 | 0.142 | 0.082 | 0.235 |
东部 | 17 | 0.158 | 0.095 | 0.252 | ||||
中部 | 13 | 0.199 | 0.112 | 0.330 | ||||
西部 | 14 | 0.166 | 0.108 | 0.245 |
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 检出率 | 95%CI | |||
QB | df | p | 下限 | 上限 | ||||
学校类别 | 2.98 | 2 | 0.226 | 初中 | 13 | 0.162 | 0.115 | 0.224 |
高中 | 16 | 0.230 | 0.137 | 0.360 | ||||
中职 | 4 | 0.070 | 0.015 | 0.267 | ||||
测量工具+检出标准 | 45.05 | 1 | <0.001 | SCL-90≥2 | 32 | 0.299 | 0.233 | 0.375 |
SCL-90≥3 | 16 | 0.053 | 0.033 | 0.083 | ||||
区域 | 0.76 | 3 | 0.859 | 东北 | 11 | 0.142 | 0.082 | 0.235 |
东部 | 17 | 0.158 | 0.095 | 0.252 | ||||
中部 | 13 | 0.199 | 0.112 | 0.330 | ||||
西部 | 14 | 0.166 | 0.108 | 0.245 |
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 检出率 | 95%CI | |||
QB | df | p | 下限 | 上限 | ||||
学校类别 | 3.57 | 2 | 0.168 | 初中 | 13 | 0.155 | 0.106 | 0.220 |
高中 | 17 | 0.220 | 0.134 | 0.339 | ||||
中职 | 4 | 0.065 | 0.017 | 0.222 | ||||
测量工具+检出标准 | 51.41 | 1 | <0.001 | SCL-90≥2 | 31 | 0.303 | 0.238 | 0.377 |
SCL-90≥3 | 15 | 0.041 | 0.025 | 0.069 | ||||
区域 | 5.38 | 3 | 0.146 | 东北 | 11 | 0.103 | 0.057 | 0.181 |
东部 | 15 | 0.168 | 0.098 | 0.272 | ||||
中部 | 12 | 0.237 | 0.142 | 0.367 | ||||
西部 | 14 | 0.200 | 0.140 | 0.276 |
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 检出率 | 95%CI | |||
QB | df | p | 下限 | 上限 | ||||
学校类别 | 3.57 | 2 | 0.168 | 初中 | 13 | 0.155 | 0.106 | 0.220 |
高中 | 17 | 0.220 | 0.134 | 0.339 | ||||
中职 | 4 | 0.065 | 0.017 | 0.222 | ||||
测量工具+检出标准 | 51.41 | 1 | <0.001 | SCL-90≥2 | 31 | 0.303 | 0.238 | 0.377 |
SCL-90≥3 | 15 | 0.041 | 0.025 | 0.069 | ||||
区域 | 5.38 | 3 | 0.146 | 东北 | 11 | 0.103 | 0.057 | 0.181 |
东部 | 15 | 0.168 | 0.098 | 0.272 | ||||
中部 | 12 | 0.237 | 0.142 | 0.367 | ||||
西部 | 14 | 0.200 | 0.140 | 0.276 |
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 检出率 | 95%CI | |||
QB | df | p | 下限 | 上限 | ||||
学校类别 | 0.75 | 1 | 0.387 | 初中 | 3 | 0.480 | 0.251 | 0.718 |
高中 | 5 | 0.357 | 0.242 | 0.491 | ||||
测量工具+检出标准 | 0.67 | 2 | 0.716 | PSQI>7 | 3 | 0.369 | 0.225 | 0.541 |
PSQI≥8 | 5 | 0.423 | 0.194 | 0.690 | ||||
SLEEP<7 | 5 | 0.472 | 0.300 | 0.650 | ||||
区域 | 1.91 | 2 | 0.385 | 东部 | 8 | 0.365 | 0.234 | 0.520 |
中部 | 7 | 0.279 | 0.150 | 0.459 | ||||
西部 | 8 | 0.448 | 0.288 | 0.619 |
调节变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | 检出率 | 95%CI | |||
QB | df | p | 下限 | 上限 | ||||
学校类别 | 0.75 | 1 | 0.387 | 初中 | 3 | 0.480 | 0.251 | 0.718 |
高中 | 5 | 0.357 | 0.242 | 0.491 | ||||
测量工具+检出标准 | 0.67 | 2 | 0.716 | PSQI>7 | 3 | 0.369 | 0.225 | 0.541 |
PSQI≥8 | 5 | 0.423 | 0.194 | 0.690 | ||||
SLEEP<7 | 5 | 0.472 | 0.300 | 0.650 | ||||
区域 | 1.91 | 2 | 0.385 | 东部 | 8 | 0.365 | 0.234 | 0.520 |
中部 | 7 | 0.279 | 0.150 | 0.459 | ||||
西部 | 8 | 0.448 | 0.288 | 0.619 |
蔡华俭, 黄梓航, 林莉, 张明杨, 王潇欧, 朱慧珺, … 敬一鸣. 半个多世纪来中国人的心理与行为变化——心理学视野下的研究. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28 (10): 1599- 1618.
|
|
陈雨濛, 张亚利, 俞国良. 2010~2020中国内地大学生心理健康问题检出率的元分析. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30 (5): 991- 1004.
DOI |
|
黄潇潇, 张亚利, 俞国良. 2010~2020中国内地小学生心理健康问题检出率的元分析. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30 (5): 953- 964.
DOI |
|
金东贤, 邢淑芬, 俞国良. 教师心理健康对学生发展的影响. 教育研究, 2008, (1): 56- 59, 98.
|
|
靳娟娟, 俞国良. 教师心理健康问题与调适: 角色理论视角的考量. 教师教育研究, 2021, 33 (6): 45- 51.
|
|
梁晓仙, 丁晓云, 金运钦, 王子云. 中国40~65岁女性人群失眠症状流行特征的Meta分析. 中国预防医学杂志, 2021, 22 (9): 670- 679.
|
|
万志琼, 鞠晓梅. 新课程改革中初中教师心理健康问题研究. 民族教育研究, 2009, 20 (3): 54- 58.
|
|
吴洪艳. 内江市中学教师心理健康状况的调查分析. 现代预防医学, 2014, 41 (15): 2720- 2723.
|
|
肖少北, 李玉美. 海南省4市县400名中学教师心理健康状况抽样调查. 中国临床康复, 2005, 9 (24): 76- 77.
|
|
辛素飞, 梁鑫, 盛靓, 赵智睿. 我国内地教师主观幸福感的变迁(2002~2019): 横断历史研究的视角. 心理学报, 2021, 53 (8): 875- 889.
|
|
杨力宇. 中学与中职的比较研究. 卫生职业教育, 2004, 22 (20): 22- 24.
DOI |
|
俞国良. 社会转型: 国民幸福感的震荡与变迁. 黑龙江社会科学, 2016, (2): 80- 89.
|
|
俞国良. 中国学生心理健康问题的检出率及其教育启示. 清华大学教育研究, 2022, 43 (4): 20- 32.
|
|
俞国良, 曾盼盼. 论教师心理健康及其促进. 北京师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2001, (1): 20- 27.
|
|
于晓琪, 张亚利, 俞国良. 2010~2020中国内地高中生心理健康问题检出率的元分析. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30 (5): 978- 990.
DOI |
|
于璇. 我国中西部贫困地区普通高中教育经费投入: 成就、问题及对策. 教育学报, 2019, 15 (3): 94- 103.
|
|
张积家, 陆爱桃. 十年来教师心理健康研究的回顾和展望. 教育研究, 2008, (1): 48- 55.
|
|
张亚利, 靳娟娟, 俞国良. 2010~2020中国内地初中生心理健康问题检出率的元分析. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30 (5): 965- 977.
DOI |
|
中华人民共和国国家统计局. (2022). 中国统计年鉴—各级各类教育专任教师情况(2021年). 2023-06-20 取自 http://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/2022/indexch.htm
|
|
Ayubi, E., Bashirian, S., & Khazaei, S. Depression and anxiety among patients with cancer during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, 2021, 52 (2): 499- 507.
DOI |
|
Ballou, G. W. (2012). A discussion of the mental health of public school teachers. National Social Science Journal, 39(1), 1–10.
|
|
Bannai, A., Ukawa, S., & Tamakoshi, A. Long working hours and sleep problems among public junior high school teachers in Japan. Journal of Occupational Health, 2015, 57 (5): 457- 464.
DOI |
|
Buysse, D. J., Reynolds III, C. F., Monk, T. H., Berman, S. R., & Kupfer, D. J. The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Research, 1989, 28 (2): 193- 213.
DOI |
|
Cook, S., & Dong, X. Y. Harsh choices: Chinese women’s paid work and unpaid care responsibilities under economic reform. Development and Change, 2011, 42 (4): 947- 965.
DOI |
|
Cui, N. M., & Ma, H. W. (2023). Research on the influence of teachers’ mental health on teaching quality. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8, 2048–2054.
|
|
Derogatis, L. R. (1977). SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual. Baltimore, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research.
|
|
Huedo-Medina, T. B., Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., & Botella, J. Assessing heterogeneity in metaanalysis: Q statistic or I2 index. Psychological Methods, 2006, 11 (2): 193- 206.
DOI |
|
Kendell, R., & Jablensky, A. Distinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 2003, 160 (1): 4- 12.
DOI |
|
Li, G., & Xin, T. (2022). An overview of the teacher evaluation system in China. In J. Manzi, Y. L. Sun, & M. R. García (Eds.), Teacher evaluation around the world (pp. 293–319). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
|
|
Li, L. Understanding language teachers’ practice with educational technology: A case from China. System, 2014, 46, 105- 119.
|
|
Li, X., Lin, X. Y., Zhang, F., & Tian, Y. Playing roles in work and family: Effects of work/family conflicts on job and life satisfaction among junior high school teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, 12, 772025.
DOI |
|
Liao, J. Y., Wang, X. Q., & Wang, X. The effect of work stress on the well-being of primary and secondary school teachers in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2023, 20 (2): 1154.
DOI |
|
Lin, Q. Z., Bonkano, O., Wu, K. K., Liu, Q. M., Ali Ibrahim, T., & Liu, L. The value of Chinese version GAD-7 and PHQ-9 to screen anxiety and depression in Chinese outpatients with atypical chest pain. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 2021, 17, 423- 431.
DOI |
|
Liu, S. J., Xu, X. X., & Stronge, J. H. (2016). Chinese middle school teachers’ preferences regarding performance evaluation measures. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(2), 161–177.
|
|
Mayisela, S. (2018). “Malicious to the skin” the internalisation of corporal punishment as a teaching and a disciplinary tool among South African teachers. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 25(4), 293–307.
|
|
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 2010, 8 (5): 336- 341.
DOI |
|
Musa, N. A., Moy, F. M., & Wong, L. P. Prevalence and factors associated with poor sleep quality among secondary school teachers in a developing country. Industrial Health, 2018, 56 (5): 407- 418.
DOI |
|
Olson, R. E., McKenzie, J., Mills, K. A., Patulny, R., Bellocchi, A., & Caristo, F. Gendered emotion management and teacher outcomes in secondary school teaching: A review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2019, 80, 128- 144.
DOI |
|
Ozamiz-Etxebarria, N., Mondragon, N. I., Bueno-Notivol, J., Pérez-Moreno, M., & Santabárbara, J. Prevalence of anxiety, depression, and stress among teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid systematic review with meta-analysis. Brain Sciences, 2021, 11 (9): 1172.
DOI |
|
Poon, C. Y. S., Hui, V. K. Y., Yuen, G. W. C., Kwong, V. W. Y., & Chan, C. S. A well-slept teacher is a better teacher: A multi-respondent experience-sampling study on sleep, stress, and emotional transmission in the classroom. PsyCh Journal, 2019, 8 (3): 280- 292.
DOI |
|
Rosenthal, R. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 1979, 86 (3): 638- 641.
DOI |
|
Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. Better p-curves: Making p-curve analysis more robust to errors, fraud, and ambitious p-hacking, a reply to Ulrich and Miller (2015). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2015, 144 (6): 1146- 1152.
DOI |
|
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 2006, 166 (10): 1092- 1097.
DOI |
|
Volkert, J., Gablonski, T. C., & Rabung, S. Prevalence of personality disorders in the general adult population in western countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 2018, 213 (6): 709- 715.
DOI |
|
Wang, Y., Liu, X., & Zhang, Z.H. An overview of e-learning in China: History, challenges and opportunities. Research in Comparative and International Education, 2018, 13 (1): 195- 210.
DOI |
|
Wu, K. D., & Cortesi, G. T. Relations between perfectionism and obsessive-compulsive symptoms: Examination of specificity among the dimensions. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2009, 23 (3): 393- 400.
DOI |
|
Xu, J., & Huang, Y. T. Identity transformation of Chinese secondary school teachers during educational reform. Asian Journal of Social Science, 2021, 49 (2): 101- 108.
DOI |
|
Zhang, J. B., & Zhang, Q. Teacher burnout and turnover intention in a Chinese sample: The mediating role of teacher satisfaction. China Media Research, 2012, 8 (2): 101- 106.
|
|
Zhang, L. L., Zhao, J. P., Xiao, H. Q., Zheng, H. B., Xiao, Y. N., Chen, M. Y., & Chen, D. L. Mental health and burnout in primary and secondary school teachers in the remote mountain areas of Guangdong province in the People’s Republic of China. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 2014, 10, 123- 130.
|
|
Zung, W. W. K. A self-rating depression scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1965, 12 (1): 63- 70.
DOI |
|
Zung, W. W. K. A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosomatics, 1971, 12 (6): 371- 379.
DOI |
[1] | Chengjia ZHAO, Xiaoxiao HUANG, Guoliang YU. A Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of Mental Health Problems Among Preschool Teachers in Chinese Mainland: 2000~2022 [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(2): 145-153. |
[2] | Xiaoxiao HUANG, Juanjuan JIN, Guoliang YU. A Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of Mental Health Problems Among Primary School Teachers in Chinese Mainland: 2000~2022 [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(2): 154-162. |
[3] | SHAO Lei, HUANG Xiaoxiao, YU Guoliang. A Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of Mental Health Problems Among University Teachers in Chinese Mainland: 2000~2022 [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(2): 173-182. |
[4] | Yanbin GONG, Haibo YANG. The Relationship Between Physical Exercise and Smartphone Addiction in College Students: The Chain Mediating Effect of Innovative Behavior and Mental Health [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(6): 770-775. |
[5] | YU Guoliang. Implementing the Spirit of the 20th CPC National Congress, Flourishing “Mental Health Education” in Secondary Vocational Schools [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(2): 154-162. |
[6] | XIAO Jingjing, CHEN Dengshui, ZHANG Jinkun. The Relationship Between Divided Attention and Memory Processing: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(2): 200-208. |
[7] | MENG Hongxing, MEI Zhiling, WANG Xiaozhuang, XU Sheng. Association Between Social Media Use and Loneliness of the Elderly: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(2): 280-288. |
[8] | Hui DING, Zhichao ZHANG, Manman ZHANG, Chuanli ZANG. A Meta-Analysis of Eye Movement Studies on the Effects of Context on Irony Comprehension [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(1): 28-35. |
[9] | BAI Huihui, WANG Yuqing, SUN Wanjing. The Resilience Status of Left-Behind Children: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(2): 261-267. |
[10] | LI Qiming, WANG Jiting. The Relationship Between Family Atmosphere Children’s Life Satisfaction and Intergenerational Transmission of Mental Health: The Difference of Parent-Child Gender and Children Age [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(2): 282-288. |
[11] | CHEN Yantao, GAO Xiaotong, CHEN Zhaolin, HUANG Shihua. Meaning in Life and Mental Health of the Elderly Based on the Dual-Factor Model : Mediating Effects of Attitudes Toward Aging [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(1): 88-95. |
[12] | YOU Xuqun, LI Qianqin, ZHANG Zhenyu, HUANG Pujiang, LIU Zhiyuan. Effectiveness of N-Back Working Memory Training: An Evidence from Meta-Analysis [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 794-801. |
[13] | XIONG Sicheng, ZHANG Bin, JIANG Yongzhi, JIANG Huaibin, CHENG Yun. Global Prevalence of Mobile Phone Addiction: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 802-808. |
[14] | JIA Xiaoshan, ZHU Haidong. Socioeconomic Status and Mental Health in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 671-678. |
[15] | GAO Feng, BAI Xuejun. The Harder You Work, the Happier You Will Be: A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Achievement Motivation and Subjective Well-Being with Chinese Sample [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(4): 466-472. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||